The reliability of eyewitness Identifications by the elderly: An evidence-based review

The Elderly Eyewitness in Court

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 3-37

  Sporer, Siegfried L ^a   Martschuk, Natalie ^b  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925752624     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315813936     Document Type: Chapter

References (104)

1. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P., & Duchek, J. (2000). Memory changes in healthy older adults. In E. Tulving & F.I.M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 395–410). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (2007). Eyewitness memory in young and older adults. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for people (pp. 309–338). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bornstein, B. H. (1995). Memory processes in elderly eyewitnesses: What we know and what we don’t know. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 337–348.
4. Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2010). Eyewitness confidence and latency: Indices of memory processes not just markers of accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 827–840. doi:10.1002/acp.1486
5. Brewer, N., & Wells, G. L. (2006). The confidence–accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target- absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 12, 11–30.
6. Brimacombe, C. A. E., Jung, S., Garrioch, L., & Allison, M. (2003). Perceptions of older adult eyewitnesses: Will you believe me when I am 64? Law and Human Behavior, 27, 507–522.
7. Brimacombe, C. A. E., Quinton, N., Nance, N., & Garrioch, L. (1997). Is age irrelevant? Perceptions of young and old eyewitnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 619–634.
8. Bull, R., & Clifford, B. R. (1984). Earwitness voice recognition accuracy. In G. L. Wells & E. F. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 92–123). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, S. E., Howell, R., & Davey, S. D. (2008). Regularities of eyewitness identification. Law and Human Behavior, 32, 406–422. doi:10.1007/s10979–006–9082–4
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Cohen, G., & Faulkner, D. (1989). Age differences in source forgetting: Effects on reality monitoring and on eyewitness testimony. Psychology and Aging, 4, 10–17.
12. Davies, G. M., & Valentine, T. (2007). Facial composites: Forensic utility and psychological research. In R. C. L. Lindsay, D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Vol. 2, Memory for people (pp. 59–83). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Diges, M., Rubio, M. E., & Rodriguez, M. C. (1992). Eyewitness memory and time of day. In F. Loesel, D. Bender, & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 317–320). Berlin, Germany, and New York, NY: Walter DeGruyter.
14. Donaldson, W. (1992). Measuring recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 121, 275–277.
15. Dunlop, B. D., Rothman, M. B., & Hirt, M. G. (2001). Elders and criminal justice: International issues for the 21st century. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24, 285–303.
16. Dunning, D., & Stern, L. B. (1994). Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identifications via inquiries about decision- processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 818–835. doi:10.1037/0022–3514.67.5.818
17. Ebbesen, E. B., & Flowe, H. D. (2002). Simultaneous v. sequential lineups: What do we really know? Retrieved from http://www2.le.ac.uk/departments/psychology/ppl/hf49/SimSeq%20Submit.pdf
18. Elgamal, S. A., Roy, E. A., & Sharratt, M. T. (2011). Age and verbal fluency: The mediating effect of speed processing. Canadian Geriatric Journal, 14, 66–72.
19. Eriksson, E., Sullivan, K., Zetternholm, E., Czigler, P., Green, J., Skagerstrand, A., & van Doorn, J. (2010). Detection of imitated voices: Who are reliable earwitnesses? The International Journal of Speech, Language and the Law, 17, 25–44. doi:10.1558/ijsll.v17i1.25
20. Fisher, R. P., McCauley, M. R., & Geiselman, R. E. (1994). Improving eyewitness testimony with the Cognitive Interview. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 245–269). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
21. Fotenos, A. F., Mintun, M. A., Snyder, A. Z., Morris, J. C., & Buckner, R. L. (2008). Brain volume decline in aging: Evidence for a relation between socioeconomic status, preclinical Alzheimer disease, and reserve. Archives of Neurology, 65, 113–120.
22. Gross, J., & Hayne, H. (1996). Eyewitness identification by 5- to 6- year- old children. Law & Human Behavior, 20, 359–373.
23. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: A review and a new view. In G. H. Bower (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 193–225). New York, NY: Academic Press.
24. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta- analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
25. Henkel, L. A., Johnson, M. K., & De Leonardis, D. M. (1998). Aging and source monitoring: Cognitive processes and neuropsychological correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 251–268.
26. Hess, L. M., Auman C., Colcombe, S. J., & Rahhal, E. A. (2003). The impact of stereotype threat on age differences in memory performance. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences & Social Sciences, 58, 3–11.
27. Hummert, M. L. (1994). Physiognomic cues to age and the activation of stereotypes of the elderly in interaction. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 39, 5–19.
28. Hummert, M. L. (2011). Age stereotypes and aging. In K. Warner Schaie & S. L. Willis (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 249–262). London, England: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/B978–0-12–380882–0.00016–4
29. The Innocence Project. (n.d.- a). Eyewitness identification reform. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Eyewitness_Identification_Reform.php
30. The Innocence Project. (n.d.- b). Know the cases: Willie Davidson. Retrieved from http://www.innocenceproject.org/Content/Willie_Davidson.php
31. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. V. (1993). Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: Aging, attention, and control. Psychology and Aging, 8, 283–293.
32. Kaminski, K. S., & Sporer, S. L. (2013, September). Sind Polizeibeamte bessere Zeugen? Ein Vergleich zwischen Polizisten und Zivilpersonen hinsichtlich Beschreibungen und Identifizierungsaussagen [Are police officers better witnesses? A comparison between police officers and laypeople regarding person descriptions and identifications]. Paper presented at the German Psychology- Law Conference in Bonn, Germany.
33. Kite, M. E., Stockdale, G. D., Whitley, B. E., Jr., & Johnson, B. T. (2005). Attitudes toward younger and older adults: An updated meta- analytic review. Journal of Social Issues, 61, 241–266. doi:10.1111/j.1540–4560.2005.00404.x
34. Kline, D. W., & Scialfa, C. T. (1996). Visual and auditory aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (4th ed., pp. 181–203). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
35. Kocab, K., Martschuk. N, Sporer, S. L. (2013). Identification evidence by elderly eyewitnesses: A meta- analysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
36. Krafka, C. & Penrod, S. (1985). Reinstatement of context in a field experiment on eyewitness identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 58–69.
37. Kwong See, S. T., Hoffman, H. G., & Wood, T. L. (2001). Perceptions of an old female eyewitness: Is the older eyewitness believable? Psychology and Aging, 16, 346–350.
38. Leippe, M. R. (1984). The appraisal of eyewitness testimony. In G. L. Wells & E. L. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 385–418). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
39. Lindsay, D. S., Allen, B. P., Chan, J. C. K., & Dahl, L. C. (2004). Eyewitness suggestibility and source similarity: Intrusions of details from one event into memory reports of another event. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 96–111.
40. Lindsay, D. S., Nilsen, E., & Read, J. D. (2000). Witnessing- condition heterogeneity and witnesses’ versus investigators’ confidence in the accuracy of witnesses’ identification decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 685–697.
41. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta- analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
42. Loftus, E.F. (1979). The malleability of human memory. American Scientist, 67, 312–320.
43. Loftus, E. F., Levidow, B., & Duensing, S. (1992). Who remembers best? Individual differences in memory for events that occurred in a science museum. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 6, 93–107.
44. MacMillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
45. Martschuk, N., Kocab, K., & Sporer, S. L. (2013). Face recognition in old age: A metaanalysis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Giessen, Germany.
46. Mayes, A.D. (2000). Selective memory disorders. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 427–440). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
47. McDowd, J. M., & Shaw, R. S. (2000). Attention and aging: A functional perspective. In F. I. M. Craik & T. A. Salthouse (Eds.), Handbook of aging and cognition (pp. 221–292). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
48. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Susa, K. J. (2008). A theoretical review and metaanalysis of the description- identification relationship in memory for faces. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 414–455.
49. Meissner, C. A., Tredoux, C. G., Parker, J. F., & MacLin, O. H. (2005). Eyewitness decisions in simultaneous and sequential lineups: A dual- process signal detection theory analysis. Memory & Cognition, 33, 783–792.
