On the Inclusion of Externally Controlled Actions in Action Planning

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 37, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 1407-1419

  Tsai, Jessica Chia Chin ^a,b   Knoblich, Günther ^a   Sebanz, Natalie ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b National Science Council   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Action planning; Body schema; Corepresentation; Motor experience; Tool use

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; COLOR VISION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); KINESTHESIA; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION; TOOL USE;

ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COLOR PERCEPTION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); KINESTHESIS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TOOL USE BEHAVIOR; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 80053969792     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0024672     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Arbib M.A., Bonaiuto J.B., Jacobs S., Frey S.H. Tool use and the distalization of the end-effector. Psychological Research 2009, 73:441-462.
2. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2000, 12:415-420.
3. Botvinick M.M., Cohen J.D. Rubber hands feel touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
4. Brass M., Derrfuss J., von Cramon D.Y. The inhibition of imitative and overlearned responses: A functional double dissociation. Neuropsychologia 2005, 43:89-98.
5. Cardinali L., Frassinetti F., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Roy A.C., Farne A. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Current Biology 2009, 19:R478-479.
6. Chao L.L., Martin A. Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage 2000, 12:478-484.
7. Craighero L., Fadiga L., Umilta C., Rizzolatti G. Evidence for visuomotor priming effect. NeuroReport 1996, 8:347-349.
8. Degos J.D., Bachoud-Levi A.C. Pointing and its object: Towards the neuropsychology of objectivation. Revue Neurologique 1998, 154:283-290.
9. Ehrsson H.H. The experimental induction of out-of-body experiences. Science 2007, 317:1048.
10. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1979, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
11. Grafton S.T., Fadiga L., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G. Premotor cortex activation during observation and naming of familiar tools. Neuroimage 1997, 6:231-236.
12. Green C.B., Hummel J.E. Familiar interacting object pairs are perceptually grouped. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2006, 32:1107-1119.
13. Greeno J.G. Gibson's affordances. Psychological Review 1994, 101:336-342.
14. Haggard P., Wolpert D.M. Disorders of body scheme 2005, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Handy T.C., Grafton S.T., Shroff N.M., Ketay S., Gazzaniga M.S. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized. Nature Neuroscience 2003, 6:421-427.
16. Handy T.C., Tipper C.M., Borg J.S., Grafton S.T., Gazzaniga M.S. Motor experience with graspable objects reduces their implicit analysis in visual- and motor-related cortex. Brain Research 2006, 1097:156-166.
17. Head H., Holmes G. Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions. Brain 1911, 34:102-254.
18. Helbig H.B., Graf M., Kiefer M. The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 174:221-228.
19. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neuroscience Letters 2004, 372:62-67.
20. Holmes N.P., Spence C. The body schema and the multisensory representation(s) of peripersonal space. Cognitive Processing 2004, 5:94-105.
21. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (Theory of Event Coding). Psychological Research 2009, 73:512-526.
22. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-878.
23. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 1996, 7:2325-2330.
24. Jeannerod M., Arbib M.A., Rizzolatti G., Sakata H. Grasping objects: The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends in Neurosciences 1995, 18:314-320.
25. Johnson-Frey S.H. The neural bases of complex tool use in humans. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:71-78.
26. Knoblich G., Butterfill S., Sebanz N. Psychological research on joint action: Theory and data. The psychology of learning and motivation 2011, Vol. 54:59-101. Academic Press, Burlington, MA. B. Ross (Ed.).
27. Knoblich G., Sebanz N. The social nature of perception and action. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15:99-104.
28. Kornblum S., Hasbroucq T., Osman A. Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility: A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review 1990, 97:253-270.
29. Lenggenhager B., Tadi T., Metzinger T., Blanke O. Video ergo sum: Manipulating bodily self-consciousness. Science 2007, 317:1096-1099.
30. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2004, 8:79-86.
31. Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: Close to hand and within reach. Current Biology 2003, 13:R531-R539.
32. Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 2002, 83:B25-B34.
33. Milanese N., Iani C., Rubichi S. Shared learning shapes human performance: Transfer effects in task sharing. Cognition 2010, 116:15-22.
34. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 1997, 9:129-154.
35. Reed C.L., Farah M.J. The psychological reality of the body schema: A test with normal participants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995, 21:334-343.
36. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: A case of semantic access agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1987, 4:131-185.
37. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Hickman M., Clift J., Daly A., Colin J. I can see what you are doing: Action familiarity and affordance promote recovery from extinction. Cognitive Neuropsychology 2006, 23:583-605.
38. Riddoch M.J., Humphreys G.W., Price C.J. Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 1989, 6:437-454.
39. Ruys K.I., Aarts H. When competition merges people's behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46:1130-1133.
40. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W. Representing others' actions: Just like one's own?. Cognition 2003, 88:B11-B21.
41. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W. How two share a task: Corepresenting stimulus-response mappings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:1234-1246.
42. Sebanz N., Knoblich G., Prinz W., Wascher E. Twin peaks: An ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2006, 18:859-870.
43. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1969, 81:174-176.
44. Tessari A., Rumiati R.I. Motor distal component and pragmatic representation of objects. Cognitive Brain Research 2002, 14:218-227.
45. Tsai C.C., Brass M. Does the human motor system simulate Pinocchio's actions? Co-acting with a human hand versus a wooden hand in a dyadic interaction. Psychological Science 2007, 18:1058-1062.
46. Tsai C.C., Kuo W.J., Hung D.L., Tzeng O.J. Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 2008, 20:2015-2024.
47. Tsai C.C., Kuo W.J., Jing J.T., Hung D.L., Tzeng O.J. A common coding framework in self-other interaction: Evidence from joint action task. Experimental Brain Research 2006, 175:353-362.
48. Tsakiris M., Haggard P. The rubber hand illusion revisited: Visuotactile integration and self-attribution. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2005, 31:80-91.
49. Tucker M., Ellis R. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1998, 24:830-846.
50. Welsh T.N. When 1+1=1: The unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions. Human Movement Science 2009, 28:726-737.
51. Yoon E.Y., Humphreys G.W., Riddoch M.J. The paired-object affordance effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 2010, 34:812-824.