Agarose particle-templated porous bacterial cellulose and its application in cartilage growth in vitro

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 129-138

  Yin, Na ^a,b   Stilwell, Matthew D ^a   Santos, Thiago M A ^a   Wang, Huaping ^b   Weibel, Douglas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b DONGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Acetobacter xylinum; Agarose microparticles; Bacterial cellulose; Chondrocytes; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BODY FLUIDS; CELL ENGINEERING; CELLULOSE; CULTIVATION; MAMMALS; SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY); SUBSTRATES; TISSUE;

ACETOBACTER XYLINUM; AGARISE MICROPARTICLE; AGAROSE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; CELLULOSE SUBSTRATES; CHONDROCYTES; ITS APPLICATIONS; MICRO PARTICLES; TEMPLATED; TISSUES ENGINEERINGS;

PORE SIZE;

AGAROSE; BACTERIAL CELLULOSE; BACTERIAL POLYSACCHARIDE; CELLULOSE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; SEPHAROSE;

ARTICLE; CARTILAGE CELL; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL GROWTH; CELL INTERACTION; CELL STRUCTURE; CELL VIABILITY; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMULSION; FREEZE DRYING; GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VITRO STUDY; MICROFLUIDICS; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; SPRAY DRYING; BACTERIA; CARTILAGE; CHEMISTRY; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); GLUCONACETOBACTER XYLINUS; MAMMALIA;

BACTERIA; CARTILAGE; CELLULOSE; IN VITRO TECHNIQUES; MICROFLUIDICS; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; SEPHAROSE;

EID: 84924969110     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.10.019     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Hwang N, Varghese S, Elisseeff J. Cartilage tissue engineering. In: Vemuri M, editor. Stem cell assays. New York: Humana Press; 2007. p. 351-73.
2. Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 2000;21:2529-43.
3. Palsson BO, Bhatia SN. Tissue engineering. London: Pearson Education; 2004.
4. Deng HW, Liu YZ. Current topics in bone biology. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific; 2005.
5. Salgado AJ, Coutinho OP, Reis RL. Bone tissue engineering: state of the art and future trends. Macromol Biosci 2004;4:743-65.
6. Eisenbarth E. Biomaterials for tissue engineering. Adv Eng Mater 2007;9:1051-60.
7. Place ES, Evans ND, Stevens MM. Complexity in biomaterials for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2009;8:457-70.
8. Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials 2005;26:5474-91.
9. Cannon RE, Anderson SM. Biogenesis of bacterial cellulose. Crit Rev Microbiol 1991;17:435-47.
10. Iguchi M, Yamanaka S, Budhiono A. Bacterial cellulose - a masterpiece of nature's arts. J Mater Sci 2000;35:261-70.
11. Bodin A, Concaro S, Brittberg M, Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose as a potential meniscus implant. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2007;1:406-8.
12. Klemm D, Schumann D, Udhardt U, Marsch S. Bacterial synthesized cellulose - artificial blood vessels for microsurgery. Prog Poly Sci 2001;26:1561-603.
13. Petersen N, Gatenholm P. Bacterial cellulose-based materials and medical devices: current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011;91:1277-86.
14. Andersson J, Stenhamre H, Bäckdahl H, Gatenholm P. Behavior of human chondrocytes in engineered porous bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;94A:1124-32.
15. Uraki Y, Nemoto J, Otsuka H, Tamai Y, Sugiyama J, Kishimoto T, et al. Honeycomb-like architecture produced by living bacteria Gluconacetobacter xylinus. Carbohydr Polym 2007;69:1-6.
16. Zaborowska M, Bodin A, Bäckdahl H, Popp J, Goldstein A, Gatenholm P. Microporous bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for bone regeneration. Acta Biomater 2010;6:2540-7.
17. Williams WS, Cannon RE. Alternative environmental roles for cellulose produced by Acetobacter xylinum . Appl Environ Microbiol 1989;55:2448-52.
18. Schramm M, Hestrin S. Factors affecting production of cellulose at the air/liquid interface of a culture of Acetobacter xylinum. J Gen Appl Microbiol 1954;11:123-9.
19. Quevedo E, Steinbacher J, McQuade DT. Interfacial polymerization within a simplified microfluidic device: capturing capsules. J Am Chem Soc 2005;127:10498-9.
20. Zhao X, Wu J, Gong FL, Cui JM, Janson JC, Ma GH, et al. Preparation of uniform and large sized agarose microspheres by an improved membrane emulsification technique. Powder Technol 2014;253:444-52.
21. Ioannidis N, Bowen J, Pacek A, Zhang Z. Manufacturing of agarose-based chromatographic adsorbents - effect of ionic strength and cooling conditions on particle structure and mechanical strength. J Colloid Interface Sci 2012;367:153-60.
22. Eun YJ, Utada AS, Copeland MF, Takeuchi S, Weibel DB. Encapsulating bacteria in agarose microparticles using microfluidics for high-throughput cell analysis and isolation. ACS Chem Biol 2010;6:260-6.
23. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006;126:677-89.
24. Madihally SV, Matthew HWT. Porous chitosan scaffolds for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 1999;20:1133-42.
25. Hollister SJ. Porous scaffold design for tissue engineering. Nat Mater 2005;4:518-24.
26. Bäckdahl H, Esguerra M, Delbro D, Risberg B, Gatenholm P. Engineering microporosity in bacterial cellulose scaffolds. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2008;2:320-30.
27. Bodin A, Bharadwaj S, Wu S, Gatenholm P, Atala A, Zhang Y. Tissue-engineered conduit using urine-derived stem cells seeded bacterial cellulose polymer in urinary reconstruction and diversion. Biomaterials 2010;31:8889-901.
28. White DG, Brown RM. Prospects for the commercialization of the biosynthesis of microbial cellulose. In: Schuerech C, editor. Cellulose and wood-chemistry and technology. New York: Wiley; 1989. p. 573-90.
29. Svensson A, Nicklasson E, Harrah T, Panilaitis B, Kaplan DL, Brittberg M, et al. Bacterial cellulose as a potential scaffold for tissue engineering of cartilage. Biomaterials 2005;26:419-31.
30. Todaro GJ, Green H. Quantitative studies of the growth of mouse embryo cells in culture and their development into established lines. J Cell Biol 1963;17:299-313.
31. Frame KK, Hu WS. A model for density-dependent growth of anchorage-dependent mammalian cells. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng 1988;32:1061-6.
32. León y León CA. New perspectives in mercury porosimetry. Adv Colloid Interface Sci 1998;76-77:341-72.
33. Kuboki Y, Takita H, Kobayashi D, Tsuruga E, Inoue M, Murata M, et al. BMP-Induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: topology of osteogenesis. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:190-9.
34. Wang CC, Yang KC, Lin KH, Liu HC, Lin FH. A highly organized three-dimensional alginate scaffold for cartilage tissue engineering prepared by microfluidic technology. Biomaterials 2011;32:7118-26.
35. Dai W, Kawazoe N, Lin X, Dong J, Chen G. The influence of structural design of PLGA/collagen hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010;31:2141-52.