Lessons from the origins of eyewitness testimony research in Europe

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 737-757

  Sporer, Siegfried Ludwig ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL RESEARCH; ARTICLE; COGNITION; CRIMINAL JUSTICE; CRIMINAL LAW; CRIMINOLOGY; EUROPE; EXPERT WITNESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 53849119210     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1479     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against an unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70 (Whole no. 9).
2. Ash, M. G. (1980). Academic politics in the history of science: Experimental psychology in Germany, 1879-1914. Central European History, 13, 255-286.
3. Bender, H.-U. (1987). Merkmalskombinationen in Aussagen [Criteria combinations in eyewitness statements]. Tübingen: J.C.B. Mohr.
4. Bernheim, H. (1888). De la suggestion et ses applications à la thérapeutique [Suggestion and its applications in therapy] (2nd ed). Paris: Doin. (1st ed. 1986).
5. Binet, A. (1900). La suggestibilité [On suggestibility]. Paris: Schleicher Frères.
6. Binet, A. (1905). La science du témoignage. Année Psychologique, 11, 128-136.
7. Borst, M. (1905). Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Erziehbarkeit und die Treue der Aussage [Experimental investigations on the education and fidelity of the Aussage]. In L. W. Stern (Ed.), Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage (Vol. 2, pp. 73-120). Leipzig: Barth.
8. Brewer, N., & Weber, N. (2008). Eyewitness confidence and latency: Indices of memory processes not just markers of accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 827-840. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1486
9. Brigham, J. C. (1999). What is forensic psychology, anyway? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 273-298.
10. Butterfield, H. (1951). The Whig interpretation of history. New York: Scribners. (Originally published 1931 in London: G. Bell and Sons).
11. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). The suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
12. Ceci, S. J., & Bruck, M. (1999). Foreword: The legacy of Clara and William Stern: Rediscovering the origins of contemporary views on the child witness. In C. Stern, & W. L. Stern (Ed.), Recollection, testimony, and lying in early childhood (pp. XI-XV). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
13. Davis, S. L. (1998). Social and scientific influences on the study of children's suggestibility: A historical perspective. Child Maltreatment, 3, 186-494.
14. Deffenbacher, K. A. (2008). Estimating the impact of estimator variables on eyewitness identification: A fruitful marriage of practical problem solving and psychological theorizing. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 815-826. DOI: 10.1002/acp.1485
15. Deutsch, W. (Ed.). (1991). Pie verborgene Aktualität von William Stern [The hidden currency of William Stern]. Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Peter Lang.
16. Doyle, J. M. (2005). True witness. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
17. Ellenberger, H. F. (1970). The discovey of the unconscious. New York: Basic Books.
18. Endres, J. (1997). The suggestibility of the child witness: The role of individual differences and their assessment. Journal of Credibility Assessment and Witness Psychology, 1, 44-67.
19. Flachsbart, U. (1999). William Sterns Beiträge zur Forensischen Psychologie und ihre Rezeption in Deutschland. Eine Literaturanalyse in Kontext biographischer, psychologiegeschichtlicher und gesellschaftspolitischer Hintergründe [William Stern's contributions to forensic psychology and its reception in Germany. An analysis of the literature in biographical, psychohistorical and social-political contexts]. Unveröffentlichte Dissertation, Universität Hannover.
20. Grassberger, R. (1956). Pioneers in Criminology. XIII. Hans Gross(1847-1915). The Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 47, 397-405.
21. Gross, H. (1893). Handbuch für Untersuchunqsrichter [Handbook for investigative judges]. Graz: Teuschner & Lubensky.
22. Gross, H. (1898/1905). Crimininalpsychologie [Criminal psychology]. Graz: Teuschner & Lubensky. (Engl. transl. 1905).
23. Gundlach, H. (2004a). Die Lage der Psychologie um 1900 [The state of psychology around 1900]. Psychologische Rundschau, 55 (Suppl. 1), 2-11.
24. Gundlach, H. (2004b). Reine Psychologie, Angewandte Psychologie und die Institutionalisierung der Psychologie. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 212, 183-199.
