Response to intensive upper extremity therapy by individuals with ataxia from stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 262-271

  Richards, Lone ^a,b   Senesac, Claudia ^a,b   McGuirk, Theresa ^a,b   Woodbury, Michelle ^a,b   Howland, Dena ^a,c   Davis, Sandra ^a   Patterson, Tara ^a,b  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Ataxia; Motor skills; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MUSCLE; ARTICLE; ATAXIA; CASE REPORT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT THERAPY; OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSIOTHERAPY; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT RESPONSE; WALKING SPEED;

AGED; ARM; ATAXIA; BIOMECHANICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; STROKE;

EID: 48249158222     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1503-262     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A Neurophysiological Approach. New York: Harper and Row; 1970.
2. Beer R, Dewald J, Rymer W. Deficits in the coordination of multijoint arm movements in patients with hemiparesis: evidence for disturbed control of limb dynamics. Exp Brain Res. 2000;131:305-319.
3. Beer R, Given J, Dewald J. Task-dependent weakness at the elbow in patients with hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:766-772.
4. Dewald J, Pope P, Given J, Buchanan T, Rymer W. Abnormal muscle coactivational patterns during isometric torque generation at the elbow and shoulder in hemiparetic subjects. Brain. 1995;118:495-510.
5. Dewald J, Beer R. Abnormal joint torque patterns in the paretic upper limb of subjects with hemiparesis. Muscle Nerve. 2001;24:273-283.
6. Nakayama H, Jorgensen H, Raaschou H, Olsen T. Compensation in recovery of upper extremity function after stroke: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75(8):852-857.
7. Wolf S, Winstein C, Miller J, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke. The EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2006;296(17):2095-2104.
8. Taub E, Uswatte G, King D, Morris D, Crago J, Chatterjee A. A placebo-controlled trial of constraint-induced movement therapy for upper extremity after stroke. Stroke. 2006;37:1045-1049.
9. van der Lee J, Beckerman H, Lankhorst G, Bouter L. Constraint-induced movement therapy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1606-1607.
10. Holmes G. The cerebellum of man (The Hughlings Jackson Memorial Lecture). Brain. 1939;62:1-30.
11. Fries W, Danek A, Scheidtmann K, Hamburger C. Motor recovery following capsular stroke. Role of descending pathways from multiple motor areas. Brain. 1993;116(Pt2):369-382.
12. Ohara S, Lenz F. Reorganization of somatic sensory function in the human thalamus after stroke. Ann Neurol. 2001;50(6):800-803.
13. Binkofski F, Seitz R, Arnold S, Classen J, Benecke R, Freund H. Thalamic metabolism and corticospinal tract integrity determine motor recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol. 1996;39(4):460-470.
14. Torriero S, Oliveri M, Koch G, et al. Cortical networks of procedural learning: evidence from cerebellar damage. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45(6):1208-1214.
15. Kleim J, Markham J, Vij K, Freese J, Ballard D, Greenough W. Motor learning induces astrocytic hypertrophy in the cerebellar cortex. Behav Brain Res. 2007;178(2):244-249.
16. Ioffe M, Chernikova L, Ustinova K. Role of cerebellum in learning postural tasks. Cerebellum. 2007;6(1):87-94.
17. Spraker M, Yu H, Corcos D, Vaillancourt D. Role of individual basal ganglia nuclei in force amplitude generation. J Neurophysiol. 2007;98(2):821-834.
18. Tregellas J, Davalos D, Rojas D. Effect of task difficulty on the functional anatomy of temporal processing. Neuroimage. 2006;32(1):307-315.
19. Aguilar J, Castro-Alamancos M. Spatiotemporal gating of sensory inputs in thalamus during quiescent and activated states. J Neurosci. 2005;25(47):10990-11002.
20. Ito M. Historical review of the significance of the cerebellum and the role of Purkinje cells in motor learning. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;978:273-288.
21. Rab G, Petuskey K, Bagley A. A method for determination of upper extremity kinematics. Gait Posture. 2002;15:113-119.
22. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs H, et al. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci. 2002;22(18):8297-8304.
23. Wolf S, McJunkin J, Swanson M, Weiss P. Pilot normative database for the Wolf Motor Function Test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:443-445.
24. Levin MF, Michaelsen SM, Cirstea CM, Roby-Brami A. Use of the trunk for reaching targets placed within and beyond the reach in adult hemiparesis. Exp Brain Res. 2002;143(2):171-180.
25. Cirstea MC, Levin MF. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 5):940-953.
26. Bastian A. Learning to predict the future: the cerebellum adapts feedforward movement control. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006;16:645-649.
27. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kölbel S, Rockstroh B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(10):1374-1377.
28. Morris D, Taub E, Mark VW. Constraint-induced movement therapy: characterizing the intervention protocol. Europa Medicophysica. 2006;42:257-268.
29. Dettmers C, Teske U, Hamzei F, Uswatte G, Taub E, Weiller C. Distributed form of constraint-induced movement therapy improves functional outcome and quality of life after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(2):204-209.