Business Students’ Perceptions, Attitudes, and Satisfaction With Interactive Technology: An Exploratory Study

Journal of Education for Business

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 36-43

  Eastman, Jacqueline Kilsheimer ^a   Iyer, Rajesh ^b   Eastman, Kevin L ^a  

^a GEORGIA SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BRADLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

audience response systems; clicker satisfaction; interactive technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 79960549696     PISSN: 08832323     EISSN: 19403356     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08832321003774756     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson, J. C., and Gerbing, D. W., 1988. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103: 411–421.
2. Arnould, E. J., and Price, L. L., 1993. River magic: Extraordinary experience and the extended service encounter. Journal of Consumer Research, 20: 24–45.
3. Bagozzi, R. P., and Baumgartner, H., 1994. “ The evaluation of structural equation models and hypothesis testing ”. In Principles of marketing research, Edited by: Bagozzi, R. P., 386–422. Cambridge: England: Blackwell.
4. Bagozzi, R. P., and Yi, Y., 1991. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 459–489.
5. Baumgatner, H., and Homburg, C., 1996. Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13: 139–161.
6. Carnagan, C., and Webb, A., 2005. Investigating the effects of group response systems on learning outcomes and satisfaction in accounting education, Ontario, Canada: Working paper from the School of Accountancy at the University of Waterloo.
7. Cauley, F. G., Aiken, K. D., and Whitney, L. K., 2010. Technologies across our curriculum: A study of technology integration in the classroom. Journal of Education for Business, 85: 114–118.
8. Chen, H.-L., and Williams, J. P., 2008. Use of multi-modal media and tools in an online information literacy course: College students’ attitudes and perceptions. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 35 (1): 14–24.
9. Cohen, S., 2005, July 14. Personal response systems changing college classrooms. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News,: 1
10. Cole, C. A., and Balasubramanian, S. K., 1993. Age differences in consumers’ search for information: Public policy implications. Journal of Consumer Research, 20: 157–169.
11. Eastman, J. K., 2007. Enhancing classroom communication with interactive technology: How faculty can get started. International College Teaching Methods & Styles Journal, 3 (1): 31–38.
12. Fisher, J., and Price, L. L., 1991. The relationship between international travel motivations and cultural receptivity. Journal of Leisure Research, 23: 193–208.
13. Fitch, J. L., 2004. Student feedback in the college classroom: A technology solution. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52 (1): 71–81.
14. Ghosh, S., and Renna, F., 2009. Using electronic response systems in economics classes. Journal of Economic Education, 40: 354–365.
15. Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., and Tatham, R. L., 2006. Multivariate data analysis, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
16. Hatch, S., 2003. ARS systems: Creativity and planning required. Corporate Meetings & Incentives, 22 (11): 35–36.
17. Hoffman, C., and Goodwin, S., 2006. A clicker for your thoughts: Technology for active learning. New Library World, 107: 422–433.
18. Jöreskog, K. G., and Sörbom, D., 1993. LISREL 8: A guide to the program and applications, Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
19. Khan, M. B., 2009. Effects of information technology usage on student learning—An empirical study in the United States. International Journal of Management, 26: 354–364.
20. Krantz, M., 2004. Audience response systems = Marketing tools. Meeting News, 28 (5): 5
21. Kurdziel, J., 2005. Engaging students in large lectures using a classroom response system Retrieved from www.crlt.umich.edu/faculty/JoKurdziel02–05.pdf
22. Lincoln, D. J., 2008. Teaching with clickers in the large-size principles of marketing class. Marketing Education Review, 18 (1): 39–45.
23. Massey, A. P., Brown, S. A., and Johnston, J. D., 2005. It's all fun and games… until students learn. Journal of Information Systems Education, 16 (1): 9–15.
24. Matulich, E., Papp, R., and Haytko, D. L., 2008. Continuous improvement through teaching innovations: A requirement for today's learners. Marketing Education Review, 18 (1): 1–7.
25. Nelson, M. L., and Hauck, R. V., 2008. Clicking to learn: A case study of embedded radio-frequency based clickers in an introductory management information systems course. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19 (1): 55–64.
26. Paladino, A., 2008. Creating an interactive and responsive teaching environment to inspire learning. Journal of Marketing Education, 30: 185–188.
27. Savage, S. J., 2009. The effect of information technology on economic education. Journal of Economic Education, 40: 337–353.
28. Simpson, S., 2007, January 28. Faculty telling students to “click”: Technology makes it easier for professors to give quizzes and foster classroom discussions. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News,: 1
29. Stone, L., Escoe, G. M., and Schenk, R., 1999. Multimedia instruction methods. Journal of Economic Education, 30: 265–275.
30. Taylor, P. S., 2007. Can clickers cure crowded classes?. Maclean's, 120 (26/27): 73
31. Terreri, A., and Simons, T., 2005. What are they thinking?. Presentations, 19 (2): 36
32. Thomson Learning and Turning Technologies. 2006. Thomson learning and turning technologies pilot reveals college students more likely to attend class and interact with instructor as a result of added technology resources Retrieved from http://www.turningtechnologies.com/company/pressroom/pressreleases/2006/?i=53
33. Toral, S. L., Barrero, F., Martinez-Torres, M. R., Gallardo, S., and Duran, M. J., 2009. Modeling learning satisfaction in an electronic instrumentation and measurement course using structural equation models. IEEE Transactions on Education, 52 (1): 190–199.
34. Unmuth, K. L., 2004, March 30. Wichita, Kansas college students try out classroom interaction technology. Knight Ridder Tribune Business News,: 1