The dynamic conformational cycle of the group I chaperonin C-termini revealed via molecular dynamics simulation

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Dalton, Kevin M ^a   Frydman, Judith ^a   Pande, Vijay S ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHAPERONIN; CHAPERONIN 60; EARLY PREGNANCY FACTOR; PROTEIN GROE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; PROTEIN BINDING;

ARTICLE; CARBOXY TERMINAL SEQUENCE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; MOLECULAR MODEL; PROTEIN DOMAIN;

ESCHERICHIA COLI;

GROUP I CHAPERONINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS;

EID: 84926476786     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117724     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Hartl FU, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M (2011) Molecular chaperones in protein folding and proteostasis. Nature 475: 324-332. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21776078. Accessed 26 October 2012. doi: 10.1038/nature10317 PMID: 21776078
2. Kerner MJ, Naylor DJ, Ishihama Y, Maier T, Chang H-C, et al. (2005) Proteome-wide analysis of chaperonin-dependent protein folding in Escherichia coli. Cell 122: 209-220. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16051146. Accessed 7 August 2013. PMID: 16051146
3. Houry W, Frishman D, Eckerskorn C (1999) Identification of in vivo substrates of the chaperonin GroEL. Nature: 147-154. Available: http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/csls2000/studies/compubio/Tamar-578D5A74d01.ps. Accessed 7 December 2012. PMID: 10647006
4. Gong Y, Kakihara Y, Krogan N, Greenblatt J, Emili A, et al. (2009) An atlas of chaperone-protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: implications to protein folding pathways in the cell. Mol Syst Biol 5: 275. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2710862&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 March 2013. doi: 10.1038/msb.2009.26 PMID: 19536198
5. Horwich AL, Fenton W a, Chapman E, Farr GW (2007) Two families of chaperonin: physiology and mechanism. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 115-145. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17489689. Accessed 12 March 2013. PMID: 17489689
6. Braig K, Otwinowski Z, Hegde R, Boisvert DC, Joachimiak A, et al. (1994) The crystal structure of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL at 2.8 A. Nature 371: 578-586. Available: http://www.nature.com/nsmb/journal/v3/n2/abs/nsb0296-170.html. PMID: 7935790
7. Xu Z, Horwich a L, Sigler PB (1997) The crystal structure of the asymmetric GroEL-GroES-(ADP)7 chaperonin complex. Nature 388: 741-750. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9285585. PMID: 9285585
8. Fenton W, Kashi Y, Furtak K, Horwich A (1994) Residues in chaperonin GroEL required for polypeptide binding and release. Nature 371: 614-619. Available: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v371/n6498/abs/371614a0.html. Accessed 7 December 2012. PMID: 7935796
9. Lucent D, England J, Pande V (2009) Inside the chaperonin toolbox: theoretical and computational models for chaperonin mechanism. Phys Biol 6: 015003. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19208937. Accessed 12 July 2011. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/6/1/015003 PMID: 19208937
10. Tyagi NK, Fenton W a, Deniz A a, Horwich AL (2011) Double mutant MBP refolds at same rate in free solution as inside the GroEL/GroES chaperonin chamber when aggregation in free solution is prevented. FEBS Lett 585: 1969-1972. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3144026&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.031 PMID: 21609718
11. Brinker a, Pfeifer G, Kerner MJ, Naylor DJ, Hartl FU, et al. (2001) Dual function of protein confinement in chaperonin-assisted protein folding. Cell 107: 223-233. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11672529. PMID: 11672529
12. Zhou H, Dill KA (2001) New Concepts Stabilization of Proteins in Confined Spaces †. Biochemistry 40: 11289-11293. Available: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/bi0155504. PMID: 11560476
13. Hofmann H, Hillger F, Pfeil SH, Hoffmann A, Streich D, et al. (2010) Single-molecule spectroscopy of protein folding in a chaperonin cage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107: 11793-11798. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2900638&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 22 July 2011. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002356107 PMID: 20547872
14. Lucent D, Vishal V, Pande VS (2007) Protein folding under confinement: a role for solvent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10430-10434. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1965530&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. PMID: 17563390
