Distinctive effects of TiO2 and CuO nanoparticles on soil microbes and their community structures in flooded paddy soil

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volumn 86, Issue , 2015, Pages 24-33

  Xu, Chen ^a   Peng, Cheng ^a   Sun, Lijuan ^a   Zhang, Shu ^a   Huang, Haomin ^a   Chen, Yingxu ^a   Shi, Jiyan ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

CuO nanoparticles; Enzyme activity; Paddy soil; Phospholipid fatty acids (PLFAs); Soil microbes; TiO2 nanoparticles

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BIOCHEMISTRY; COPPER OXIDES; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FATTY ACIDS; FLOODS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; METALS; PHOSPHOLIPIDS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

CUO NANOPARTICLES; PADDY SOILS; PHOSPHOLIPID FATTY ACIDS; SOIL MICROBES; TIO2 NANO-PARTICLES;

SOILS;

BIOAVAILABILITY; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; COPPER COMPOUND; ENZYME ACTIVITY; FATTY ACID; FLOODED SOIL; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PADDY FIELD; SOIL MICROORGANISM; TITANIUM;

EID: 84926339619     PISSN: 00380717     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Aon M., Colaneri A. II. Temporal and spatial evolution of enzymatic activities and physico-chemical properties in an agricultural soil. Applied Soil Ecology 2001, 18:255-270.
2. 2 to microalgae Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata. Science of the Total Environment 2009, 407:1461-1468.
3. Bååth E. The use of neutral lipid fatty acids to indicate the physiological conditions of soil fungi. Microbial Ecology 2003, 45:373-383.
4. Bailey V.L., Peacock A., Smith J.L., Bolton H. Relationships between soil microbial biomass determined by chloroform fumigation-extraction, substrate-induced respiration, and phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2002, 34:1385-1389.
5. Ben-Moshe T., Frenk S., Dror I., Minz D., Berkowitz B. Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil properties. Chemosphere 2013, 90:640-646.
6. Bernhardt E.S., Colman B.P., Hochella M.F., Cardinale B.J., Nisbet R.M., Richardson C.J., Yin L. An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment. Journal of Environmental Quality 2010, 39:1954-1965.
7. Blaser P., Zimmermann S., Luster J., Shotyk W. Critical examination of trace element enrichments and depletions in soils: As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb, and Zn in Swiss forest soils. Science of the Total Environment 2000, 249:257-280.
8. Blinova I., Ivask A., Heinlaan M., Mortimer M., Kahru A. Ecotoxicity of nanoparticles of CuO and ZnO in natural water. Environmental Pollution 2010, 158:41-47.
9. Brookes P.C., Landman A., Pruden G., Jenkinson D. Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: a rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 1985, 17:837-842.
10. Burke D.J., Zhu S., Pablico-Lansigan M.P., Hewins C.R., Samia A.C.S. Titanium oxide nanoparticle effects on composition of soil microbial communities and plant performance. Biology and Fertility of Soils 2014, 50:1169-1173.
11. Burns R.G., DeForest J.L., Marxsen J., Sinsabaugh R.L., Stromberger M.E., Wallenstein M.D., Weintraub M.N., Zoppini A. Soil enzymes in a changing environment: current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2013, 58:216-234.
12. Carson J.K., Gonzalez-Quinones V., Murphy D.V., Hinz C., Shaw J.A., Gleeson D.B. Low pore connectivity increases bacterial diversity in soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2010, 76:3936-3942.
13. Cui H., Zhou J., Zhao Q., Si Y., Mao J., Fang G., Liang J. Fractions of Cu, Cd, and enzyme activities in a contaminated soil as affected by applications of micro-and nanohydroxyapatite. Journal of Soils and Sediments 2013, 13:742-752.
14. Dick R., Pankhurst C., Doube B., Gupta V. Soil enzyme activities as integrative indicators of soil health. Biological Indicators of Soil Health 1997, 121-156. CAB International. C.E. Pankhurst, B.M. Doube, V.V.S.R. Gupta (Eds.).
15. Dinesh R., Anandaraj M., Srinivasan V., Hamza S. Engineered nanoparticles in the soil and their potential implications to microbial activity. Geoderma 2012, 173:19-27.
16. Doran J.W., Parkin T.B. Quantitative indicators of soil quality: a minimum data set. SSSA Special Publication 1996, 49:25-38.
17. Doran J.W., Zeiss M.R. Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Applied Soil Ecology 2000, 15:3-11.
18. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2011, 13:822-828.
19. Frostegård Å., Bååth E. The use of phospholipid fatty acid analysis to estimate bacterial and fungal biomass in soil. Biology and Fertility of Soils 1996, 22:59-65.