50. Memon, A., & Gabbert, F. (2003a). Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: Do prelineup questions and sequential testing help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 341–347.
51. Memon, A., & Gabbert, F. (2003b). Unraveling the effects of sequential presentation in culprit- present lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 703–714.
52. Memon, A., Hope, L., Bartlett, J., & Bull, R. (2002). Eyewitness recognition errors: The effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1219–1227.
53. Moulin, C. J. A., Thompson, R. G., Wright, D. B., & Conway, M. A., (2007). Eyewitness memory in older adults. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 1. Memory for events (pp. 627–646). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
54. Mueller- Johnson, K., & Ceci, S. J. (2004). Memory and suggestibility in older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1109–1127.
55. Mueller- Johnson, K., & Ceci, S. J. (2007). The elderly eyewitness: A review and prospectus. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology. Vol. 1: Memory for events (pp. 577–603). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
56. Mueller- Johnson, K., Toglia, M. P., Sweeney, C. D., Ceci, S. J. (2007). The perceived credibility of older adults as witnesses and its relation to ageism. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 25, 355–375.
57. Naveh- Benjamin, M. Guez, J. Kilb, A. & Reedy, S. (2004). The associative memory deficit of older adults: Further support using face- name associations. Psychology and Aging, 19, 541–546.
58. Neuschatz, J. S., Preston, E. L., Burkett, A.D., Toglia, M. P., Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S.,… Goodsell, C. A. (2005). The effects of post- identification feedback and age on retrospective eyewitness memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 435–453. doi:10.1002/acp.1084
59. O’Barr, W. M., & Lind, E. A. (1981). Ethnography and experimentation: Partners in legal research. In B. D. Sales (Ed.), The trial process (pp. 181–207). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
60. O’Rourke, T. E., Penrod, S. D., Cutler, B. L., & Stuve, T. E. (1989). The external validity of eyewitness identification research: Generalizing across subject populations. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 385–395.
61. Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., McKinnon, A. C., & Weber, N. (2010). Phenomenological reports diagnose accuracy of eyewitness identification decisions. Acta Psychologica, 133, 137–145. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.11.002
62. Park, D.C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A.D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 229–320.
63. Park, D.C., & Reuter- Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: Aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 173–196.
64. Pozzulo, J. (2007). Person descriptions and identification by child witnesses. In M. P. Toglia, J. D. Read, D. F. Ross, & R. C. L. Lindsay (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Vol. 2. Memory for people (pp. 283–307). New York, NY: Erlbaum.
65. Reinhard, M. A., Sporer, S. L., Scharmach, M., & Marksteiner, T. (2011). Listening, not watching: Situational familiarity and the ability to detect deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 467–484. doi:10.1037/a0023726
66. Rhodes, M. G., & Anastasi, J. S. (2012). The own- age bias in face recognition: A metaanalytic and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 146–174.
67. Rose, R. A., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2003). Enhancing older witnesses’ identification performance: Context reinstatement is not the answer. Canadian Journal of Police and Security Services, 1, 173–184.
68. Rose, R. A., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2005). Non- biased lineup instructions do matter: A problem for older witnesses. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11, 147–159.
69. Ross, D. F., Dunning, D., Toglia, M. P., & Ceci, S. J. (1990). Assessing mock jurors’ perceptions of child witness. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 5–23.
70. Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. L. (2007). Post- decision confidence, decision time, and self- reported decision processes as postdictors of identification accuracy. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 611–625.
71. Sauerland, M., & Sporer, S. L. (2009). Fast and confident: Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy in a field study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 46–62. doi:10.1037/a0014560
72. Schooler, J.W. & Engstler- Schooler, T.Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36–71.
73. Scogin, F., Calhoon, S. K., & D’Errico, M. (1994). Eyewitness confidence and accuracy among three age cohorts. The Journal of Applied Gerontology, 13, 172–184.
74. Smith, S. M., Lindsay, R. C. L., Pryke, S., & Dysart, J. E. (2001). Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed in the cross- race situation? Psychology Public Policy and Law, 7, 153–169.
