Figures in and out of context: Absent, simple, complex and halved spatial fields

Drawing and the Non-Verbal Mind: A Life-Span Perspective

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 195-216

  Lange Küttner, Chris ^a  

^a LONDON METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926982732     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511489730.010     Document Type: Chapter

References (89)

1. Aldhous, P. (2006). Elephants recognize their mirror image. New Scientist, 192, 17.
2. Anati, E. (2002). Höhlenmalerei [Cave paintings]. Düsseldorf: Albatros.
3. Barlow, C. M., Jolley, R. P., White, D. G. and Galbraith, D. (2003). Rigidity in children’s drawings and its relation with representational change. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 124–52.
4. Baylis, G. C. (1998). Visual parsing and object-based attention: a developmental perspective. In J. E. Richards (ed.), Cognitive neuroscience of attention: a developmental perspective (pp. 251–86). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Baylis, G. C. and Driver, J. (1995). One-sided edge-assignment in vision: 1. Figure–ground segmentation and attention to objects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 140–6.
6. Behr, H.-G., Grohmann, H. and Hagedorn, B.-O. (1983). Charakter-Köpfe: Der Fall F. X. Messerschmidt [Heads with character: the case of F. 10. Messerschmidt]. Basel and Weinheim: Beltz.
7. Bisiach, E. and Vallar, G. (1988). Hemineglect in humans. In F. Boller and J. Grafman (eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 195–222). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
8. Bruner, J. S. and Koslowski, B. (1972). Visually preadapted constituents of manipulatory action. Perception, 1, 3–14.
9. Cox, M. V. (1993). Children’s drawings of the human figure. Hove: Erlbaum. Davies, A. (1985). Conflict between canonicality and array-specificity in young children’s drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 3, 363–72.
10. DeLoache, J. S. (1989). Young children’s understanding of the correspondence between a scale model and a larger space. Cognitive Development, 4, 121–39.
11. DeLoache, J. S., Miller, K. F. and Rosengren, K. S. (1997). The credible shrinking room: very young children’s performance with symbolic and nonsymbolic relations. Psychological Science, 8, 308–13.
12. DeLoache, J., Uttal, D. and Rosengren, K. S. (2004). Scale errors offer evidence for a perception–action dissociation early in life. Science, 304, 1027–9.
13. Der¸ egowski, J. B. and Dziurawiec, S. (1996). The puissance of typical contours and children’s drawings. Australian Journal of Psychology, 48, 98–103.
14. Driver, J., Baylis, G. C., Goodrich, S. J. and Rafal, R. D. (1994). Axis-based neglect of visual shapes. Neuropsychologia, 32, 1353–65.
15. Edelman, G. M. (2006). The embodiment of mind. Daedalus, 135, 23–32.
16. Edelstein, W., Keller, M. and Schröder, E. (1990). Child development and social structure: a study of individual differences. In R. M. Lerner (ed.), Life-span development and behaviour (pp. 152–87). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Efron, R. and Yundt, E. W. (1996). Spatial non-uniformities in visual search. Brain and Cognition, 31, 331–68.
18. Emile, O., Floch, A. L. and Vollrath, F. (2006). Biopolymers: shape memory in spider draglines. Nature, 440, 621.
19. Foelix, R. F. (1996). Biology of spiders. Second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Freeman, N. H. (1980). Strategies of representation in young children. London: Academic Press.
21. Goodenough, F. L. (1926). Measurement of intelligence by drawings. New York: World Book Company.
22. Goodenough, F. L. and Harris, D. B. (1950). Studies in the psychology of children’s drawings. 2. Psychological Bulletin, 47, 369–433.
23. Goodnow, J. J. (1977). Children’s drawings. London: Fontana.
24. Graff, J. (2006). Saving beauty. Mold and bureaucracy threaten France’s Lascaux cave. Time, 167, 36–42.
25. Hagen, M. A. (1985). There is no development in art. In N. Freeman and M. V. Cox (eds.), Visual order (pp. 78–100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
26. Halligan, P. W. and Marshall, J. C. (1998). Neglect of awareness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 356–80.
27. Hegel, G. W. F. (1812/1975). Wissenschaft der Logik. Erster Band: Die objective Logik [Science of logic. First volume: The objective logic]. Hamburg: Felix Meiner [reprint of the first edition by Schrag, Nuremberg].
28. Hesselberg, T. and Vollrath, F. (2004). The effects of neurotoxins on webgeometry and web-building behaviour in Araneus diadematus Cl. Physiology and Behaviour, 82, 519–29.
29. Humphreys, G. W. and Riddoch, M. J. (1993). Interactions between object and space systems revealed through neuropsychology. In D. E. Meyer and S. Kornblum (eds.), Attention and performance XIV: synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 143–75). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
30. Kail, R. (1986). Sources of age differences in speed of processing. Child Development, 57, 969–87.
