Computer aided diagnosis of breast cancer in digitized mammograms

Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 309-319

  Christoyianni, Ioanna ^a   Koutras, Athanasios ^a   Dermatas, Evangelos ^a   Kokkinakis, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Computer aided diagnosis; Digital mammography; Independent component analysis; Medical image analysis

Indexed keywords

MAMMOGRAPHY; NEURAL NETWORKS; TUMORS;

BREAST CANCERS;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CANCER; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; DATA BASE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL COMPUTER; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALIGNANT NEOPLASTIC DISEASE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BREAST DISEASES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; NEURAL NETWORKS (COMPUTER); RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 0036768026     PISSN: 08956111     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0895-6111(02)00031-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersson I. Mammography in clinical practice. Med Radiogr Photogr. 62:(2):1986.
2. Kopans D. Breast imaging. 1989;Lippincott, Philadelphia, PA.
3. Kalisher L. Factors influencing false negative rates in xero-mammography. Radiology. 1979;133.
4. Martin J., Moskowitz M., Milbrath J. Breast cancer missed by mammography. AJR. 1979;132.
5. Sickles E. Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. Radiology. 160:1986;289-293.
6. Kopans D. The positive predictive value of mammography. Am J Roentgenol. 158:1992;521-526.
7. Adler D., Helview M. Mammographic biopsy recommendations. Curr Opin Radiol. 4:1992;123-129.
8. Wallis M., Walsh M., Lee J. A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. Clin Radiol. 44:1991;13-15.
9. Tabar L., Dean B.P. Teaching atlas of mammography. 2nd ed: 1985;Thieme, New York.
10. Bick U., Giger M., Schmidt R., Nishikawa R., Wolverton D., Doi K. Computer-aided breast cancer detection in screening mammography. Digital Mammogr'96, Chicago, IL. 1996;97-103.
11. Giger M., Lu P., Huo Z., Bick U., Vyborny C., Schmidt R., Zhang W., Metz C., Wolverton D., Nishikawa R., Zouras W., Doi K. CAD in digital mammography: computerized detection and classification of masses. Digital Mammogr'94, York, England. 1994;281-288.
12. Petrick N., Chan H., Sahiner B., Helvie M., Goodsitt M., Adler D. Computer-aided breast mass detection: false positive reduction using breast tissue composition. Digital Mammogr'96, Chicago, IL. 1996;373-378.
13. Christoyianni I., Dermatas E., Kokkinakis G. Fast detection of masses in computer-aided mammography. IEEE Signal Process Mag. 17:(1):2000;54-64.
14. Christoyianni I., Dermatas E., Kokkinakis G. Neural classification of abnormal tissue in digital mammography using statistical features of the texture. IEEE Int Conf Electron, Circuits Syst. 1:1999;117-120.
15. Christoyianni I., Koutras A., Dermatas E., Kokkinakis G. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. 2001;Springer, Berlin.
16. Polakowski W., Cournoyer D., Rogers S., DeSimio M., Ruck D., Hoffmeister J., Raines R. Computer-aided breast cancer detection and diagnosis of masses using difference of Gaussians and derivative-based feature saliency. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 16:(6):1997;811-819.
17. Chen C., Lee G. Image segmentation using multiresolution wavelet analysis and expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for digital mammography. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 8:(5):1997;491-504.
18. Qian W., Li L., Clarke L. Image feature extraction for mass detection in digital mammography: influence of wavelet analysis. Med Phys. 26:(3):1999;402-408.
19. Wang T., Karayiannis N. Detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms using wavelets. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 17:(4):1998;498-509.
20. Lefebvre F., Benali H., Kahn E. Fractal analysis of clustered microcalcifications in mammograms. Acta Stereol. 11:1992;611-616.
21. Li H., Liu R., Lo S. Fractal modeling and segmentation for the enhancement of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 16:(6):1997;785-798.
22. Chan H., Sahiner B., Kwok L., Petrick N., Helvie M., Goodsitt M., Adler D. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces. Med Phys. 25:(10):1998;2007-2019.
23. Dhawan Y, Chitre C, Bonasso KW. Radial-basis-function based classification of mammographic microcalcifications using texture features. Proceedings of the 17th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society 1995;1:535-6.
24. Karssemeijer N. Adaptive Noise equalization and recognition of microcalcifications clusters in mammograms. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell. 7:1993;1357-1376.
25. Brzakovic D., Luo X., Brzakovic P. An approach to automated detection of tumors in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 9:(3):1990;233-241.
26. Brzakovic D., Neskovic M. Mammogram screening using multiresolution-based image segmentation. Int J Pattern Recogn Artif Intell. 7:(6):1993;1437-1460.
27. Li H., Kallergi M., Clarke L., Jain V., Clark R. Markov random field for tumor detection in digital mammography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 14:(3):1995;565-576.
28. Woods K. Automated image analysis techniques for digital mammography. PhD Dissertation, University of South Florida; 1994.
29. Lee T.W. Independent Component Analysis: Theory and Applications. 1998;Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
30. Feng M, Kammeyer K. Application of source separation algorithms for mobile communication environment. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on ICA and Signal Separation, France; 1999. p. 431-6.
31. Makeig S., Bell A., Jung T., Sejnowski T. Advances in neural information processing systems. Advances in neural information processing systems. vol. 8:1996;MIT Press, Cambridge. p. 145-51.
32. Koutras A., Dermatas E., Kokkinakis G. Blind separation of speakers in noisy reverberant environments: a neural network approach. Neural Network World J. 10:(4):2000;619-630.
33. Bajcsy R. Computer description of texture surfaces. Proceedings of Third International Conference; 1973. p. 572-9.
34. Unser M. Sum and Difference histograms for texture classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. 8:1986;118-125.
35. Vickers V., Modestino J. A maximum-likelihood approach to texture classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell. 4:1982;61-68.
36. Kimme-Smith C, Frankl G, Wassel G, Sklansky J. Toward reliable measurement of breast parenchymal patterns. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology and Computer/Aided Analysis of Radiological Images; 1979. p. 112-8.
37. Miller P., Astley S. Classification of breast tissue by texture analysis. Image Vision Comput. 10:(5):1992;277-282.
38. Sonka M., Fitzpatrick J. Handbook of medical imaging. 2000;SPIE Press, Bellingham, Washington, USA.
39. Gonzalez R., Woods R. Digital image processing. 1992;Addison-Wesley, Reading.
40. Haralick R. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proc IEEE. 67:(4):1979;786-804.
41. Yang H., Amari S., Cichocki A. Information theoretic approach to blind separation of sources in non-linear mixture. Signal Process. 64:1998;291-300.
42. Amari S. Natural gradient works efficiently in learning. Neural Comput. 10:1998;251-276.
43. Bartlett M, Lades M, Sejnowski T. Independent component representation for face recognition. Proceedings of the SPIE Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology; 1998.