From rational actor to efficient complexity manager: Exorcising the ghost of Homo economicus with a unified synthesis of cognition research

Ecological Economics

Volumn 114, Issue , 2015, Pages 22-32

  Levine, Jordan ^a   Chan, Kai M A ^a   Satterfield, Terre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Analogy; Biases; Heuristics; Homo efficens; Mental models; Unified model

Indexed keywords

ANALOG MODEL; CANONICAL ANALYSIS; COGNITION; ECONOMIC THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; HEURISTICS; INNOVATION;

EID: 84925234302     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.03.010     Document Type: Short Survey

References (131)

1. Ableson R.P., Levi A. Decision making and decision theory. Vol. 1, in The Handbook of Social Psychology 1985, 231-309. Random House, New York. G. Lindzey, E. Aronson (Eds.).
2. Adamowicz W.L. What's it worth? An examination of historical trends and future directions in environmental valuation. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 2004, 48(3):419-443.
3. Anderies J.M., et al. The challenge of understanding decisions in experimental studies of common pool resource governance. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 70(9):1571-1579.
4. Arana J.E., Leon C.J. Do emotions matter? Coherent preferences under anchoring and emotional effects. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 66(4):700-711.
5. Arana J.E., Leon C.J. Understanding the use of non-compensatory decision rules in discrete choice experiments. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(8-9):2316-2326.
6. Ariely D., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. "Coherent arbitrariness": stable demand curves without stable preferences. Q. J. Econ. 2003, 118(1):73-106.
7. Arrow K.J. Social Choice and Individual Values 1963, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
8. Atran S., Medin D. The Native Mind and the Cultural Construction of Nature 2010, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
9. Bang M., Medin D.L., Atran S. Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature. PNAS 2007, 104(35):13868-13874.
10. Bar M. The proactive brain: memory for predictions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 2009, 364(1521):1235-1243.
11. Bateman I., Mawby J. First impressions count: interviewer appearance and information effects in state preference studies. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 49(1):47-55.
12. Baveye P., Baveye J., Gowdy J. Monetary evaluation of ecosystem services: it matters to get the timeline right. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 95:231-235.
13. Becker C. The human actor in ecological economics: philosophical approach and research perspectives. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 60(1):17-23.
14. Benet-Martinez V., Leu J., Lee F., Morris M. Negotiating biculturalism: cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. J. Cross-Cult. Psychol. 2002, 33(5):492-516.
15. Bina O., Vaz S.G. Humans, environment and economies: from vicious relationships to virtuous responsibility. Ecol. Econ. 2011, 72:170-178.
16. Borgida E., Nisbett R.E. The differential impact of abstract vs. concrete information on decision. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 1977, 7(3):258-271.
17. Bower G.H. Mood and memory. Am. Psychol. 1981, 36(2):129-148.
18. Bowles S., Gintis H. The revenge of homo economicus: contested exchange and the revival of political economy. J. Econ. Perspect. 1993, 7(1):83-102.
19. Boyer P. Evolutionary economics of mental time travel?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2008, 12(6):219-224.
20. Buck R. Prime theory: an integrated view of motivation and emotion. Psychol. Rev. 1985, 92(3):389-413.
21. Bulkeley H., Mol A.P.J. Participation and environmental governance: consensus, ambivalence and debate. Environ. Values 2003, 12(2):143-154. (May).
22. Bute E.H., Lipper L., Stringer R., ZIlberman D. Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues and empirical perspectives. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2008, 13(3):245-254.
23. Camerer C., Loewenstein G., Prelec D. Neuroeconomics: how neuroscience can inform economics. J. Econ. Lit. 2005, 53:9-64.
24. Claxton G. Hare Brain, Tortoise Mind: How Intelligence Increases When you Think Less 1999, HarperCollins, New York.
25. Cohen D., Nisbett R.E., Bowdle B.F., Schwarz N. Insult, aggression and the southern culture of honor: an experimental ethnography. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1996, 70(5):945-960.
26. Corcoran K., Mussweiler T. The cognitive miser's perspective: social comparison as a heuristic in self-judgements. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 21(1):78-113.
27. Damasio A.R. Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain 1994, HarperCollins, New York.
28. Damasio A.R. The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 1996, 351:1413-1420.
