The generation effect: A meta-analytic review

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 201-210

  Bertsch, Sharon ^a   Pesta, Bryan J ^b   Wiscott, Richard ^c   McDaniel, Michael A ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b CLEVELAND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SHIPPENSBURG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; COGNITION; EFFECT SIZE; GENERATION EFFECT; HUMAN; INFORMATION; LEARNING; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; READING; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SAMPLING ERROR; SCORING SYSTEM; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VARIANCE;

EID: 34250856203     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193441     Document Type: Article

References (102)

1. *BEGG, I., VINSKI, E., FRANKOVICH, L., & HOLGATE, B. (1991). Generating makes words memorable, but so does effective reading. Memory & Cognition, 19, 487-497.
2. BROWN, A. S., & MITCHELL, D. B. (1991). Age differences in retrieval consistency and response dominance. Journal of Gerontology, 46, P332-P339.
3. BROWN, J. C., NIINIKOSKI, J., & DUKE, L. W. (1993). Generation effect and frequency judgment in young and elderly adults. Experimental Aging Research, 19, 147-164.
4. *BURNS, D. J. (1992). The consequences of generation. Journal of Memory & Language, 31, 615-633.
5. *BURNS, D. J. (1996). The item-order distinction and the generation effect: The importance of order information in long-term memory. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 567-580.
6. *BURNS, D. J., CURTI, E. T., & LAVIN, J. C. (1993). The effects of generation on item and order retention in immediate and delayed recall. Memory & Cognition, 21, 846-852.
7. *BUYER, L. S., & DOMINOWSKI, R. L. (1989). Retention of solutions: It is better to give than to receive. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 353-363.
8. *CARROLL, M., & NELSON, T. O. (1993). Failure to obtain a generation effect during naturalistic learning. Memory & Cognition, 21, 361-366.
9. *CHECHILE, R. A., & SORACI, S. A., JR. (1999). Evidence for a multiple-process account of the generation effect. Memory, 7, 483-508.
10. CHRISTENSEN-SZALANSKI, J. J., & WILLHAM, C. F. (1991). The hind-sight bias: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 48, 147-168.
11. *CLARK, S. E. (1995). The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory. Memory & Cognition, 23, 442-455.
12. CONE, J. D., & FOSTER, S. L. (1991). Training in measurement: Always the bridesmaid. American Psychologist, 46, 653-654.
13. *CRUTCHER, R. J., & HEALY, A. F. (1989). Cognitive operations and the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 15, 669-675.
14. *DEWINSTANLEY, P. A., & BJORK, E. L. (1997). Processing instructions and the generation effect: A test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory. Memory, 5, 401-421.
15. *DEWINSTANLEY, P. A., & BJORK, E. L. (2004). Processing strategies and the generation effect: Implications for making a better reader. Memory & Cognition, 32, 945-955.
16. *DICK, M. B., KEAN, M.-L., & SANDS, D. (1989). Memory for internally generated words in Alzheimer-type dementia: Breakdown in encoding and semantic memory. Brain & Cognition, 9, 88-108.
17. *DONALDSON, W., & BASS, M. (1980). Relational information and memory for problem solutions. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 26-35.
18. *FIEDLER, K., LACHNIT, H., FAY, D., & KRUG, C. (1992). Mobilization of cognitive resources and the generation effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45A, 149-171.
19. *FLORY, P., & PRING, L. (1995). The effects of data-driven and conceptually driven generation of study items on direct and indirect measures of memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 153-165.
20. *GARDINER, J. M. (1988). Generation and priming effects in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 495-501.
21. *GARDINER, J. M. (1989). A generation effect in memory without awareness. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 163-168.
22. *GARDINER, J. M., & ARTHURS, F. S. (1982). Encoding context and the generating effect in multitrial free-recall learning. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 527-531.
23. *GARDINER, J. M., DAWSON, A. J., & SUTTON, E. A. (1989). Specificity and generality of enhanced priming effects for self-generated study items. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 295-305.
