How perception impacts on drawings

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 996-1003

  Mitchell, Peter ^a   Ropar, Danielle ^a   Ackroyd, Katie ^a   Rajendran, Gnanathusharan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Drawings; Illusions; Perceptual distortion; Perspective; Shepard figure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

ADULT; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL ILLUSIONS; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SIZE PERCEPTION; SOFTWARE;

EID: 27844444294     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.5.996     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Bruce, V., Green, P. R., & Georgeson, M. (1996). Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, and ecology (3rd ed). Hove, England: Psychology Press.
2. Chen, M. J. (1986). Young children's representational drawings of solid objects: A comparison of drawing and copying. In N. H. Freeman & M. V. Cox (Eds.), Visual order: The nature and development of pictorial representation (pp. 157-175). London: Cambridge University Press.
3. Cohen, D. J., & Bennett, S. (1997). Why can't most people draw what they see? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23, 609-621.
4. Gombrich, E. H. (2004). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation (6th ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
5. Gregory, R. L. (1966). Eye and brain. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
6. Gregory, R. L. (1971). The intelligent eye. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
7. Kubovy, M. (1986). The psychology of perspective and renaissance art. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8. Marr, D., & Vaina, L. (1982). Representation and recognition of the movements of shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences, 214, 501-524.
9. Mitchell, P., & Taylor, L. M. (1999). Shape constancy and theory of mind: Is there a link? Cognition, 70, 167-190.
10. Nicholls, A. L., & Kennedy, J. M. (1993). Foreshortening and the perception of parallel projections. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 665-674.
11. Phillips, W. A., Hobbs, S. B., & Pratt, F. R. (1978). Intellectual realism in children's drawings of cubes. Cognition, 6, 15-33.
12. Ropar, D., & Mitchell, P. (2002). Shape constancy in autism: The role of prior knowledge and perspective cues. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 647-653.
13. Shepard, R. N. (1990). Mind sights: Original visual illusions, ambiguities, and other anomalies with a commentary on the play of mind in perception and art. San Francisco: Freeman.
14. Taylor, L. M., & Mitchell, P. (1997). Judgments of apparent shape contaminated by knowledge of reality: Viewing circles obliquely. British Journal of Psychology, 88, 653-670.
15. Thouless, R. H. (1931). Phenomenal regression to the real object: I. British Journal of Psychology, 21, 339-359.
16. Williams, P. A., & Enns, J. T. (1996). Pictorial depth and framing have independent effects on the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception, 24, 921-926.