The importance of cone-beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems: A review of the literature

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 40, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 1895-1901

  Venskutonis, Tadas ^a   Plotino, Gianluca ^b   Juodzbalys, Gintaras ^a   Mickevičiene, Lina ^a  

^a LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Lithuania)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dental radiography; Endodontics; Root canal therapy; X ray diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTAL PULP DISEASES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDODONTIC PROCEDURE; HUMAN; INJURIES; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PROCEDURES; ROOT RESORPTION; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH ROOT;

CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; DENTAL PULP DISEASES; HUMANS; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; ROOT RESORPTION; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 84927693390     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.05.009     Document Type: Review

References (112)

1. Patel S, Dawood A, Ford TP, Whaites E. The potential applications of cone beam computed tomography in the management of endodontic problems. Int Endod J 2007;10:818-30.
2. Patel S. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 2. Cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2009;6:463-75.
3. Christiansen R, Kirkevang LL, Gotfredsen E, Wenzel A. Periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography for assessment of the periapical bone defect 1 week and 12 months after root-end resection. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;8: 531-6.
4. Patel S, Dawood A, Whaites E, Pitt Ford T. New dimensions in endodontic imaging: part 1. Conventional and alternative radiographic systems. Int Endod J 2009;6: 447-62.
5. Kau CH, Bozic M, English J, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography of the maxillofacial region-an update. Int J Med Robot 2009;4:366-80.
6. Palomo JM, Rao PS, Hans MG. Influence of CBCT exposure conditions on radiation dose. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;6:773-82.
7. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;1:106-14.
8. SEDENTEXCT Project. Radiation Protection 172. Evidence Based Guidelines on Cone Beam CT for Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2012 Dec 10]. Available at: http://www.sedentexct.eu/content/guidelines-cbctdental- and-maxillofacial-radiology. Accessed August 6, 2012.
9. Qu X-M, Li G, Ludlow JB, et al. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;6:770-6.
10. Hedesiu M, Baciut M, Baciut G, et al., SEDENTEXCT Consortium. Comparison of cone beam CT device and field of view for the detection of simulated periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;7:548-52.
11. Durack C, Patel S, Davies J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of small volume cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiography for the detection of simulated external inflammatory root resorption. Int Endod J 2011;2:136-47.
12. Lennon S, Patel S, Foschi F, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of limited-volume conebeam computed tomography in the detection of periapical bone loss: 360° scans versus 180° scans. Int Endod J 2011;12:1118-27.
13. Hashem D, Brown JE, Patel S, et al. An in vitro comparison of the accuracy of measurements obtained from high- and low-resolution cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2013;3:394-7.
14. Hassan BA, Payam J, Juyanda B, et al. Influence of scan setting selections on root canal visibility with cone beam CT. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;8:645-8.
15. Bechara B, McMahan CA, Nasseh I, et al. Number of basis images effect on detection of root fractures in endodontically treated teeth using a cone beam computed tomography machine: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;5:676-81.
16. Neves FS, Vasconcelos TV, Vaz SLA, et al. Evaluation of reconstructed images with different voxel sizes of acquisition in the diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2012;3:234-9.
17. Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Gröndahl K. Evaluation of subjective image quality in relation to diagnostic task for cone beam computed tomography with different fields of view. Eur J Radiol 2011;2:483-8.
18. Costa FF, Gaia BF, Umetsubo OS, Cavalcanti MG. Detection of horizontal root fracture with small-volume cone-beam computed tomography in the presence and absence of intracanal metallic post. J Endod 2011;10:1456-9.
19. Bueno MR, Estrela C, De Figueiredo JA, Azevedo BC. Map-reading strategy to diagnose root perforations near metallic intracanal posts by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2011;1:85-90.
20. Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, et al. The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;3:e108-16.
21. Kamburoʇlu K, Murat S, Kolsuz E, et al. Comparative assessment of subjective image quality of cross-sectional cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Oral Sci 2011;4:501-8.