75. Smith, S. M., Stinson, V., & Prosser, M. A. (2004). Do they all look alike? An exploration of decision- making strategies in cross- race facial identifications. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science–Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 36, 146–154.
76. Sporer, S. L. (1982). A brief history of the psychology of testimony. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 323–339.
77. Sporer, S. L. (1984). Experimentalpsychologische Grundlagen der Personenidentifizierung [Experimental psychological foundations of the psychology of person identification]. Monatsschrift fuer Kriminologie and Strafrechtsreform, 67, 339–348.
78. Sporer, S. L. (1992). Das Wiedererkennen von Gesichtern [Recognizing faces]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz/Psychologie Verlags Union.
79. Sporer, S. L. (1993). Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence, and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 22–33.
80. Sporer, S. L. (2001a). The cross- race effect: Beyond recognition of faces in the laboratory. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 1–18.
81. Sporer, S. L. (2001b). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 36–97.
82. Sporer, S. L. (2007). Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help? Psychology, Crime, & Law, 13, 591–609.
83. Sporer, S. L. (2008). Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 737–757. doi:10.1002/acp.1479
84. Sporer, S.L., & Cohn, L. D. (2011). Meta- analysis. In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in psychology (pp. 43–62). New York, NY: Wiley.
85. Sporer, S. L., Davids, M. C., Kaminski, K. S., & McQuiston, D. (2012, March). Re- reading brings your memory back: The end of verbal overshadowing? Paper presented at the American Psychology and Law Society Conference, Caribe Hilton, San Juan, Puerto Rico.
86. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S. D., Read, J. D., & Cutler, B. L. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta- analysis of the confidence–accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315–327.
87. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
88. Tulving, E. (2000). Concepts of memory. In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of memory (pp. 33–43). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
89. Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (Eds.). (2009). The handbook of research synthesis and meta- analysis (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
90. Valentine, T., Pickering, A., & Darling, S. (2003). Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 969–993.
91. Vredeveldt, A., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2011). Eyeclosure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation. Memory & Cognition, 39, 1253–1263. doi:10.3758/s13421–011–0098–8
92. Wells, G. L. (1984). How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? In G. L. Wells & E. L. Loftus (Eds.), Eyewitness testimony: Psychological perspectives (pp. 256–272). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
93. Wells, G. L., & Bradfield, A. L. (1998). “Good, you identified the suspect”: Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 360–376.
94. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1980). On estimating the diagnosticity of eyewitness non- identifications. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 776–784. doi:10.1037/0033–2909.88.3.776
95. Wells, G. L., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1983). How do people infer the accuracy of eyewitness memory? Studies of performance and a metamemory analysis. In S. Lloyd- Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 41–55). Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.
96. Wells, G. L., & Olsen, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277–295. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.54.101601.145028
97. Wells, G. L., & Windschitl, P. D. (1999). Stimulus sampling and social psychological experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1115–1125.
98. Wilcock, R., Bull, R., & Milne, R. (2008). Criminal identification by witnesses: Psychology and practice. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
99. Wilcock, R. A., Bull, R., & Vrij, A. (2005). Aiding the performance of older eyewitnesses: Enhanced non- biased line- up instructions and line- up presentation. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 12, 129–140.
100. Wright, A. M., & Holliday, R. E. (2005). Police officers’ perceptions of older eyewit nesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 211–223. doi:10.1348/135532505X37001
101. Wright, D. B., & Stroud, J. N. (2002). Age differences in lineup identification accuracy: People are better with their own age. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 641–654.
102. Yarmey, A.D. (1979). The psychology of eyewitness testimony. New York, NY: Free Press.
103. Yarmey, A.D. (1996). The elderly witness. In S. Sporer, R. Malpass, & G. Köhnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 259–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
104. Yarmey, A. D. (2001). The older eyewitness. In M. B. Rothman, B. D. Dunlop, & P. Entzel (Eds.), Elders, crime, and the criminal justice system (pp. 127–147). New York, NY: Springer.