Opposite rheological properties of neuronal microcompartments predict axonal vulnerability in brain injury

Scientific Reports

Volumn 5, Issue , 2015, Pages

  Grevesse, Thomas ^a   Dabiri, Borna E ^b   Parker, Kevin Kit ^b   Gabriele, Sylvain ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONS   (Belgium)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; AXON; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN INJURY; FLOW KINETICS; METABOLISM; NERVE CELL; NEURITE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

ANIMALS; AXONS; BRAIN INJURIES; CEREBRAL CORTEX; NEURITES; NEURONS; RATS; RHEOLOGY;

EID: 84926321405     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep09475     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Parker, K. K. et al. Directionnal control of lamellipodia extension by constraining cell shape and orienting cell tractional forces. FASEB J. 16, 1195-204 (2002).
2. Olson, E. N. & Nordheim, A. Linking acin dynamics and gene transcription to drive cellular motile functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11, 353-365 (2010).
3. Nakahari, T. Regulation of ciliary beat frequency in airways: shear stress, ATP action, and its modulation. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 292, 612-613 (2007).
4. Adams, J. H. et al . Diffuse axonal injury in head injuries caused by a fall. Lancet 2, 1420-1422 (1984).
5. Smith, D. H., Meaney, D. F. & Shull, W. H. Diffuse axonal injury in head trauma. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 18, 307-316 (2003).
6. Johnson, V. E., Stewart, W. & Smith, D. H. Axonal pathology in traumatic brain injury. Exp. Neurol. 246, 35-43 (2012).
7. Wang, J. T., Medress, Z. A. & Barres, B. A. Axon degeneration: Molecular mechanisms of a self-destruction pathway. J. Cell Biol. 196, 7-18 (2012).
8. Kilinc, D., Gallo, G. & Barbee, K. A. Mechanically-induced membrane poration causes axonal beading and localized cytoskeletal damage. Exp. Neurol. 212, 422-430 (2008).
9. Maniotis, A., Chen, C. S. & Ingber, D. E. Demonstration of mechanical connections between integrins, cytoskeletal filaments, and nucleoplasm that stabilize nuclear structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94, 849-854 (1997).
10. Hemphill, M. A. et al. A possible role for integrin in diffuse axonal injury. PLoS ONE 6, e22899 (2011).
11. Gallyas, F., Zoltay, G. & Balás, I. An immediate light microscopic response of neuronal somata, dendrites and axons to contusing concussive head injury in the rat. Acta Neuropathol. 83, 394-401 (1992).
12. Clarck, R. S. B. et al. Detection of single- and double-strand DNA breaks after traumatic brain injury in rat: comparison of labeling techniques using DNA polymerase I, the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I, and terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase. J Neurotrauma 18, 675-689 (2001).
13. Bausch, A. R., Ziemann, F., Boulbitch, A. A., Jacobson, K. & Sackmann, E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surface by magnetic bead microrheology. Biophys. J. 75, 2038-2049 (1998).
14. Desprat, N., Richert, A., Simeon, J. & Asnacios, A. Creep function of a single living cell. Biophys. J. 88, 2224-2233 (2005).
15. Kollmannsberger, P. & Fabry, B. Linear and Nonlinear Rheology of Living Cells. Annu Rev. Mater. Res. 41, 75-97 (2011).
16. Fabry, B. et al. Scaling the microrheology of living cells. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 148102 (2001).
17. Hoffman, B. D., Massiera, G., Van Citters, K. M. & Crocker, J. C. The consensus mechanics of cultured mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 10259-64 (2006).
18. Clegg, D. O., Wingerd, K. L., Hikita, S. T. & Tolhurst, E. C. Integrins in the development, function and dysfunction of the nervous system. Front. Biosci. 8, d723-50 (2003).