22. Eskandarloo A, Mirshekari A, Poorolajal J, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography with intraoral photostimulable phosphor imaging plate for diagnosis of endodontic complications: a simulation study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2012;6:e54-61.
23. Decurcio DA, Bueno MR, de Alencar AH, et al. Effect of root canal filling materials on dimensions of cone-beam computed tomography images. J Appl Oral Sci 2012; 2:260-7.
24. Bernardes RA, de Moraes IG, Húngaro Duarte MA, et al. Use of cone-beam volumetric tomography in the diagnosis of root fractures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;2:270-7.
25. Bornstein MM, Wölner-Hanssen AB, Sendi P, Arx von T. Comparison of intraoral radiography and limited cone beam computed tomography for the assessment of root-fractured permanent teeth. Dent Traumatol 2009;6:571-7.
26. Suomalainen A, Ventä I, Mattila M, et al. Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;2:276-84.
27. Gröndahl HG, Huumonen S. Radiographic manifestations of periapical inflammatory lesions. Endod Topics 2004;1:55-67.
28. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;4:559-65.
29. Matherne RP, Angelopoulos C, Kulild JC, Tira D. Use of cone-beam computed tomography to identify root canal systems in vitro. J Endod 2008;1:87-9.
30. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet J-P, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod 2010;7:1187-90.
31. Neelakantan P, Subbarao C, Subbarao CV. Comparative evaluation of modified canal staining and clearing technique, cone-beam computed tomography, peripheral quantitative computed tomography, spiral computed tomography, and plain and contrast medium-enhanced digital radiography in studying root canal morphology. J Endod 2010;9:1547-51.
32. de Alencar AH, Dummer PM, Oliveira HC, et al. Procedural errors during root canal preparation using rotary NiTi instruments detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. Braz Dent J 2010;6:543-9.
33. Bauman R, Scarfe W, Clark S, et al. Ex vivo detection of mesiobuccal canals in maxillary molars using CBCT at four different isotropic voxel dimensions. Int Endod J 2011;8:752-8.
34. Lauber R, Bornstein MM, Arx von T. Cone beam computed tomography in mandibular molars referred for apical surgery. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 2012;1: 12-24.
35. Plotino G, Tocci L, Grande NM, et al. Symmetry of root and root canal morphology of maxillary and mandibular molars in a white population: a cone-beam computed tomography study in vivo. J Endod 2013;12:1545-8.
36. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, Mannocci F. The detection of periapical pathosis using periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography - part 1: preoperative status. Int Endod J 2012;8:702-10.
37. Vizzotto MB, Silveira PF, Arús NA, et al. CBCT for the assessment of second mesiobuccal (MB2) canals in maxillary molar teeth: effect of voxel size and presence of root filling. Int Endod J 2013;9:870-6.
38. Blattner TC, George N, Lee CC, et al. Efficacy of cone-beam computed tomography as a modality to accurately identify the presence of second mesiobuccal canals in maxillary first and second molars: a pilot study. J Endod 2010;5:867-70.
39. Liang YH, Yuan M, Li G, et al. The ability of cone-beam computed tomography to detect simulated buccal and lingual recesses in root canals. Int Endod J 2012;8: 724-9.
40. Özer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod 2011;1:75-9.
41. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Azevedo BC, et al. A new periapical index based on cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2008;11:1325-31.
42. Patel S, Dawood A, Mannocci F, et al. Detection of periapical bone defects in human jaws using cone beam computed tomography and intraoral radiography. Int Endod J 2009;6:507-15.
43. Soʇur E, Gröndahl HG, Baksi BG, Mert A. Does a combination of two radiographs increase accuracy in detecting acid-induced periapical lesions and does it approach the accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography scanning? J Endod 2012;2:131-6.
44. Sogur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG, et al. Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009;7:458-64.
45. Tsai P, Torabinejad M, Rice D, Azevedo B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in detecting small periapical lesions. J Endod 2012;7:965-70.
46. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Sousa-Neto MD, Pécora JD. Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images. Braz Dent J 2008;2:114-8.