24. *GARDINER, J. M., GREGG, V. H., & HAMPTON, J. A. (1988). Word frequency and generation effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 687-693.
25. *GARDINER, J. M., & HAMPTON, J. A. (1985). Semantic memory and the generation effect: Some tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 732-741.
26. *GARDINER, J. M., & HAMPTON, J. A. (1988). Item-specific processing and the generation effect: Support for a distinctiveness account American Journal of Psychology, 101, 495-504.
27. *GARDINER, J. M., & ROWLEY, J. M. C. (1984). A generation effect with numbers rather than words. Memory & Cognition, 12, 443-445.
28. *GHATALA, E. S. (1983). When does internal generation facilitate memory for sentences? American Journal of Psychology, 96, 75-83.
29. GLASS, G. V. (1977). Integrating findings: The meta-analysis of research. Review of Research in Education, 5, 351-379.
30. *GLISKY, E. L., & RABINOWITZ, J. C. (1985). Enhancing the generation effect through repetition of operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, 193-205.
31. *GRAF, P. (1981). Reading and generating normal and transformed sentences. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 35, 293-308.
32. *GREENWALD, A. G., & JOHNSON, M. M. (1989). The generation effect extended: Memory enhancement for generation cues. Memory & Cognition, 17, 673-681.
33. *GROSOFSKY, A., PAYNE, D. G., & CAMPBELL, K. D. (1994). Does the generation effect depend upon selective displaced rehearsal? American Journal of Psychology, 107, 53-68.
34. *HARA, K., NEUMANN, E., & TAJIKA, H. (1989). Effects of word versus nonword rehearsal frequency on the generation effect. Psychologia, 32, 230-235.
35. *HERTEL, P. T. (1989). The generation effect: A reflection of cognitive effort? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 27, 541-544.
36. *HIRSHMAN, E., & BJORK, R. A. (1988). The generation effect: Support for a two-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 14, 484-494.
37. HUNTER, J. E., & SCHMIDT, F. L. (1990). Methods of meta-analysis: Correcting error and bias in research findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. *JACOBY, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667.
39. *JACOBY, L. L. (1983). Remembering the data: Analyzing interactive processes in reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 485-508.
40. *JAVA, R. I. (1994). States of awareness following word stem completion. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 6, 77-92.
41. *JAVA, R. I. (1996). Effects of age on state of awareness following implicit and explicit word-association tasks. Psychology & Aging, 11, 108-111.
42. *JOHNS, E. E., & SWANSON, L. G. (1988). The generation effect with nonwords. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 180-190.
43. *JOHNSON, M. K., RAYE, C. L., FOLEY, H. J., & FOLEY, M. A. (1981). Cognitive operations and decision bias in reality monitoring. American Journal of Psychology, 94, 37-64.
44. *JOHNSON, M. M., SCHMITT, F. A., & PIETRUKOWICZ, M. (1989). The memory advantages of the generation effect: Age and process differences. Journal of Gerontology, 44, P91-P94.
45. *KANE, J. H., & ANDERSON, R. C. (1978). Depth of processing and interference effects in the learning and remembering of sentences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 626-635.
46. *KINOSHITA, S. (1989). Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect Memory & Cognition, 17, 563-571.
47. *LIU, I.-M., & LEE, Y.-S. (1990). Memorial consequences of generating words and non-words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42A, 255-278.
48. *LUTZ, J., BRIGGS, A., & CAIN, K. (2003). An examination of the value of the generation effect for learning new material. Journal of General Psychology, 130, 171-188.
49. *MACLEOD, C. M., & DANIELS, K. A. (2000). Direct versus indirect tests of memory: Directed forgetting meets the generation effect Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 354-359.
50. *MCCLELLAND, A. G., & PRING, L. (1991). An investigation of cross-modality effects in implicit and explicit memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A, 19-33.
51. *MCDANIEL, M. A., RIEGLER, G. L., & WADDILL, P. J. (1990). Generation effects in free recall: Further support for a three-factor theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 789-798.
