Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 6749-6758

  Ge, Yuan ^a   Schimel, Joshua P ^a   Holdena, Patricia A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; BACTERIAL TAXA; DOSE-DEPENDENT MANNER; FINGERPRINTING ANALYSIS; METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLES; METHANE OXIDATION; NANO-TIO; NANO-ZNO; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; PROTEASE ACTIVITIES; PYROSEQUENCING; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; RHIZOBIALES; SOIL BACTERIAL COMMUNITY; SOIL BACTERIUM; SOIL MICROCOSMS; SOIL PROCESS; TIO; ZNO; ZNO NANOPARTICLES;

BACTERIA; BIOPOLYMERS; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; METHANE; NANOPARTICLES; NITROGEN FIXATION; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ZINC OXIDE;

SOILS;

ANTIINFECTIVE AGENT; NANOPARTICLE; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE; ZINC OXIDE;

BACTERIUM; DNA FINGERPRINTING; ENZYME ACTIVITY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; MICROCOSM; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; SOIL MICROORGANISM;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM; BIOTA; CLASSIFICATION; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA BARCODING; DNA SEQUENCE; DRUG EFFECT; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYLOGENY;

ANTI-BACTERIAL AGENTS; BACTERIA; BIOTA; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA BARCODING, TAXONOMIC; NANOPARTICLES; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; TITANIUM; ZINC OXIDE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); BRADYRHIZOBIACEAE; BRADYRHIZOBIUM; METHYLOBACTERIACEAE; RHIZOBIALES; SPHINGOMONADACEAE; STREPTOMYCES; STREPTOMYCETACEAE;

