The 3P learning model

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 74-85

  Chatti, Mohamed Amine ^a   Jarke, Matthias ^a   Specht, Marcus ^b  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b OPEN UNIVERSITY OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Knowledge ecology; LaaN; Personal learning Environment; Personalization

Indexed keywords

EID: 78650261167     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Anderson C. (2006). The Long Tail. New York, NY: Hyperion.
2. Aroyo, L. et al. (2005). Learner Models for Web-based Personalised Adaptive Learning: Current Solutions and Open Issues. Deliverable 1.3 of the Prolearn EU/FP6 Network of Excellence.
3. Attwell, G. (2007). The personal learning environments - the future of elearning? eLearning Papers, 2(1).
4. Beck, J., Stern, M., & Haugsjaa, E. (1996). Applications of AI in Education. ACM Crossroads, 3(1), 11-15.
5. Brown, J. S. & Adler, R. P. (2008). Minds on fire: Open education, the long tail, and learning 2.0. EDUCAUSE Review, 43(1), 16-32.
6. Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and Techniques of adaptive hypermedia. User modelling and User-Adopted Interaction, 6(2/3), 87-129.
7. Burgos, D. et al. (2007). Integration of adaptive learning processes with IMS Learning Design considering corporate requirements. Deliverable 1.11 of the Prolearn EU/FP6 Network of Excellence.
8. Chatti, M. A. & Jarke (2009). Social Software for Bottom-up Knowledge Networking and Community Building. In Lytras, M. D., Tennyson, R. & Ordonez de Pablos, P. (Eds.) Knowledge Networks: The Social Software Perspective (pp. 17-27). Hershey, PA, USA: IDEA Group Publishing.
9. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M. & Frosch-Wilke, D. (2007). The future of elearning: a shift to knowledge networking and social software. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 3(4/5), 404-420.
10. Chatti, M. A., Jarke, M. & Specht S. (2009). PLEF: A Conceptual Framework for Mashup Personal Learning Environments. IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology (TCLT), 11(3).
11. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
12. De Bra, P. (2002). Adaptive educational hypermedia on the Web. Communications of the ACM, 45(5), 60-61.
13. Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ACM eLearn Magazine. Retrieved March 15, 2010, from http://www.elearnmag.org/subpage.cfm?article=29-1§ion=articles.
14. Downes, S. (2006). Learning Networks and Connective Knowledge. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://it.coe.uga.edu/itforum/paper92/DownesPaper92.pdf
15. Engeström, Y., Engeström, R. & Vähäaho, T. (1999). When the Center Does not Hold: the Importance of Knotworking. In Chaiklin, S., Hedegaard, M. & Jensen, U.J. (Eds.) Activity Theory and Social Practice: Cultural-Historical Approaches (pp. 345-374). Aarhus: Aarhus University.
16. Hafner, K. (2004, September 16). Software tutors offer help and customized hints. The New York Times.
17. Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From Chaos to Order. MA: Addison-Wesley.
18. Husband, J. (1999). Wirearchy is emerging. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://wirearchy.com/
19. Jonassen, D. H. (1991). Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(3), 5-14.
20. Kravcik, et al. (2005). Interoperability of Adaptive Learning Components. Deliverable 1.1 of the Prolearn EU/FP6 Network of Excellence.
21. Lubensky, R. (2006). The present and future of Personal Learning Environments (PLE). Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://members.optusnet.com.au/rlubensky/2006/12/present-and-future-of-personal-learning.html
22. Mejias, U. (2005). A Nomad's Guide to Learning and Social Software. The Knowledge Tree: An e-Journal of Learning Innovation, Edition 7, Oct 2005, ISSN 1448-2673.
23. Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional Design and Learning Theory. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://www.usask.ca/education/coursework/802papers/mergel/brenda.htm
24. Nardi, B., Whittaker, S., & Schwarz, H. (2002). NetWORKers and their Activity in Intensional Networks. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11(1/2), 205-242.
25. Ohlsson, S. (1994). Constraint-based Student Modeling. In: Greer, J.E. & McCalla, G.I. (Eds.) Student Modeling: the Key to Individualized Knowledge-based Instruction (pp. 167-189). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
26. Polanyi, M. (1967). The Tacit Dimension, New York: Anchor books.
27. Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.) (1999). Instructional Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory (Vol. II). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Siemens, G. (2006). Knowing Knowledge, Lulu.com.
29. Specht, M., & Burgos, D. (2007). Modeling Adaptive Educational Methods with IMS Learning Design. Journal of Interactive Media in Education. Special Issue Adaptation and IMS Learning Design.
30. Surowiecki, J. (2004). The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. New York: Doubleday.
31. Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 3(2), 50-60.
32. Tobin, D. R. (2000). All Learning is Self-Directed: How Organizations Can Support and Encourage Independent Learning. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press.
33. van Harmelen, M. (2006). Personal learning environments. Retrieved January 4, 2010, from http://octette.cs.man.ac.uk/jitt/index.php/Personal_Learning_Environments.
34. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Wenger, E., McDermott, R. & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating Communities of Practice. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
36. Wild, F., Mödritscher, F. & Sigurdarson, S. (2008). Designing for Change: Mash-Up Personal Learning Environments. eLearning Papers, 9.
37. Wilson, S., Liber, O., Johnson, M., Beauvoir, P., Sharples, P. & Milligan, C. (2007). Personal learning environments: Challenging the dominant design of educational systems. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 3(2), 27-38.