29. Damasio A.R. The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness 2000, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston.
30. D'Andrade R.G. Development of Cognitive Anthropology 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
31. Desvousges W., Mathews K., Train K. Adequate responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 84:121-128.
32. Dijksterhuis A., Nordgren L.F. A theory of unconscious thought. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2006, 1(2):95-109.
33. Doucouliagos C. A note on the evolution of homo economicus. J. Econ. Issues 1994, 28(3):877-883.
34. Eclles J.S., Wigfield A. Motivational beliefs, values and goals. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2002, 53:109-132.
35. Engel S., Pagiola S., Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 65(4):663-674.
36. Eubanks P. The story of conceptual metaphor: what motivates metaphoric mappings?. Poetics Today 1999, 20(3):419-442.
37. Faber M., Petersen T., Schiller J. Homo oeconomicus and homo politicus in ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 40(3):323-333.
38. Fauconnier G., Turner M. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities 2002, Basic Books, New York.
39. Fehr E., Gachter S. Fairness and retaliation: the economics of reciprocity. J. Econ. Perspect. 2000, 14(3):159-181.
40. Feldman A. Welfare economics. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics 2008, (online [accessed 9 Jan 2014]). Second edition. S. Durlauf, L. Blume (Eds.).
41. Finucane M.L., Alhakami A., Slovic P., Johnson S.M. The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 2000, 13:1-17.
42. Fisher B., Kulindwa K., Mwanyoka I., Kerry Turner R., Burgess N.D. Common pool resource management and PES: Lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1253-1261.
43. Fong C. Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J. Public Econ. 2001, 82(2):225-246.
44. J. Forgas (Ed.). Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition 2000, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
45. Frank R.H. If Homo economicus could choose his own utility function, would he want one with a conscience?. Am. Econ. Rev. 1987, 77(4):593-604.
46. Frey B. How intrinsic motivation is crowded out and in. Ration. Soc. 1994, 6(3):334-352.
47. Fuster J.M. Memory in the Cerebral Cortex: An Empirical Approach to Neural Networks in the Human and Nonhuman Primate 1999, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
48. Gentner D., Gentner D.R. Flowing waters or teeming clouds: mental models of electricity. Mental Models 1983, 99-129. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey. D. Gentner, A.L. Steven (Eds.).
49. Giere R.N., Moffatt B. Distributed cognition: where the cognitive and the social merge. Soc. Stud. Sci. 2003, 33(2):301-310.
50. Gigerenzer G., Goldstein D. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychol. Rev. 1996, 103(4):650-669.
51. Gilovitch T., Griffin D., Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment 2002, Cambridge University Press, New York.
52. Gintis H. Beyond Homo economicus: evidence from experimental economics. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 35(3):311-322.
53. Glimcher P., Dorris M., Bayer H. Physiological utility theory and the neuroeconomics of choice. Games Econ. Behav. 2005, 52(2):213-256.
54. Goldstein N.J., Cialdini R.B., Criskevicius V. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 2008, 35(3):472-482.
55. Gomez-Baggathun E., de Groot R., Lomas P., Montes C. The history of ecosystem services in economic theory and practice: from early notions to markets and payment schemes. Ecol. Econ. 2010, 69(6):1209-1218.
56. Gowdy J. The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy. Land Econ. 2004, 80(2):239-257.
57. Greene J., Haidt J. How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2002, 6(12):517-523.
58. Gregory R., Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. Valuing environmental resources: a constructive approach. J. Risk Uncertain. 1993, 7:177-197.
59. Haidt J. The emotional dog and its rational tail: a social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev. 2001, 108:814-834.
60. Haidt J. The Happiness Hypothesis 2006, Basic Books, New York.
61. Hart S.J., Green S.R., Casp M., Belger A. Emotional priming effects during Stroop task performance. NeuroImage 2010, 49(3):2662-2670.
62. Henrich J., et al. In search of homo economicus: behavioural experiments in 15 small-scale societies. Am. Econ. Rev. 2001, 91(2):73-78.
63. Hickey D.T., McCaslin M.A. A comparative, sociocultural analysis of context and motivation. Motivation in Learning Contexts: Theoretical Advances and Methodological Implications 2001, 33-56. Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford. S. Volet, S. Jarvela (Eds.).
64. Hudson D., Gallardo R.K., Hanson T.R. A comparison of choice experiments and actual grocery store behaviour: an empirical application to seafood products. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 2012, 44(1):49-62.