15. England J, Lucent D, Pande V (2008) A role for confined water in chaperonin function. J Am ...: 11838-11839. Available: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja802248m. Accessed 2 November 2012.
16. Weber JK, Pande VS (2013) Functional understanding of solvent structure in GroEL cavity through dipole field analysis. J Chem Phys 138: 165101. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23635172. Accessed 8 May 2013. doi: 10.1063/1.4801942 PMID: 23635172
17. Weaver J, Rye HS (2014) The C-terminal tails of the bacterial chaperonin GroEL stimulate protein folding by directly altering the conformation of a substrate protein. J Biol Chem 289: 23219-23232. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24970895. Accessed 11 December 2014. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.577205 PMID: 24970895
18. Shomura Y, Yoshida T, Iizuka R, Maruyama T, Yohda M, et al. (2004) Crystal Structures of the Group II Chaperonin from Thermococcus strain KS-1: Steric Hindrance by the Substituted Amino Acid, and Inter-subunit Rearrangement between Two Crystal Forms. J Mol Biol 335: 1265-1278. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283603014062. Accessed 2 November 2012. PMID: 14729342
19. Pereira JH, Ralston CY, Douglas NR, Meyer D, Knee KM, et al. (2010) Crystal structures of a group II chaperonin reveal the open and closed states associated with the protein folding cycle. J Biol Chem 285: 27958-27966. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2934662&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 12 July 2011. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.125344 PMID: 20573955
20. Ditzel L, Löwe J, Stock D, Stetter KO, Huber H, et al. (1998) Crystal structure of the thermosome, the archaeal chaperonin and homolog of CCT. Cell 93: 125-138. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9546398. PMID: 9546398
21. Dekker C, Roe SM, McCormack EA, Beuron F, Pearl LH, et al. (2011) The crystal structure of yeast CCT reveals intrinsic asymmetry of eukaryotic cytosolic chaperonins. EMBO J 30: 3078-3090. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3160183&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 29 October 2012. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.208 PMID: 21701561
22. Leitner A, Joachimiak LA, Bracher A, Mönkemeyer L, Walzthoeni T, et al. (2012) The molecular architecture of the eukaryotic chaperonin TRiC/CCT. Structure 20: 814-825. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22503819. Accessed 2 November 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.str.2012.03.007 PMID: 22503819
23. Ranson N a, Farr GW, Roseman a M, Gowen B, Fenton W a, et al. (2001) ATP-bound states of GroEL captured by cryo-electron microscopy. Cell 107: 869-879. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11779463. PMID: 11779463
24. Clare DK, Vasishtan D, Stagg S, Quispe J, Farr GW, et al. (2012) ATP-triggered conformational changes delineate substrate-binding and -folding mechanics of the GroEL chaperonin. Cell 149: 113-123. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3326522&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 2 November 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.047 PMID: 22445172
25. Zhang J, Baker ML, Schröder GF, Douglas NR, Reissmann S, et al. (2010) Mechanism of folding chamber closure in a group II chaperonin. Nature 463: 379-383. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2834796&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 12 July 2011. doi: 10.1038/nature08701 PMID: 20090755
26. Douglas NR, Reissmann S, Zhang J, Chen B, Jakana J, et al. (2011) Dual action of ATP hydrolysis couples lid closure to substrate release into the group II chaperonin chamber. Cell 144: 240-252. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3055171&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 2 November 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.12.017 PMID: 21241893
27. Cong Y, Schröder GF, Meyer AS, Jakana J, Ma B, et al. (2012) Symmetry-free cryo-EM structures of the chaperonin TRiC along its ATPase-driven conformational cycle. EMBO J 31: 720-730. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3273382&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 2 November 2012. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2011.366 PMID: 22045336
28. Luo H, Robb FT (2011) A modulator domain controlling thermal stability in the Group II chaperonins of Archaea. Arch Biochem Biophys 512: 111-118. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21600187. Accessed 31 October 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2011.04.017 PMID: 21600187
29. Burnett BP, Horwich AL, Low KB (1994) A carboxy-terminal deletion impairs the assembly of GroEL and confers a pleiotropic phenotype in Escherichia coli K-12. J Bacteriol 176: 6980-6985. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=197070&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. PMID: 7961461
