Unravelling the effects of sequential presentation in culprit-present lineups

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 703-714

  Memon, Amina ^a   Gabbert, Fiona ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIME; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENTIAL ANALYSIS; TASK PERFORMANCE; VIDEORECORDING; VISUAL MEMORY; WITNESS;

EID: 8744315639     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.909     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bartlett, J. C., & Fulton, A. (1991). Familiarity and recognition of faces in old age. Memory and Cognition, 19, 229-238.
2. Benton, A. L. (1968). Differential behavioural effects in frontal lobe disease. Neuropsychologia, 6, 53-60.
3. Benton, A. L., Sivan, A., Hamsher, K., Varney, N. R., & Spreen, O. (1994). Facial recognition: Stimulus and multiple choice pictures: Contributions to neuropsychological assessment (pp. 35-52). New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: visual and non-visual processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105-116.
5. Bryan, J., & Luszcz, M. A. (1996). Speed of information processing as a mediator between age and free recall performance. Psychology and Aging, 11, 3-9.
6. Craik, F., & Byrd, M. (1982). Aging and cognitive deficits: the role of attentional resources. In F. I. M. Craik & S. Trehub (Eds.), Aging and cognitive processes (pp. 191-211). New York: Plenum.
7. Davies, G. M., & Flin, R. (1984). The man behind the mask - disguise and face recognition. Human Learning, 3, 83-95.
8. Dysart, J. E., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). A pre-identification questioning effect: serendipitously increasing correct rejections. Law and Human Behavior, 25, 155-166.
9. Hart, S., Smith, C. M., & Swash, M. (1988). Word fluency in patients with early dementia of Alzheimer type. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 27, 115-124.
10. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
11. Jacoby, L. L. (1999). Ironic effects of repetition: measuring age-related differences in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 25, 3-22.
12. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1997). An opposition procedure for detecting age related deficits in repetition: the telling effects of repetition. Psychology and Aging, 12, 352-361.
13. Kneller, W., Memon, A., & Stevenage, S. (2001). Simultaneous and sequential lineups: decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 15, 659-671.
14. Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Applying applied research: selling the sequential lineup. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 219-225.
15. Lindsay, R. C. L., Lea, J. A., & Fulford, J. A. (1991). Sequential lineup presentation: technique matters. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 741-745.
16. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: the judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 75, 421-441.
17. Mäntylä, T. (1997) Recollection of faces: remembering differences and knowing similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 23, 1203-1216.
18. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29, 176-186.
19. Memon, A., & Bartlett, J. (2002). The effects of verbalisation on face recognition. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16 635-650.
20. Memon, A., & Gabbert, F. (2003). Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help? Journal of Applied Psychology, 88.
21. Memon, A., Hope, L., Bartlett, J., & Bull, R. (2002). Eyewitness Recognition errors: the effects of mugshot viewing and choosing in young and old adults. Memory & Cognition, 30, 1219-1227.
22. Narby, D. J., Cutler, B., & Penrod, S. (1996). The effect of witness, target and situational factors on eyewitness identifications. In S. Sporer, R. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
23. O'Donnell, C., & Bruce, V. (2000). The Batman effect: selective enhancement of facial features during familiarisation. Perception, 29, 76-76.
24. Parkin, A., & Walter, B. (1992). Recollective experience, normal aging and frontal dysfunction. Psychology and Aging, 7, 290-298.
25. Pozzulo, J. D., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (1995). Eyewitness identification procedures when appearance has been changed. Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, Vancouver, June.
26. Read, J. D. (1994). Understanding bystander misidentifications: the role of familiarity and contextual knowledge. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 56-79). New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Richardson-Klavehn, A., Gardiner, J., & Java, R. (1996). Memory: task dissociations, process dissociations and dissociations of consciousness. In G. Underwood (Ed.), Implicit cognition (pp. 85-158). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
28. Salthouse, T. A. (1993). Speed mediation of adult age differences in cognition. Developmental Psychology, 29, 722-738.
29. Scheck, B., Neufeld, P., & Dwyer, J. (2000) Actual innocence: Five days to execution and other dispatches from the wrongly convicted. New York: Doubleday.
30. Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (1999). Age differences in accuracy and choosing in eyewitness identification and face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 27, 538-552.
31. Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., & Memon, A. (2000). Relationship of availability, lineup conditions and individual differences to false identification by young and older eyewitnesses. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 5, 219-236.
32. Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., Memon, A., & Swanson, K. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 207-214.
33. Shapiro, P. N., & Penrod, S. (1986). Meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 139-156.
34. Shepherd, J. W., Ellis, H. D., & Davies, G. M. (1982). Identification evidence. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.
35. Steblay, N., Dysart, J., Fulero, S., & Lindsay, R. C. L. (2001). Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: a meta-analytic comparison. Law and Human Behavior, 25 459-473.
36. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R., Fulero, S. M., & Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 603-647.
37. Whitlesea, B. W. A., & Leboe, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: fluency, generation, and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84-106.