Common pool resource management and PES: Lessons and constraints for water PES in Tanzania

Ecological Economics

Volumn 69, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1253-1261

  Fisher, Brendan ^a   Kulindwa, Kassim ^b   Mwanyoka, Iddi ^c   Turner, R Kerry ^a   Burgess, Neil D ^d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM   (Tanzania)

^c World Wildlife Fund Tanzania Programme Office   (Tanzania)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^e World Wildlife Fund ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Common pool resources; Ecosystem services; Payments for ecosystem services; Tanzania; Water payments

Indexed keywords

ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; POOL; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; WATER ECONOMICS; WATER FLOW; WATER RESOURCE;

TANZANIA;

EID: 77950336959     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.008     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Abbink K., and Irlenbusch B. Group size and social ties in microfinance institutions. Economic Inquiry 44 4 (2006) 614-628
2. Agrawal A. Common resources and institutional sustainability. The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academy Press, Washington DC 41-86
3. Alix-Garcia J., De Janvry A., and Sadoulet E. The role of deforestation risk and calibrated compensation in designing payments for environmental services. Environment and Development Economics 13 (2008) 375-394
4. Asquith N.M., Vargas M.T., and Wunder S. Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 675-684
5. Baland J., and Platteau. Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities (1996), Clarendon Press, Oxford
6. Becker C.D. Protecting a Garua forest in Ecuador: the role of institutions and ecosystem valuation. Ambio 28 (1999) 156-161
7. Becker C.D. Grassroots to grassroots: why forest preservation was rapid at Loma Alta, Ecuador. World Development 31 (2003) 163-176
8. Bulte E.H., Lipper L., Stringer R., and Zilberman D. Payments for ecosystem services and poverty reduction: concepts, issues and empirical perspectives. Environment and Development Economics 13 (2008) 245-254
9. Burgess N.D., D'Amico Hales J., Underwood E., Dinerstein E., Olson D., Itoua I., Schipper J., Ricketts T., and Newman K. Terrestrial ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: a continental assessment (2004), Island Press, Washington DC
10. Burgess N.D., D'Amico Hales J., Ricketts T., and Dinerstein E. Factoring species, non-species values and threats into biodiversity priority-setting across the ecoregions of Africa and its islands. Biological Conservation 127 (2006) 383-401
11. Chomitz K.M., and Gray D.A. Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to belize. World Bank Economic Review 10 (1996) 487-512
12. Clements T., John A., Nielsen K., An D., Tan S., and Milner-Gulland E.J. Payments for biodiversity conservation in the context of weak institutions: comparison of three programs from Cambodia. Ecological Economics 69 (2010) 1283-1291 (this issue)
13. Corbera E., Brown K., and Adger W.N. The equity and legitimacy of markets for ecosystem services. Development and Change 38 (2007) 587-613
14. Corbera E., Kosoy N., and Tuna M.M. Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions 17 (2007) 365-380
15. Dietz T., Dolsak N., Ostrom E., and Stern P.C. The drama of the commons. The Drama of the Commons (2002), National Academy Press, Washington DC 3-36
16. Dietz T., Ostrom E., and Stern P.C. The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302 (2003) 1907-1912
17. In: Doggart N.D., and Burgess N.D. (Eds). State of the Arc in 2005: special issue on Eastern Arc Mountains monitoring baselines. The Arc Journal vol. 19 (2005) 1-32
18. Engel S., Pagiola S., and Wunder S. Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 663-674
19. Fisher B. Sustainable Discourse and Sustainable Development in Cambodia: A Qualitative Study (2001), University of Oxford, Oxford
20. Geist H.J., and Lambin E.F. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience 52 (2002) 143-150
21. In: Keohane R.O., and Ostrom E. (Eds). Local Commons and Global Interdependence: Heterogeneity and Cooperation in Two Domains (1995), Sage, London
22. Kissui B.M. Livestock predation by lions, leopards, spotted hyenas, and their vulnerability to retaliatory killing in the Maasai steppe, Tanzania. Animal Conservation 11 (2008) 422-432
23. Krishna A. Large-scale government programmes: watershed development in Rajasthan, India. In: Hinchcliffe F., Thompson J., Pretty J., Guijt I., and Shah P. (Eds). Fertile Ground: The Impacts of Participatory Watershed Management (1999), Intermediate Technology Publications, London, UK
24. Kulindwa K. A feasibility study to design payment for environmental services mechanism for Pangani River Basin IUCN East African Regional Office, Nairobi (2005)
