Detectability of chemically induced periapical lesions by limited cone beam computed tomography, intra-oral digital and conventional film radiography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 38, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 458-464

  Sogur, Elif ^a   Baksi, B G ^a   Grondahl H G ^b   Lomcali, G ^a   Sen, B H ^a  

^a EGE UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Cone beam; Periapical lesion; Radiology

Indexed keywords

PERCHLORIC ACID; PHOSPHORUS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DUNN TEST; FRIEDMAN TEST; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEM; KAPPA STATISTICS; RANK SUM TEST; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TECHNIQUE; TOOTH; TOOTH PERIAPICAL DISEASE; TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY; X RAY FILM;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; OBSERVER VARIATION; PERCHLORIC ACID; PERIAPICAL DISEASES; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL; RADIOGRAPHY, DENTAL, DIGITAL; ROC CURVE; X-RAY FILM;

EID: 70349281502     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/15206149     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Lee SJ, Messer HH. Radiographic appearance of artificially prepared periapical lesions confined to cancellous bone. Int Endod J 1986; 19: 64-72.
2. Halse A, Moven O, Fristad I. Diagnosing periapical lesions - disagreement and borderline cases. Int Endod J 2002; 35: 703-709.
3. Bender IB, Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: I. 1961. J Endod 2003; 29: 702-706.
4. Ramadan AE, Mitchell DF. A roentgenographic study of experimental bone destructions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1962; 15: 934-942.
5. Shwartz SF, Foster JK. Roentgenographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1971; 32: 606-612.
6. Shoha RR, Dowson J, Richards AG. Radiographic interpretation of experimentally produced bony lesions. Oral Surg 1974; 38: 294-303.
7. Brynolf I. Roentgenologic periapical diagnosis. One, two or more roentgenograms? Swed Dent J 1970; 63: 345.
8. Bender IB. Factors influencing the radiographic appearance of bony lesions. J Endod 1982; 8: 161-170.
9. van der Stelt PF. Experimentally produced bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1985; 59: 306-312.
10. Wenzel A. Direct digital radiography in the dental office. Int Dent J 1995; 45: 27-34.
11. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GCH, Van Der Stelt PF. Efficacy of digital introral radiography in clinical dentistry. J Dentistry 1997; 25: 215-234.
12. Cederberg RA, Tidwell E, Frederiksen NL, Benson BW. Endodontic working length assessment. Comparison of storage phosphor digital imaging and radiographic film. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 325-328.
13. Shearer AC, Mullane E, Macfarlane TV, Grondahl HG, Horner K. Three phosphor plate systems and film compared for imaging root canals. Int Endod J 2001; 34: 275-279. (Pubitemid 33672065)
14. Naoum HJ, Chandler NP, Love RM. Conventional versus storage phosphor-plate digital images to visualize the root canal system contrasted with a radiopaque medium. J Endod 2003; 29: 349-352.
15. Arai Y, Tammisalo E, Iwai K, Hashimoto K, Shinoda K. Fundamental efficiency of limited cone-beam X-ray CT (3DX multi image micro CT) for practical use. Dental Radiology 2000; 40: 145-154.
16. Hatcher DC, Dial C, Mayorga C. Cone beam CT for pre-surgical assessment of implant sites. CDA Journal 2003; 31: 825-833.
17. Pawelzik J, Cohnen M, Willers R, Becker J. A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular thirdmolars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002; 60: 979-984. (Pubitemid 34971234)
18. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic examination of the temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 196-201.
19. Honey BO, Scarfe WC, Hilgers MJ, Klueber K, Silveira AM, Bruce S, et al. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography imaging of the temporomandibular joint: comparisons with panoramic radiology and linear tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007; 132: 429-438.
20. Stavropoulos A, Wenzel A. Accuracy of cone beam dental CT, intraoral digital and conventional film radiography for the detection of periapical lesions. An ex vivo study in pig jaws. Clin Oral Invest 2007; 11: 101-106.
21. Lofthag-Hansen S, Huumonen S, Grondahl K, Grondahl HG. Limited cone-beam CT and intraoral radiography for the diagnosis of periapical pathology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103: 114-119. (Pubitemid 44909521)
22. Yokota ET, Miles DA, Newton CW, Brown Jr CE. Interpretation of periapical lesions using RadioVisioGraphy. J Endod 1994; 20: 490-494.
23. Tirrell BC, Miles DA, Brown CE, Legan JJ. Interpretation of chemically created lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 1996, 22: 74-78. (Pubitemid 126730418)
24. Koening L, Parks E, Analoui M, Eckert G. The impact of image compression on diagnostic quality of digital images for detection of chemically-induced periapical lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 37-43.
