Corrigendum to: “Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use” [Neuropsychologia (2015) 70 (486–494)] (S0028393215000263)(10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.019);Dynamic expansion of alert responses to incoming painful stimuli following tool use

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 70, Issue , 2015, Pages 486-494

  Rossetti, Angela ^a,b   Romano, Daniele ^a   Bolognini, Nadia ^a,b   Maravita, Angelo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MILANO BICOCCA   (Italy)

^b ISTITUTO AUXOLOGICO ITALIANO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Pain anticipation; Peripersonal space; Skin conductance response; Tool use; Vision

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AROUSAL; DEPTH PERCEPTION; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; ELECTRODERMAL RESPONSE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PAIN; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STIMULATION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AROUSAL; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; FEMALE; GALVANIC SKIN RESPONSE; HUMANS; MALE; NONLINEAR DYNAMICS; PAIN; PHYSICAL STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPACE PERCEPTION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84926609560     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: 18733514     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.05.005     Document Type: Erratum

References (72)

1. Armel K.C., Ramachandran V.S. Projecting sensations to external objects: evidence from skin conductance response. Proc. Biol. Sci. R. Soc. , 2003, 270(1523):1499-1506.
2. Bender M.B. Disorders in Perception: With Particular Reference to the Phenomena of Extinction and Displacement 1952, Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, IL, US.
3. Berti A., Frassinetti F. When far becomes near: remapping of space by tool use. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 2000, 12(3):415-420.
4. Bolognini N., Maravita A. Proprioceptive alignment of visual and somatosensory maps in the posterior parietal cortex. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17:1890-1895.
5. Bufalari I., Aprile T., Avenanti A., Di Russo F., Aglioti S.M. Empathy for pain and touch in the human somatosensory cortex. Cereb. Cortex 2007, 17(11):2553-2561.
6. Cardinali L., Brozzoli C., Farnè A. Peripersonal space and body schema: two labels for the same concept?. Brain Topogr. 2009, 21(3):252-260.
7. Cardinali L., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Salemme R., Roy A.C., Farnè A. When action is not enough: tool-use reveals tactile-dependent access to body schema. Neuropsychologia 2011, 49(13):3750-3757.
8. Cardinali L., Frassinetti F., Brozzoli C., Urquizar C., Roy A.C., Farnè A. Tool-use induces morphological updating of the body schema. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19(12):R478-R479.
9. Cheng Y., Lin C.-P., Liu H.-L., Hsu Y.-Y., Lim K.-E., Hung D., Decety J. Expertise modulates the perception of pain in others. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17(19):1708-1713.
10. Cohen J. Eta-squared and partial eta-squared in fixed factor anova designs. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 1973, 33:107-112.
11. Cohen J. Things I have learned (so far). Am. Psychol. 1990, 45(12):1304-1312.
12. Cohen J. The earth is round (p<.05). Am. Psychol. 1994, 49(12):997-1003.
13. Cooke D.F., Graziano M.S.A. Defensive movements evoked by air puff in monkeys. J. Neurophysiol. 2003, 90(5):3317-3329.
14. Cooke D.F., Taylor C.S.R., Moore T., Graziano M.S.A. Complex movements evoked by microstimulation of the ventral intraparietal area. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003, 100(10):6163-6168.
15. Cowey A., Small M., Ellis S. No abrupt change in visual hemineglect from near to far space. Neuropsychologia 1998, 37(1):1-6.
16. Cumming G. The new statistics: why and how. Psychol. Sci. 2013, 25(8):7-29.
17. Dawson M.E., Schell A.M., Filion D.L., Cacioppo J.T., Tassinary L.G., Berntson G.G. The electrodermal system. Handbook of Psychophysiology 2007, 159-181. Cambridge University Press, New York, US. 3rd ed. J.T. Cacioppo, L.G. Tassinary, G.G. Berntson (Eds.).
18. de Vignemont F. Embodiment, ownership and disownership. Conscious. Cognit. 2011, 20(1):82-93.
19. Deltombe T., Hanson P., Jamart J., Clérin M. The influence of skin temperature on latency and amplitude of the sympathetic skin response in normal subjects. Muscle Nerve 1998, 21(1):34-39.
20. di Pellegrino G., Làdavas E., Farnè A. Seeing where your hands are. Nature 1997, 388(6644):730.
