Judgments of learning as memory modifiers

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 553-558

  Soderstrom, Nicholas C ^a   Clark, Colin T ^a   Halamish, Vered ^a   Bjork, Elizabeth Ligon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Judgments of learning; Memory; Metacognition; Metamemory; Monitoring

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ASSOCIATION; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PAIRED ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; RECALL;

ADULT; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MEMORY; MENTAL RECALL; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PAIRED-ASSOCIATE LEARNING; REACTION TIME; SERIAL LEARNING;

EID: 84925757634     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0038388     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Arbuckle, T. Y., & Cuddy, L. L. (1969). Discrimination of item strength at time of presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 126-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0027455
2. Benjamin, A. S., Bjork, R. A., & Schwartz, B. L. (1998). The mismeasure of memory: When retrieval fluency is misleading as a metamnemonic index. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.127.1.55
3. Bertsch, S., Pesta, B. J., Wiscott, R., & McDaniel, M. A. (2007). The generation effect: A meta-analytic review. Memory & Cognition, 35, 201-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193441
4. Bjork, R. A. (1975). Retrieval as a memory modifier: An interpretation of negative recency and related phenomena. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola symposium (pp. 123-144). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and Performance XVII-cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435-459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning:Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
7. Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC Psycholinguistic Database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 33, 497-505. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
8. de Winstanley, P. A., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (1996). Generation effects and the lack thereof: The role of transfer-appropriate processing. Memory, 4, 31-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/741940667
9. Dougherty, M. R., Scheck, P., Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (2005). Using the past to predict the future. Memory & Cognition, 33, 1096-1115. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03193216
10. Dunlosky, J., & Nelson, T. O. (1994). Does the sensitivity of judgments of learning (JOLs) to the effects of various study activities depend on when the JOLs occur? Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 545-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1026
11. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students:Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 126-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0181-y
12. Kelemen, W. L., & Weaver, C. A., III. (1997). Enhanced metamemory at delays: Why do judgments of learning improve over time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 1394-1409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.6.1394
13. Koriat, A. (1997). Monitoring one's own knowledge during study: A cue-utilization approach to judgments of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 349-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.349
14. Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2007). The promise and perils of selfregulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 219-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03194055
15. Kornell, N., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). Study efficacy and the region of proximal learning framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 609-622. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.609
16. Lovelace, E. A. (1984). Metamemory: Monitoring future recallability during study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 756-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.10.4.756
17. Mason, W., & Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0124-6
18. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
19. Nelson, T. O., Dunlosky, J., Graf, E. A., & Narens, L. (1994). Utilization of metacognitive judgments in the allocation of study during multitrial learning. Psychological Science, 5, 207-213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x
20. Nelson, T. O., & Leonesio, R. J. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the "labor-in-vain effect". Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 14, 676-686. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.14.4.676
21. Roediger, H. L., III, & Karpicke, J. D. (2006). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
22. Slamecka, N. J., & Graf, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 4, 592-604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.4.6.592
23. Soderstrom, N. C., & Bjork, R. A. (2014). Testing facilitates the regulation of subsequent study time. Journal of Memory and Language, 73, 99-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2014.03.003
24. Soderstrom, N. C., & McCabe, D. P. (2011). The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control:Evidence for agenda-based monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1236-1242. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/a0023548
25. Soderstrom, N. C., Yue, C. L., & Bjork, E. L. (in press). Metamemory and education. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of metamemory. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Son, L. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2000). Metacognitive and control strategies in study-time allocation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 204-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.1.204
27. Spellman, B. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). Technical commentary: When predictions create reality: Judgments of learning may alter what they are intended to assess. Psychological Science, 3, 315-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00680.x
28. Tauber, S. K., & Rhodes, M. G. (2012). Measuring memory monitoring with judgements of retention (JORs). The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 1376-1396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2012.656665
29. Zechmeister, E. B., & Shaughnessy, J. J. (1980). When you know that you know and when you think that you know but you don't. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 41-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03329756