A theoretical review and meta-analysis of the description-identification relationship in memory for faces

European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 414-455

  Meissner, Christian A ^a   Sporer, Siegfried L ^b   Susa, Kyle J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT EL PASO   (United States)

^b JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; COGNITION; FACE; FACILITATION; HUMAN; MEMORY; PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; REVIEW; VISUAL MEMORY;

EID: 41849127802     PISSN: 09541446     EISSN: 14640635     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09541440701728581     Document Type: Review

References (110)

1. Anderson, J. R., & Reder, L. M. (1979). An elaborative processing explanation of depth of processing. In L. Cermak & F. Craik (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 385-403). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
2. Becker, B. J. (1994). Combining significance levels. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 215-230). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
3. Begg, C. B. (1994). Publication bias. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 399-409). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
4. *Bothwell, R. K. (1985). The effects of gender and arousal on facial recognition and recall. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL.
5. Bothwell, R. K., Deffenbacher, K. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1987). Correlation of eyewitness accuracy and confidence: Optimality hypothesis revisited. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 691-695.
6. *Bothwell, R. K., Trahan, M. A., & Newsome, S. R. (1991). Eyewitness description accuracy as a function of weapon presence and delay. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southeastern Psychological Association, New Orleans, LA.
7. Brandimonte, M. A., Hitch, G. J., & Bishop, D. V. M. (1992). Influence of short-term memory codes on visual image processing: Evidence from image transformation tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 157-165.
8. Brewer, N., & Burke, A. (2002). Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law and Human Behavior, 26, 353-364.
9. *Brigham, J. C., & Pigott, M. (1983). The relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association, Anaheim, CA.
10. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2002). Verbal overshadowing in a multiple face presentation paradigm: Effects of description instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 873-885.
11. Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2003). Verbal overshadowing of multiple face and car recognition: Effects of within- versus across-category verbal descriptions. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 183-201.
12. *Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2005). Verbal facilitation of face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 33, 1442-1456.
13. *Brown, C., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2006). Beneficial effects of verbalization and visual distinctiveness on remembering and knowing faces. Memory and Cognition, 34, 277-286.
14. Cabeza, R., & Kato, T. (2000). Features are also important: Contributions of featural and configural processing to face recognition. Psychological Science, 11, 429-433.
15. Chance, J., & Goldstein, A. G. (1976). Recognition of faces and verbal labels. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 7, 384-386.
16. Clare, J., & Lewandowsky, S. (2004). Verbalizing facial memory: Criterion effects in verbal overshadowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 739-755.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
18. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994). The handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
19. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671-684.
20. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D., & Martens, T. K. (1987). The reliability of eyewitness identification: The role of system and estimator variables. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 233-258.
21. *Davids, M. S. C., Sporer, S. L., & McQuiston-Surrett, D. (2006). The verbal facilitation effect: Person descriptions as a means to improve identification performance. Manuscript submitted for publication.
22. Deffenbacher, K. A. (1983). The influence of arousal on reliability of testimony. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock & B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 235-251). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
23. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., Penrod, S. D., & McGorty, E. K. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the effects of high stress on eyewitness memory. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 687-706.
24. Diamond, R., & Carey, S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 107-117.
25. Dodson, C. S., Johnson, M. K., & Schooler, J. W. (1997). The verbal overshadowing effect: Why descriptions impair face recognition. Memory and Cognition, 25, 129-139.
26. Dore, H. S., Brigham, J. C., Moussallie, N. M., Bennett, L. B., & Butz, D. A. (2005). What did he look like? Is there an "other-race effect" in description accuracy? Unpublished manuscript.
27. Ellis, H. D., Deregowski, J. B., & Shepherd, J. W. (1975). Descriptions of white and black faces by white and black subjects. International Journal of Psychology, 10, 119-123.
28. Fallshore, M., & Schooler, J. W. (1995). The verbal vulnerability of perceptual expertise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1608-1623.
29. *Finger, K. (2002). Mazes and music: Using perceptual processing to release verbal over-shadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 887-896.
30. *Finger, K., & Pezdek, K. (1999). The effect of verbal description on face identification accuracy: "Release from verbal overshadowing". Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 340-348.
