Effect of metal oxide nanoparticles on microbial community structure and function in two different soil types

PLoS ONE

Volumn 8, Issue 12, 2013, Pages

  Frenk, Sammy ^a,c   Ben Moshe, Tal ^b   Dror, Ishai ^b   Berkowitz, Brian ^b   Minz, Dror ^a  

^a VOLCANI CENTER   (Israel)

^b WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE   (Israel)

^c HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COPPER OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLE; METAL OXIDE NANOPARTICLE; NANOPARTICLE; ORGANIC MATTER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; HYDROLYSIS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; NONHUMAN; OXIDATION REDUCTION POTENTIAL; PARTICLE SIZE; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; RHIZOBIALES; SANDY CLAY LOAM; SANDY LOAM; SOIL; SOIL ANALYSIS; SOIL MICROFLORA; SOIL POLLUTION; SOIL TEXTURE; SPECIES COMPOSITION; SPHINGOBACTERIACEAE;

COPPER; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; MAGNETITE NANOPARTICLES; MICROBIAL CONSORTIA; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; RHIZOBIACEAE; SOIL; SOIL MICROBIOLOGY; SPHINGOBACTERIUM;

EID: 84892514243     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084441     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Rietmeijer FJM, Mackinnon IDR (1997) Bismuth oxide nanoparticles in the stratosphere. J Geophysic Res 102: 6621-6627. doi: 10.1029/96JE03989.
2. Obernosterer I, Catala P, Reinthaler T, Herndl GJ, Lebaron P (2005) Enhanced heterotrophic activity in the surface microlayer of the Mediterranean Sea. Aquat Microb Ecol 39: 293-302. doi:10.3354/ame039293.
3. Lead JR, Wilkinson KJ (2006) Aquatic colloids and nanoparticles: current knowledge and future trends. Environ Chem 3: 159-171. doi: 10.1071/EN06025. Available online at: . doi:10.1071/EN06025
4. Wilson MA, Tran NH, Milev AS, Kannangara G, Volk H et al. (2008) Nanomaterials in soils. Geoderma 146: 291-302. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2008.06. 004.
5. Reid BJ, Jones KC, Semple KT (2000) Bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soils and sediments - a perspective on mechanisms, consequences and assessment. Environ Pollut 108: 103-112. doi:10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00206-7. PubMed: 15092971.
6. Handy RD, Von Der Kammer F, Lead JR, Hassellöv M, Owen R et al. (2008) The ecotoxicology and chemistry of manufactured nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 17: 287-314.
7. Perugini P, Simeoni S, Scalia S, Genta I, Modena T et al. (2002) Effect of nanoparticle encapsulation on the photostability of the sunscreen agent, 2-ethylhexyl- p-methoxycinnamate. Int J Pharm 246: 37-45. doi: 10.1016/S0378-5173(02)00356-3. PubMed: 12270607.
8. Kaegi R, Ulrich A, Sinnet B, Vonbank R, Wichser A et al. (2008) Synthetic TiO2 nanoparticle emission from exterior facades into the aquatic environment. Environ Pollut 156: 233-239. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2008.08.004. PubMed: 18824285.
9. Luechinger NA, Athanassiou EK, Stark WJ (2008) Graphene-stabilized copper nanoparticles as an air-stable substitute for silver and gold in low-cost ink-jet printable electronics. Nanotechnology 19: 445201. doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/19/44/445201. PubMed: 21832722.
10. Kiser MA, Westerhoff P, Benn T, Wang Y, Pérez-Rivera J et al. (2009) Titanium nanomaterial removal and release from wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 43: 6757-6763. doi:10.1021/es901102n. PubMed: 19764246.
11. Musee N (2011) Nanowastes and the environment: Potential new waste management paradigm. Environ Int 37: 112-128.
12. Klaine SJ, Alvarez PJJ, Batley GE, Fernandes TF, Handy RD et al. (2008) Nanomaterials in the environment: behavior, fate, bioavailability, and effects. Environ Toxicol Chem 27: 1825-1851. doi: 10.1897/08-090.1. PubMed: 19086204.
13. Qafoku NP (2010) Terrestrial nanoparticles and their controls on soil-/geo-processes and reactions. Adv Agron 107: 33-91. doi:10.1016/S0065- 2113(10)07002-1.
14. Peralta-Videa JR, Zhao L, Lopez-Moreno ML, De La Rosa G, Hong J et al. (2011) Nanomaterials and the environment: a review for the biennium 2008-2010. J Hazard Mater 186: 1-15. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.11.020. PubMed: 21134718.
15. Brar SK, Verma M, Tyagi R, Surampalli R (2010) Engineered nanoparticles in wastewater and wastewater sludge-Evidence and impacts. Waste Manage 30: 504-520. doi:10.1016/j.wasman. 2009.10.012.
16. Sagee O, Dror I, Berkowitz B (2012) Transport of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) in soil. Chemosphere 88: 670-675. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.03.055. PubMed: 22516207.
