Radiographic outcome of limb-based versus knee-based patient specific guides in total knee arthroplasty

Knee

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1244-1249

  Crane, Catherine ^a   Marimuthu, Kanniraj ^b   Chen, Darren B ^a,b   Harris, Ian A ^c   Wheatley, Emma ^b   MacDessi, Samuel J ^a,b  

^a The Canterbury Hospital   (Australia)

^b St George Private Hospital   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alignment; CT Perth protocol; Knee arthroplasty; Patient specific guides; Radiographic outcomes

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMORAL CORONAL ANGLE; FEMORAL ROTATION ANGLE; FEMORAL SAGITTAL ANGLE; HIP KNEE ANKLE ANGLE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KNEE RADIOGRAPHY; LIMB RADIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MEASUREMENT PRECISION; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; TIBIAL CORONAL ANGLE; TIBIAL SAGITTAL ANGLE; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; VALGUS DEFORMITY; VARUS DEFORMITY; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMUR; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; METHODS; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; BONE MALALIGNMENT; FEMUR; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE; KNEE JOINT; KNEE PROSTHESIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; TIBIA; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84926136483     PISSN: 09680160     EISSN: 18735800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.013     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chauhan S.K., Clark G.W., Lloyd S., Scott R.G., Breidahl W., Sikorski J.M. Computer-assisted total knee replacement. A controlled cadaver study using a multi-parameter quantitative CT assessment of alignment (the Perth CT Protocol). J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:818-823.
2. Lombardi A.V., Berend K.R., Ng V.Y. Neutral mechanical alignment: a requirement for successful TKA: affirms. Orthopedics 2011, 34(9):e504-e506. [PubMed PMID: 21902145]. 10.3928/01477447-20110714-40.
3. Eckhoff D.G., Bach J.M., Spitzer V.M., Reinig K.D., Bagur M.M., Baldini T.H., et al. Three-dimensional mechanics, kinematics, and morphology of the knee viewed in virtual reality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(Suppl. 2):S71-S80.
4. Fang D.M., Ritter M.A., Davis K.E. Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24(6 Suppl.):S39-S43.
5. Kumar P.J., Dorr L.D. Severe malalignment and soft-tissue imbalance in total knee arthroplasty. Am J Knee Surg 1997, 10:36-41.
6. Blakeney W.G., Khan R.J.K., Wall S.J. Computer-assisted techniques versus conventional guides for component alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:1377-1384.
7. Lombardi A.V., Frye B.M. Customization of cutting blocks: can this address the problem?. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2012, 5:309-314.
8. Barrett W., Hoeffel D., Dalury D., Mason J.B., Murphy J., Himden S. In-vivo alignment comparing patient specific instrumentation with both conventional and computer assisted surgery (CAS) instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:343-347.
9. Tibesku C.O., Innocenti B., Wong P., Salehi A., Labey L. Can CT-based patient-matched instrumentation achieve consistent rotational alignment in knee arthroplasty?. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2012, 132:171-177.
10. Lonner J.H., Laird M.T., Stuchin S.A. Effect of rotation and knee flexion on radiographic alignment in total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, 331:102-106.
11. Nunley R.M., Ellison B.S., Zhu J., Ruh E.L., Howell S.M., Barrack R.L. Do patient specific-guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop 2012, 470:895-902.
12. Hauschild O., Muenzberg M., Knothe D., Konstantinidis L., Helwig P., Sudkamp N.P., et al. Rotational limb alignment changes following total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2346-2354. 10.1007/s00167-012-2322-x.
13. Krishnan S.P., Dawood A., Richards R., Henckel J., Hart A.J. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012, 94:1457-1461.
14. Longstaff L.M., Sloan K., Stamp N., et al. Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:570-578.
15. White D., Chelule K.L., Seedhom B.B. Accuracy of MRI vs CT imaging with particular reference to patient specific templates for total knee replacement surgery. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 2008, 4:224-231.
16. Bali K., Walker P., Bruce W. Custom-fit total knee arthroplasty: our initial experience in 32 knees. J Arthroplasty 2012, 27:1149-1154.
17. Conteduca F., Iorio R., Mazza D., Caperna L., Bolle G., Argento G., et al. Are MRI-based, patient matched cutting jigs as accurate as the tibial guides?. Int Orthop 2012, 36:1589-1593.
18. Lustig S., Scholes C.J., Oussedik S.I., Kinzel V., Coolican M.R.J., Parker D.A. Unsatisfactory accuracy as determined by computer navigation of Visionaire patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28:469-473.
19. Vundelinckx B.J., Bruckers L., De Mulder K., De Schepper J., Van Esbroeck G. Functional and radiographic short-term outcome evaluation of the Visionaire system, a patient-matched instrumentation system for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28:964-970.
20. Parratte S., Blanc G., Boussemart T., Ollivier M., Le Corroller T., Argenson J.-N. Rotation in total knee arthroplasty: no difference between patient-specific and conventional instrumentation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2213-2219.
21. Ng V.Y., DeClaire J.H., Berend K.R., Gulick B.C., Lombardi A.V. Improved accuracy of alignment with patient-specific positioning guides compared with manual instrumentation in TKA. Clin Orthop 2012, 470:99-107.
22. Boonen B., Schotanus M.G.M., Kerens B., van der Weegen W., van Drumpt R.A.M., Kort N.P. Intra-operative results and radiological outcome of conventional and patient-specific surgery in total knee arthroplasty: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013, 21:2206-2212.
23. Roh Y.W., Kim T.W., Lee S., Seong S.C., Lee M.C. Is TKA using patient-specific instruments comparable to conventional TKA? A randomized controlled study of one system. Clin Orthop 2013, 471:3988-3995.
24. Hamilton W.G., Parks N.L., Saxena A. Patient-specific instrumentation does not shorten surgical time: a prospective, randomized trial. J Arthroplasty 2013, 28(8 Suppl.):S96-S100.
25. Victor J., Dujardin J., Vandenneucker H., Arnout N., Bellemans J. Patient-specific guides do not improve accuracy in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop 2014, 472:263-271. [PubMed PMID: 23616267; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC388946]. 10.1007/s11999-013-2997-4.
26. Ensini A., Timoncini A., Cenni F., Belvedere C., Fusai F., Leardini A., et al. Intra- and post-operative accuracy assessments of two different patient-specific instrumentation systems for total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014, 22:621-629. [PubMed PMID: 24061719. Epub 2013 Sep 24]. 10.1007/s00167-013-2667-9.