25. Sogur E, Baksi BG, Gröndahl HG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited conebeam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 179-185.
26. Nair MK, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA, Platin E, Denton G. Periodontitis detection efficacy of film and digital images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 85: 608-612. (Pubitemid 128643630)
27. Wallace JA, Nair MK, Colaco MF, Kapa SF. A comparative evaluation of the diagnostic efficacy of film and digital sensors for detection of simulated periapical lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 92: 93-97.
28. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977; 33: 159-174.
29. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Schwartz SA, Schindler WG. Imaging of root canal fillings: a comparison of subjective image quality between limited cone-beam CT, storage phosphor and film radiography. Int Endod J 2007; 40: 179-185.
30. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M, Rohlin M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions: overall comparison between conventional and direct digital radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 344-350. (Pubitemid 126813033)
31. Kullendorff B, Nilsson M. Diagnostic accuracy of direct digital dental radiography for the detection of periapical bone lesions. II. Effects on diagnostic accuracy after application of image processing. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1996; 82: 585-589.
32. Pauzaras SB, Geist JR, Pink FE, Hoen MM, Steiman HR. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital imaging by using CCD and CMOS-APS sensors with E-speed film in the detection of periapical bony lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 356-362.
33. Barbat J, Messer HH. Detectability of artificial periapical lesions using direct digital and conventional radiography. J Endod 1998; 24: 837-842. (Pubitemid 128703706)
34. Tammisalo T, Luostarinen T, Vahatalo K, Tammisalo EH. Comparison of periapical and detailed narrow-beam radiography for diagnosis of periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 183-187.
35. Mistak EJ, Loushine RJ, Primack PD, West LA, Runyan DA. Interpretation of periapical lesions comparing conventional, direct digital, and telephonically transmitted radiographic images. J Endod 1998; 24: 262-266.
36. Furkart AD, McDavid WN, Matteson S. Direct digital radiography for the detection of periodontal bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1992; 74: 652-660.
37. Stassinakis A, Brägger U, Stojanovic M, Bürgin W, Lussi A, Lang NP. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 232-237.
38. Meier AW, Brown CE, Miles DA, Analoui M. Interpretation of chemically created periapical lesions using direct digital imaging. J Endod 1996; 22: 516-520. (Pubitemid 126730491)
39. Bender IB Seltzer S. Roentgenographic and direct observation of experimental lesions in bone: II. 1961. J Endod 2003; 29: 707-712.
40. Bianchi SD, Roccuzzo M, Cappello N, Libero A, Rendine S. Radiological visibility of small artificial periapical bone lesions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1991; 20: 35-39.
41. Farman TT, Farman AG. Evaluation of a new F speed dental Xray film. The effect of processing solutions and a comparison with D and E speed films. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2000; 29: 41-45.
42. Parsell DE, Gatewood RS, Watts JD, Streckfus CF. Sensitivity of various radiographic methods for detection of oral cancellous bone lesions. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 1998; 86: 498-502.
43. Borg E, Gröndahl K, Gröndahl HG. Marginal bone level buccal to mandibular molars in digital radiographs from charge-coupled device and storage phosphor systems. An in vitro study. J Clin Periodontol 1997; 24: 306-312. (Pubitemid 127731528)
44. Huumonen S, Ørstavik D. Radiological aspects of apical period-ontitis. Endodontic Topics 2002; 1: 3-25.
45. Terakado M, Hashimoto K, Arai Y, Honda M, Sekiwa T, Sato H. Diagnostic imaging with newly developed ortho cubic superhigh resolution computed tomography (Ortho-CT). Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 509-518.
46. Wolf B, von Bethlenfalvy E, Hassfeld S, Staehle HJ, Eickholz P. Reliability of assessing interproximal bone loss by digital radiography: intrabony defects. J Clin Periodontol 2001; 28: 869-878. (Pubitemid 33755450)
47. Versteeg CH, Sanderink GC, van Ginkel FC, van der Stelt PF. Effects of calibration and automatic greyscale adjustment on detectability of simulated bone lesions using a storage phosphor system. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27: 240-244.
48. Dove SB, McDavid WD, Welander U, Tronje G, Wilcox CD. Design and implementation of an image management and communications system (IMACS) for dentomaxillofacial radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1992; 21: 216-221.
49. Akdeniz BG, Gröndahl HG, Magnusson B. Accuracy of proximal caries depth measurements: comparison between limited cone beam computed tomography, storage phosphor and film radiography. Caries Res 2006; 40: 202-207.
50. Iwai K, Arai Y, Hashimoto K, Nishizawa K. Estimation of effective dose from limited cone beam X-ray CT examination. Dent Radiol 2000; 40: 251-259.