19. Milner, R. & Campbell, I. L. The integrin family of cell adhesion molecules has multiple functions within the CNS. J. Neurosci. Res. 69, 286-91 (2002).
20. Salgin, S., Salgin, U. & Bahadir, S. Zeta Potentials and Isoelectric Points of Biomolecules: The Effects of Ion Types and Ionic Strengths. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 7, 12404-14 (2012).
21. Bernal, R., Pullarkat, P. A. & Melo, F. Mechanical properties of axons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 018301 (2007).
22. Granek, R. From semi-flexible polymers to membranes: anomalous diffusion and reptation. J. Phys. II 7, 1761-1788 (1997).
23. Fletcher, D. A. & Mullin, R. D. Cell mechanics and the cytoskeleton. Nature 463, 485-492 (2010).
24. Pullarkat, P. A., Fernandez, P. A. & Ott, A. Rheological properties of the eukaryotic cell cytoskeleton. Phys. Rep. 449, 29-53 (2007).
25. Tang-Schomer, M. D., Patel, A. R., Baas, P. W. & Smith, D. H. Mechanical breaking of microtubules in axons during dynamic stretch injury underlies delayed elasticity, microtubule disassembly, and axon degeneration. FASEB J. 24, 1401-1410 (2010).
26. LaPlaca, M. C. & Prado, G. R. Neural mechanobiology and neuronal vulnerability to traumatic loading. J. Biomech. 43, 71-78 (2010).
27. Sollich, P. Rheological constitutive equation for a model of soft glassy materials. Phys. Rev. E 58, 738-59 (1998).
28. Rotsch, C. & Radmacher, M. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 78, 520-535 (2000).
29. Perrot, R. & Eyer, J. Neuronal intermediate filaments and neurodegenerative disorders. Brain Res. Bull 80, 282-95 (2009).
30. Zmuda, F. & Rivas, R. J. Actin disruption alters the localization of tau in the growth cones of cerebellar granule neurons. J. Cell. Sci. 113, 2797-809 (2000).
31. Dahl, K. N., Engler, A. J., Pajerowski, J. D. & Discher, D. E. Power-law rheology of isolated nuclei with deformation mapping of nuclear substructures. Biophys. J. 89, 2855-2864 (2005).
32. Versaevel, M., Grevesse, T. & Gabriele, S. Spatial coordination between cell and nuclear shape within micropatterned endothelial cells. Nat. Commun. 3, 671 (2012).
33. Wong, P. C. et al . Increasing neurofilaments subunit NF-M expression reduces axonal NF-H, inhibits radial growth and results in neurofilaments accumulation in motor neurons. J. Cell Biol. 130, 1413-1422 (1995).
34. Xu, K., Zhong, G. & Zhuang, X. Actin, Spectrin, and Associated Proteins Form a Periodic Cytoskeletal Structure in Axons. Science 339, 452-456 (2013).
35. Gittes, F., Mickey, B., Nettleton, J. & Howard, J. Flexural rigidity of microtubules and actin filaments measured from thermal fluctuations in shape. J. Cell Biol. 120, 923-934 (1993).
36. Drake, P. F. & Lasek, R. J. Regional differences in the neuronal cytoskeleton. J. Neurosci. 4, 1173-1186 (1984).
37. Peng, I., Binder, L. I. & Black, M. M. Biochemical and immunological analyses of cytoskeletal domains of neurons. J. Cell Biol. 102, 252-262 (1986).
38. Brown, A. & Lasek, J. L. Studying the cytoskeleton of the squid giant axon. Squid as experimental animals, Plenum Publishing Corporation, N.Y. 235-302 (1990).
39. Leach, J. B., Brown, X. Q., Jacot, J. G., DiMilla, P. A. & Wong, J. Y. Neurite outgrowth and branching of PC12 cells on very soft substrates sharply decreases below a threshold of substrate rigidity. J. Neural Eng. 4, 26-34 (2007).
40. Lin, Y. W., Cheng, C. M., LeDuc, P. R. & Chen, C. C. Understanding sensory nerve mechanotransduction through localized elastomeric matrix control. PLoS ONE 4, e4293 (2009).
41. Franze, K. & Guck, J. The biophysics of neuronal growth. Rep. Prog. Phys. 73, 094601 (2010).
42. Franze, K., Janmey, P. A. & Guck, J. Mechanics in Neuronal Development and Repair. Annu Rev. Biomed. Eng. 15, 227-51 (2013).
