The new trends in adaptive educational hypermedia systems

International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 221-241

  Somyürek, Sibel ^a  

^a GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Adaptive educational hypermedia systems; Content analysis, distance education; New trends

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925349783     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14923831     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.19173/irrodl.v16i1.1946     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Ahuja, J. S. and Webster, J. (2001). Perceived disorientation: An examination of a new measure to assess web design effectiveness. Interacting with Computers, 14(1), 15-29.
2. Aroyo, L., Pokraev, S., and Brussee, R. (2003). Preparing SCORM for the semantic web. Paper presented at the International Conference on Ontologies, Databases and Applications of Semantics (ODBASE'03), 3-7, November, Catania, Sicily.
3. Aroyo, L., & Dicheva, D. (2004). The new challenges for e-learning: The educational semantic web. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), 59-69.
4. Behaz, A. and Djoudi, M. (2011). Ontological representation models for adaptive hypermedia construction. International Review on Computers & Software, 6(2), 199-205.
5. Bittencourt, I. I., Costa, E., Silva, M. and Soares, E. (2009). A computational model for developing semantic web-based educational systems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 22(4), 302-315.
6. Boyle, C. and Encarnacion, O. (1994). MetaDoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(1), 1-19.
7. Botsios, S., Georgiou, D. and Safouris, N. (2008). Contributions to adaptive educational hypermedia systems via on-line learning style estimation. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 322-339.
8. Brusilovsky, P. (1998). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa & J. Vassileva, Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia (pp. 1-44). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: The role of student knowledge level and the case for meta-adaptation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4), 487-497.
10. Brusilovsky, P. and Henze, N. (2007). Open corpus adaptive educational hypermedia. In P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa and W. Neidl, The adaptive web: Methods and strategies of web personalization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4321, (pp. 671-696). Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag.
11. Brusilovsky, P. and Pesin, L. (1998) Adaptive navigation support in educational hypermedia: An evaluation of the ISIS-Tutor. Journal of Computing and Information Technology, 6(1), 27-38.
12. Brusilovsky, P. and Rizzo, R. (2002) Using maps and landmarks for navigation between closed and open corpus hyperspace in Web-based education. The New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 9, 59-82.
13. Burgos, D., Tattersall, C. and Koper R. (2007). How to represent adaptation in e-learning with IMS learning design. Interactive Learning Environments, 15(2), 161-170.
14. Caravantes, A., and Galán, R. (2011). Generic educational knowledge representation for adaptive and cognitive systems. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 252-266.
15. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M. and Specht, M. (2010). The 3P learning model. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 74-85.
16. Chen, S. Y. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 449-460.
17. Cristea, A. & Stash, N. (2006). AWELS: Adaptive web-based education and learning styles. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'06). July 5-7, 2006. IEEE, Kerkrade, The Netherland.
18. Cristea, A. I. (2004). What can the semantic web do for adaptive educational hypermedia? Educational Technology &. Society, 7(4), 40-58.
19. Cristea, A I., and Ghali, F. (2011). Towards adaptation in e-learning 2.0. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 17(2), 199-238.
20. De Bra, P. and Calvi., L. (1998). Towards a generic adaptive hypermedia system. In second workshop on adaptive hypertext and hypermedia (Hypertext'98), June 20-24, 1998, Pittsburgh, USA, pp. 5-11.
21. Demirbilek, M. (2004). Effects of interface windowing modes and individual differences on disorientation and cognitive load in a hypermedia learning environment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida University.
22. Despotović-Zrakić, M., Marković, A., Bogdanović, Z., Barać, D., & Krčo, S. (2012). Providing adaptivity in Moodle LMS courses. Educational Technology & Society, 15(1), 326-338.
23. Dicheva, D., and Dichev, C. (2006). TM4L: Creating and browsing educational topic maps. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(3), 391-404.
24. Duffy, T. M., & Kirkley, J. R. (2004). Learning theory and pedagogy applied in distance learning: The case of Cardean University. Learner-centered theory and practice in distance education: Cases from higher education, 107-141.
25. Ford, N. and Chen, S. Y. (2001) Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5-22.
26. Ghauth, K. I. and Abdullah, N. A. (2011). The effect of incorporating good learners' ratings in e-learning content-based recommender system. Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 248-257.
27. Henze, N. and Nejdl, W. (2001). Adaptation in open corpus hypermedia. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 12(4), 325-350.
28. Holmberg, B. (1985). The feasibility of a theory of teaching for distance education and a proposed theory. ZIFF Papiere 60. ERIC, ED 290013.
29. Höök, K. (1998). Evaluating the utility and usability of an adaptive hypermedia system. Knowledge-Based Systems, 10(5), 311-319.
30. Hsiao, I. H., Bakalov, F., Brusilovsky, P., and König-Ries, B. (2013) Progressor: social navigation support through open social student modeling. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 19(2), 112-131.
31. Hsieh, H. F. and Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
32. Huang, H.-C., Wang, T. and Hsieh, F.-m. (2012). Constructing an adaptive mobile learning system for the support of personalized learning and device adaptation. In Proceedings of the 12 the International Educational Technology Conference - IETC 2012, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences (ISSN 1877-0428), 64, 332-341.
33. Jonassen, D. H., and Grabinger, R. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In D. H. Jonassen & H. Mandl (Eds.), Designing hypermedia for learning (pp. 3-26). Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
