Retrieval attempts enhance learning, but retrieval success (versus failure) does not matter

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 283-294

  Kornell, Nate ^a   Klein, Patricia Jacobs ^b   Rawson, Katherine A ^c  

^a WILLIAMS COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^c KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Learning; Memory; Metacognition; Retrieval

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RECALL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CUES; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925744206     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0037850     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Arnold, K. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2013). Test-potentiated learning: Distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 940- 945. doi:10.1037/a0029199
2. Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (1992). A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In A. F. Healy, S. M. Kosslyn, & R. M. Shiffrin (Eds.), From learning processes to cognitive processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes (Vol. 2, pp. 35-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
3. Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 417-444. doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
4. Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., 3rd. (2008). Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 918-928. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918
5. Carpenter, S. K. (2009). Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1563-1569. doi:10.1037/ a0017021
6. Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547-1552. doi:10.1037/ a0024140
7. Carrier, M., & Pashler, H. (1992). The influence of retrieval on retention. Memory & Cognition, 20, 633-642. doi:10.3758/BF03202713
8. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 354-380. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354
9. Collins, A. M., & Quillian, M. R. (1972). Experiments on semantic memory and language comprehension. In L. W. Gregg (Ed.), Cognition in learning and memory (pp. 117-137). Oxford, England: Wiley.
10. Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. A. (Eds.). (2008). A handbook of metamemory and memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Psychology Press.
11. Finn, B., & Roediger, H. L. (2011). Enhancing retention through reconsolidation: Negative emotional arousal following retrieval enhances later recall. Psychological Science, 22, 781-786. doi:10.1177/ 0956797611407932
12. Finn, B., Roediger, H. L., & Rosenzweig, E. (2012). Reconsolidation from negative emotional pictures: Is successful retrieval required? Memory & Cognition, 40, 1031-1045. doi:10.3758/s13421-012-0203-7
13. Grimaldi, P. J., & Karpicke, J. D. (2012). When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding? Memory & Cognition, 40, 505- 513. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0174-0
14. Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2010). The costs and benefits of providing feedback during learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 797-801. doi:10.3758/PBR.17.6.797
15. Hays, M. J., Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2013). When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 290-296.
16. Huelser, B. J., & Metcalfe, J. (2012). Making related errors facilitates learning, but learners do not know it. Memory & Cognition, 40, 514- 527. doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0167-z
17. Izawa, C. (1970). Optimal potentiating effects and forgetting-prevention effects of tests in paired-associate learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 340-344. doi:10.1037/h0028541
18. Jacoby, L. L. (1978). On interpreting the effects of repetition: Solving a problem versus remembering a solution. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 649-667. doi:10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90393-6
19. Karpicke, J. (2009). Metacognitive control and strategy selection: Deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 469-486. doi:10.1037/a0017341
20. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Repeated retrieval during learning is the key to long-term retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 151-162. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.09.004
21. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science, 319, 966 -968. doi:10.1126/science .1152408
22. Karpicke, J. D., & Zaromb, F. M. (2010). Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 227-239. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.010
23. Knight, J. B., Ball, B. H., Brewer, G. A., DeWitt, M. R., & Marsh, R. L. (2012). Testing unsuccessfully: A specification of the underlying mechanisms supporting its influence on retention. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 731-746. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.008
24. Kornell, N. (2014). Attempting to answer a meaningful question enhances subsequent learning even when feedback is delayed. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 106-114. doi:10.1037/a0033699
25. Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65, 85-97. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002
26. Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 989-998. doi:10.1037/ a0015729
27. Kornell, N., & Son, L. K. (2009). Learners' choices and beliefs about self-testing. Memory, 17, 493-501. doi:10.1080/09658210902832915
28. Ledgerwood, A., & Sherman, J. W. (2012). Short, sweet, and problematic? The rise of the short report in psychological science. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 60-66. doi:10.1177/1745691611427304
29. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved from http://w3.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
30. Pashler, H., Cepeda, N. J., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2005). When does feedback facilitate learning of words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 3-8. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.31.1.3
31. Pashler, H., & Harris, C. R. (2012). Is the replicability crisis overblown? Three arguments examined. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7, 531-536. doi:10.1177/1745691612463401
32. Potts, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143, 644-667. doi:10.1037/a0033194
33. Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2010) Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science, 330, 335. doi:10.1126/ science.1191465
34. Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 243-257. doi:10.1037/a0016496
35. Roediger, H. L. (2012). Psychology's woes and a partial cure: The value of replication. APS Observer, 25, 27-29.
36. Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 20-27. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003
37. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006a). Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychological Science, 17, 249-255. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x
38. Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006b). The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 181-210. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x
39. Schmidt, S. (2009). Shall we really do it again? The powerful concept of replication is neglected in the social sciences. Review of General Psychology, 13, 90-100. doi:10.1037/a0015108
40. Vaughn, K. E., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 899-905. doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0276-0