52. *MCDANIEL, M. A., WADDILL, P. J., & EINSTEIN, G. O. (1988). A contextual account of the generation effect: A three-factor theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 521-536.
53. *MCELROY, L. A. (1987). The generation effect with homographs: Evidence for postgeneration processing. Memory & Cognition, 15, 148-153.
54. *MCELROY, L. A., & SLAMECKA, N. J. (1982). Memorial consequences of generating nonwords: Implications for semantic-memory interpretations of the generation effect. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 21, 249-259.
55. *MCFARLAND, C. E., JR., FREY, T. J., & RHODES, D. D. (1980). Retrieval of internally versus externally generated words in episodic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 210-225.
56. *MCFARLAND, C. E., JR., WARREN, L. R., & CROCKARD, J. (1985). Memory for self-generated stimuli in young and old adults. Journal of Gerontology, 40, 205-207.
57. *MCNAMARA, D. S., & HEALY, A. F. (1995). A procedural explanation of the generation effect: The use of an operand retrieval strategy for multiplication and addition problems. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 399-416.
58. *MCNAMARA, D. S., & HEALY, A. F. (2000). A procedural explanation of the generation effect for simple and difficult multiplication problems and answers. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 652-679.
59. MITCHELL, D. B., HUNT, R. R., & SCHMITT, F. A. (1986). The generation effect and reality monitoring: Evidence from dementia and normal aging. Journal of Gerontology, 41, 79-84.
60. MORRIS, C. D., BRANSFORD, J. D., & FRANKS, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 16, 519-533.
61. *MULLIGAN, N. W. (2001). Generation and hypermnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 436-450.
62. *MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002a). The emergent generation effect and hypermnesia: Influences of semantic and nonsemantic generation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory. & Cognition, 28, 541-554.
63. *MULLIGAN, N. W. (2002b). The generation effect: Dissociating enhanced item memory and disrupted order memory. Memory & Cognition, 30, 850-861.
64. *MULLIGAN, N. W., & DUKE, M. D. (2002). Positive and negative generation effects, hypermnesia, and total recall time. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1044-1053.
65. *NAIRNE, J. S., PUSEN, C., & WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1985). Representation in the mental lexicon: Implications for theories of the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 13, 183-191.
66. *NAIRNE, J. S., RIEGLER, G. L., & SERRA, M. (1991). Dissociative effects of generation on item and order retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 702-709.
67. *NAIRNE, J. S., & WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1987). Generation effects with nonwords: The role of test appropriateness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 164-171.
68. *NAIRNE, J. S., & WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1988). Familiarity and lexicality as determinants of the generation effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 694-699.
69. *NICOLAS, S., & TARDIEU, H. (1996). The generation effect in a word-stem completion task: The influence of conceptual processes. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 405-424.
70. *OLOFSSON, U., & NILSSON, L.-G. (1992). The generation effect in primed word-fragment completion reexamined. Psychological Research, 54, 103-109.
71. O'NEILL, W., ROY, L., & TREMBLAY, R. (1993). A translation-based generation effect in bilingual recall and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 21, 488-495.
72. *PAYNE, D. G., NEELY, J. H., & BURNS, D. J. (1986). The generation effect: Further tests of the lexical activation hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 14, 246-252.
73. *PESTA, B. J., SANDERS, R. E., & MURPHY, M. D. (1999). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: What factors determine the generation effect for simple multiplication problems? Memory & Cognition, 27, 106-115.
74. *PESTA, B. J., SANDERS, R. E., & NEMEC, R. J. (1996). Older adults' strategic superiority with mental multiplication: A generation effect assessment Experimental Aging Research, 22, 155-169.
75. PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F. (1989). The generation effect with pictures and nonsense figures. Acta Psychologica, 70, 153-160.
76. *PEYNIRCIOǦLU, Z. F., & MUNGAN, E. (1993). Familiarity, relative distinctiveness, and the generation effect. Memory & Cognition, 21, 367-374.
