Modelling response selection in task switching: Testing the contingent encoding assumption

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 1074-1095

  Schneider, Darryl W ^a,b   Logan, Gordon D ^b  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive modelling; Response congruency; Response selection; Stimulus order; Task switching

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME; RECALL; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; STUDENTS; UNIVERSITIES;

EID: 84901390237     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2013.843009     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Altmann, E. M., & Gray, W. D. (2008). An integrated model of cognitive control in task switching. Psychological Review, 115, 602-639. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.115.3.602
2. Anderson, J. R. (2007). How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Anderson, J. R., & Lebiere, C. (1998). The atomic components of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Arrington, C. M., Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2007). Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 484-502.
5. Bernstein, I. H., & Segal, E. M. (1968). Set and temporal integration. Perception & Psychophysics, 4, 233-236. doi: 10.3758/BF03206308
6. Biederman, I. (1973). Mental set and mental arithmetic. Memory & Cognition, 1, 383-386. doi: 10.3758/BF03198124
7. Brown, J. W., Reynolds, J. R., & Braver, T. S. (2007). A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching. Cognitive Psychology, 55, 37-85. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.005
8. Davis, R., & Taylor, D. H. (1967). Classification on the basis of conditional cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 19, 30-36. doi: 10.1080/14640746708400064
9. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2006). Implicit task sets in task switching? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1221-1233.
10. Dreisbach, G., Goschke, T., & Haider, H. (2007). The role of task rules and stimulus-response mappings in the task switching paradigm. Psychological Research, 71, 383-392. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0041-3
11. Gilbert, S. J., & Shallice, T. (2002). Task switching: A PDP model. Cognitive Psychology, 44, 297-337. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0770
12. Kantowitz, B. H., & Sanders, M. S. (1972). Partial advance information and stimulus dimensionality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 92, 412-418. doi: 10.1037/h0032359
13. Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching-A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 849-874. doi: 10.1037/a0019842
14. Kiesel, A., Wendt, M., & Peters, A. (2007). Task switching: On the origin of response congruency effects. Psychological Research, 71, 117-125. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0004-8
15. LeMay, R. P., & Simon, J. R. (1969). Temporal and symbolic S-R compatibility in a sequential information-processing task. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 558-560. doi: 10.1037/h0027447
16. Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95, 492-527. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.95.4.492
17. Logan, G. D. (2002). An instance theory of attention and memory. Psychological Review, 109, 376-400. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.109.2.376
18. Logan, G. D. (2004). Cumulative progress in formal theories of attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 207-234. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141415
19. Logan, G. D., & Bundesen, C. (2003). Clever homunculus: Is there an endogenous act of control in the explicit task-cuing procedure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 575-599.
20. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2006). Priming or executive control? Associative priming of cue encoding increases "switch costs" in the explicit task-cuing procedure. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1250-1259. doi: 10.3758/BF03193269
21. Logan, G. D., & Schneider, D. W. (2010). Distinguishing reconfiguration and compound-cue retrieval in task switching. Psychologica Belgica, 50, 413-433. doi: 10.5334/pb-50-3-4-413
22. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2003). Differential effects of cue changes and task changes on task-set selection costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 362-372.
23. Meiran, N. (2005). Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 1023-1041. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000421
24. Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211-253. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0736
25. Meiran, N., & Kessler, Y. (2008). The task rule congruency effect in task switching reflects activated long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 137-157.
26. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342. doi: 10.3758/BF03194391
27. Newell, A. (1990). Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
28. Nosofsky, R. M., & Alfonso-Reese, L. A. (1999). Effects of similarity and practice on speeded classification response times and accuracies: Further tests of an exemplar-retrieval model. Memory & Cognition, 27, 78-93. doi: 10.3758/BF03201215
29. Nosofsky, R. M., & Palmeri, T. J. (1997). An exemplar-based random walk model of speeded classification. Psychological Review, 104, 266-300. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.266
30. Ratcliff, R. (1980). A note on modeling accumulation of information when the rate of accumulation changes over time. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 21, 178-184. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(80)90006-1
31. Ratcliff, R. (2001). Diffusion and random walk processes. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (Vol. 6, pp. 3668-3673). Oxford: Elsevier.
32. Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 288-311. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.126.3.288
33. Ruge, H., Braver, T., & Meiran, N. (2009). Attention, intention, and strategy in preparatory control. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1670-1685. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.004
34. Schneider, D. W., & Anderson, J. R. (2011). A memory-based model of Hick's law. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 193-222. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.11.001
35. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2005). Modeling task switching without switching tasks: A short-term priming account of explicitly cued performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 343-367. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.343
36. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2006). Priming cue encoding by manipulating transition frequency in explicitly cued task switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 145-151. doi: 10.3758/BF03193826
37. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2009). Selecting a response in task switching: Testing a model of compound cue retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 122-136.
38. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2010). The target of task switching. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 129-133. doi: 10.1037/a0019598
39. Schneider, D. W., & Logan, G. D. (2011). Task-switching performance with 1:1 and 2:1 cue-task mappings: Not so different after all. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 405-415.
40. Shaffer, L. H. (1965). Choice reaction with variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 284-288. doi: 10.1037/h0022207
41. Shaffer, L. H. (1966). Some effects of partial advance information on choice reaction with fixed or variable S-R mapping. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72, 541-545. doi: 10.1037/h0023749
42. Sohn, M.-H., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Task preparation and task repetition: Two-component model of task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 764-778. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.764
43. Sohn, M.-H., & Carlson, R. A. (1998). Procedural frameworks for simple arithmetic skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 1052-1067.
44. Sudevan, P., & Taylor, D. A. (1987). The cuing and priming of cognitive operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 89-103.
45. Usher, M., & McClelland, J. L. (2001). The time course of perceptual choice: The leaky, competing accumulator model. Psychological Review, 108, 550-592. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.550
46. Vandierendonck, A., Liefooghe, B., & Verbruggen, F. (2010). Task switching: Interplay of reconfiguration and interference control. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 601-626. doi: 10.1037/a0019791
47. Wendt, M., & Kiesel, A. (2008). The impact of stimulus-specific practice and task instructions on response congruency effects between tasks. Psychological Research, 72, 425-432. doi: 10.1007/s00426-007-0117-3
48. White, C. N., Ratcliff, R., & Starns, J. J. (2011). Diffusion models of the flanker task: Discrete versus gradual attentional selection. Cognitive Psychology, 63, 210-238. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2011.08.001