65. Ingebrigsten S., Jakobsen O. Moral development of the economic actor. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68(11):2777-2784.
66. Jager W., Janssen M.A., De Vries H.J.M., De Greef J., Vlek C.A.J. Behaviour in commons dilemmas: homo economicus and homo psychologicus in an ecological-economic model. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 35(3):357-379.
67. Jollands N. Concepts of efficiency in ecologial economics: Sisyphus and the decision maker. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 56(3):359-372.
68. Kahneman D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am. Psychol. 2003, 58(9):697-720.
69. Kahneman D., Frederick S. Representativeness revisited: attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. Heuristics and Biases 2002, 49-81. Cambridge University Press, New York. T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, D. Kahneman (Eds.).
70. Kahneman D., Knetch J. Valuing public goods: the purchase of moral satisfaction. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1992, 22(1):57-70.
71. Kahneman D., Slovic P., Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases 1982, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
72. Keller C., Siegrist M., Gutscher H. The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Anal. 2006, 26(3):631-639.
73. Kissinger G., Patterson C., Neufeldt G. Payments for ecosystem services schemes: project-level insights on benefits for ecosystem and the rural poor. Working Paper 2013, World Agroforestry Centre, Nairobi.
74. Klockner C.A., Matthies E., Hunecke M. Problems of operationalizing habits and integrating habits in normative decision-making models. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 33(2):396-417.
75. Kokinov B.N., Petrov A.A. Integrating memory and reasoning in analogy-making: the AMBR model. The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science 2001, 59-124. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. D. Genter, K.J. Holyoak, B.N. Kokinov (Eds.).
76. Kolodner J. An introduction to case-based reasoning. Artif. Intell. Rev. 1992, 6:3-34.
77. Kusev P., van Schaik P., Aldrovandi S. Preferences induced by availability: evidence from priming. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 2012, 5(4):250-258.
78. Lakoff G. The contemporary theory of metaphor. Metaphor and Thought 1993, 202-252. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. A. Ortony (Ed.).
79. Lakoff G. Cognitive models and prototype theory. The Cognitive Linguistics Reader 2007, 130-167. Equinox, London. V. Evans, B. Bergen, J. Zinken (Eds.).
80. Lakoff G., Johnson M. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought 1999, Basic Books, New York.
81. Lavine H. On the primacy of affect in the determination of attitudes and behaviour: the moderating role of affective-cognitive ambivalence. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1998, 34(4):398-421.
82. Lichtenstein S., Slovic P. The Construction of Preference 2006, Cambridge University Press, New York.
83. Lowenstein G.F., Hsee C.K., Weber E.U., Welch N. Risk as feelings. Psychol. Bull. 2001, 127(2):267-286.
84. Macnaghten P., Jacobs M. Public identification with sustainable development: investigating cultural barriers to participation. Glob. Environ. Chang. 1997, 7(1):5-24.
85. Macrae C.N., Milne A.B., Bodenhausen G.V. Stereotypes as energy-saving devices: a peek inside the cognitive toolbox. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 66(1):37-47.
86. Markus H., Kitayama S. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 1991, 98(2):224-253.
87. McDaniels T., Gregory R., Arvai J., Chuenpagdee R. Decision structuring to alleviate embedding in environmental evaluation. Ecol. Econ. 2003, 46(1):33-46.
88. Miloslavljevic M., Navalpakkam V., Koch C., Rangel A. Relative visual saliency differences induce sizable bias in consumer choice. J. Consum. Psychol. 2012, 22:64-74.
89. Monroe K.R., Maher K.H. Psychology and rational actor theory. Polit. Psychol. 1995, 16(1):1-21. (March).
90. Murphy S., Zajonc R.B. Affect, cognition and awareness: affective priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1993, 64(5):723-739.
91. Norton B., Noonan D.S. Ecology and valuation: big changes needed. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 64(3):644-675.
92. Payne J.W., Bettman J.R., Johnson E.J. Behavioral decision research: a constructive processing perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 1992, 43:87-132.
93. Persky J. Retrospectives: the ethology of homo economicus. J. Econ. Perspect. 1995, 9(2):221-223.
94. Pessoa L. On the relationship between emotion and cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9(148-158).
95. Peterson J.B. Maps of Meaning 1999, Routledge, New York.
96. Peterson J., Flanders J.L. Complexity management theory: motivation for ideological rigidity and social conflict. Cortex 2002, 38:429-458.