17. Ben-Moshe T, Frenk S, Dror I, Minz D, Berkowitz B (2013) Effects of metal oxide nanoparticles on soil properties. Chemosphere 90: 640-646. PubMed: 23040650.
18. Prosser JI, Bohannan BJM, Curtis TP, Ellis RJ, Firestone MK et al. (2007) The role of ecological theory in microbial ecology. Nat Rev Microbiol 5: 384-392. doi:10.1038/nrmicro1643. PubMed: 17435792.
19. Doran JW, Zeiss MR (2000) Soil health and sustainability: managing the biotic component of soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 15: 3-11. doi: 10.1016/S0929-1393(00)00067-6.
20. Warheit DB, Hoke RA, Finlay C, Donner EM, Reed KL et al. (2007) Development of a base set of toxicity tests using ultrafine TiO2 particles as a component of nanoparticle risk management. Toxicol Lett 171: 99-110. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2007.04.008. PubMed: 17566673.
21. Zhu X, Zhu L, Duan Z, Qi R, Li Y et al. (2008) Comparative toxicity of several metal oxide nanoparticle aqueous suspensions to Zebrafish (Danio rerio) early developmental stage. J Environ Sci Heal 43: 278-284. PubMed: 18205059.
22. Hund-Rinke K, Simon M (2006) Ecotoxic effect of photocatalytic active nanoparticles (TiO2) on algae and daphnids. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 13: 225-232. doi:10.1065/espr2006.06.311. PubMed: 16910119.
23. Heinlaan M, Ivask A, Blinova I, Dubourguier H-C, Kahru A (2008) Toxicity of nanosized and bulk ZnO, CuO and TiO2 to bacteria Vibrio fischeri and crustaceans Daphnia magna and Thamnocephalus platyurus. Chemosphere 71: 1308-1316. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.11.047. PubMed: 18194809.
24. Lovern SB, Strickler JR, Klaper R (2007) Behavioral and physiological changes in Daphnia magna when exposed to nanoparticle suspensions (titanium dioxide, nano-C60, and C60HxC70Hx). Environ Sci Technol 41: 4465-4470. doi:10.1021/es062146p. PubMed: 17626453.
25. 2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res 40: 3527-3532. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.004. PubMed: 17011015.
26. Pradhan A, Seena S, Pascoal C, Cássio F (2011) Can metal nanoparticles be a threat to microbial decomposers of plant litter in streams? Microb Ecol 62: 1-11. doi:10.1007/s00248-011-9810-2. PubMed: 21553058.
27. Ge Y, Schimel JP, Holden PA (2012) Identification of soil bacteria susceptible to TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles. Appl Environ Microbiol 78: 6749-6758. doi:10.1128/AEM.00941-12. PubMed: 22798374.
28. Kumar N, Shah V, Walker VK (2011) Perturbation of an arctic soil microbial community by metal nanoparticles. J Hazard Mater 190: 816-822. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.04.005. PubMed: 21546158.
29. Shah V, Belozerova I (2009) Influence of metal nanoparticles on the soil microbial community and germination of lettuce seeds. Water Air Soil Pollution 197: 143-148. doi:10.1007/s11270-008-9797-6.
30. Collins D, Luxton T, Kumar N, Shah S, Walker VK et al. (2012) Assessing the impact of copper and zinc oxide nanoparticles on soil: A field study. PLOS ONE 7: e42663. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0042663. PubMed: 22905159.
31. Rousk J, Ackermann K, Curling SF, Jones DL (2012) Comparative toxicity of nanoparticulate CuO and ZnO to soil bacterial communities. PLOS ONE 7: e34197. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0034197. PubMed: 22479561.
32. He S, Feng Y, Ren H, Zhang Y, Gu N et al. (2011) The impact of iron oxide magnetic nanoparticles on the soil bacterial community. J Soils Sediments: 1-10.
33. Oehlinger R (1995) Methods in Soil Microbiology. In: F SchinnerR OehlingerE KandelerR Margesin. Berlin. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. pp. 95-98.
34. Casida L Jr, Klein D, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98: 371-377. doi:10.1097/00010694-196412000-00004.
35. Schnürer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl Environ Microbiol 43: 1256-1261. PubMed: 16346026.
36. Inbar E, Green SJ, Hadar Y, Minz D (2005) Competing factors of compost concentration and proximity to root affect the distribution of streptomycetes. Microb Ecol 50: 73-81. doi:10.1007/s00248-004-0111-x. PubMed: 16052380.
37. Boyle JS, Lew AM (1995) An inexpensive alternative to glassmilk for DNA purification. Trends Genet 11: 8. doi:10.1016/S0168-9525(00)88977-5. PubMed: 7900196.
38. Dowd SE, Wolcott RD, Sun Y, McKeehan T, Smith E et al. (2008) Polymicrobial Nature of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcer Biofilm Infections Determined Using Bacterial Tag Encoded FLX Amplicon Pyrosequencing (bTEFAP). PLOS ONE 3: e3326. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003326. PubMed: 18833331.
