The shape and size effects of polycation functionalized silica nanoparticles on gene transfection

Acta Biomaterialia

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 381-392

  Lin, Xinyi ^a   Zhao, Nana ^a   Yan, Peng ^a   Hu, Hao ^a   Xu, Fu Jian ^a  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Gene transfection; Polycation; Shape; Silica nanoparticles; Size

Indexed keywords

ASPECT RATIO; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; GENE TRANSFER; GENES; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; MORPHOLOGY; NANORODS; PARTICLE SIZE; SURFACE TREATMENT;

FUNCTIONALIZED SILICA; GENE CARRIER; GENE TRANSFECTION; NONVIRAL; PARTICLE SIZE AND SHAPE; POLYCATIONS; SHAPE; SHAPE AND SIZE EFFECTS; SILICA NANOPARTICLES; SIZE;

SILICA NANOPARTICLES;

POLYCATION; SILICA NANOPARTICLE; CATION; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOCAPSULE; NANOCOMPOSITE; NYLON; POLY(2-(DIMETHYLAMINO)ETHYL METHACRYLATE); SILICON DIOXIDE;

ADSORPTION; AGAR GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; ARTICLE; ATOM TRANSFER RADICAL POLYMERIZATION; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; CATALYST; CELL MEMBRANE; CELL VIABILITY; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CHIRALITY; COMPLEX FORMATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTOTOXICITY; DESORPTION; DRUG SYNTHESIS; ELECTROPHORETIC MOBILITY; ENDOCYTOSIS; FLOW CYTOMETRY; GEL ELECTROPHORESIS; GENE DELIVERY SYSTEM; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC TRANSFECTION; HYDRODYNAMICS; HYDROLYSIS; IN VITRO GENE TRANSFER; INTERNALIZATION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE CHARGE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TEMPERATURE; ZETA POTENTIAL; ADMINISTRATION AND DOSAGE; ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; CHLOROCEBUS AETHIOPS; CONFORMATION; COS 1 CELL LINE; DIFFUSION; GENETICS; HEPG2 CELL LINE; HUMAN; MATERIALS TESTING; PLASMID; PROCEDURES; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

ANIMALS; CATIONS; CERCOPITHECUS AETHIOPS; COS CELLS; DIFFUSION; HEP G2 CELLS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; NANOCAPSULES; NANOCOMPOSITES; NYLONS; PARTICLE SIZE; PLASMIDS; SILICON DIOXIDE; TRANSFECTION;

