Assimilation and Contrast are on the same scale of food anticipated-experienced pleasure divergence

Appetite

Volumn 90, Issue , 2015, Pages 160-167

  Davidenko, Olga ^a,b   Delarue, Julien ^c   Marsset Baglieri, Agnès ^a   Fromentin, Gilles ^a   Tomé, Daniel ^a   Nadkarni, Nachiket ^a   Darcel, Nicolas ^a  

^a INRA Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique   (France)

^b Chaire ANCA Food Nutrition and Eating Behavior   (France)

^c UMR SayFood   (France)

Author keywords

Anticipation; Assimilation; Consumer; Contrast; Food; Pleasure

Indexed keywords

ANTICIPATION; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; BEVERAGE; CONSUMER; FLAVOR; FOOD; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PLEASURE; TASTE; ADULT; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; ANTICIPATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; BEVERAGES; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; FOOD; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; PLEASURE; TASTE; TASTE PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84925627242     PISSN: 01956663     EISSN: 10958304     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.03.006     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aaron J.I., Mela D.J., Evans R.E. The influences of attitudes, beliefs and label information on perceptions of reduced-fat spread. Appetite 1994, 22(1):25-37. 10.1006/appe.1994.1003.
2. Blundell J., de Graaf C., Hulshof T., Jebb S., Livingstone B., Lluch A., et al. Appetite control. Methodological aspects of the evaluation of foods. Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 2010, 11(3):251-270. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2010.00714.x.
3. Caporale G., Monteleone E. Influence of information about manufacturing process on beer acceptability. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(3):271-278. 10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00067-3.
4. Caporale G., Policastro S., Carlucci A., Monteleone E. Consumer expectations for sensory properties in virgin olive oils. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17(1):116-125.
5. Cardello A.V., Sawyer F.M. Effects of disconfirmed consumer expectations on food acceptability. Journal of Sensory Studies 1992, 7(4):253-277. 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1992.tb00194.x.
6. Deliza R., MacFie H.J.H. The generation of sensory expectation by external cues and its effect on sensory perception and hedonic ratings. A review. Journal of Sensory Studies 1996, 11(2):103-128. 10.1111/j.1745-459X.1996.tb00036.x.
7. Grabenhorst F., Rolls E.T., Bilderbeck A. How cognition modulates affective responses to taste and flavor. Top-down influences on the orbitofrontal and pregenual cingulate cortices. Cerebral Cortex 2008, 18(7):1549-1559. 10.1093/cercor/bhm185.
8. Hamelin J. Le prix de référence. Un concept polymorphe. Recherche et Applications En Marketing 2000, 15(3):75-88. 10.1177/076737010001500305.
9. Herr P.M., Sherman S.J., Fazio R.H. On the consequences of priming. Assimilation and contrast effects. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 1983, 19(4):323-340. 10.1016/0022-1031(83)90026-4.
10. Hewson L., Hollowood T., Chandra S., Hort J. Taste-aroma interactions in a citrus flavoured model beverage system. Similarities and differences between acid and sugar type. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(3):323-334. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.10.008.
11. Hovland C.I., Harvey O.J., Sherif M. Assimilation and contrast effects in reactions to communication and attitude change. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 1957, 55(2):244-252. 10.1037/h0048480.
12. Imm B.-Y., Lee J.H., Lee S.H. Effects of sensory labels on taste acceptance of commercial food products. Food Quality and Preference 2012, 25(2):135-139. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.01.010.
13. Kähkönen P., Tuorila H. Effect of reduced-fat information on expected and actual hedonic and sensory ratings of sausage. Appetite 1998, 30(1):13-23. 10.1006/appe.1997.0104.
14. Kuenzel J., Zandstra E.H., Deredy W.E., Blanchette I., Thomas A. Expecting yoghurt drinks to taste sweet or pleasant increases liking. Appetite 2011, 56(1):122-127. 10.1016/j.appet.2010.12.009.
15. Manis M., Nelson T.E., Shedler J. Stereotypes and social judgment. Extremity, assimilation, and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1988, 55(1):28-36. 10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.28.
16. McBride R.L., Johnson R.L. Perception of sugar-acid mixtures in lemon juice drink. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 1987, 22(4):399-408. 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1987.tb00503.x.
17. Nitschke J.B., Dixon G.E., Sarinopoulos I., Short S.J., Cohen J.D., Smith E.E., et al. Altering expectancy dampens neural response to aversive taste in primary taste cortex. Nature Neuroscience 2006, 9(3):435-442. 10.1038/nn1645.
18. Pfaffmann C. Wundt's schema of sensory affect in the light of research on gustatory preferences. Psychological Research 1980, 42(1):165-174. 10.1007/BF00308700.
19. Plassmann H., O'Doherty J., Shiv B., Rangel A. Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2008, 105(3):1050.
20. Popper R., Rosenstock W., Schraidt M., Kroll B.J. The effect of attribute questions on overall liking ratings. Food Quality and Preference 2004, 15(7-8):853-858. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2003.12.004.
21. Sherif M., Hovland C.I. Social judgment. Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change 1961, Vol. 12. Yale University Press, Oxford, England.
22. Sherif M., Taub D., Hovland C.I. Assimilation and contrast effects of anchoring stimuli on judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1958, 55(2):150-155. 10.1037/h0048784.
23. Stefani G., Romano D., Cavicchi A. Consumer expectations, liking and willingness to pay for specialty foods. Do sensory characteristics tell the whole story?. Food Quality and Preference 2006, 17(1-2):53-62. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.010.
24. Veldhuizen M.G., Douglas D., Aschenbrenner K., Gitelman D.R., Small D.M. The anterior insular cortex represents breaches of taste identity expectation. The Journal of Neuroscience 2011, 31(41):14735-14744. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1502-11.2011.
25. Wansink B., van Ittersum K., Painter J.E. How descriptive food names bias sensory perceptions in restaurants. Food Quality and Preference 2005, 16(5):393-400. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2004.06.005.
26. Wickham H. ggplot2. Elegant graphics for data analysis 2009, Springer New York. http://had.co.nz/ggplot2/book.
27. Yeomans M.R., Chambers L., Blumenthal H., Blake A. The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation. The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference 2008, 19(6):565-573. 10.1016/j.foodqual.2008.02.009.
28. Zellner D.A., Kern B., Parker S. Protection for the good. Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast. Appetite 2002, 38(3):175-180. 10.1006/appe.2002.0476.
29. Zellner D.A., Strickhouser D., Tornow C.E. Disconfirmed hedonic expectations produce perceptual contrast, not assimilation. The American Journal of Psychology 2004, 363-387.