21. Di Pino G., Maravita M., Zollo L., Guglielmelli E., Di Lazzaro V. Augmentation-related brain plasticity. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2014, 8:109.
22. Driver J., Spence C. Attention and the crossmodal construction of space. Trend Cognit. Sci. 1998, 2(7):254-262.
23. Driver J., Spence C. Crossmodal attention. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 1998, 8(2):245-253.
24. Ehrsson H.H., Wiech K., Weiskopf N., Dolan R.J., Passingham R.E. Threatening a rubber hand that you feel is yours elicits a cortical anxiety response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104(23):9828-9833.
25. Elie B., Guiheneuc P. Sympathetic skin response: normal results in different experimental conditions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1990, 76(3):258-267.
26. Farnè A., Làdavas E. Dynamic size-change of hand peripersonal space following tool use. Neuroreport 2000, 11(8):1645-1649.
27. Farnè A., Serino A., Làdavas E. Dynamic size-change of peri-hand space following tool-use: determinants and spatial characteristics revealed through cross-modal extinction. Cortex 2007, 43(3):436-443.
28. Forgiarini M., Gallucci M., Maravita A. Racism and the empathy for pain on our skin. Front. Psychol. 2011, 1-7. 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00108.
29. Graziano M.S., Gross C.G. Somatotopically organized maps of near visual space exist. Behav. Brain Sci. 1992, 15(special issue 04):750.
30. Graziano M.S.A., Cooke D.F. Parieto-frontal interactions, personal space, and defensive behavior. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(6):845-859.
31. Graziano M.S.A., Gross C.G. A bimodal map of space: somatosensory receptive fields in the macaque putamen with corresponding visual receptive fields. Exp. Brain Res. 1993, 97(1):96-109.
32. Graziano M.S.A., Gross C.G. The Representation of Extrapersonal Space: A Possible Role for Bimodal, Visual-tactile Neurons. The Cognitive Neurosciences 1995, 1021-1034. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US.
33. Graziano M.S.A., Taylor C.S., Moore T. Complex Movements Evoked by Microstimulation of Precentral Cortex. Neuron 51, 2002, 34(5):841-848.
34. Guterstam A., Petkova V.I., Ehrsson H.H. The illusion of owning a third arm. PLoS One 2011, 6(2):e17208.
35. Hägni K., Eng K., Hepp-Reymond M.-C., Holper L., Keisker B., Siekierka E., Kiper D.C. Observing virtual arms that you imagine are yours increases the galvanic skin response to an unexpected threat. PLoS One 2008, 3(8):e3082.
36. Hediger H. Studies of the Pyschology and Behaviour of Captive Animals in Zoos and Circuses 1955, Criterion Books, Inc., Oxford, England.
37. Höfle M., Hauck M., Engel A.K., Senkowski D. Viewing a needle pricking a hand that you perceive as yours enhances unpleasantness of pain. Pain 2012, 153(5):1074-1081.
38. Holmes N., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool use changes multisensory interactions in seconds: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. Exp. Brain Res. 2007, 183(4):465-476.
39. Holmes N.P. Does tool use extend peripersonal space? A review and re-analysis. Exp. Brain Res. 2012, 218(2):273-282.
40. Holmes N.P., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Extending or projecting peripersonal space with tools? Multisensory interactions highlight only the distal and proximal ends of tools. Neurosci. Lett. 2004, 372(1-2):62-67.
41. Holmes N.P., Sanabria D., Calvert G.A., Spence C. Tool-use: capturing multisensory spatial attention or extending multisensory peripersonal space?. Cortex 2007, 43(3):469-489.
42. Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurones. Neuroreport 1996, 7(14):2325-2330.
43. Kobayashi N., Yoshino A., Takahashi Y., Nomura S. Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution. Auton. Neurosci. 2007, 132(1-2):70-75.
44. Làdavas E., Farnè A. Visuo-tactile representation of near-the-body space. J. Physiol. 2004, 98(1):161-170.
45. Làdavas E., Gd Pellegrino, Farnè A., Zeloni G. Neuropsychological evidence of an integrated visuotactile representation of peripersonal space in humans. J. Cognit. Neurosci. 1998, 10(5):581-589.
46. Levinson D.F., Edelberg R. Scoring criteria for response latency and habituation in electrodermal research: a critique. Psychophysiology 1985, 22(4):417-426.
47. Longo M.R., Lourenco S.F. On the nature of near space: effects of tool use and the transition to far space. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44(6):977-981.
48. Macaluso E., Maravita A. The representation of space near the body through touch and vision. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48(3):782-795.
