Fast and Confident: Postdicting Eyewitness Identification Accuracy in a Field Study

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 46-62

  Sauerland, Melanie ^a   Sporer, Siegfried L ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

decision time; eyewitness identification; multiple targets; postdecision confidence; remember know distinction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FACE; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 65349127822     PISSN: 1076898X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0014560     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ackerman P.L., Beier M.E., and Bowen K.R. What we really know about our abilities and our knowledge. Personality and Individual Differences 33 (2002) 587-605
2. Baranski J.V., and Petrusic W.M. The calibration and resolution of confidence in perceptual judgments. Perception & Psychophysics 55 (1994) 412-428
3. Beal C.R., Schmitt K.L., and Dekle D.J. Eyewitness identification of children: Effects of absolute judgments, nonverbal response options, and event encoding. Law and Human Behavior 19 (1995) 197-216
4. Behrman B.W., and Richards R.E. Suspect/foil identification in actual crimes and in the laboratory: A reality monitoring analysis. Law and Human Behavior 29 (2005) 279-301
5. Bothwell R.K., Deffenbacher K.A., and Brigham J.C. Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revised. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987) 691-695
6. Brewer N. Uses and abuses of eyewitness identification confidence. Legal and Criminological Psychology 11 (2006) 3-23
7. Brewer N., Caon A., Todd C., and Weber N. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency. Law and Human Behavior 30 (2006) 31-50
8. Brewer N., Keast A., and Rishworth A. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: The effects of reflection and disconfirmation on correlation and calibration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 8 (2002) 44-56
9. Brewer N., and Wells G.L. The confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identification: Effects of lineup instructions, foil similarity, and target-absent base rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12 (2006) 11-30
10. Brigham J.C. Target person distinctiveness and attractiveness as moderator variables in the confidence-accuracy relationship in eyewitness identifications. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 11 (1990) 101-115
11. Charman S.D., and Wells G.L. Eyewitness lineups: Is the appearance change instruction a good idea?. Law and Human Behavior 31 (2007) 3-22
12. Clark S.E. A memory and decision model for eyewitness identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 629-654
13. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (1988), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ
14. Conway M.A., Gardiner J.M., Perfect T., Anderson S.J., and Cohen G.M. Changes in memory awareness during learning: The acquisition of knowledge by psychology undergraduates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 126 (1997) 393-413
15. Cutler B.L., and Penrod S.D. Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Lineup construction and presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology 73 (1988) 281-290
16. Cutler B.L., and Penrod S.D. Moderators of the confidence-accuracy correlation in face recognition: The role of information processing and base-rates. Applied Cognitive Psychology 3 (1989) 95-107
17. Cutler B.L., Penrod S.D., and Martens T.K. Improving the reliability of eyewitness identification: Putting context into context. Journal of Applied Psychology 72 (1987) 629-637
18. Cutler B.L., Penrod S.D., O'Rourke T.E., and Martens T.K. Unconfounding the effects of contextual cues on eyewitness identification accuracy. Social Behaviour 1 (1986) 113-134
19. Deffenbacher K.A., Bornstein B.H., Penrod S.D., and McGorty E.K. A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior 28 (2004) 687-706
20. Donaldson W. The role of decision processes in remembering and knowing. Memory & Cognition 24 (1996) 523-533
21. Douglass A., and Steblay N. Memory distortion in eyewitnesses: A meta-analysis of the post-identification feedback effect. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006) 859-869
22. Dunn J.C. Remember-know: A matter of confidence. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 524-542
23. Dunning D., and Perretta S. Automaticity and eyewitness accuracy: A 10- to 12-second rule for distinguishing accurate from inaccurate positive identifications. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 951-962
