How many peripersonal spaces?

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 70, Issue , 2015, Pages 327-334

  de Vignemont, F ^a   Iannetti, G D ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Anxiety; Defence; Goal; Goal oriented actions; Multisensory attention; Peripersonal space; Reaching space; Tool

Indexed keywords

ANXIETY; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN REGION; COGNITION; HUMAN; MOTOR SYSTEM; NEUROSCIENCE; SENSORY SYSTEM; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOMATOSENSORY STIMULATION; SOMATOSENSORY SYSTEM; TACTILE STIMULATION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PERSONAL SPACE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION;

ANIMALS; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PERSONAL SPACE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SENSATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 84927669888     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.11.018     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Anderson M.L. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas. Neuroscientist 2007, 13:13-21.
2. Anderson M.L. Neural reuse: a fundamental organizational principle of the brain. Behav. Brain Sci. 2010, 33:245-266. (discussion 266-313).
3. Anelli F., Ranzini M., Nicoletti R., Borghi A.M. Perceiving object dangerousness: an escape from pain?. Exp. Brain Res. 2013, 228:457-466.
4. Avenanti A., Annela L., Serino A. Suppression of premotor cortex disrupts motor coding of peripersonal space. NeuroImage 2012, 63:281-288.
5. Bassolino M., Serino A., Ubaldi S., Ladavas E. Everyday use of the computer mouse extends peripersonal space representation. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:803-811.
6. Beck B.B. Animal Tool Behavior: The use and manufacture of tools 1980, Garland Press, New York, NY.
7. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2000, 12:415-420.
8. Bonnet C.T., Temprado J.J., Berton E. The effects of the proximity of an object on human stance. Gait Posture 2010, 32(1):124-128.
9. Bracha H.S. Freeze, flight, fight, fright, faint: adaptationist perspectives on the acute stress response spectrum. CNS Spectrum 2004, 9:679-685.
10. Brain W.R. A form of visual disorientation resulting from lesions of the right cerebral hemisphere. Proc. R. Soc. Med. 1941, 34(12):771-776.
11. Brady A.T., Walker M.B. Interpersonal distance as a function of situationally induced anxiety. Br. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 1978, 17:127-133.
12. Brozzoli, C., Makin, T.R., Cardinali, L., Holmes, N.P., Farne, A., 2012. Peripersonal space: a multisensory interface for body-object interactions. In: Murray, M.M., Wallace, M.T. (Eds.), The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes, CRC press, Boca Raton (FL).
13. Brozzoli C., Pavani F., Urquizar C., Cardinali L., Farne A. Grasping actions remap peripersonal space. NeuroReport 2009, 20:913-917.
14. Cantello R., Civardi C., Cavalli A., Varrasi C., Vicentini R. Effects of a photic input on the human cortico-motoneuron connection. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:1981-1989.
15. Canzoneri E., Ubaldi S., Rastelli V., Finisguerra A., Bassolino M., Serino A. Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space representations. Exp. Brain Res. 2013, 228:25-42.
16. Cardinali L., Brozzoli C., Farne A. Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept?. Brain Topogr. 2009, 21:252-260.
17. Carruthers P. The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought 2006, Clarendon Press.
18. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. NeuroImage 2000, 12:478-484.
19. Coello Y., Bourgeois J., Iachini T. Embodied perception of reachable space: how do we manage threatening objects?. Cogn. Process. 2012, 13(Suppl. 1):S131-S135.
20. Costantini M., Ambrosini E., Tieri G., Sinigaglia C., Committeri G. Where does an object trigger an action? An investigation about affordances in space. Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 207(1-2):95-103.
21. Cruccu G., Deuschl G. The clinical use of brainstem reflexes and hand-muscle reflexes. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:371-387.
22. de Vignemont F. Body schema and body image - pros and cons. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:669-680.
23. Dehaene S., Cohen L. Cultural recycling of cortical maps. Neuron 2007, 56:384-398.
24. Dijkerman H.C., de Haan E.H. Somatosensory processes subserving perception and action. Behav. Brain Sci 2007, 30:189-201. (discussion 201-139).
25. Dong W.K., Chudler E.H., Sugiyama K., Roberts V.J., Hayashi T. Somatosensory, multisensory, and task-related neurons in cortical area 7b (PF) of unanesthetized monkeys. J. Neurophysiol 1994, 72:542-564.
26. Dosey M.A., Meisels M. Personal space and self-protection. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 1969, 11:93-97.
27. Evans G.W., Howard R.B. Personal space. Psychol. Bull. 1973, 80:334-344.
28. Farne A., Iriki A., Ladavas E. Shaping multisensory action-space with tools: evidence from patients with cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:238-248.
29. Farne A., Ladavas E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. NeuroReport 2000, 11:1645-1649.
30. Farne A., Serino A., Ladavas E. Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool-use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 2007, 43(3):436-443.
31. Furubayashi T., Ugawa Y., Terao Y., Hanajima R., Sakai K., Machii K., Mochizuki H., Shiio Y., Uesugi H., Enomoto H., Kanazawa I. The human hand motor area is transiently suppressed by an unexpected auditory stimulus. Clin. Neurophysiol. 2000, 111:178-183.
32. Gibson J.J. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception 1979, Boston Mifflin, Boston.
33. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. NeuroImage 1997, 6:231-236.