34. Jovanović, J. , Gašević, D., Torniai, C., Bateman, S. and Hatala, M. (2009). The social semantic web in intelligent learning environments: State of the art and future challenges. Interactive Learning Environments, 17(4), 273-309.
35. Juvina, I. and Herder, E. (2005). The impact of link suggestions on user navigation and user perception. In Proceedings of the User Modeling 2005: Tenth International Conference (UM2005), Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
36. Kabassi, K., Virvou, M., and Tsihrintzis, G. A. (2007). Web services user model server performing decision making. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence, 21(2), 245-264.
37. Karampiperis, P., Lin, T. and Sampson, D. G. (2006). Adaptive cognitive-based selection of learning objects. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(2), 121-135.
38. Kay, J. (2000). User interfaces for all. In User modeling for adaptation (pp. 271-294). Human Factors Series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., http://www.cs.usyd.edu.au/~judy/Homec/Pubs/ch18.pdf
39. Keegan, D. 1986. The foundations of distance education. London: Croom Helm.
40. Khribi, M. K., Jemni, M., and Nasraoui, O. (2009). Automatic recommendations for e-learning personalization based on web usage mining techniques and information retrieval. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 30-42.
41. Krippendorff, K. (2012). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Sage.
42. Klamma, R., Chatti, M. A., Duval, E., Hummel, H., Hvannberg, E. H., Kravcik, M., Law, E., Naeve, A., and Scott, P. (2007). Social software for life-long learning. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 72-83.
43. Knutov, E., De Bra, P. and Pechenizkiy, M. (2009). AH 12 years later: A comprehensive survey of adaptive hypermedia methods and techniques. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 15(1), 5-38.
44. Lazarinis, F., Green, S. and Pearson, E. (2010). Creating personalized assessments based on learner knowledge and objectives in a hypermedia Web testing application. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1732-1743.
45. Lo, J.-J. and Shu P.-C. (2005). Identification of learning styles online by observing learners' browsing behaviour through a neural network. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 43-55.
46. Mcdonald, S. and Stevenson, R. J. (1998). The effects of text structure and prior knowledge on navigation in hypertext. Human Factors, 40(1), 18-27.
47. Micarelli, A. and Sciarrone, F. (1996). A case-based system for adaptive hypermedia navigation. Advances in Case-Based Reasoning Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume 1168, 266-279.
48. Moallem, M. (2007). Accommodating individual differences in the design of online learning environments: A comparative study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(2), 217-245.
49. Muntean, C. H. and Muntean, G.-M. (2009). Open corpus architecture for personalised ubiquitous e-learning. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 13(3), 197-205.
50. Ortigosa, A., Paredes, P. and Rodriguez, P. (2010). AH-questionnaire : An adaptive hierarchical questionnaire for learning styles. Computers & Education, 54(4), 999-1005.
51. Özpolat, E. and Akar, G. B. (2009). Automatic detection of learning styles for an e-learning system. Computers & Education, 53(2), 355-367.
52. Rezende, F. and Barros, S. d. S. (2008). Students' navigation patterns in the interaction with a mechanics hypermedia program. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1370-1382.
53. Ruiz, M.P.P., Diaz, M. J. F., Soler, F. O. and Perez, J. R. P. (2008). Adaptation in current e-learning systems. Computer Standards & Interfaces, 30, 62-70.
54. Sherry, L. (1995). Issues in distance learning. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 1(4), 337-365.
55. Simonson, M., Schlosser, C., and Hanson, D. (1999). Theory and distance education: A new discussion. American Journal of Distance Education, 13(1), 60-75.
56. Sjoer, E., and Dopper, S. (2006). Learning objects and learning content management systems in engineering education: implications of new trends. European Journal of Engineering Education, 31(4), 363-372.
57. Somyürek, S. (2009). Student modeling: Recognizing the individual needs of users in e-learning environments. Uluslarasi{dotless} I˙nsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 429-450.
58. Stathacopoulou, R., Grigoriadou, M., Samarakou, M. and Mitropoulos, D. (2007). Monitoring students ' actions and using teachers ' expertise in implementing and evaluating the neural network-based fuzzy diagnostic model. Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal, 32(4), 955-975.
59. Tseng, S.-S., Su, J.-M., Hwang, G.-J., Hwang, G.-H., Tsai, C.-C., and Tsai, C.-J. (2008). An object-oriented course framework for developing adaptive learning systems. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 171-191.
60. Verbert, K., Ochoa, X., Derntl, M., Wolpers, M. Pardo, A. and Duval, E. (2012). Semi-automatic assembly of learning resources. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1257-1272.
61. Vesin, B., Ivanovic, M., Klašnja-Milicevic, A. and Budimac, Z. (2012). Protus 2.0: Ontology-based semantic recommendation in programming tutoring system. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(15), 12229-12246.
62. Weber, R. P. (1990). Basic content analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
63. Wexelblat, A., & Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: history-rich tools for information foraging. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 270-277). ACM.
64. Wolpers, M., Najjar, J., Verbert, K. and Duval, E. (2007). Tracking actual usage : The attention metadata approach. Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 106-121.
65. Yaghmaie, M. and Bahreininejad, A. (2011). A context-aware adaptive learning system using agents. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(4), 3280-3286.
66. Yeh, S.-w. (2005). Assessing metacognitive knowledge in web-based CALL : A neural network approach. Computers & Education, 44(2), 97-113.
67. Yessad, A., Faron-Zucker, C. and Laskri, M. T. (2008). Ontology-based personalization of hypermedia courses. International Review on Computers & Software, 3(6), 586.
68. Zhang, Y. and Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science, 308-319.