43. Corr, D. T., Gallant-Behm, C. L., Shrive, N. G. & Hart, D. A. Biomechanical behavior of scar tissue and uninjured skin in a porcine model. Wound Repair Regen. 17, 250-259 (2009).
44. Chesnut, R. M. et al. A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. N. Engl. J. Med. 367, 2471-2481 (2012).
45. Riek, K. et al. Magnetic resonance elastography reveals altered brain viscoelasticity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. NeuroImage 1, 81-90 (2012).
46. Grevesse, T., Versaevel, M., Riaz, M. & Gabriele, S. Micropatterning hydroxy-PAAm hydrogels and Sylgard 184 silicone elastomers with tunable elastic moduli. Methods Cell Biol. 121, 33-48 (2014).
47. Trappmann, B. et al. Extracellular-matrix tethering regulates stem-cell fate. Nat. Mater. 11, 642-649 (2012).
48. Wen, J. H. et al. Interplay of matrix stiffness and protein tethering in stem cell differentiation. Nat. Mater. 13, 979-987 (2014).
49. Jiang, X. et al. Cell growth in response to mechanical stiffness is affected by neuron-astroglia interactions. Open Neurosci. J. 1, 7-14 (2007).
50. Yeung, T. et al. Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 60, 24-34 (2005).
51. Engler, A. et al. Substrate compliance versus ligand density in cell on gel responses. Biophys. J. 86, 317-628 (2004).
52. Grevesse, T., Versaevel, M., Circelli, G., Desprez, S. & Gabriele, S. A simple route to functionalize polyacrylamide gels for the independent tuning of mechanotransduction cues. Lab Chip 13, 777-780 (2013).
53. Solon, J., Levental, I., Sengupta, K., Georges, P. C. & Janmey, P. A. Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys. J. 93, 4453-4461 (2007).
54. Stoica, B. A. & Faden, A. I. Cell death mechanisms and modulation in traumatic brain injury. Neurotherapeutics 7, 3-12 (2010).
55. Versaevel, M., Riaz, M., Grevesse, T. & Gabriele, S. Cell confinement: putting the squeeze on the nucleus. Soft Matter 9, 6665-6676 (2013).
56. Benzina, O. et al. Changes induced by peripheral nerve injury in the morphology and nanomechanics of sensory neurons. J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 106014 (2013).
57. Jiang, X. J., Lin, D. C., Horkay, F. & Langrana, N. A. Probing mechanical adaptation of neurite outgrowth on a hydrogel material using atomic force microscopy. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 39, 706 (2011).
58. Stabenfeldt, S. E. & LaPlaca, M. C. Variations in rigidity and ligand density influence neuronal response in methylcellulose-laminin hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 7, 4102-8 (2011).
59. Iwashita, M., Kataoka, N., Toida, K. & Kosodo, Y. Systematic profiling of spatiotemporal tissue and cellular stiffness in the developing brain. Development 141, 3793 (2014).
60. Lu, Y.-B. et al. Viscoelastic properties of individual glial cells and neurons in the CNS. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 17759-17764 (2006).
61. Kovács, M., Tóth, J., Hetényi, C., Málnási-Csizmadia, A. & Sellers, J. R. Mechanism of blebbistatin inhibition of myosin II. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 35557-63 (2004).
62. Weinger, J. S., Qiu, M., Yang, G. & Kapoor, T. M. A nonmotor microtubule binding site in kinesin-5 is required for filament crosslinking and sliding. Curr. Biol. 21, 154-60 (2011).
63. Bouchard, P., Penningroth, S. M., Cheung, A., Gagnon, C. & Bardin, C. W. Erythro-9- [3-(2-Hydroxynonyl)]adenine is an inhibitor of sperm motility that blocks dynein ATPase and protein carboxylmethylase activities. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78, 1033-6 (1981).
64. Heijink, E., Bolhuis, P. A. & De Wolff, F. A. Sensitivity to 2,5-hexanedione of neurofilaments in neuroblastoma cell line SK-N-SH increases during differentiation. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 54, 82-90 (1995).