49. Makin T.R., Holmes N.P., Brozzoli C., Rossetti Y., Farnè A. Coding of visual space during motor preparation: approaching objects rapidly modulate corticospinal excitability in hand-centered coordinates. J. Neurosci. 2009, 29(38):11841-11851.
50. Maravita A., Clarke K., Husain M., Driver J. Active tool use with the contralesional hand can reduce cross-modal extinction of touch on that hand. Neurocase 2002, 8(6):411-416.
51. Maravita A., Husain M., Clarke K., Driver J. Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia 2001, 39(6):580-585.
52. Maravita A., Iriki A. Tools for the body (schema). Trends Cognit. Sci. 2004, 8(2):79-86.
53. Maravita A., Spence C., Driver J. Multisensory integration and the body schema: close to hand and within reach. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13(13):R531-R539.
54. Maravita A., Spence C., Kennett S., Driver J. Tool-use changes multimodal spatial interactions between vision and touch in normal humans. Cognition 2002, 83(2):B25-B34.
55. Marini F., Tagliabue C.F., Sposito A.V., Hernandez-Arieta A., Brugger P., Estévez N., Maravita A. Crossmodal representation of a functional robotic hand arises after extensive training in healthy participants. Neuropsychologia 2014, 53:178-186.
56. Masson M.E., Loftus G.R. Using confidence intervals for graphically based data interpretation. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 2003, 57(3):203.
57. Mattingley J.B., Driver J., Beschin N., Robertson I.H. Attentional competition between modalities: extinction between touch and vision after right hemisphere damage. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35(6):867-880.
58. Mordkoff A.M., Edelberg R., Ustick M. The differential conditionalbility of two components of the skin conductance response. Psychophysiology 1967, 4(1):40-47.
59. Povinelli D.J., Reaux J.E., Frey S.H. Chimpanzees' context-dependent tool use provides evidence for separable representations of hand and tool even during active use within peripersonal space. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48:243-247.
60. Rhudy J.L., Bartley E.J., Williams A.E. Habituation, sensitization, and emotional valence modulation of pain responses. Pain 2010, 148(2):320-327.
61. Rhudy J.L., France C.R., Bartley E.J., McCabe K.M., Williams A.E. Psychophysiological responses to pain: further validation of the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) as a measure of nociception using multilevel modeling. Psychophysiology 2009, 46(5):939-948.
62. Rhudy J.L., Williams A.E., McCabe K.M., Russell J.L., Maynard L.J. Emotional control of nociceptive reactions (ECON): do affective valence and arousal play a role?. Pain 2008, 136(3):250-261.
63. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys: I. Somatosensory responses. Behav. Brain Res. 1981, 2(2):125-146.
64. Rizzolatti G., Scandolara C., Matelli M., Gentilucci M. Afferent properties of periarcuate neurons in macaque monkeys: II. Visual responses. Behav. Brain Res. 1981, 2(2):147-163.
65. Romano D., Caffa E., Hernandez-Arieta A., Brugger P., Maravita A. The robot hand illusion: inducing proprioceptive drift through visuo-motor congruency. Neuropsychologia 2015, 70:414-420. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.10.033.
66. Romano D., Gandola M., Bottini G., Maravita A. Arousal responses to noxious stimuli in somatoparaphrenia and anosognosia: clues to body awareness. Brain 2014, 137(4):1213-1223.
67. Romano D., Maravita A. The visual size of one's own hand modulates pain anticipation and perception. Neuropsychologia 2014, 57:93-100.
68. Romano D., Pfeiffer C., Maravita A., Blanke O. Illusory self-identification with an avatar reduces arousal responses to painful stimuli. Behav. Brain Res. 2014, 261:275-281.
69. Spence C., Pavani F., Driver J. Spatial constraints on visual-tactile cross-modal distractor congruency effects. Cognit. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 2004, 4(2):148-169.
70. Spence C., Pavani F., Maravita A., Holmes N. Multisensory contributions to the 3-D representation of visuotactile peripersonal space in humans: evidence from the crossmodal congruency task. J. Physiol. 2004, 98(1-3):171-189.
71. Sposito A., Bolognini N., Vallar G., Maravita A. Extension of perceived arm length following tool-use: clues to plasticity of body metrics. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50(9):2187-2194.
72. Williams A.E., Rhudy J.L. Emotional modulation of autonomic responses to painful trigeminal stimulation. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 2009, 71(3):242-247.