EID: 84924959888     PISSN: 17427061     EISSN: 18787568     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Valtchev V, Tosheva L. Porous nanosized particles: preparation, properties, and applications. Chem Rev 2013;113(8):6734-60.
2. Yang P, Gai S, Lin J. Functionalized mesoporous silica materials for controlled drug delivery. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:3679-98.
3. Li Z, Barnes J, Bosoy A, Stoddart JF, Zink JI. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles in biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:2590-605.
4. Tang F, Li L, Chen D. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles: synthesis, biocompatibility and drug delivery. Adv Mater 2012;24(12):1504-34.
5. Zhang J, Yuan ZF, Wang Y, Chen WH, Luo GF, Cheng SX, et al. Multifunctional envelope-type mesoporous silica nanoparticles for tumor-triggered targeting drug delivery. J Am Chem Soc 2013;135(13):5068-73.
6. Tian H, Chen J, Chen X. Nanoparticles for gene delivery. Small 2013;9(12):2034-44.
7. Guo X, Huang L. Recent advances in nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Acc Chem Res 2012;45:971-9.
8. Mintzer MA, Simanek EE. Nonviral vectors for gene delivery. Chem Rev 2009; 109:259-302.
9. Torney F, Trewyn BG, Lin VSY, Wang K. Mesoporous silica nanoparticles deliver DNA and chemicals into plants. Nat Nanotechnol 2007;2:295-300.
10. Zhang Z, Wang L, Wang J, Jiang X, Li X, Hu Z, et al. Mesoporous silica-coated gold nanorods as a light-mediated multifunctional theranostic platform for cancer treatment. Adv Mater 2012;24(11):1418-23.
11. Meng H, Mai WX, Zhang H, Xue M, Xia T, Lin S, et al. Codelivery of an optimal drug/siRNA combination using mesoporous silica nanoparticles to overcome drug resistance in breast cancer in vitro and in vivo. ACS Nano 2013;7(2):994-1005.
12. Lu F, Wu SH, Huang Y, Mou CY. Size effect on cell uptake in well-suspended, uniform mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Small 2009;5(12):1408-13.
13. Zhu J, Liao L, Zhu L, Zhang P, Guo K, Kong J, et al. Size-dependent cellular uptake efficiency, mechanism, and cytotoxicity of silica nanoparticles toward HeLa cells. Talanta 2013;107(30):408-15.
14. Meng H, Yang S, Li Z, Xia T, Chen J, Ji Z, et al. Aspect ratio determines the quantity of mesoporous silica nanoparticle uptake by a small GTPase-dependent macropinocytosis mechanism. ACS Nano 2011;5(6):4434-47.
15. Huang X, Teng X, Chen D, Tang F, He J. The effect of the shape of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on cellular uptake and cell function. Biomaterials 2010; 31(3):438-48.
16. Jogleka M, Roggers RA, Zhao Y, Trewyn BG. Interaction effects of mesoporous silica nanoparticles with different morphologies on human red blood cells. RSC Adv 2013;3:2454-61.
17. Huang X, Li L, Liu T, Hao N, Liu H, Chen D, et al. The shape effect of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on biodistribution, clearance, and biocompatibility in vivo. ACS Nano 2011;5(7):5390-9.
18. Gratton SEA, Ropp PA, Pohlhaus PD, Luft JC, Madden VJ, Napier ME, et al. The effect of particle design on cellular internalization pathways. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008;105:11613-8.
19. Nel AE, Mädler L, Velegol D, Xia T, Hoek EMV, Somasundaran P, et al. Understanding biophysicochemical interactions at the nano-bio interface. Nature 2009;8:543-57.
20. Verma A, Stellacci F. Effect of surface properties on nanoparticle-cell interactions. Small 2010;6(1):12-21.
21. Lin J, Alexander-Katz A. Cell membranes open "doors" for cationic nanoparticles/biomolecules: insights into uptake kinetics. ACS Nano 2013;7(12):10799-808.
22. Wan Y, Zhao D. On the controllable soft-templating approach to mesoporous silicates. Chem Rev 2007;107(7):2821-60.
23. Wu SH, Mou CY, Lin HP. Synthesis of mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Chem Soc Rev 2013;42:3862-75.
24. Guan S, Inagaki S, Ohsuna T, Terasaki O. Cubic hybrid organic-inorganic mesoporous crystal with a decaoctahedral shape. J Am Chem Soc 2000;122(23):5660-1.
25. Chen A, Komura M, Kamata K, Iyoda T. Highly ordered arrays of mesoporous silica nanorods with tunable aspect ratios from block copolymer thin films. Adv Mater 2008;20(4):763-7.
26. Platschek B, Keibach A, Bein T. Mesoporous structures confined in anodic alumina membranes. Adv Mater 2011;23(21):2395-412.
