Intensive physical therapeutic approaches to stroke recovery

Brain Repair After Stroke

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 219-232

  Wolf, Steven L ^a   Winstein, Carolee J ^b  

^a EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84926959398     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511777547.021     Document Type: Chapter

References (76)

1. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: Issues for consideration. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:823-30.
2. Richards L, Senesac C, McGuirk T, et al. Response to intensive upper extremity therapy by individuals with ataxia from stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15:262-71.
3. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009;73:195-201.
4. Dobkin BH. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: Lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:3-13.
5. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Looking in the rear view mirror when conversing with back seat drivers: The EXCITE trial revisited. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:379-87.
6. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, et al. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke. 1997;28:1550-6.
7. Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: Evaluation and treatment. 3rd ed. Oxford: Heinemann; 1990.
8. Bobath B. Abnormal postural reflex activity caused by brain lesions. 2nd ed. London: Heinemann; 1971.
9. Brunnstrom S. Movement therapy in hemiplegia. 1st ed. New York, NY: Harper & Row; 1970.
10. Voss DE, Ionta MK, Myers B. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation: Patterns and techniques. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1985.
11. Howle JM. Neuro-developmental treatment approach: Theoretical foundations and principles of clinical practice. 1st ed. Laguna Beach: The North American Neurodevelopmental Tretment Association; 2003.
12. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, et al. The poststroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehab Med. 1975;7:13-31.
13. Feys H, De Weerdt W, Verbeke G, et al. Early and repetitive stimulation of the arm can substantially improve the long-term outcome after stroke: A 5-year follow-up study of a randomized trial. Stroke. 2004;35:924-9.
14. Luke C, Dodd KJ, Brock K. Outcomes of the Bobath concept on upper limb recovery following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:888-98.
15. Dickstein R, Hocherman S, Pillar T, et al. Stroke rehabilitation. Three exercise therapy approaches. Phys Ther. 1986;66:1233-8.
16. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke. 1999;30:573-9.
17. Wang RY, Chen HI, Chen CY, et al. Efficacy of Bobath versus orthopaedic approach on impairment and function at different motor recovery stages after stroke: A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:155-64.
18. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al.The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: What’s the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:833-62.
19. Langhorne P. Intensity of rehabilitation: Some answers and more questions? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:430-1.
20. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial. Lancet. 1999;354:191-6.
21. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: A randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:473-9.
22. Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, et al. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome? Clin Rehabil. 2003;17:579-89.
23. Morris JH, van Wijck F, Joice S, et al. A comparison of bilateral and unilateral upper-limb task training in early poststroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1237-45.
24. Liu KP, Chan CC, Lee TM, et al. Mental imagery for promoting relearning for people after stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1403-08.
25. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard AC. Effects of mental practice on affected limb use and function in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:399-402.
26. Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A. Mental practice in chronic stroke: Results of a randomized, placebocontrolled trial. Stroke. 2007;38:1293-7.
27. Barreca S, Wolf SL, Fasoli S, et al. Treatment interventions for the paretic upper limb of stroke survivors: A critical review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003;17:220-6.
28. Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Teasell R, et al. Priorities for stroke rehabilitation and research: Results of a 2003 Canadian Stroke Network consensus conference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:526-8.
29. Wolf SL. Revisiting constraint-induced movement therapy: Are we too smitten with the mitten? Is all nonuse “learned”? and other quandaries. Phys Ther. 2007;87:1212-23.
30. Lee TD, Swanson LR, Hall AL. What is repeated in a repetition? Effects of practice conditions on motor skill acquisition. Phys Ther. 1991;71:150-6.
31. Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. 4th ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005.
32. Wolf SL, Edwards DI, Shutter LA. Concurrent assessment of muscle activity (CAMA). A procedural approach to assess treatment goals. Phys Ther. 1986;66:218-24.
33. Wolf SL, Newton H, Maddy D, et al. The Excite Trial: Relationship of intensity of constraint induced movement therapy to improvement in the Wolf motor function test. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:549-62.
34. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: The EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:33-40.
35. Winstein C, Wolf SL. Task-oriented training to promote extremity recovery. In: Stein RLH, Macko RF, Winstein CJ, Zorowitz RD, editors. Stroke recovery & rehabilitation. New York, NY: Demos Medical; 2008: Pp. 267-390.
36. Dobkin BH. Strategies for stroke rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2004;3:528-36.
37. Nudo RJ, Plautz EJ, Frost SB. Role of adaptive plasticity in recovery of function after damage to motor cortex. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24:1000-19.
38. Wu C, Trombly CA, Lin K, et al. A kinematic study of contextual effects on reaching performance in persons with and without stroke: Influences of object availability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:95-101.
39. Duncan P, Studenski S, Richards L, et al. Randomized clinical trial of therapeutic exercise in subacute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2173-80.