24. Dunning D., and Stern L.B. Distinguishing accurate from inaccurate eyewitness identification via inquiries about decision processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67 (1994) 818-835
25. Dysart J.E., Lindsay R.C.L., and Dupuis P.R. Show-ups: The critical issue of clothing bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006) 1009-1023
26. Dysart J.E., Lindsay R.C.L., MacDonald T.K., and Wicke C. The intoxicated witness: Effects of alcohol on identification accuracy from showups. Journal of Applied Psychology 87 (2002) 170-175
27. Gardiner J.M., Ramponi C., and Richardson-Klavehn A. Recognition memory and decision processes: A meta-analysis of remember, know, and guess responses. Memory 10 (2002) 83-98
28. Gonzalez R., Ellsworth P.C., and Pembroke M. Response biases in lineups and showups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64 (1993) 525-537
29. Gwyer P., and Clifford B.R. The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology 11 (1997) 121-145
30. Henke E. Handbuch des Criminalrechts und der Criminalpolitik. Vierter Teil [Handbook of criminal law and criminal politics. Pt. 4] (1838), Nicolai, Berlin
31. Hirshman E., and Master S. Modeling the conscious correlates of recognition memory: Reflections on the remember-know paradigm. Memory & Cognition 25 (1997) 345-351
32. Ibabe I., and Sporer S.L. The influence of question form on the accuracy and confidence of memories for central and peripheral action and descriptive details of an event. Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (2004) 711-726
33. Juslin P., Olsson N., and Winman A. Calibration and diagnosticity of confidence in eyewitness identification: Comments on what can be inferred from the low confidence-accuracy correlation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 1304-1316
34. Kensinger E.A., and Schacter D.L. Amygdala activity is associated with the successful encoding of item, but not source, information for positive and negative stimuli. Journal of Neuroscience 26 (2006) 2564-2570
35. Kneller W., Memon A., and Stevenage S. Simultaneous and sequential lineups: Decision processes of accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. Applied Cognitive Psychology 15 (2001) 659-671
36. Leippe M.R., Wells G.L., and Ostrom T.M. Crime seriousness as a determinant of accuracy in eyewitness identification. Journal of Applied Psychology 63 (1978) 345-351
37. Lindsay D.S., Read J.D., and Sharma K. Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 215-218
38. Lindsay R.C.L., Pozzulo J.D., Craig W., Lee K., and Corber S. Simultaneous lineups, sequential lineups, and showups: Eyewitness identification decisions of adults and children. Law and Human Behavior 21 (1997) 391-404
39. Lindsay R.C.L., and Wells G.L. Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentation. Journal of Applied Psychology 70 (1985) 556-564
40. Malpass R.S., and Devine P.G. Realism and eyewitness identification research. Law and Behavior 4 (1980) 347-358
41. Mäntylä T. Recollections of faces: Remembering differences and knowing similarities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23 (1997) 1203-1216
42. Mather M., Mitchell K.J., Raye C.L., Novak D.L., Greene E.J., and Johnson M.K. Emotional arousal can impair feature binding in working memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 18 (2006) 614-625
43. Olsson N., and Juslin P. Can self-reported encoding strategy and recognition skill be diagnostic of performance in eyewitness identification?. Journal of Applied Psychology 84 (1999) 42-49
44. Olsson N., Juslin P., and Winman A. Realism of confidence in earwitness versus eyewitness identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 4 (1998) 101-118
45. Perfect T.J. The role of self-rated ability in the accuracy of confidence judgements in eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology 18 (2004) 157-168
46. Perfect T.J., and Hollins T.S. Predictive feeling of knowing judgements and postdictive confidence judgements in eyewitness memory and general knowledge. Applied Cognitive Psychology 10 (1996) 371-382
47. Rajaram S. Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 365-377
48. Read J.D. The availability heuristic in person identification: The sometimes misleading consequences of enhanced contextual information. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9 (1995) 91-122
49. Rotello C.M., Macmillan N.A., and Reeder J.A. Sum-difference theory of remembering and knowing: A two-dimensional signal-detection model. Psychological Review 111 (2004) 588-616