31. Kant, I. (1781/1980). Kritik der reinen Vernunft [Critique of pure reason]. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
32. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1990). Constraints on representational change: evidence from children’s drawings. Cognition, 34, 57–83.
33. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1995). Beyond modularity: a developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34. Kinsbourne, M. (1993). Orientational bias model of unilateral neglect: evidence from attentional gradients within hemispace. In I. H. Robertson and J. C. Marshall (eds.), Unilateral neglect: clinical and experimental studies (pp. 63–86). Hove: Erlbaum.
35. Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Lange-Küttner, C. (1989). Raumbegriff und Objektbeziehungen beim Kind [Space concept and object relations in the child]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
37. Lange-Küttner, C. (1994). Gestalt und Konstruktion: die Entwicklung der grafischen Kompetenz beim Kind [Gestalt and construction: the development of graphic competence in the child]. Berne: Huber.
38. Lange-Küttner, C. (1997). Development of size modification of human figure drawings in spatial axes systems of varying complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 264–78.
39. Lange-Küttner, C. (1998). Pressure, velocity and time in speeded drawing of basic graphic pattern by young children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 1299–1310.
40. Lange-Küttner, C. (2000). The role of object violations in the development of visual analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 3–24.
41. Lange-Küttner, C. (2004). More evidence on size modification in spatial axes systems of varying complexity. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 88, 171–92.
42. Lange-Küttner, C. (2006). Drawing boundaries: from individual to common region – the development of spatial region attribution in children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 419–27.
43. Lange-Küttner, C. (2008). Size and contour as crucial parameters in children drawing images. In C. Milbrath and H. M. Trautner (eds.), Children’s understanding and production of pictures, drawing, and art: theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 89–106).
44. Lange-Küttner, C., and Crichton, M. T. (1999). Change of spatial field effects in 16- to 20-week-old infants. Brain and Cognition, 39, 75–92.
45. Lange-Küttner, C., and Green, H. (2007). What is the age of mental rotation? Proceedings of the 6th IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, pp. 259–63.
46. Lange-Küttner, C. Kerzmann, A. and Heckhausen, J. (2002). The emergence of visually realistic contour in the drawing of the human figure. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 439–63.
47. Lange-Küttner, Cand Reith, E. (1995). The transformation of figurative thought: implications of Piaget and Inhelder’s developmental theory for children’s drawings. In C. Lange-K¨ uttner and G. V. Thomas (eds.), Drawing and looking (pp. 75–92). London: Pearson/Prentice Hall (distributed by www.amazon.co.uk).
48. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper Brothers.
49. Lewin, K. (1963/1982). Feldtheorie: Kurt-Lewin-Werkausgabe, Band 4 [Field theory. Kurt Lewin Collected Writings, Vol. 4]. Berne and Stuttgart: Huber and Klett-Cotta.
50. Light, P. H. and Humphreys, J. (1981). Internal spatial relationships in young children’s drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 31, 521–30.
51. Light, P. H. and MacIntosh, E. (1980). Depth relationships in young children’s drawings. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 30, 79–87.
52. Logan, G. D. (1996). The CODE theory of visual attention. An integration of space-based and object-based attention. Psychological Review, 103, 603– 49.
53. Manly, T., Dobler, V. B., Dodds, C. M. and George, M. A. (2005). Rightward shift in spatial awareness with declining alertness. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1721–8.
54. Mayer-Hillebrand, F. (1947). Die Perspektive in psychologischer Betrachtung. Wiener Zeitschrift f ür Philosophie, Psychologie und Pädagogik, 1, 141–61.
55. Mecklinger, A. and Meinshausen, R.-M. (1998). Recognition memory for object form and object location: an event-related potential study. Memory and Cognition, 26, 1068–88.
56. Mitchell, P., Ropar, D., Ackroyd, K. and Rajendran, G. (2005). How perception impacts on drawings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 996–1003.
57. Nielsen, M., Suddendorf, T. and Slaughter, V. (2006). Mirror self-recognition beyond the face. Child Development, 77, 176–85.
58. Panofsky, E. (1927/1991). Perspective as symbolic form. New York: Zone.
59. Pérez-Rigueiro, J., Elices, M., Plaza, G. R., Real, J. I. and Guinea, G. V. (2006). The influence of anaesthesia on the tensile properties of spider silk. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 320–6.
60. Piaget, J. (1969). The mechanisms of perception. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