30. Farr GW, Fenton W a, Horwich AL (2007) Perturbed ATPase activity and not "close confinement" of substrate in the cis cavity affects rates of folding by tail-multiplied GroEL. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 5342-5347. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1828711&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 2 November 2012. PMID: 17372195
31. Machida K, Kono-Okada A, Hongo K, Mizobata T, Kawata Y (2008) Hydrophilic residues 526 KNDAAD 531 in the flexible C-terminal region of the chaperonin GroEL are critical for substrate protein folding within the central cavity. J Biol Chem 283: 6886-6896. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18184659. Accessed 8 May 2013. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M708002200 PMID: 18184659
32. Tang Y-C, Chang H-C, Roeben A, Wischnewski D, Wischnewski N, et al. (2006) Structural features of the GroEL-GroES nano-cage required for rapid folding of encapsulated protein. Cell 125: 903-914. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16751100. Accessed 12 July 2011. PMID: 16751100
33. Elad N, Farr GW, Clare DK, Orlova E V, Horwich AL, et al. (2007) Topologies of a substrate protein bound to the chaperonin GroEL. Mol Cell 26: 415-426. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1885994&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 7 December 2012. PMID: 17499047
34. Wang Y, Zhang W, Zhang Z, Li J, Li Z, et al. (2013) Mechanisms involved in the functional divergence of duplicated GroEL chaperonins in Myxococcus xanthus DK1622. PLoS Genet 9: e1003306. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3578752&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 3 May 2013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003306 PMID: 23437010
35. Chen D-H, Madan D, Weaver J, Lin Z, Schröder GF, et al. (2013) Visualizing GroEL/ES in the Act of Encapsulating a Folding Protein. Cell 153: 1354-1365. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S009286741300528X. Accessed 7 June 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.04.052 PMID: 23746846
36. Wang J, Boisvert DC (2003) Structural Basis for GroEL-assisted Protein Folding from the Crystal Structure of (GroEL-KMgATP)14 at 2.0Å Resolution. J Mol Biol 327: 843-855. Available: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022283603001840. Accessed 3 October 2013. PMID: 12654267
37. Hess B, Uppsala S-, Lindahl E (2008) GROMACS 4: Algorithms for Highly Efficient, Load-Balanced, and Scalable Molecular Simulation: 435-447.
38. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K (2010) Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66: 486-501. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2852313&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 4 March 2013. doi: 10.1107/S0907444910007493 PMID: 20383002
39. Still W, Tempczyk A (1990) Semianalytical treatment of solvation for molecularmechanics and dynamics. J ...: 6127-6129. Available: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja00172a038. Accessed 3 May 2013.
40. Voelz V a, Jäger M, Yao S, Chen Y, Zhu L, et al. (2012) Slow unfolded-state structuring in Acyl-CoA binding protein folding revealed by simulation and experiment. J Am Chem Soc 134: 12565-12577. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22747188. doi: 10.1021/ja302528z PMID: 22747188
41. Voelz V a, Bowman GR, Beauchamp K, Pande VS (2010) Molecular simulation of ab initio protein folding for a millisecond folder NTL9(1-39). J Am Chem Soc 132: 1526-1528. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2835335&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. doi: 10.1021/ja9090353 PMID: 20070076
42. Lindorff-Larsen K, Piana S, Palmo K, Maragakis P, Klepeis JL, et al. (2010) Improved side-chain torsion potentials for the Amber ff99SB protein force field. Proteins 78: 1950-1958. Available: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=2970904&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract. Accessed 6 August 2013. doi: 10.1002/prot.22711 PMID: 20408171
43. Humphrey W, Dalke a, Schulten K (1996) VMD: visual molecular dynamics. J Mol Graph 14: 33-38, 27-28. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8744570. PMID: 8744570
44. Hunter JD (2007) Matplotlib: A 2D graphic environment. Comput Sci Eng 9: 90-95. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/abstractKeywords.jsp?arnumber=4160265.
45. Oliphant TE (2007) Python for Scientific Computing. Comput Sci Eng 9: 10-20. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=4160250.
46. Pérez F, Granger BE (2007) IPython: A System for Interactive Scientific Computing. Comput Sci Eng 9: 21-29. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?arnumber=4160251.