27. Che S, Liu Z, Ohsuna T, Sakamoto K, Terasaki O, Tatsumi T. Synthesis and characterization of chiral mesoporous silica. Nature 2004;429:281-4.
28. Yang X, Tang H, Cao K, Song H, Sheng W, Wu Q. Template-assisted one-dimensional silica nanotubes: synthesis and applications. J Mater Chem 2011;21:6122-35.
29. Mout R, Moyano DF, Rana S, Rotello VM. Surface functionalization of nanoparticles for nanomedicine. Chem Soc Rev 2012;41:2539-44.
30. Gao F, Botella P, Corma A, Blesa J, Dong L. Monodispersed mesoporous silica nanoparticles with very large pores for enhanced adsorption and release of DNA. J Phys Chem B 2009;113(6):1796-804.
31. Li X, Chen Y, Wang M, Ma Y, Xia W, Gu H. A mesoporous silica nanoparticle-PEI-fusogenic peptide system for siRNA delivery in cancer therapy. Biomaterials 2013;34(4):1391-401.
32. Xu FJ, Yang WT. Polymer vectors via controlled/living radical polymerization for gene delivery. Prog Polym Sci 2011;36(9):1099-131.
33. Hu H, Xiu KM, Xu SL, Yang WT, Xu FJ. Functionalized layered double hydroxide nanoparticles conjugated with disulfide-linked polycation brushes for advanced gene delivery. Bioconjug Chem 2013;24(6):968-78.
34. Cai Q, Zhu Y, He JQ, Wang ZH, Su FB, Xu FJ, et al. Well-defined hydroxyapatite-polycation nanohybrids via surface-initiated atom transfer radical polymerization for biomedical applications. J Mater Chem 2012;22:9358-67.
35. Xu FJ, Li H, Li J, Zhang ZX, Kang ET, Neoh KG. Pentablock copolymers of poly(ethylene glycol), poly((2-dimethyl amino)ethyl methacrylate) and poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate) from consecutive atom transfer radical polymerizations for non-viral gene delivery. Biomaterials 2008;29(20):3023-33.
36. Cai Q, Luo ZS, Pang WQ, Fan YW, Chen XH, Cui FZ. Dilute solution routes to various controllable morphologies of MCM-41 silica with a basic medium. Chem Mater 2001;13(2):258-63.
37. Yang S, Zhou X, Yuan P, Yu M, Xie S, Zou J, et al. Siliceous nanopods from a compromised dual-templating approach. Angew Chem Int Ed 2007;46(45):8579-82.
38. 2 nanotubes by using 1D silica mesostructures as sacrificial templates and their applications in lithium-ion batteries. Small 2010;6(2):296-306.
39. Wei J, Liu A, Chen L, Zhang P, Chen X, Jing X. The surface modification of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles by the ring opening polymerization of γ-benzyl-L-glutamate N-carboxyanhydride. Macromol Biosci 2009;9(7):631-8.
40. Ma X, Zhao Y, Ng KW, Zhao Y. Integrated hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles for target drug/siRNA co-delivery. Chem Eur J 2013;19(46):15593-603.
41. Yang S, Zhao L, Yu C, Zhou X, Tang J, Yuan P, et al. On the origin of helical mesostructures. J Am Chem Soc 2006;128(32):10460-6.
42. Zhang L, Qiao SZ, Cheng L, Yan Z, Lu GQ. Fabrication of a magnetic helical mesostructured silica rod. Nanotechnology 2008;19(43):435608.
43. Ohsuna T, Liu Z, Che S, Terasaki O. Characterization of chiral mesoporous materials by transmission electron microscopy. Small 2005;1(2):233-7.
44. Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature 1992;359(22):710-2.
45. Oh JM, Choi SJ, Lee GE, Han SH, Choy JH. Inorganic drug-delivery nanovehicle conjugated with cancer-cell-specific ligand. Adv Funct Mater 2009;19(10):1617-24.
46. Moulder JF, Stickle WF, Sobol PE, Bomben KD. In: Chastain J, editor. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Eden Prairie, MN: Perkin-Elmer; 1992.
47. Wetering PVD, Moret EE, Nieuwenbroek NME, Steenbergen MJV, Hennik WE. Structure-activity relationship of water-soluble cationic methacrylate/methacrylamide polymers for nonviral gene delivery. Bioconjug Chem 1999;10(4):589-97.
48. Gharavi J, Marks P, Moran K, Kingsborough B, Verma R, Chen Y, et al. Chiral cationic polyamines for chiral microcapsules and siRNA delivery. Bioorg Med Chem Lett 2013;23(21):5919-22.
49. Terp MC, Bauer F, Sugimoto Y, Yu B, Brueggemeier RW, Lee LJ, et al. Differential efficacy of DOTAP enantiomers for siRNA delivery in vitro. Int J Pharm 2012;430(1-2):328-34.
50. Guo XD, Wiradharma N, Liu SQ, Zhang LJ, Khan M, Qian Y, et al. Oligomerized alpha-helical KALA peptides with pendant arms bearing cell-adhesion, DNA-binding and endosome-buffering domains as efficient gene transfection vectors. Biomaterials 2012;33(26):6284-91.