47. Kamburoʇlu K, Kilic C, Ozen T, Horasan S. Accuracy of chemically created periapical lesion measurements using limited cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2010;2:95-9.
48. Bornstein MM, Lauber R, Sendi P, Arx von T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam computed tomography in mandibular molars for analysis of anatomical landmarks before apical surgery. J Endod 2011;2:151-7.
49. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;1:114-9.
50. Cheung GS, Wei WLL, McGrath C. Agreement between periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography for assessment of periapical status of root filled molar teeth. Int Endod J 2013;10:889-95.
51. Cevidanes LH, Styner MA, Proffit WR. Image analysis and superimposition of 3- dimensional cone-beam computed tomography models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;5:611-8.
52. Huumonen S, Kvist T, Grondahl K, Molander A. Diagnostic value of computed tomography in re-treatment of root fillings in maxillary molars. Int Endod J 2006;10: 827-33.
53. Moura MS, Guedes OA, de Alencar AH, et al. Influence of length of root canal obturation on apical periodontitis detected by periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009;6:805-9.
54. Jervøe-Storm P-M, Hagner M, Neugebauer J, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computerized tomography and intraoral radiographs for determination of the periodontal ligament in a variable phantom. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;2:e95-101.
55. Abella F, Patel S, Durán Sindreu F, et al. An evaluation of the periapical status of teeth with necrotic pulps using periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2013;47:387-96.
56. Paula-Silva FW, Wu M-K, Leonardo MR, et al. Accuracy of periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography scans in diagnosing apical periodontitis using histopathological findings as a gold standard. J Endod 2009;7:1009-12.
57. Low KM, Dula K, Bürgin W, Arx von T. Comparison of periapical radiography and limited cone-beam tomography in posterior maxillary teeth referred for apical surgery. J Endod 2008;5:557-62.
58. Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, et al. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J 2009;9:831-8.
59. Shahbazian M, Vandewoude C, Wyatt J, Jacobs R. Comparative assessment of periapical radiography and CBCT imaging for radiodiagnostics in the posterior maxilla. Odontology 2013.
60. Abella F, Patel S, Duran-Sindreu F, et al. Evaluating the periapical status of teeth with irreversible pulpitis by using cone-beam computed tomography scanning and periapical radiographs. J Endod 2012;12:1588-91.
61. Patel S, Wilson R, Dawood A, et al. The detection of periapical pathosis using digital periapical radiography and cone beam computed tomography-part 2: a 1-year post-treatment follow-up. Int Endod J 2012;8:711-23.
62. Metska ME, Parsa A, Aartman IH, et al. Volumetric changes in apical radiolucencies of endodontically treated teeth assessed by cone-beam computed tomography 1 year after orthograde retreatment. J Endod 2013;12:1504-9.
63. Liang Y-H, Jiang L-M, Jiang L, et al. Radiographic healing after a root canal treatment performed in single-rooted teeth with and without ultrasonic activation of the irrigant: a randomized controlled trial. J Endod 2013;10:1218-25.
64. Kaya S, Yavuz I, Uysal I, Akkuş Z. Measuring bone density in healing periapical lesions by using cone beam computed tomography: a clinical investigation. J Endod 2012;1:28-31.
65. Simon JH, Enciso R, Malfaz J-M, et al. Differential diagnosis of large periapical lesions using cone-beam computed tomography measurements and biopsy. J Endod 2006;9:833-7.
66. Guo J, Simon JH, Sedghizadeh P, et al. Evaluation of the reliability and accuracy of using cone-beam computed tomography for diagnosing periapical cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2013;12:1485-90.
67. Rosenberg PA, Frisbie J, Lee J, et al. Evaluation of pathologists (histopathology) and radiologists (cone beam computed tomography) differentiating radicular cysts from granulomas. J Endod 2010;3:423-8.
68. Ahlowalia MS, Patel S, Anwar HM, et al. Accuracy of CBCT for volumetric measurement of simulated periapical lesions. Int Endod J 2013;6:538-46.
