Influence of voxel size on the diagnostic ability of cone-beam computed tomography to evaluate simulated root perforations

Oral Radiology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 151-159

  Venskutonis, Tadas ^a   Juodzbalys, Gintaras ^a   Nackaerts, Olivia ^b   Mickevicienė, Lina ^a  

^a LITHUANIAN UNIVERSITY OF HEALTH SCIENCES   (Lithuania)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Cone beam computed tomography; Dental radiography; Endodontics; Root canal therapy; X ray diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CHEEK; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EX VIVO STUDY; HUMAN; MANDIBLE; MICROSCOPE; PARALLEL DESIGN; PERFORATION; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ROOT LENGTH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TONGUE; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH ROOT;

EID: 84880048791     PISSN: 09116028     EISSN: 16139674     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-013-0125-5     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (45)

1. Holland R, Valle GF, Taintor JF, Ingle JI. Influence of bone resorption on endodontic treatment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1983;55:191-203.
2. Webber RL, Messura JK. An in vivo comparison of diagnostic information obtained from tuned-aperture computed tomography and conventional dental radiographic imaging modalities. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 1999;88:239-47.
3. Regan JD, Witherspoon DE, Gutmann JL. Prevention, identification and management of tooth perforation. Endod Pract. 1998;1:24-40.
4. Anonymous glossary of endodontic terms, 7th edn. Chicago: American Association of Endodontists; 2003.
5. Duggins LD, Clay JR, Himel VT, Dean JW. A combined endodontic retrofill and periodontal guided tissue regeneration technique for the repair of molar endodontic furcation perforations: report of a case. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:109-14.
6. Fuss Z, Trope M. Root perforations: classification and treatment choices based on prognostic factors. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:255-64. (Pubitemid 126796319)
7. Velvart P, Hecker H, Tillinger G. Detection of the apical lesion and mandibular canal in conventional radiography and computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92:682-8. (Pubitemid 33601783)
8. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Martini PT, Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:1558-64. (Pubitemid 128662693)
9. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Development of a compact computed tomographic apparatus for dental use. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 1999;28:245-8.
10. Alqerban A, Jacobs R, Souza PC, Willems G. In-vitro comparison of 2 cone-beam computed tomography systems and panoramic imaging for detecting simulated canine impaction-induced external root resorption in maxillary lateral incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009;136:764.e1-11 (discussion 764-5).
11. Patel S, Dawood A, Wilson R, Horner K, Mannocci F. The detection and management of root resorption lesions using intraoral radiography and cone beam computed tomography - an in vivo investigation. Int Endod J. 2009;42:831-8.
12. Shemesh H, Cristescu RC, Wesselink PR, Wu MK. The use of cone-beam computed tomography and digital periapical radiographs to diagnose root perforations. J Endod. 2011;37:513-6.
13. Liedke GS, da Silveira HE, Silveira HL, Dutra V, de Figueiredo JA. Influence of voxel size in the diagnostic ability of cone beam tomography to evaluate simulated external root resorption. J Endod. 2009;35:233-5.
14. White DR. Phantom materials for photons and electrons. The Hospital Physicists' Association, Radiotherapy Topic Group. Sci Rep Ser. 1977;20:1-30.
15. Eleftheriadis GI, Lambrianidis TP. Technical quality of root canal treatment and detection of iatrogenic errors in an undergraduate dental clinic. Int Endod J. 2005;38:725-34. (Pubitemid 41391468)
16. Farzaneh M, Abitbol S, Friedman S. Treatment outcome in endodontics: the Toronto study. Phases I and II: orthograde retreatment. J Endod. 2004;30:627-33. (Pubitemid 39236983)
17. Ingle JI. A standardized endodontic technique utilizing newly designed instruments and filling materials. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1961;14:83-91.
18. Kerekes K, Tronstad L. Long-term results of endodontic treatment performed with a standardized technique. J Endod. 1979;5:83-90.
19. Nicholls E. Treatment of traumatic perforations of the pulp cavity. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1962;15:603-12.
20. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures - an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. II. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23:517-30.
21. Seltzer S, Bender IB, Smith J, Freedman I, Nazimov H. Endodontic failures - an analysis based on clinical, roentgenographic, and histologic findings. I. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1967;23:500-16.
22. Sinai IH, Romea DJ, Glassman G, Morse DR, Fantasia J, Furst ML. An evaluation of tricalcium phosphate as a treatment for endodontic perforations. J Endod. 1989;15:399-403.
23. Tsesis I, Rosenberg E, Faivishevsky V, Kfir A, Katz M, Rosen E. Prevalence and associated periodontal status of teeth with root perforation: a retrospective study of 2,002 patients' medical records. J Endod. 2010;36:797-800.
24. Tsesis I, Fuss Z. Diagnosis and treatment of accidental root perforations. Endod Topics. 2006;13:95-107.
25. Goerig AC, Neaverth EJ. A simplified look at the buccal object rule in endodontics. J Endod. 1987;13:570-2.
26. Fava L, Dummer P. Periapical radiographic techniques during endodontic diagnosis and treatment. Int Endod J. 1997;30:250-61. (Pubitemid 127490928)
27. D'Addazio PS, Campos CN, Özcan M, Teixeira HG, Passoni RM, Carvalho AC. A comparative study between cone-beam computed tomography and periapical radiographs in the diagnosis of simulated endodontic complications. Int Endod J. 2011;44:218-24.
28. Kamburoǧlu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, Cebeci AR, Paksoy CS. Occlusal caries detection by using a cone-beam CT with different voxel resolutions and a digital intraoral sensor. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e63-9.
29. Özer S. Detection of vertical root fractures by using cone beam computed tomography with variable voxel sizes in an in vitro model. J Endod. 2011;37:75-9.
30. Lofthag-Hansen S, Hummonen S, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl H-G. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007;103:114-9. (Pubitemid 44909521)
31. Soǧur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. Int Endod J. 2007;40:179-85.
32. Noujeim M, Prihoda T, Langlais R, Nummikoski P. Evaluation of high-resolution cone beam computed tomography in the detection of simulated interradicular bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009;38:156-62.
33. Decurcio DA, Bueno MR, de Alencar AH, Porto OC, Azevedo BC, Estrela C. Effect of root canal filling materials on dimensions of cone-beam computed tomography images. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:260-7.
34. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Noujeim M, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, et al. Image artifact in dental cone-beam CT. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2006;101:652-7. (Pubitemid 43621508)
35. Schulze RK, Berndt D, d'Hoedt B. On cone-beam computed tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21:100-7.
36. Pauwels R, Stamatakis H, Bosmans H, Bogaerts R, Jacobs R, Horner K, et al. Quantification of metal artifacts on cone beam computed tomography images. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02382.x
37. Kamburoǧlu K, Murat S, Yüksel SP, Cebeci AR, Horasan S. Detection of vertical root fracture using cone-beam computerized tomography: an in vitro assessment. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e74-81.
38. Ritter L, Mischkowski RA, Neugebauer J, Dreiseidler T, Scheer M, Keeve E, et al. The influence of body mass index, age, implants, and dental restorations on image quality of cone beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;108:e108-16.
39. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Walker A, Bosmans H, et al. Comparison of spatial and contrast resolution for cone-beam computed tomography scanners. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2012;114:127-35.
40. Chau AC, Fung K. Comparison of radiation dose for implant imaging using conventional spiral tomography, computed tomography, and cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009;107:559-65.
41. Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B, Theodorakou C, Rogers J, Walker A, et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:267-71.
42. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2008;106:106-14.
43. Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E, Pauwels R, Vanheusden S, Suetens P, et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol. 2009;71:46-8.
44. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:229-34. (Pubitemid 40288494)
45. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiographic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. J Am Dent Assoc. 2008;139:1237-43.