97. Raymond C.M., Singh G.G., Benessaiah K., Bernhardt J.R., Levine J., Nelson H., Turner N.J., Norton B., Tam J., Chan K.M.A. Ecosystem services and beyond: using multiple metaphors to understand human-environment relationships. Bioscience 2013, 63(7):536-546.
98. Read J.D. The availability heuristic in person identification: the sometimes misleading consequences of enhanced contextual information. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 1995, 9:91-121.
99. Roeser S. Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: a role for emotions. Risk Anal. 2012, 32(6):1033-1040.
100. Ropke I. Trends in the development of ecological economics from the late 1980s to the early 2000s. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55(2):262-290.
101. Roth A.E., Vesna P., Okuno-Fujiwara M., Zamir S. Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 1991, 81(5):1068-1095. (December).
102. Ruth M. A quest for the economics of sustainability and the sustainability of economics. Ecol. Econ. 2006, 53(3):332-342.
103. Schlapfer F., Fischhoff B. Task familiarity and contextual cues predict hypothetical bias in a meta-analysis of stated preference studies. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 81:44-47.
104. Schulter A. Institutional change and ecological economics: the role of mental models and sufficient reason. Inst. Sustain. 2009, 4:315-340.
105. Sen A.K. On Ethics and Economics 1988, Blackwell, Oxford.
106. Sen A.K. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. Philos. Public Aff. 1997, 6(4):317-344.
107. Shah A.K., Oppenheimer D.M. Heuristics made easy: an effort-reduction framework. Psychol. Bull. 2008, 134(2):207-222. (March).
108. Shi T. Ecological economics as a policy science: rhetoric or commitment towards an improved decision-making process on sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2004, 48(1):23-36.
109. Shore B. Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture and the Problem of Meaning 1996, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
110. Shove E. Beyond the ABC: climate change policy and theories of social change. Environ. Plan. A 2010, 42:1273-1285.
111. Siebenhuner B. Homo sustinens: towards a new conception of humans for the science of sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32(1):15-25.
112. Simon H.A. Models of Bounded Rationality 1982, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
113. Slade S. Case-based reasoning: a research paradigm. AI Mag. 1991, 21(42):55.
114. Slingerland E. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Culture 2008, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
115. Slovic P., Fincucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. The affect heuristic. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2007, 177(3):1333-1352.
116. Smith E.T., Semin G.R. Socially situated cognition: cognition in its social context. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2004, 36:53-117.
117. Spash C. New foundations for ecological economics. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 77:36-47.
118. Stanovich K.E., West R.F. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate?. Behav. Brain Sci. 2000, 23(5):645-665.
119. Storbeck J., Clore G.L. The affective regulation of cognitive priming. Emotion 2008, 8(2):208-215.
120. Thaler R. From homo economicus to homo sapiens. J. Econ. Perspect. 2000, 14(1):133-141.
121. Turner R.K., Adger W.N., Brouwer R. Ecosystem service value, research needs, and policy relevance: a commentary. Ecol. Econ. 1998, 25(1):61-65.
122. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cogn. Psychol. 1973, 5:207-232.
123. Tversky A., Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981, 211(4481):453-458.
124. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 1992, 5(4):297-323.
125. Van den Burgh J., Ferrer-i-Carbonell A., Munda G. Alternative models of individual behaviour and implications for environmental policy. Ecol. Econ. 2000, 32(1):43-61.
126. Weenig M.W.H., Maarleveld M. The impact of time constraint on information search strategies in complex choice tasks. J. Econ. Psychol. 2002, 23(6):689-702.
127. Welsh H., Kuhling J. Determinants of pro-environmental consumption: the role of reference groups and routine behaviour. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 69(1):166-176.
128. Winch D. Adam Smith: Scottish moral philosopher as political economist. Hist. J. 1992, 35(1):91-113.
129. Wray R., et al. Towards a complete, multi-level cognitive architecture. Proceedings of ICCM 2007 Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modelling 2007, 325-330.
130. Zajonc R.B. Closing the debate over the independence of affect. Feeling and Thinking: The Role of Affect in Social Cognition 2000, 31-58. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J. Forgas (Ed.).
131. Zhang J., Patel V.L. Distributed cognition, representation and affordance. Pragmat. Cogn. 2006, 14(2):31-58.