20. Frostegård Å., Bååth E., Tunlio A. Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 1993, 25:723-730.
21. Frostegård Å., Tunlid A., Bååth E. Phospholipid fatty acid composition, biomass, and activity of microbial communities from two soil types experimentally exposed to different heavy metals. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1993, 59:3605-3617.
22. 2 nanoparticles on the Nitrosomonas europaea. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science 2010, 348:329-334.
23. Frenk S., Ben-Moshe T., Dror I., Berkowitz B., Minz D. Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on microbial community structure and function in two different soil types. PloS one 2013, 8. e84441.
24. Frostegård Å., Tunlid A., Bååth E. Use and misuse of PLFA measurements in soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2011, 43:1621-1625.
25. Gajjar P., Pettee B., Britt D.W., Huang W., Johnson W.P., Anderson A.J. Antimicrobial activities of commercial nanoparticles against an environmental soil microbe, Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Journal of Biological Engineering 2009, 3:1-13.
26. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environmental Science & Technology 2011, 45:1659-1664.
27. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2012, 78:6749-6758.
28. 2 nanoparticle effects on soil bacterial communities. Environmental Science & Technology 2013, 47:14411-14417.
29. Godwin H.A., Chopra K., Bradley K.A., Cohen Y., Harthorn B.H., Hoek E.M., Holden P., Keller A.A., Lenihan H.S., Nisbet R.M. The university of california center for the environmental implications of nanotechnology. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:6453-6457.
30. 2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environmental Science & Technology 2009, 43:9216-9222.
31. Gottschalk F., Nowack B. The release of engineered nanomaterials to the environment. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 2011, 13:1145-1155.
32. Guan S., Zhang D., Zhang Z. Soil Enzyme and its Research Methods 1986, Agricultural, Beijing.
33. Gunawan C., Teoh W.Y., Marquis C.P., Amal R. Cytotoxic origin of copper (II) oxide nanoparticles: comparative studies with micron-sized particles, leachate, and metal salts. ACS nano 2011, 5:7214-7225.
34. Hedlund K. Soil microbial community structure in relation to vegetation management on former agricultural land. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2002, 34:1299-1307.
35. 2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 2008, 71:1308-1316.
36. Huang Z., Zheng X., Yan D., Yin G., Liao X., Kang Y., Yao Y., Huang D., Hao B. Toxicological effect of ZnO nanoparticles based on bacteria. Langmuir 2008, 24:4140-4144.
37. Jenkinson D.S., Brookes P.C., Powlson D.S. Measuring soil microbial biomass. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2004, 36:5-7.
38. Jiang X., Herricks T., Xia Y. CuO nanowires can be synthesized by heating copper substrates in air. Nano Letters 2002, 2:1333-1338.
39. John M.G.S., Orwin K.H., Dickie I.A. No 'home' versus 'away' effects of decomposition found in a grassland-forest reciprocal litter transplant study. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2011, 43:1482-1489.
40. 3, CuO and Ni) and their bulk counterparts on enzyme activities in different soils. Geoderma 2014, 232:528-537.
41. 3 extraction. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2009, 41:309-314.
42. Kizilkaya R., Bayrakli B. Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Applied Soil Ecology 2005, 30:192-202.
43. Kozdrój J., van Elsas J.D. Response of the bacterial community to root exudates in soil polluted with heavy metals assessed by molecular and cultural approaches. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2000, 32:1405-1417.
44. Kumar A., Pandey A.K., Singh S.S., Shanker R., Dhawan A. Cellular uptake and mutagenic potential of metal oxide nanoparticles in bacterial cells. Chemosphere 2011, 83:1124-1132.
45. Kumar N., Shah V., Walker V.K. Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2011, 190:816-822.
46. Lakanen E., Erviö R. Acomparison of eight extractants for the determination of plant available micronutrients in soils. Acta Agriculturica Fennica 1971, 123:223-232.
47. Larue C., Castillo-Michel H., Sobanska S., Cécillon L., Bureau S., Barthès V., Ouerdane L., Carrière M., Sarret G. Foliar exposure of the crop Lactuca sativa to silver nanoparticles: evidence for internalization and changes in Ag speciation. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2014, 264:98-106.
48. Lindsay W., Norvell W.A. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese, and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1978, 42:421-428.