EID: 84866177911     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00941-12     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. 2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res. 40:3527-3532.
2. Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral. Ecol. 26:32-46.
3. 2: transport behavior and effects on aquatic microbial communities under environmental conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:8098-8104.
4. Bernhardt ES, et al. 2010. An ecological perspective on nanomaterial impacts in the environment. J. Environ. Qual. 39:1954-1965.
5. Brayner R, et al. 2006. Toxicological impact studies based on Escherichia coli bacteria in ultrafine ZnO nanoparticles colloidal medium. Nano Lett. 6:866-870.
6. Campbell BJ, Yu L, Heidelberg JF, Kirchman DL. 2011. Activity of abundant and rare bacteria in a coastal ocean. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 108:12776-12781.
7. Caporaso JG, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:335-336.
8. Chater KF, Biró S, Lee KJ, Palmer T, Schrempf H. 2010. The complex extracellular biology of Streptomyces. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 34:171-198.
9. Chistoserdova L, Kalyuzhnaya MG, Lidstrom ME. 2009. The expanding world of methylotrophic metabolism. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 63:477-499.
10. Choi O, Hu Z. 2008. Size dependent and reactive oxygen species related nanosilver toxicity to nitrifying bacteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:4583-4588.
11. Costello EK, et al. 2009. Bacterial community variation in human body habitats across space and time. Science 326:1694-1697.
12. Damoiseaux R, et al. 2011. No time to lose-high throughput screening to assess nanomaterial safety. Nanoscale 3:1345-1360.
13. De'ath G. 2002. Multivariate regression trees: a new technique for modeling species-environment relationships. Ecology 83:1105-1117.
14. DeSantis TZ, et al. 2006. NAST: a multiple sequence alignment server for comparative analysis of 16S rRNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 34:W394-W399.
15. Diaz-Raviña M, Bååth E. 2001. Response of soil bacterial communities pre-exposed to different metals and reinoculated in an unpolluted soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 33:241-248.
16. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. J. Environ. Monit. 13:822-828.
17. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26:2460-2461.
18. Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, Knight R. 2008. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105:17994-17999.
19. Ge Y, Chen C, Xu Z, Oren R, He J-Z. 2010. The spatial factor, rather than elevated CO2, controls the soil bacterial community in a temperate forest ecosystem. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7429-7436.
20. Ge Y, et al. 2008. Differences in soil bacterial diversity: driven by contemporary disturbances or historical contingencies? ISME J. 2:254-264.
21. 2 and ZnO nanoparticles on soil bacterial communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:1659-1664.
22. 2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:9216-9222.
23. Gou N, Onnis-Hayden A, Gu AZ. 2010. Mechanistic toxicity assessment of nanomaterials by whole-cell-array stress genes expression analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:5964-5970.
24. Griffiths BS, et al. 1997. Community DNA hybridisation and %G+C profiles of microbial communities from heavy metal polluted soils. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 24:103-112.
25. Guo L, et al. 2008. Adsorption of essential micronutrients by carbon nanotubes and the implications for nanotoxicity testing. Small 4:721-727.
26. Hadduck AN, Hindagolla V, Contreras AE, Li Q, Bakalinsky AT. 2010. Does aqueous fullerene inhibit the growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae or Escherichia coli? Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:8239-8242.
27. Hamady M, Walker JJ, Harris JK, Gold NJ, Knight R. 2008. Errorcorrecting barcoded primers for pyrosequencing hundreds of samples in multiplex. Nat. Methods 5:235-237.
28. 2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 71:1308-1316.
29. 2 nanoparticle agglomerates by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7292-7298.
30. Hughes JB, Hellmann JJ, Ricketts TH, Bohannan BJM. 2001. Counting the uncountable: statistical approaches to estimating microbial diversity. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67:4399-4406.
31. Johansen A, et al. 2008. Effects of C60 fullerene nanoparticles on soil bacteria and protozoans. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:1895-1903.
32. Jones RT, et al. 2009. A comprehensive survey of soil acidobacterial diversity using pyrosequencing and clone library analyses. ISME J. 3:442-453.
33. Keller AA, et al. 2010. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:1962-1967.
34. Klaine SJ, et al. 2008. Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:1825-1851.
35. Kumar N, Shah V, Walker VK. 2011. Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 190:816-822.
36. Ladd JN, Butler JHA. 1972. Short-term assays of soil proteolytic enzyme activities using proteins and dipeptide derivatives as substrates. Soil Biol. Biochem. 4:19-30.
37. Lauber CL, Hamady M, Knight R, Fierer N. 2009. Pyrosequencingbased assessment of soil pH as a predictor of soil bacterial community structure at the continental scale. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5111-5120.
38. 2 nanoparticles on soybean (Glycine max) plants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 44:7315-7320.
39. Lozupone C, Lladser ME, Knights D, Stombaugh J, Knight R. 2011. UniFrac: an effective distance metric for microbial community comparison. ISME J. 5:169-172.
40. Nel A, Xia T, Madler L, Li N. 2006. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. Science 311:622-627.
41. Nishiyama M, Senoo K, Wada H, Matsumoto S. 1992. Identification of soil micro-habitats for growth, death and survival of a bacterium, gamma;-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexachlorocyclohexane-assimilating Sphingomonas paucimobilis, by fractionation of soil. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 10:145-150.
42. Pelletier DA, et al. 2010. Effects of engineered cerium oxide nanoparticles on bacterial growth and viability. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76:7981-7989.
43. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2: approximately maximum-likelihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5:e9490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009490.
44. Priester JH, et al. 2009. Effects of soluble cadmium salts versus CdSe quantum dots on the growth of planktonic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:2589-2594.
45. Rao MB, Tanksale AM, Ghatge MS, Deshpande VV. 1998. Molecular and biotechnological aspects of microbial proteases. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:597-635.
46. 2 production as a basis for exposure assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43:4227-4233.
47. Rousk J, et al. 2010. Soil bacterial and fungal communities across a pH gradient in an arable soil. ISME J. 4:1340-1351.
48. Schimel JP, Bennett J. 2004. Nitrogen mineralization: challenges of a changing paradigm. Ecology 85:591-602.
49. Shoults-Wilson WA, et al. 2011. Role of particle size and soil type in toxicity of silver nanoparticles to earthworms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 75:365-377.
50. Tong Z, Bischoff M, Nies L, Applegate B, Turco RF. 2007. Impact of fullerene (C60) on a soil microbial community. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:2985-2991.
51. Wang S, et al. 2009. Nanoparticles affect the survival of bacteria on leaf surfaces. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 68:182-191.
52. Werlin R, et al. 2011. Biomagnification of cadmium selenide quantum dots in a simple experimental microbial food chain. Nat. Nanotechnol. 6:65-71.
53. White DC, Sutton SD, Ringelberg DB. 1996. The genus Sphingomonas: physiology and ecology. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 7:301-306.
54. Xiang S-R, Doyle A, Holden PA, Schimel JP. 2008. Drying and rewetting effects on C and N mineralization and microbial activity in surface and subsurface California grassland soils. Soil Biol. Biochem. 40:2281-2289.
55. Zhang L, Jiang Y, Ding Y, Povey M, York D. 2007. Investigation into the antibacterial behaviour of suspensions of ZnO nanoparticles (ZnO nanofluids). J. Nanopart. Res. 9:479-489.
56. Zheng X, Chen Y, Wu R. 2011. Long-term effects of titanium dioxide nanoparticles on nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewater and bacterial community shift in activated sludge. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45:7284-7290.
57. Zhou J, et al. 2011. Reproducibility and quantitation of amplicon sequencing-based detection. ISME J. 5:1303-1313.