69. Liang YH, Jiang L, Gao XJ, et al. Detection and measurement of artificial periapical lesions by cone-beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:332-8.
70. Esposito S, Cardaropoli M, Cotti E. A suggested technique for the application of the cone beam computed tomography periapical index. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011; 8:506-12.
71. Balasundaram A, Shah P, Hoen MM, et al. Comparison of cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiography in predicting treatment decision for periapical lesions: a clinical study. Int J Dent 2012;2012:920815.
72. Lu Y, Liu Z, Zhang L, et al. Associations between maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and apical periodontitis using cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a retrospective study. J Endod 2012;8:1069-74.
73. Rigolone M, Pasqualini D, Bianchi L, et al. Vestibular surgical access to the palatine root of the superior first molar: ''low-dose cone-beam'' CT analysis of the pathway and its anatomic variations. J Endod 2003;11:773-5.
74. Maillet M, Bowles WR, McClanahan SL, et al. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of maxillary sinusitis. J Endod 2011;6:753-7.
75. Huybrechts B, Bud M, Bergmans L, et al. Void detection in root fillings using intraoral analogue, intraoral digital and cone beam CT images. Int Endod J 2009;8: 675-85.
76. Møller L, Wenzel A, Wegge-Larsen AM, et al. Comparison of images from digital intraoral receptors and cone beam computed tomography scanning for detection of voids in root canal fillings: an in vitro study using micro-computed tomography as validation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;6:810-8.
77. Demiralp KÖ, Kamburoʇlu K, Güngör K, et al. Assessment of endodontically treated teeth by using different radiographic methods: an ex vivo comparison between CBCT and other radiographic techniques. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;3:129-37.
78. Liang Y-H, Li G, Wesselink PR, Wu M-K. Endodontic outcome predictors identified with periapical radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2011;3:326-31.
79. Jeger FB, Janner SF, Bornstein MM, Lussi A. Endodontic working length measurement with preexisting cone-beam computed tomography scanning: a prospective, controlled clinical study. J Endod 2012;7:884-8.
80. Connert T, Hülber-J M, Godt A, et al. Accuracy of endodontic working length determination using cone beam computed tomography. Int Endod J 2014;47:698-703.
81. Liang Y-H, Jiang L, Chen C, et al. The validity of cone-beam computed tomography in measuring root canal length using a gold standard. J Endod 2013;12:1607-10.
82. Wang P, Yan XB, Liu D-G, et al. Evaluation of dental root fracture using cone-beam computed tomography. Chin J Dent Res 2010;1:31-5.
83. Kajan ZD, Taromsari M. Value of cone beam CT in detection of dental root fractures. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;1:3-10.
84. Özer SY. Detection of vertical root fractures of different thicknesses in endodontically enlarged teeth by cone beam computed tomography versus digital radiography. J Endod 2010;7:1245-9.
85. Varshosaz M, Tavakoli MA, Mostafavi M, Baghban AA. Comparison of conventional radiography with cone beam computed tomography for detection of vertical root fractures: an in vitro study. J Oral Sci 2010;4:593-7.
86. da Silveira PF, Vizzotto MB, Liedke GS, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures by conventional radiographic examination and cone beam computed tomography- an in vitro analysis. Dent Traumatol 2013;1:41-6.
87. Junqueira RB, Verner FS, Campos CN, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures in the presence of intracanal metallic post: a comparison between periapical radiography and cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod 2013;12:1620-4.
88. Patel S, Brady E, Wilson R, et al. The detection of vertical root fractures in root filled teeth with periapical radiographs and CBCT scans. Int Endod J 2013;12: 1140-52.
89. Taramsari M, Kajan ZD, Bashirzadeh P, Salamat F. Comparison of high-resolution and standard zoom imaging modes in cone beam computed tomography for detection of longitudinal root fracture: an in vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent 2013;3: 171-7.
90. Brady E, Mannocci F, Brown J, et al. A comparison of cone beam computed tomography and periapical radiography for the detection of vertical root fractures in nonendodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2013.