77. PRING, L. (1988). The "reverse-generation" effect: A comparison of memory performance between blind and sighted children. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 387-400.
78. *RABINOWITZ, J. C. (1989). Judgments of origin and generation effects: Comparisons between young and elderly adults. Psychology & Aging, 4, 259-268.
79. *RABINOWITZ, J. C., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (1986). Specific enhancement effects associated with word generation. Journal of Memory & Language, 25, 226-237.
80. *REARDON, R., DURSO, F. T., FOLEY, M. A., & MCGAHAN, J. R. (1987). Expertise and the generation effect. Social Cognition, 5, 336-348.
81. *SCHMIDT, S. R. (1990). A test of resource-allocation explanations of the generation effect. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 28, 93-96.
82. *SCHMIDT, S. R. (1992). Evaluating the role of distinctiveness in the generation effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 237-260.
83. *SCHMIDT, S. R., & CHERRY, K. (1989). The negative generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Memory & Cognition, 17, 359-369.
84. *SCHWEICKERT, R., MCDANIEL, M. A., & RIEGLER, G. (1994). Effects of generation on immediate memory span and delayed unexpected free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47A, 781-804.
85. *SERRA, M., & NAIRNE, J. S. (1993). Design controversies and the generation effect: Support for an item-order hypothesis. Memory & Cognition, 21, 34-40.
86. *SLAMECKA, N. J., & FEVREISKI, J. (1983). The generation effect when generation fails. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 22, 153-163.
87. *SLAMECKA, N. J., & GRAF, P. (1978). The generation effect: Delineation of a phenomenon. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 4, 592-604.
88. *SLAMECKA, N. J., & KATSAITI, L. T. (1987). The generation effect as an artifact of selective displaced rehearsal. Journal of Memory & Language, 26, 589-607.
89. *SMITH, R. W., & HEALY, A. F. (1998). The time-course of the generation effect Memory & Cognition, 26, 135-142.
90. SMITH, S. M., & VELA, E. (2001). Environmental context-dependent memory: A review and meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 203-220.
91. *SOLOWAY, R. M. (1986). No generation effect without semantic activation. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 24, 261-262.
92. *SORACI, S. A., JR., CARLIN, M. T., CHECHILE, R. A., FRANKS, J. J., WILLS, T., & WATANABE, T. (1999). Encoding variability and cuing in generative processing. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 541-559.
93. *SORACI, S. A., JR., FRANKS, J. J., BRANSFORD, J. D., CHECHILE, R. A., BELLI, R. F., CARR, M., & CARLIN, M. (1994). Incongruous item generation effects: A multiple-cue perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 67-78.
94. STEFFENS, M. C., & ERDFELDER, E. (1998). Determinants of positive and negative generation effects in free recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 51A, 705-733.
95. *TACONNAT, L., & ISINGRINI, M. (2004). Cognitive operations in the generation effect on a recall test: Role of aging and divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 827-837.
96. *THOMPSON, C. P., & BARNETT, C. (1981). Memory for product names: The generation effect Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, 241-243.
97. *TOTH, J. P., & HUNT, R. R. (1990). Effect of generation on a word-identification task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 16, 993-1003.
98. TYLER, S. W., HERTEL, P. T., MCCALLUM, M. C., & ELLIS, H. C. (1979). Cognitive effort and memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 607-617.
99. VISWESVARAN, C., & SCHMIDT, F. L. (1992). A meta-analytic comparison of the effectiveness of smoking cessation methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77, 554-561.
100. *WATKINS, M. J., & SECHLER, E. S. (1988). Generation effect with an incidental memorization procedure. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 537-544.
101. *WIDNER, R. L., JR. (1995). Associative spread as a mediating variable in the generation effect. Memory, 3, 1-19.
102. ZACKS, R. T., HASHER, L., & LI, K. Z. H. (2000). Human memory. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 293-357). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.