40. Platz T. Impairment-oriented training (IOT) -Scientific concept and evidence-based treatment strategies. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2004;22:301-15.
41. Platz T, van Kaick S, Moller L, et al. Impairment-oriented training and adaptive motor cortex reorganisation after stroke: A fTMS study. J Neurol. 2005;252:1363-71.
42. Platz T, Winter T, Muller N, et al. Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: A single-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:961-8.
43. Winstein CJ, Rose DK, Tan SM, et al. A randomized controlled comparison of upper-extremity rehabilitation strategies in acute stroke: A pilot study of immediate and long-term outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:620-8.
44. Sunderland A, Tuke A. Neuroplasticity, learning and recovery after stroke: A critical evaluation of constraint-induced therapy. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2005;15:81-96.
45. Winstein CJ, Wing AM, Whitall J. Motor control and learning principles for rehabilitation of upper limb movements after brain injury. In: Boller F, Grafman J, editors. Handbook of neurospychology. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2003: Pp. 77-137.
46. Patten C, Dozono J, Schmidt SG, et al. Combined functional task practice and dynamic high intensity resistance training promotes recovery of upper-extremity motor function in post-stroke hemiparesis: A case study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2006;30:99-115.
47. Zackowski KM, Dromerick AW, Sahrmann SA, et al. How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? Brain. 2004;127:1035-46.
48. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191-215.
49. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman; 1997.
50. Jones F. Strategies to enhance chronic disease selfmanagement: How can we apply this to stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:841-7.
51. Kendall E, Catalano T, Kuipers P, et al. Recovery following stroke: The role of self-management education. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:735-46.
52. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Sharp D, etal. Testing a self-determination theory intervention for motivating tobacco cessation: Supporting autonomy and competence in a clinical trial. Health Psychol. 2006;25:91-101.
53. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, etal. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes selfmanagement. Health Psychol. 2004;23:58-66.
54. Ewart CK, Stewart KJ, Gillilan RE, et al. Self-efficacy mediates strength gains during circuit weight training in men with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1986;18:531-40.
55. Taylor CB, Bandura A, Ewart CK, et al. Exercise testing to enhance wives’ confidence in their husbands’ cardiac capability soon after clinically uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 1985;55:635-8.
56. Sniehotta FF, Scholz U, Schwarzer R, et al. Long-term effects of two psychological interventions on physical exercise and self-regulation following coronary rehabilitation. Int J Behav Med. 2005;12:244-55.
57. Werner RA, Kessler S. Effectiveness of an intensive outpatient rehabilitation program for postacute stroke patients. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;75:114-20.
58. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, et al. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005;22:51-6.
59. Hemmen B, Seelen HA. Effects of movement imagery and electromyography-triggered feedback on arm hand function in stroke patients in the subacute phase. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:587-94.
60. Yavuzer G, Selles R, Sezer N, et al. Mirror therapy improves hand function in subacute stroke: A randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:393-8.
61. Quin CE. Observations on the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation techniques in the treatment of hemiplegia. Rheumatol Phys Med. 1971;11:186-92.
62. Kraft GH, Fitts SS, Hammond MC. Techniques to improve function of the arm and hand in chronic hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:220-7.
63. Basmajian JV, Gowland CA, Finlayson MA, et al. Stroke treatment: Comparison of integrated behavioral-physical therapy vs. traditional physical therapy programs. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987;68:267-72.
64. Partridge C, Edwards S, Mee R, et al. Hemiplegic shoulder pain: A study of two methods of physiotherapy treatment. Clin Rehab. 1990;4:43-9.
65. Nakayama H, Jorgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:394-8.
66. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al. Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial. Stroke. 1999;30:2369-75.
67. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: A randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14:361-9.
68. Platz T, Eickhof C, van Kaick S, et al. Impairment-oriented training or Bobath therapy for severe arm paresis after stroke: A single-blind, multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19:714-24.
69. Hafsteinsdottir TB, Kappelle J, Grypdonck MH, et al. Effects of Bobath-based therapy on depression, shoulder pain and health-related quality of life in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:627-32.
70. van Vliet PM, Lincoln NB, Foxall A. Comparison of Bobath based and movement science based treatment for stroke: A randomised controlled trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2005;76:503-08.
71. Hesse S, Schmidt H, Werner C, et al. Upper and lower extremity robotic devices for rehabilitation and for studying motor control. Curr Opin Neurol. 2003;16:705-10.
72. Macclellan LR, Bradham DD, Whitall J, et al. Robotic upper-limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke patients. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2005;42:717-22.
73. Gladstone DJ, Danells CJ, Armesto A, et al. Physiotherapy coupled with dextroamphetamine for rehabilitation after hemiparetic stroke: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke. 2006;37:179-85.
74. Merians AS, Poizner H, Boian R, et al. Sensorimotor training in a virtual reality environment: Does it improve functional recovery poststroke? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006;20:252-67.
75. Muller K, Butefisch CM, Seitz RJ, et al. Mental practice improves hand function after hemiparetic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2007;25:501-11.
76. Volpe BT, Lynch D, Rykman-Berland A, et al. Intensive sensorimotor arm training mediated by therapist or robot improves hemiparesis in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:305-10.