25. Hale, M. (1980). Human science and social order: Hugo Münsterberg and the origins of applied psychology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
26. Henke, E. (1838). Handbuch des Criminalrechts und der Criminalpolitik. Vierter Teil [Handbook of criminal law and criminal politics. Part 4]. Berlin: Nicolai.
27. Hillebrand, F. (1913). Die Aussperrung der Psychologen [The exclusion of psychologists]. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 67, 1-21.
28. Ibabe, I., & Sparer. S. L. (2004). The influence of question form on the accuracy and confidence of memories for central and peripheral action and descriptive details of an event. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 711-726.
29. Jaffa, S. (1903). Ein psychologisches Experiment im kriminalistischen Seminar der Universität Berlin [A psychological experiment in the criminalistic seminar at the University of Berlin]. In W. Stern (Ed.), Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage (Vol. 2, pp. 79-99). Leipzig: Barth.
30. Jung, C. G. (1905). Die psychologische Diagnose des Tatbestandes. In C. G. Jung (Ed.), Gesammelte Werke (Vol. 2, pp. 338-374). Olten: Walter.
31. Kobler, F. (1914). Ein rechtspsychologisches Experiment [A legal psychological experiment]. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Psychologie, 8, 317-325.
32. Kühne, A. (1997). Historisch-psychologische Betrachtungen zur Zeugenaussage: William Stern und die Folgen für die psychologische Forschung und Rechtspraxis [Historical-psychological reflections on eyewitness testimony: William Stern and the consequences for psychological research and legal practice]. In M. Stadler, & L. Greuel (Eds.), Zur Psychologie der Zeugenaussage (pp. 5-13). Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.
33. Lane, S. M., & Meissner, C. A. (2008). A 'middle road' approach to bridging the basic - applied divide in eyewitness identification research. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22, 779-787. DOI: 10.1002/ acp.1482
34. Lipmann, O. (1935). Methoden der Aussagepsychologie [Methods of eyewitness testimony]. In E. Abderhalden (Ed.), Handbuch der biologischen Arbeitsmethoden (Abt. VI, Teil C, II, 2, Band 3, pp. 967-1056). Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg.
35. Marbe, K. (1913). Grundzüge der Forensischen Psychologie [Principles of forensic psychology]. München: Beck.
36. Metraux, A. (1980). Wilhelm Wundt und die Tnstitutionalisierung der Psychologie [Wilhelm Wundt and the institutionalization of psychology]. Psychologische Rundschau, 31, 84-98.
37. Mittermaier, C. J. A. (1834). Die Lehre vom Beweise im deutschen Strafprozesse [The doctrine of evidence in German criminal proceedings]. Darmstadt: Heyer.
38. Moore, C. C. (1907). Yellow psychology. Law Notes, 11, 125-127.
39. Münsterberg, H. (1908). On the witness stand: Essays on psychology and crime. New York: Doubleday, Page.
40. Münsterberg, M. (1922). Hugo Münsterberg: His life and work. New York: D. Appleton & Co.
41. Pfungst, O. (1911). Clever Hans (the horse of Mr. von Osten): A contribution to experimental animal and human psychology. New York: H. Holt & Company.
42. Roback, A. A. (1952). History of American psychology. New York: Library Publishers.
43. Sello, E. (1911). Die Irrtümer der Strafjustiz und ihre Ursachen [Errors of criminal justice and their causes] (Vol. 1). Berlin: R. v. Decker Verlag.
44. Sporer, S. L. (1982). A brief history of the psychology of testimony. Current Psychological Reviews, 2, 323-340.
45. Sporer, S. L. (1987). Gedächtnis in vitro und in vivo: Von Hermann Ebbinghaus' sinnlosen Silben bis zur experimentellen Pädagogik and zur Aussagepsychologie [Memory in vitro and in vivo: From Hermann Ebbinghaus' nonsense syllables to experimental pedagogy and the psychology of verbal reports]. In W. Traxel (Ed.), Internationales Hermann Ebbinghaus Symposion (pp. 107-119). Passau: Passavia.
46. Sporer, S. L. (1997). On the origins of the psychology of testimony. In C. Early, W. Bringmann, H. E. Lück, & R. Miller (Eds.), A. pictorial history of psychology (pp. 476-479). Carol Stream, IL: Quintessence Publishing Co.
47. Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P.-A. Granhag, & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
48. Sporer, S. L. (2006). Editorial: The science of eyewitness testimony has come of age. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 7, I-II.
49. Sporer, S. L. (2007). Evaluating witness evidence: The fallacies of intuition. In C. Engel, & F. Strack (Eds.), The impact of court procedure on the psychology of judicial decision making (pp. 111-150). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos Verlag.
50. Sprung, L., & Brandt, R. (1992). Otto Lipmann (1880-1933) und die Anfänge der angewandten Psychologie in Berlin. [Otto Lipmann (1880-1933) and the beginnings of applied psychology in Berlin]. In L. Sprung, & W. Schönpflug (Eds.), Zur Geschichte der Psychologie in Berlin (pp. 139-159). Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
51. Sprung, L., & Schönpflug W. (Eds.). (1992). Zur Geschichte der Psychologie in Berlin [On the history of psychology in Berlin]. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.
52. Stern, C., & Stern, L. W. (1909/1999). Erinnerung, Aussage, und Lüge in der frühen Kindheit [Recollection, testimony, and lying in early childhood]. Leipzig: Barth. (transl. by J. T. Lamiell, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association).
53. Stern, L. W. (1902). Zur Psychologie der Aussage [On the psychology of testimony]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 22, 315-370.
54. Stern L. W. (Ed.). (1903-1906). Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage (2 Bände) [Contributions to the psychology of testimony (2 Vols.)]. Leipzig: Barth. (1. Folge 1903-04; 2. Folge 1905-06).
55. Stern, L. W. (1904). Die Aussage als geistige Leistung and als Verhörsprodukt [Testimony as mental achievement and product of interrogation]. In L. W. Stern (Ed.), Beiträge zur Psychologie der Aussage (Vol. 1, pp. 267-415). Leipzig: Barth.
56. Stern, L. W. (1905/1906). Leitsätze über die Bedeutung der Aussagepsychologie für das gerichtliche Verfahren [Guidelines on the relevance of the psychology of testimony for criminal proceedings]. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strachrechtswissenschaft, 26, 180-188.
57. Stern, L. W. (1910). Abstracts of lectures on the psychology of testimony and on the study of individuality. American Journal of Psychology, 21, 270-282.
58. Stern, L. W. (1926). Jugendliche Zeugen in Sittlichkeitsprozessen [Juvenile witnesses in criminal trials of sexual abuse]. Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer.
59. Stern, L. W. (1939). The psychology of testimony. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 34, 3-20.
60. Stocking, G. W., Jr. (1965). On the limits of 'presentism' and 'historicism' in the history of the behavioral sciences. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1, 211-217.
61. Undeutsch, U. (1967). Beurteilung der Glaubhaftigkeit von Zeugenaussagen [Evaluation of the credibility of eyewitness statements]. In U. Undeutsch (Ed.), Handbuch der Psycholoqie (Vol. 11, pp. 26-181). Göttingen: Hogrefe.
62. Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility Assessment (pp. 101-119). Deventer, the Netherlands: Kluwer.
63. Van Ginneken, J. (1992). Crowds, psychology and politics, 1871-1899. New York: Cambridge University Press.
64. Varendonck, J. (1911). La psychologie du témoignage [The psychology of testimony]. Gand: Maison d̀éditions et d̀impressions.
65. Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-based content analysis: A qualitative review of the first 37 studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11, 3-41.
66. Wertheimer, M., & Klein, J. (1904). Psychologische Tatbestandsdiagnostik. Archiv für Kriminal-Anthropologie und Kriminalistik, 15, 72-113.
67. Whipple, G. M. (1909). The observer as reporter: A survey of the 'psychology of testimony'. Psychological Bulletin, 6, 153-170.
68. Wigmore, J. H. (1909). Professor Münsterberg and the psychology of testimony. Illinois Law Review, 3, 399-445.
69. Wigmore, J. H. (1937). The science of judicial proof, as given by logic, psychology, and general experience, and illustrated in judicial trials (3rd ed.). Boston: Litlle, Brown.
70. Wolf, T. H. (1973). Alfred Binet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Wrightsman, L. S. (2001). Forensic psychology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.