61. Piaget, J. (1981). Le possible et le n´ecessaire 1. L’évolution des possibles chez l’enfant [The possible and the necessary I: the evolution of thinking the possible in the child]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
62. Piaget, J. (1983). Le possible et le n´ecessaire 2. L’evolution du n´ecessaire chez l’enfant [The possible and the necessary II. The evolution of thinking the necessary in the child]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
63. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. (1956). The child’s conception of space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
64. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B. and Szeminska, A. (1960). The child’s conception of geometry. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
65. Plotnik, J. M., de Waal, F. B. M. and Reiss, D. (2006). Self-recognition in an Asian elephant. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103, 17053–7.
66. Pylyshyn, Z. (2003). Seeing and visualizing: it’s not what you think. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
67. Rayor, L. S. and Uetz, G. W. (2000). Age-related sequential web building in the colonial spider Metepeira incrassata (Araneidae): an adaptive spacing strategy. Animal Behaviour, 59, 1251–9.
68. Reith, E. and Dominin, D. (1997). The development of children’s ability to attend to the visual projection of objects. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 177–96.
69. Risch, P. (1977). Quantitative analysis of orb web patterns in four species of spiders. Behavioral Genetics, 7, 199–238.
70. Robertson, I. H., Nico, D. and Hood, B. M. (1997). Believing what you feel: using proprioceptive feedback to reduce unilateral neglect. Neuropsychology, 11, 53–8.
71. Rogers, L. J. (2000). Evolution of side bias: motor versus sensory lateralization. In M. K. Mandal, M. B. Bulman-Fleming and G. Tiwari (eds.), Side bias: a neuropsychological perspective (pp. 3–40).
72. Sheppard, E., Ropar, D. and Mitchell, P. (2005). The impact of meaning and dimensionality on the accuracy of children’s copying. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 23, 365–81.
73. Sherick, I., Greenman, G. and Legg, C. (1976). Some comments on the significance and development of midline behaviour during infancy. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 6, 170–83.
74. Silk, A. M. J. and Thomas, G. V. (1986). Development and differentiation in children’s figure drawings. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 399–410.
75. Silk, A. M. J. and Thomas, G. V. (1988). The development of size scaling in children’s figure drawings. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6, 285–99.
76. Tada, W. L. and Stiles, J. (1996). Developmental change in children’s analysis of spatial patterns. Developmental Psychology, 32, 951–70.
77. Thelen, E., Corbetta, D., Kamm, K., Spencer, J. P., Schneider, K. and Zernicke, R. F. (1993). The transition to reaching: mapping intention and intrinsic dynamics. Child Development, 64, 1058–98.
78. Thomas, G. V. (1995). The role of drawing strategies and skills. In C. Lange- K¨uttner and G. V. Thomas (eds.), Drawing and looking (pp. 107–22). London: Pearson/Prentice Hall (distributed by www.amazon.co.uk).
79. Toomela, A. (2002). Drawing as a verbally mediated activity: a study of relationships between verbal, motor, and visuospatial skills and drawing in children. International Journal of Behavioural Development, 26, 234–47.
80. Towse, J. N. and Hitch, G. J. (1996). Performance demands in the selection of objects for counting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61, 67– 79.
81. Treisman, A. (2006). How the deployment of attention determines what we see. Visual Cognition, 14, 411–43.
82. Ungerleider, L. G. and Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale and R. J. W. Mansfield (eds.), Analysis of visual behaviour (pp. 549–86). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
83. Van Sommers, P. (1984). Drawing and cognition: descriptive and experimental studies of graphic production processes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Venner, S., Bel-Venner, M. C., Pasquet, A. and Leborgne, R. (2003). Body-mass dependent cost of web-building behaviour in an orb weaving spider, Zygiella x-notata. Naturwissenschaften, 90, 269–72.
85. Vinter, A. and Perruchet, P. (2000). Implicit learning in children is not related to age: evidence from drawing behaviour. Child Development, 71, 1223–40.
86. Vollrath, F. (2005). Spiders’ webs. Current Biology, 15, R364–R365.
87. Vollrath, F., Downes, M. and Krackow, S. (1997). Design variability in web geometry of an orb-weaving spider. Physiology and Behaviour, 62, 735–43.
88. Willats, J. (1997). Art and representation: new principles in the analysis of pictures. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
89. Zhi, Z., Thomas, G. V. and Robinson, E. J. (1997). Constraints on representational change: drawing a man with two heads. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 275–90