31. Fiore, S. M., & Schooler, J. W. (2002). How did you get here from there? Verbal overshadowing of spatial mental models. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 897-909.
32. Flexser, A., & Tulving, E. (1978). Retrieval independence in recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 85(3), 153-171.
33. Gardiner, J. M. (1988). Functional aspects of recollective experience. Memory and Cognition, 16, 309-313.
34. *Geiselman, R. E., Schroppel, T., Tubridy, A., Konisi, T., & Rodriguez, V. (2000). Objectivity bias in eyewitness performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 323-332.
35. *Goldstein, A. G., Johnson, K. S., & Chance, J. E. (1979). Does fluency of face description imply superior face recognition? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 13, 15-18.
36. *Grass, E., & Sporer, S. L. (1991, March). Richtig oder falsch? Zur Vorhersage von Identifizierungsleistungen durch weitere Aussagen von Zeugen [Correct or false? Post-dicting eyewitness identification accuracy from verbal statements]. Paper presented at the 33rd Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Giessen, Germany.
37. *Gwyer, P., & Clifford, B. R. (1997). The effects of the cognitive interview on recall, identification, confidence and the confidence/accuracy relationship. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 121-145.
38. Haas, S., & Sporer, S. L. (1989, April). Zur Entwicklung von Enkodierungsstrategien beim Wiedererkennen von Gesichtern [On the development of encoding strategies in the recognition of human faces]. Paper presented at the 31st Tagung experimentell arbeitender Psychologen, Bamberg, Germany.
39. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
40. Hintzman, D., & Hatry, A. L. (1990). Item effects in recognition and fragment completion: Contingency relations vary for different subsets of words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 965-969.
41. *Hosch, H. M., & Bothwell, R. K. (1990). Arousal, description and identification accuracy of victims and bystanders. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5, 481-488.
42. Humphreys, M. S., & Bowyer, P. A. (1980). Sequential testing effects and the relation between recognition and recognition failure. Memory and Cognition, 8, 271-277.
43. Itoh, Y. (2005). The facilitating effect of verbalization on the recognition memory of incidentally learned faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 421-433.
44. *Jenkins, F., & Davies, G. (1985). Contamination of facial memory through exposure to misleading composite pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 164-176.
45. Kahana, M. J., Hirsuto, D. S., & Schneider, A. R. (2005). Theoretical correlations and measured correlations: Relating recognition and recall in four distributed memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 933-953.
46. *Kitagami, S., Sato, W., & Yoshikawa, S. (2002). The influence of test-set similarity in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 963-972.
47. Light, R. J., Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (1994). The visual presentation and interpretation of meta-analyses. In H. Cooper & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 439-453). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
48. Lindsay, D., Read, J., & Sharma, K. (1998). Accuracy and confidence in person identification: The relationship is strong when witnessing conditions vary widely. Psychological Science, 9(3), 215-218.
49. Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
50. Lovett, S. B., Small, M. Y., & Engstrom, S. A. (1992, November). The verbal overshadowing effect: Now you see it, now you don't. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, St Louis, MO.
51. Mauldin, M. A., & Laughery, K. R. (1981). Composite production effects on subsequent facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 351-357.
52. McKelvie, S. J. (1976). The effects of verbal labeling on recognition memory for schematic faces. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 28, 459-474.
53. McQuiston-Surrett, D., & Topp, L. D. (2004, March). Cross-race face recall: Assessing perceptual expertise in a description and facial composite task. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, Scottsdale, AZ.
54. *Meissner, C. A. (2002). Applied aspects of the instructional bias effect in verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 911-928.
55. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001a). A meta-analysis of the verbal overshadowing effect in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 15, 603-616.
56. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001b). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3-35.
57. *Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Kelley, C. M. (2001). The influence of retrieval processes in verbal overshadowing. Memory and Cognition, 29, 176-186.
58. Meissner, C. A., Sporer, S. L., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Person descriptions as eyewitness evidence. In R. Lindsay, D. Ross, J. Read, & M. Toglia (Eds.), Handbook of eyewitness psychology: Memory for people (pp. 3-34). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
59. Melcher, J. M., & Schooler, J. W. (1996). The misremembrance of wines past: Verbal and perceptual expertise differentially mediate verbal overshadowing of taste memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 231-245.