34. Graydon M.M., Linkenauger S.A., Teachman B.A., Proffitt D.R. Scared stiff: the influence of anxiety on the perception of action capabilities. Cognit. Emot. 2012, 26:1301-1315.
35. Graziano M.S., Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:2621-2635.
36. Hall E.T. The hidden dimension 1966, Doubleday, New York.
37. Hayduk L.A. Personal space: where we now stand. Psychological Bulletin 1983, 94(2):293.
38. Hediger H. Studies of the psychology and behavior of captive animals in zoos and circuses 1955, Butterworths Scientific Publications, London.
39. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 183(4):465-476.
40. Holmes N.P. Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 218:273-282.
41. Hyvarinen J., Poranen A. Function of the parietal associative area 7 as revealed from cellular discharges in alert monkeys. Brain 1974, 97:673-692.
42. Iannetti G.D., Mouraux A. From the neuromatrix to the pain matrix (and back). Exp. Brain Res. 2010, 205:1-12.
43. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. NeuroReport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
44. Jeannerod M., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G., Sakata H. Grasping objects: the cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci. 1995, 18:314-320.
45. Jungé J.A., Dennett D.C. Multi-use and constraints from original use. Behav. Brain Sci. 2010, 33:4.
46. Liang M., Mouraux A., Iannetti G.D. Bypassing primary sensory cortices - a direct thalamocortical pathway for transmitting salient sensory information. Cereb. Cortex 2013, 23:1-11.
47. Lloyd D., Morrison I., Roberts N. Role for human posterior parietal cortex in visual processing of aversive objects in peripersonal space. J. Neurophysiol. 2006, 95:205-214.
48. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:977-981.
49. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R. The plasticity of near space: evidence for contraction. Cognition 2009, 112:451-456.
50. Lourenco S.F., Longo M.R., Pathman T. Near space and its relation to claustrophobic fear. Cognition 2011, 119:448-453.
51. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Brozzoli C., Rossetti Y., Farne A. Coding of visual space during motor preparation: approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(38):11841-11851.
52. Maravita A., Clarke K., Husain M., Driver J. Active tool use with the contralesional hand can reduce cross-modal extinction of touch on that hand. Neurocase 2002, 8(6):411-416.
53. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:79-86.
54. Milner A.D., Goodale M.A. The Visual brain in action 1995, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
55. Miwa H., Nohara C., Hotta M., Shimo Y., Amemiya K. Somatosensory-evoked blink response: investigation of the physiological mechanisms. Brain 1998, 121(Pt 2):281-291.
56. Nieuwenhuys A., Pijpers J.R., Oudejans R.R., Bakker F.C. The influence of anxiety on visual attention in climbing. J. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 2008, 30:171-185.
57. Paillard J. Body schema and body image - a double dissociation in deafferented patients. Motor Control. Today and Tomorrow 1999, 197-214. : Academic Publishing House, Sofia. G.N. Gantchev, S. Mori, J. Massion (Eds.).
58. Park G.D., Strom M., Reed C.L. To the end! Distribution of attention along a tool in peri- and extrapersonal space. Exp. Brain Res. 2013, 227:423-432.
59. Poliakoff E., Miles E., Li X., Blanchette I. The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch. Cognition 2007, 102:405-414.
60. Povinelli D.J., Reaux J.E., Frey S.H. Chimpanzees' context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(1):243-247.
61. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Gallese V. The space around us. Science 1997, 277:190-191.
62. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys. II. Visual responses. Behav. Brain Res. 1981, 2:147-163.
63. Ronga I., Valentini E., Mouraux A., Iannetti G.D. Novelty is not enough: laser-evoked potentials are determined by stimulus saliency, not absolute novelty. J. Neurophysiol 2013, 109:692-701.
64. Rossetti A., Romano D., Bolognini N., Maravita A. Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use. Neuropsychologia 2014, 70:486-494.
65. Sambo C.F., Forster B., Williams S.C., Iannetti G.D. To blink or not to blink: fine cognitive tuning of the defensive peripersonal space. J. Neurosci 2012, 32:12921-12927.
66. Sambo C.F., Iannetti G.D. Better safe than sorry? The safety margin surrounding the body is increased by anxiety. J. Neurosci 2013, 33:14225-14230.
67. Sambo C.F., Liang M., Cruccu G., Iannetti G.D. Defensive peripersonal space: the blink reflex evoked by hand stimulation is increased when the hand is near the face. J. Neurophysiol. 2012, 107:880-889.
68. Sandrini G., Serrao M., Rossi P., Romaniello A., Cruccu G., Willer J.C. The lower limb flexion reflex in humans. Prog. Neurobiol. 2005, 77:353-395.
69. Schwoebel J., Coslett H.B. Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2005, 17:543-553.
70. Serino A., Bassolino M., Farne A., Ladavas E. Extended multisensory space in blind cane users. Psychol. Sci. 2007, 18:642-648.
71. Spence C., Pavani F., Maravita A., Holmes N. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J. Physiol. 2004, 98:171-189.
72. Tsai J.C., Knoblich G., Sebanz N. On the inclusion of externally controlled actions in action planning. J. Exp. Psychol. 2011, 37(5):1407-1419.
73. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S. Beware and be aware: capture of spatial attention by fear-related stimuli in neglect. NeuroReport 2001, 12(6):1119-1122.
74. Warren W.H., Whang S. Visual guidance of walking through apertures: body-scaled information for affordances. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 1987, 13:371-383.
75. Willer J.C., Boureau F., Albe-Fessard D. Supraspinal influences on nociceptive flexion reflex and pain sensation in man. Brain Res. 1979, 179:61-68.