39. Ofek M, Hadar Y, Minz D (2009) Comparison of effects of compost amendment and of single-strain inoculation on root bacterial communities of young cucumber seedlings. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 6441-6450. doi:10.1128/AEM.00736- 09. PubMed: 19700550.
40. Muyzer G, Hottenträger S, Teske A, Wawer C (1996) Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR-amplified 16S rDNA - a new molecular approach to analyse the genetic diversity of mixed microbial communities. Mol Microb Ecol Manual 3: 1-23.
41. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M et al. (2009) Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 7537-7541. doi:10.1128/AEM.01541-09. PubMed: 19801464.
42. Schloss PD, Gevers D, Westcott SL (2011) Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies. PLOS ONE 6: e27310.
43. Good IJ (1953) The population frequencies of species and the estimation of population parameters. Biometrika 40: 237-264. doi: 10.2307/2333344.
44. Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R (2010) Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J 4: 17-27. PubMed: 19710709.
45. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM (1992) Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491. PubMed: 1644282.
46. White JR, Nagarajan N, Pop M (2009) Statistical methods for detecting differentially abundant features in clinical metagenomic samples. PLoS Comput Biol 5: e1000352. PubMed: 19360128.
47. Akafia MM, Reich TJ, Koretsky CM (2011) Assessing Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, and Pb Sorption on montmorillonite using surface complexation models. Appl Geochem 26 (Suppl.): S154-S157. doi:10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.091.
48. Griffiths B, Kuan H, Ritz K, Glover L, McCaig A et al. (2004) The relationship between microbial community structure and functional stability, tested experimentally in an upland pasture soil. Microbial Ecol 47: 104-113. doi:10.1007/s00248-002-2043-7.
49. Deng H, Li XF, Cheng WD, Zhu YG (2009) Resistance and resilience of Cu-polluted soil after Cu perturbation, tested by a wide range of soil microbial parameters. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 70: 293-304. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009. 00741.x. PubMed: 19663920.
50. Desai C, Jain K, Madamwar D (2008) Evaluation of In vitro Cr (VI) reduction potential in cytosolic extracts of three indigenous Bacillus sp. isolated from Cr (VI) polluted industrial landfill. Bioresource Technol 99: 6059-6069. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.12.046.
51. Andreazza R, Pieniz S, Okeke BC, Camargo FA (2011) Evaluation of copper resistant bacteria from vineyard soils and mining waste for copper biosorption. Braz J Microbiol 42: 66-74. doi:10.1590/S1517-83822011000100009. PubMed: 24031606.
52. Jiang C, Sun H, Sun T, Zhang Q, Zhang Y (2009) Immobilization of cadmium in soils by UV-mutated Bacillus subtilis 38 bioaugmentation and NovoGro amendment. J Hazard Mater 167: 1170-1177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.01.107. PubMed: 19272704.
53. Solioz M, Abicht HK, Mermod M, Mancini S (2010) Response of Grampositive bacteria to copper stress. J Biol Inorg Chem 15: 3-14. doi: 10.1007/s00775-009- 0588-3. PubMed: 19774401.
54. Gremion F, Chatzinotas A, Harms H (2003) Comparative 16S rDNA and 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicates that Actinobacteria might be a dominant part of the metabolically active bacteria in heavy metal-contaminated bulk and rhizosphere soil. Environ Microbiol 5: 896-907. doi:10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003. 00484.x. PubMed: 14510843.
55. Inglett KS, Bae HS, Aldrich H, Hatfield K, Ogram A (2011) Clostridium chromiireducens sp. nov., isolated from Cr (VI)-contaminated soil. Int J Syst and Evol Micr 61: 2626-2631. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.024554-0.
56. Lin H, Shi J, Chen X, Yang J, Chen Y et al. (2010) Effects of lead upon the actions of sulfate-reducing bacteria in the rice rhizosphere. Soil Biol Biochem 42: 1038-1044. doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.023.
57. Sakaguchi T, Burgess JG, Matsunaga T (1993) Magnetite formation by a sulphate-reducing bacterium. Nature 365: 47-49. doi: 10.1038/365047a0.
58. Bharde A, Wani A, Shouche Y, Joy PA, Prasad BL et al. (2005) Bacterial aerobic synthesis of nanocrystalline magnetite. J Am Chem Soc 127: 9326-9327. doi:10.1021/ja0508469. PubMed: 15984833.
59. Trevors J (1996) Sterilization and inhibition of microbial activity in soil. J Microbiol Methods 26: 53-59. doi:10.1016/0167-7012(96)00843-3.
60. Wolf D, Scott H, Dao T, Lavy T (1989) Influence of sterilization methods on selected soil microbiological, physical, and chemical properties. J Environ Qual 18: 39-44. doi:10.2134/jeq1989.00472425001800010007x.