60. *Memon, A., & Bartlett, J. (2002). The effects of verbalization on face recognition in young and older adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 635-650.
61. *Memon, A., & Rose, R. (2002). Identification abilities of children: Does a verbal description hurt face recognition? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 8, 229-242.
62. *Memon, A., Rose, R., Searcy, J., & Bartlett, J. C. (1999). The verbal overshadowing effect and eyewitness identification: A developmental and aging perspective. Unpublished manuscript.
63. Meurer, D., Sporer, S. L., & Rennig, C. (1990). Der Beweiswert von Personenidentifizierungen: Auf dem Weg von alltagspsychologischen Erfahrungssaetzen zu empirisch ueberpruefbaren Fragestellungen [The probative value of eyewitness identifications: From common sense psychology to empirically testable hypotheses]. In D. Meurer & S. L. Sporer (Eds.), Zum Beweiswert von Personenidentifizierungen (pp. 1-18). Marburg, Germany: N. G. Elwert.
64. Mitchell, T. L., Meissner, C. A., & MacLin, O. H. (2006). The influence of the cross-race effect on lineup construction and fairness. Manuscript submitted for publication.
65. Neil v. Biggers, 409 US 188 (1972).
66. Odenthal, H. J. (1999). Die Gegenüberstellung im Strafverfahren [The lineup in criminal procedure] (3rd ed.). Stuttgart, Germany: Boorberg.
67. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt.
68. *Pigott, M. A., & Brigham, J. C. (1985). Relationship between accuracy of prior description and facial recognition. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 547-555.
69. *Pigott, M. A., Brigham, J. C., & Bothwell, R. K. (1990). A field study on the relationship between quality of eyewitnesses' descriptions and identification accuracy. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 17, 84-88.
70. *Pozzulo, J. D., & Warren, K. L. (2003). Descriptions and identification of strangers by youth and adult eyewitnesses. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 315-323.
71. Read, J. D. (1979). Rehearsal and recognition of human faces. American Journal of Psychology, 92, 71-85.
72. Roediger, H. L., & Guynn, M. J. (1996). Retrieval processes. In E. L. Bjork & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory (pp. 197-231). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
73. Roediger, H. L., Wheeler, M. A., & Rajaram, S. (1993). Remembering, knowing, and reconstructing the past. In D. L. Medin (Ed.), Advances in research and theory: Vol. 37. The psychology of learning and motivation (pp. 97-134). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
74. Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
75. Ryan, R. S., & Schooler, J. W. (1998). Whom do words hurt? Individual differences in susceptibility to verbal overshadowing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 105-126.
76. *Sauerland, M., Holub, F. E., & Sporer, S. L. (2008). Person descriptions and person identifications: Verbal overshadowing or recognition criterion shift? European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 20, 496-528.
77. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Verbalization produces a transfer inappropriate processing shift. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 16, 989-997.
78. *Schooler, J. W., & Engstler-Schooler, T. Y. (1990). Verbal overshadowing of visual memories: Some things are better left unsaid. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 36-71.
79. Schooler, J. W., Fiore, S. M., & Brandimonte, M. A. (1997). At a loss from words: Verbal overshadowing of perceptual memories. In D. Medin (Ed.), Handbook of learning and motivation (Vol. 37, pp. 291-340). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
80. Schooler, J. W., Ryan, R. S., & Reder, L. M. (1996). The costs and benefits of verbalization. In D. Herrmann, M. Johnson, C. McEvoy, C. Hertzog, & P. Hertel (Eds.), Basic and applied memory: New findings (pp. 51-65). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
81. *Searcy, J. H., Bartlett, J. C., Memon, A., & Swanson, K. (2001). Aging and lineup performance at long retention intervals: Effects of metamemory and context reinstatement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 207-214.
82. Shepherd, J. W., & Deregowski, J. B. (1981). Races and faces: A comparison of the responses of Africans and Europeans to faces of the same and different races. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 125-133.