25. Kulindwa K., Msambichaka L.A., Lokina R.B., Hepelwa A.S., Mngodo R., and Swai R. A Study to Establishing Mechanism for Payments for Water Environmental Services for the Rufiji River Basin in Tanzania (2006), Economic Research Bureau, Dar es Salaam
26. Marshall G.R. Economics for Collaborative Environmental Management: Renegotiating the Commons (2005), Earthscan, London
27. Miles L., and Kapos V. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation and forest degradation: global land-use implications. Science 320 (2008) 1454-1455
28. Milledge S.A.H., Gelvas I.K., and Ahrends A. Forestry, Governance and National Development: Lessons learned from a Logging Boom in Southern Tanzania (TRAFFIC East/Southern Africa, Tanzania Development Partners Group, Tanzania Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism) (2007)
29. Ministry of Finance and Economic Affairs, 2008. The Economic Survey 2007. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
30. Mittermeier R.A., Robles-Gil P., Hoffmann M., Pilgrim J.D., Brooks T.M., Mittermeier C.G., Lamoreux J.L., and Fonseca G. Hotspots Revisited: Earth's Biologically Richest and Most Endangered Ecoregions (2004), Cemex, Mexico
31. Mtalo F., et al. Hydrology of the Eastern Arc Mountains. Ministry of Natural Resources and Toursim, Forestry and Beekeeping Division, Dar es Salaam (2005)
32. Muradian R., Corbera E., Pascual U., Kosoy N., and May P.H. Reconciling theory and practice: an alternative conceptual framework for understanding payments for environmental services. Ecological Economics 69 (2010) 1202-1208 (this issue)
33. Mwanyoka I.R. Payment for water services as a mechanism for watershed management: the case of the Sigi Catchment, Tanga, Tanzania WWF Tanzania Program Office, Dar es Salaam (2005)
34. Naidoo R., Balmford A., Costanza R., Fisher B., Green R.E., Lehner B., Malcolm T.R., and Ricketts T.H. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105 (2008) 9495-9500
35. Olson M. The Logic of Collective Action (1965), Harvard University Press, Cambridge
36. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
37. Ostrom E. The challenge of common-pool resources. Environment 50 (2008) 8-20
38. Ostrom E., and Nagendra H. Insights on linking forests, trees, and people from the air, on the ground, and in the laboratory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103 (2006) 19224-19231
39. Ostrom E., Gardner R., and Walker J. Rules (1994), University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MI, Games and Common-Pool Resources
40. Ostrom E., Janssen M.A., and Anderies J.M. Going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (2007) 15176-15178
41. Pagiola S. Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 712-724
42. Pagiola S., Arcenas A., and Platais G. Can payments for environmental services help reduce poverty? An exploration of the issues and the evidence to date from Latin America. World Development 33 (2005) 237-253
43. Pascual U., Muradian R., Rodríguez L.C., and Duraiappah A. Exploring the links between equity and efficiency in payments for environmental services: a conceptual approach. Ecological Economics 69 (2010) 1237-1244 (this issue)
44. Postel S.L. Entering an era of water scarcity: the challenges ahead. Ecological Applications 10 (2000) 941-948
45. Pretty J. Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science 302 (2003) 1912-1914
46. Sheya M.S., and Mushi S.J.S. The state of renewable energy harnessing in Tanzania. Applied Energy 65 (2000) 257-271
47. Turner R.K., and Daily G.C. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics 39 (2008) 25-35
48. Turpie J., Ngaga Y., and Karanja F. A preliminary economic assessment of water resources of the Pangani River Basin (2003), Economic Value, Incentives for Sustainable Use and Mechanisms for Financing Management. IUCN- East African Regional Office, Nairobi, Tanzania
49. van Wilgen B.W., Le Maitre D.C., and Cowling R.M. Ecosystem services, efficiency, sustainability and equity: South Africa's Working for Water Programme. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 13 (1998) 378
50. Vatn A. An Institutional Analysis of Payments for Environmental Services. Ecological Economics 69 (2010) 1245-1252 (this issue)
51. Wade R. Village Republics: Economic Conditions for Collective Action in South India (1988), ICS Press, San Francisco
52. Wunder S., and Alban M. Decentralized payments for environmental services: the cases of Pimampiro and PROFAFOR in Ecuador. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 685-698
53. Wunder S., Engel S., and Pagiola S. Taking stock: a comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 834-852
54. Wunscher T., Engel S., and Wunder S. Spatial targeting of payments for environmental services: a tool for boosting conservation benefits. Ecological Economics 65 (2008) 822-833