91. Iikubo M, Kobayashi K, Mishima A, et al. Accuracy of intraoral radiography, multidetector helical CT, and limited cone-beam CT for the detection of horizontal tooth root fracture. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;5: e70-4.
92. Wenzel A, Haiter-Neto F, Frydenberg M, Kirkevang L-L. Variable-resolution conebeam computerized tomography with enhancement filtration compared with intraoral photostimulable phosphor radiography in detection of transverse root fractures in an in vitro model. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;6:939-45.
93. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, et al. Comparison of five cone beam computed tomography systems for the detection of vertical root fractures. J Endod 2010;1: 126-9.
94. Hassan B, Metska ME, Ozok AR, et al. Detection of vertical root fractures in endodontically treated teeth by a cone beam computed tomography scan. J Endod 2009;5:719-22.
95. Kamburoʇlu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, et al. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010;2:e74-81.
96. Kamburoʇlu K, ílker Cebeci AR, Gröndahl HG. Effectiveness of limited cone-beam computed tomography in the detection of horizontal root fracture. Dent Traumatol 2009;3:256-61.
97. Kambungton J, Janhom A, Prapayasatok S, Pongsiriwet S. Assessment of vertical root fractures using three imaging modalities: cone beam CT, intraoral digital radiography and film. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2012;2:91-5.
98. Costa FF, Gaia BF, Umetsubo OS, et al. Use of large-volume cone-beam computed tomography in identification and localization of horizontal root fracture in the presence and absence of intracanal metallic post. J Endod 2012;6:856-9.
99. Melo SL, Bortoluzzi EA, Abreu M, et al. Diagnostic ability of a cone-beam computed tomography scan to assess longitudinal root fractures in prosthetically treated teeth. J Endod 2010;11:1879-82.
100. Metska ME, Aartman IHA, Wesselink PR, Ozok AR. Detection of vertical root fractures in vivo in endodontically treated teeth by cone-beam computed tomography scans. J Endod 2012;10:1344-7.
101. Wang P, Yan XB, Lui DG, et al. Detection of dental root fractures by using conebeam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2011;5:290-8.
102. Edlund M, Nair MK, Nair UP. Detection of vertical root fractures by using conebeam computed tomography: a clinical study. J Endod 2011;6:768-72.
103. Estrela C, Bueno MR, de Alencar AHG, et al. Method to evaluate inflammatory root resorption by using cone beam computed tomography. J Endod 2009;11:1491-7.
104. Bernardes RA, de Paulo RS, Pereira LO, et al. Comparative study of cone beam computed tomography and intraoral periapical radiographs in diagnosis of lingual-simulated external root resorptions. Dent Traumatol 2012;4:268-72.
105. Shokri A, Mortazavi H, Salemi F, et al. Diagnosis of simulated external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, PSP, and CBCT: a comparison study. Biomed J 2013;1:18-22.
106. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2009;136:764.e1-76411. discussion764-5.
107. Shemesh H, Cristescu RC, Wesselink PR, Wu M-K. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endod 2011;4:513-6.
108. D'Addazio PSS, Campos CN, Özcan M, et al. A comparative study between conebeam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in the diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int Endod J 2010;3:218-24.
109. Dalili Z, Taramsari M, Mousavi Mehr SZ, Salamat F. Diagnostic value of two modes of cone-beam computed tomography in evaluation of simulated external root resorption: an in vitro study. Imaging Sci Dent 2012;1:19.
110. Neves FS, de Freitas DQ, Campos PS, et al. In vitro comparison of cone beam computed tomography with different voxel sizes for detection of simulated external root resorption. J Oral Sci 2012;3:219-25.
111. Kamburoʇlu K, Kursun S. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities. Int Endod J 2010;9:798-807.
112. Venskutonis T, Juodzbalys G, Nackaerts O, Mickeviciené L. Influence of voxel size on the diagnostic ability of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate simulated root perforations. Oral Radiol 2013;2:151-9.