49. Manzo S., Rocco A., Carotenuto R., De Luca Picione F., Miglietta M., Rametta G., Di Francia G. Investigation of ZnO nanoparticles' ecotoxicological effects towards different soil organisms. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 2010, 18:756-763.
50. McKinley V., Peacock A., White D. Microbial community PLFA and PHB responses to ecosystem restoration in tallgrass prairie soils. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2005, 37:1946-1958.
51. Misra S.K., Dybowska A., Berhanu D., Luoma S.N., Valsami-Jones E. The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Science of the Total Environment 2012, 438:225-232.
52. Moore-Kucera J., Dick R.P. PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence. Microbial Ecology 2008, 55:500-511.
53. Nel A., Xia T., Mädler L., Li N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 2006, 311:622-627.
54. Olsson P.A. Signature fatty acids provide tools for determination of the distribution and interactions of mycorrhizal fungi in soil. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 1999, 29:303-310.
55. O'leary W.M., Wilkinson S.G. Gram-positive bacteria. Microbial Lipids 1988, Academic Press, London. C. Ratledge, S.G. Wilkinson (Eds.).
56. Pan B., Xing B. Applications and implications of manufactured nanoparticles in soils: a review. European Journal of Soil Science 2012, 63:437-456.
57. Pettersson M., Boaåth E. The rate of change of a soil bacterial community after liming as a function of temperature. Microbial Ecology 2003, 46:177-186.
58. Quevauviller P. Operationally defined extraction procedures for soil and sediment analysis I. Standardization. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 1998, 17:289-298.
59. Rousk J., Ackermann K., Curling S.F., Jones D.L. Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLOS one 2012, 7. e34197.
60. Shah V., Jones J., Dickman J., Greenman S. Response of soil bacterial community to metal nanoparticles in biosolids. Journal of Hazardous Materials 2014, 274:399-403.
61. Shah V., Belozerova I. Influence of metal nanoparticles on the soil microbial community and germination of lettuce seeds. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 2009, 197:143-148.
62. Shi J.Y., Peng C., Yang Y.Q., Yang J.J., Zhang H., Yuan X.F., Chen Y.X., Hu T.D. Phytotoxicity and accumulation of copper oxide nanoparticles to the Cu-tolerant plant Elsholtzia splendens. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8:179-188.
63. Spedding T., Hamel C., Mehuys G., Madramootoo C. Soil microbial dynamics in maize-growing soil under different tillage and residue management systems. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 2004, 36:499-512.
64. Stebbing A. Hormesis-the stimulation of growth by low levels of inhibitors. Science of the Total Environment 1982, 22:213-234.
65. Suppan S. Nanomaterials in Soil 2013, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy.
66. Treves D.S., Xia B., Zhou J., Tiedje J.M. Atwo-species test of the hypothesis that spatial isolation influences microbial diversity in soil. Microbial Ecology 2003, 45:20-28.
67. Tunlid A., Hoitink H., Low C., White D. Characterization of bacteria that suppress Rhizoctonia damping-off in bark compost media by analysis of fatty acid biomarkers. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1989, 55:1368-1374.
68. Vance E., Brookes P., Jenkinson D. An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 1987, 19:703-707.
69. 2) engineered nanoparticles on soil microbial biomass and their distribution in soil. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2013, 60:87-94.
70. Waalewijn-Kool P.L., Diez Ortiz M., van Straalen N.M., van Gestel C.A. Sorption, dissolution and pH determine the long-term equilibration and toxicity of coated and uncoated ZnO nanoparticles in soil. Environmental Pollution 2013, 178:59-64.
71. Wang Q.-Y., Zhou D.-M., Cang L. Microbial and enzyme properties of apple orchard soil as affected by long-term application of copper fungicide. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 2009, 41:1504-1509.
72. Wu B., Wang Y., Lee Y.-H., Horst A., Wang Z., Chen D.-R., Sureshkumar R., Tang Y.J. Comparative eco-toxicities of nano-ZnO particles under aquatic and aerosol exposure modes. Environmental Science & Technology 2010, 44:1484-1489.
73. Xue D., Yao H.-Y., Ge D.-Y., Huang C.-Y. Soil microbial community structure in diverse land use systems: a comparative study using Biolog, DGGE, and PLFA analyses. Pedosphere 2008, 18:653-663.
74. Zogg G.P., Zak D.R., Ringelberg D.B., White D.C., MacDonald N.W., Pregitzer K.S. Compositional and functional shifts in microbial communities due to soil warming. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1997, 61:475-481.