Effective Learning Approaches for Sustainability: A Student Perspective

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 198-205

  Erskine, Laura ^a   Johnson, Scott D ^a  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

attitudes; perceptions; PRME; students; sustainability

Indexed keywords

EID: 84925345311     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832323.2011.590162     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Alcaraz, J. M., and Thiruvattal, E., 2010. An interview with Manuel Escudero. The United Nations’ principles for responsible management education: A global call for sustainability. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 542–550.
2. Aspen Institute. 2001. Where will they lead 2001X? MBA student attitudes about business and society, New York, NY: Aspen Institute Business and Society Program.
3. Aspen Institute. 2003. Where will they lead 2003? MBA student attitudes about business and society, New York, NY: Aspen Institute Business and Society Program.
4. Aspen Institute. 2008. Where will they lead 2008? MBA student attitudes about business and society, New York, NY: Aspen Institute Business and Society Program.
5. Bradbury, H., 2003. Sustaining inner and outer worlds: A whole-systems approach to developing sustainable business practices in management. Journal of Management Education, 27: 172–187.
6. Bridges, C. M., and Wilhelm, W. B., 2008. Going beyond green: The “why and how” of integrating sustainability into the marketing curriculum. Journal of Marketing Education, 30: 33–46.
7. Brundtland Commission. 1987. Our common future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8. Clarke, I., Flaherty, T. B., and Mottner, S., 2001. Student perceptions of educational technology tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 23: 169–177.
9. Cole, M. S., Feild, H. S., and Harris, S. G., 2004. Student learning motivation and psychological hardiness: Interactive effects on students’ reactions to a management class. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3: 64–85.
10. Dean, K. L., and Beggs, J. M., 2006. University professors and teaching ethics: Conceptualizations and expectations. Journal of Management Education, 30: 15–44.
11. Eastman, J. K., Iyer, R., and Eastman, K. L., 2011. Business students’ perceptions, attitudes, and satisfaction with interactive technology: An exploratory study. Journal of Education for Business, 86: 36–43.
12. Elkington, J., 1998. Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st Century business, Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society.
13. Farias, G., Farias, C. M., and Fairfield, K. D., 2010. Teacher as judge or partner: The dilemma of grades versus learning. Journal of Education for Business, 85: 336–342.
14. Fleischman, R. K., and Schuele, K., 2006. Green accounting: A primer. Journal of Accounting Education, 24: 35–66.
15. Ghoshal, S., 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.
16. Gioia, D. A., 2002. Business education's role in the crisis of corporate confidence. The Academy of Management Executive, 16: 142–144.
17. Grayson, D., 2010, October 3. Schools ignore sustainability revolution. Financial Times, Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/63cf95b0-cd5f-lldf-ab20-00144feab49a.html#axzz10HXe4iig
18. Holliday, S., 2010. The relationship between sustainability education and business: An interview with Chad Holliday. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 532–541.
19. Karns, G. L., 2005. An update of marketing student perceptions of learning activities: Structure, preferences, and effectiveness. Journal of Marketing Education, 27: 163–171.
20. Kearins, K., and Springett, D., 2003. Educating for sustainability: Developing critical skills. Journal of Management Education, 27: 188–204. doi:10.1177/1052562903251411
21. Lämsä, A.-M., Vehkaperä, M., Puttonen, T., and Pesonen, H.-L., 2007. Effect of business education on women and men students’ attitudes on corporate responsibility in society. Journal of Business Ethics, 82: 45–58.
22. Martins, L. L., and Kellermanns, F. W., 2004. A model of business school students’ acceptance of a web-based course management system. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 3: 7–26.
23. Nicholson, C. Y., and DeMoss, M., 2009. Teaching ethics and social responsibility: An evaluation of undergraduate business education at the discipline level. Journal of Education for Business, 84: 213–218.
24. Pfeffer, J., 2005. Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 96–100.
25. Principles for Responsible Management Education. n.d. The six principles of responsible management education, Retrieved from http://www.unprme.org/the-6-principles/index.php
26. Rands, G. P., 2009. A principle-attribute matrix for environmentally sustainable management education and its application. Journal of Management Education, 33: 296–322.
27. Richlin, L., 2006. Blueprint for learning: Constructing college courses to facilitate, assess, and document learning, Sterling, VA: Stylus.
28. Rusinko, C. A., 2010. Integrating sustainability in management and business education: A matrix approach. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9: 507–519.
29. Seidman, D., 2008, December 5. Outgreening delivers sustainable competitive advantage. BusinessWeek, Retrieved from http://www.businessweek.com/managing/content/dec2008/ca2008125_029230.htm
30. Taylor, S. A., Humphreys, M., Singley, R., and Hunter, G. L., 2004. Business student preferences: Exploring the relative importance of web management in course design. Journal of Marketing Education, 26: 42–49.
31. Waddock, S. A., and Graves, S. B., 1997. The corporate social performance–financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 303–319.
32. Wasik, J. F., 2010, September 9. The surprising success of the green supply chain. Fortune, Retrieved from http://money.cnn.com/2010/08/13/news/companies/corporate_sustainability.fortune/index.htm
33. Wingfield, S. S., and Black, G., 2005. Active versus passive course designs: The impact on student outcomes. Journal of Education for Business, 81: 119–123.
34. Zocco, D., 2009. Risk theory and student course selection. Research in Higher Education, 3: 1–29.