50. Sauerland, M. (2007). Why do nonchoosers reject lineups? Unpublished raw data.
51. Sauerland M., and Sporer S.L. Post-decision confidence, decision time, and self-reported decision processes as postdictors of identification accuracy. Psychology, Crime, & Law 13 (2007) 611-625
52. Scheck B., Neufeld P., and Dwyer J. Actual innocence: When justice goes wrong and how to make it right (2000), Doubleday, New York
53. Semmler C., Brewer N., and Wells G.L. Effects of postidentification feedback on eyewitness identification and nonidentification confidence. Journal of Applied Psychology 89 (2004) 1-13
54. Shapiro P., and Penrod S. A meta-analysis of facial identification studies. Psychological Bulletin 100 (1986) 139-156
55. Smith S.M., Lindsay R.C.L., and Pryke S. Postdictors of eyewitness errors: Can false identifications be diagnosed?. Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2000) 542-550
56. Sporer S.L. A brief history of the psychology of testimony. Current Psychological Reviews 2 (1982) 323-340
57. Sporer S.L. Post-dicting eyewitness accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions of choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology 22 (1992) 157-180
58. Sporer S.L. Eyewitness identification accuracy, confidence and decision times in simultaneous and sequential lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology 78 (1993) 22-33
59. Sporer S.L. Decision-times and eyewitness identification accuracy in simultaneous and sequential lineups. In: Ross D.F., Read J.D., and Toglia M.P. (Eds). Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (1994), Cambridge University Press, New York 300-327
60. Sporer S.L. Lessons from the origin of eyewitness testimony research in Europe. Applied Cognitive Psychology 22 (2008) 737-757
61. Sporer S.L., Penrod S.D., Read J.D., and Cutler B.L. Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin 118 (1995) 315-327
62. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics (2007), Pearson, New York
63. Tredoux C.G. Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior 22 (1998) 217-237
64. Tredoux C.G. Statistical considerations when determining measures of lineup size and lineup bias. Applied Cognitive Psychology 13 (1999) 9-26
65. Tulving E. How many memory systems are there?. American Psychologist 40 (1985) 385-398
66. Valentine T. A unified account of the effects of distinctiveness, inversion and race in face recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 43A (1991) 161-204
67. Valentine T., Pickering A., and Darling S. Characteristics of eyewitness identification that predict the outcome of real lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology 17 (2003) 969-993
68. Weber N., and Brewer N. The effect of judgment type and confidence scale on confidence-accuracy calibration in face recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (2003) 490-499
69. Weber N., and Brewer N. Confidence-accuracy calibration in absolute and relative face recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 10 (2004) 156-172
70. Weber N., and Brewer N. Positive versus negative face recognition decisions: Confidence, accuracy, and response latency. Applied Cognitive Psychology 20 (2006) 17-31
71. Weber N., Brewer N., Wells G.L., Semmler C., and Keast A. Eyewitness identification accuracy and response latency: The unruly 10-12 second rule. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 10 (2004) 139-147
72. Wells G.L., and Bradfield A.L. "Good, you identified the suspect": Feedback to eyewitnesses distorts their reports of the witnessing experience. Journal of Applied Psychology 83 (1998) 360-376
73. Wells G.L., and Luus C.A.E. Police lineups as experiments: Social methodology as a framework for properly conducted lineups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 16 (1990) 106-117
74. Wells G.L., Olson E.A., and Charman S.D. Distorted retrospective eyewitness reports as functions of feedback and delay. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 9 (2003) 42-52
75. Wells G.L., Small M., Penrod S.D., Malpass R.S., Fulero S.M., and Brimacombe C.A.E. Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photospreads. Law and Human Behavior 22 (1998) 603-647
76. Wells G.L., and Windschitl P.D. Stimulus sampling and social psychology experimentation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 25 (1999) 1115-1125
77. Winer B.J. Statistical principles in experimental design (1971), McGraw-Hill, London
78. Wright D.B., and Sladden B. An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychologica 114 (2003) 101-114
79. Yaniv I., Yates J.F., and Smith J.E.K. Measures of discrimination skill in probabilistic judgment. Psychological Bulletin 110 (1991) 611-617
80. Yarmey A.D., Yarmey M.J., and Yarmey A.L. Accuracy of eyewitness identifications in showups and lineups. Law and Human Behavior 20 (1996) 459-477
81. Yonelinas A.P. Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20 (1994) 1341-1354
82. Yonelinas A.P. Consciousness, control, and confidence: The 3 cs of recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2001) 361-379