83. Smith, S. M. (1988). Environmental context-dependent memory. In G. Davies & D. Thomson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory (pp. 13-34). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
84. Sporer, S. L. (1988). Long-term improvement of facial recognition through visual rehearsal. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (pp. 182-88). London: Wiley.
85. Sporer, S. L. (1989). Verbal and visual processes in person identification. In H. Wegener, F. Loesel, & J. Haisch (Eds.), Criminal behavior and the justice system: Psychological perspectives (pp. 303-324). New York: Springer.
86. Sporer, S. L. (1991). Deep - deeper - deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology, Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 323-333.
87. *Sporer, S. L. (1992). Postdicting eyewitness identification accuracy: Confidence, decision-times and person descriptions among choosers and non-choosers. European Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 157-180.
88. Sporer, S. L. (1996). Describing others: Psychological issues. In S. L. Sporer, R. S. Malpass, & G. Koehnken (Eds.), Psychological issues in eyewitness identification (pp. 53-86). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
89. Sporer, S. (2001). Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 7, 36-97.
90. *Sporer, S. L. (2007). Person descriptions as retrieval cues: Do they really help? Psychology, Crime, and Law, 13, 591-609.
91. Sporer, S. L., & Cutler, B. L. (2003). Identification evidence in Germany: Common sense assumptions, empirical evidence, guidelines, and judicial practices. In P. J. van Koppen & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Adversarial vs. inquisitorial justice: Psychological perspectives on criminal justice systems (pp. 191-208). New York: Plenum.
92. Sporer, S. L., Penrod, S., Read, D., & Cutler, B. (1995). Choosing, confidence, and accuracy: A meta-analysis of the confidence-accuracy relation in eyewitness identification studies. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 315-327.
93. Tredoux, C. G., Meissner, C. A., Malpass, R. S., & Zimmerman, L. A. (2004). Eyewitness identification. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of applied psychology (pp. 875-887). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
94. Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory systems are there? The American Psychologist, 40, 385-398.
95. Tulving, E., & Schacter, D. L. (1990). Priming and human memory systems. Science, 247, 301-306.
96. *Wegener, H. (1966). Experimentelle Untersuchungen ueber die Personenbeschreibung und identifizierung 10- bis 12-jaehriger Kinder [Experimental investigations on person descriptions and identifications of 10- to 12-year-old children]. In J. Gerchow (Ed.), An den Grenzen von Medizin und Recht (pp. 115-125). Stuttgart, Germany: Enke.
97. Wells, G., & Hryciw, B. (1984). Memory for faces: Encoding and retrieval operations. Memory and Cognition, 12(4), 338-344.
98. *Wells, G. L. (1985). Verbal descriptions of faces from memory: Are they diagnostic of identification accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 619-626.
99. Wells, G. L., & Olson, E. A. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 277-295.
100. Wells, G. L., & Turtle, J. W. (1988). What is the best way to encode faces? In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (pp. 163-168). New York: Wiley.
101. Westerman, D. L., & Larson, J. D. (1997). Verbal overshadowing effect: Evidence for a general shift in processing. American Journal of Psychology, 110, 417-428.
102. Wickham, L. H. V., & Swift, H. (2006). Articulatory suppression attenuates the verbal overshadowing effect: A role for verbal encoding in face identification. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 157-169.
103. Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 181-190.
104. Wogalter, M. S. (1991). Effects of post-exposure description and imaging on subsequent face recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 35, 575-579.
105. *Wogalter, M. S. (1996). Describing faces from memory: Accuracy and effects on subsequent recognition performance. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40, 536-540.
106. Woodhead, M., & Baddeley, A. (1981). Individual differences and memory for faces, pictures, and words. Memory and Cognition, 9(4), 368-370.
107. *Yarmey, A. D. (1986). Verbal, visual, and voice identification of a rape suspect under different levels of illumination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 363-370.
108. *Yarmey, A. D. (2004). Eyewitness recall and photo identification: A field experiment. Psychology, Crime and Law, 10, 53-68.
109. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
110. Yu, C. J., & Geiselman, R. E. (1993). Effects of constructing identi-kit composites on photospread identification performance. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, 280-292.