Predicting volume of distribution with decision tree-based regression methods using predicted tissue:plasma partition coefficients

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Freitas, Alex A ^a   Limbu, Kriti ^b   Ghafourian, Taravat ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

^b MEDWAY SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United Kingdom)

^c TABRIZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

ADME; Data mining; Decision tree; Machine learning; Pharmacokinetics; QSAR; QSPkR; Tissue partition; Volume of distribution

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924959832     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-015-0054-x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Rosenbaum SE. Basic pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
2. De Buck SS, Sinha VK, Fenu LA, Gilissen RA, Mackie CE, Nijsen MJ. The prediction of drug metabolism tissue distribution and bioavailability of 50 structurally diverse compounds in rat using mechanism-based absorption distribution and metabolism prediction tools. Drug Metab Dispos. 2007;35:649-59.
3. Ghafourian T, Barzegar-Jalali M, Dastmalchi S, Khavari-Khorasami T, Hakimiha N, Nokhodchi A. QSPR models for the prediction of apparent volume of distribution. Int J Pharm. 2006;319:82-97.
4. Di L, Feng B, Goosen TC, Lai Y, Steyn SJ, Varma MV, et al. A perspective on the prediction of drug pharmacokinetics and disposition in drug research and development. Drug Metab Dispos. 2013;41:1975-93.
5. Louis B, Agrawal VK. Quantitative Structure-Pharmacokinetic Relationship (QSPkR) analysis of the volume of distribution values of anti-infective agents from J group of the ATC classification in humans. Acta Pharm. 2012;62:305-23.
6. ss from in vitro tissue-binding studies. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:115-21.
7. Duffy JC. Prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters in drug design and toxicology. In: Cronin MTD, Livingstone DJ, editors. Predicting chemical toxicity and fate. Boca Raton FL, USA: CRC Press; 2004. p. 229-62.
8. Graham H, Walker M, Jones O, Yates J, Galetin A, Aarons L. Comparison of in-vivo and in-silico methods used for prediction of tissue:plasma partition coefficients in rat. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2012;64:383-96.
9. Maguire TJ, Novik E, Chao P, Barminko J, Nahmias Y, Yarmush ML, et al. Design and application of microfluidic systems for in vitro pharmacokinetic evaluation of drug candidates. Curr Drug Metab. 2009;10:1192-9.
10. Jones RD, Jones HM, Rowland M, Gibson CR, Yates JWT, Chien JY, et al. PhRMA CPCDC initiative on predictive models of human pharmacokinetics part 2: comparative assessment of prediction methods of volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci. 2011;100:4074-89.
11. Madan AK, Dureja H. Prediction of pharmacokinetic parameters. In: Reisfeld B, Mayeno AN, editors. Computational toxicology: volume I methods in molecular biology Vol 929. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 337-57.
12. Xu C, Mager DE. Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationships. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2011;7:63-77.
13. Lombardo F, Obach RS, DiCapua FM, Bakken GA, Lu J, Potter DM, et al. A hybrid mixture discriminant analysis - random forest computational model for the prediction of volume of distribution of drugs in human. J Med Chem. 2006;49:2262-7.
14. Obach RS, Lombardo F, Waters NJ. Trend analysis of a database of intravenous pharmacokinetic parameters in humans for 670 drug compounds. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36:1385-405.
15. Poulin P, Ekins S, Theil FP. A hybrid approach to advancing quantitative prediction of tissue distribution of basic drugs in human. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011;250:194-212.
16. Bois FY, Jamei M, Clewell HJ. PBPK modeling of inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of environment chemicals. Toxicology. 2010;278:256-67.
17. Poulin P, Theil F-P. Prediction of pharmacokinetics prior to in vivo studies 1 mechanism based prediction of volume of distribution. J Pharm Sci. 2012;91:129-56.
18. Peyret T, Poulin P, Krishnan K. A unified algorithm for predicting partition coefficients for PBPK modeling of drugs and environment chemicals. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2010;249:197-207.
19. Poulin P, Haddad S. Advancing prediction of tissue distribution and volume of distribution of highly lipophilic compounds from a simplified tissue-composition-based model as a mechanistic animal alternative method. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:2250-61.
20. Lin JH, Sugiyama Y, Awazu S, Hanano M. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of the tissue-to-blood partition coefficient for physiological pharmacokinetic models. J Pharmacokinetic Biopharm. 1982;10:637-47.
21. Mahmood I. Interspecies scaling: predicting volumes, mean residence time and elimination half-life some suggestions. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1998;50:493-9.
22. Zhivkova Z, Doytchinova I. Prediction of steady-state volume of distribution of acidic drugs by quantitative structure-pharmacokinetics relationships. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:1253-66.
23. Limbu K. Computational models for the estimation of volume of distribution. In: MPharm Thesis. Chatham, Kent, UK: Medway School of Pharmacy, Universities of Kent and Greenwich; 2013.
24. Witten H, Frank E. Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques. 2nd ed. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2005.
25. Freitas AA, Wieser DC, Apweiler R. On the importance of comprehensible classification models for protein function prediction. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinformatics. 2010;7:172-82.
26. Freitas AA. Comprehensible classification models - a position paper. ACM SIGKDD Explorations. 2013;15:1-10.
27. Quinlan JR. C45: program for machine learning. Palo Alto, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1993.
28. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. Classification and regression tree. Pacific Grove, CA, USA: Wadsworth and Brooks; 1984.
29. Quinlan JR. Learning with continuous classes. In: Proceedings of the 5th Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence. Singapore: World Scientific; 1992. p. 343-8.
30. Holmes G, Hall M, Frank E. Generating rule sets from model trees. In: Proceedings of the twelfth Australian joint conference on artificial intelligence. Berlin: Springer; 1999. p. 1-12.
31. Breiman L. Bagging predictors. Mach Learn. 1996;24:123-40.
32. Newby D, Freitas AA, Ghafourian T. Pre-processing feature selection for improved C&RT models for oral absorption. J Chem Inform Model. 2013;53:2730-42.
33. Hall M. A correlation-based feature selection for discrete and numeric class machine learning. In: Proceedings of the 17th international conference on machine learning (ICML-2000). Palo Alto, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann; 2000. p. 359-66.
34. Freitas AA. Data mining and knowledge discovery with evolutionary algorithms. Berlin: Springer; 2002.
35. Demir-Kavuk O, Bentzien J, Muegge I, Knapp E-W. DemQSAR: predicting volume of distribution and clearance of drugs. J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2011;25:1121-33.
36. Kato Y, Hirate J, Sakaguchi K, Ueno M, Horikoshi I. Age-dependent changes in phenytoin tissue bindings in rats: comparison between in vivo and in vitro tissue-to-blood partition coefficients (Kp values) of phenytoin. J Pharmacobiodyn. 1987;10:470-7.
37. Clausen J, Bickel MH. Prediction of drug distribution in distribution dialysis and in vivo from binding to tissues and blood. J Pharm Sci. 1993;82:345-9.
38. Katritzky AR, Petrukhin R, Tatham D, Basak S, Benfenati E, Karelson M, et al. Interpretation of quantitative structure property and -activity relationships. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 2001;41:679-85.
39. Poulin P, Theil F-P. Development of a novel method for predicting human volume of distribution at steady-state of basic drugs and comparative assessment with existing methods. J Pharm Sci. 2009;98:4941-61.
40. Wildman SA, Crippen GM. Prediction of physiochemical parameters by atomic contributions. J Chem Inf Comput Sci. 1999;39:868-73.
41. Ghafourian T, Barzegar-Jalali M, Hakimiha N, Cronin MT. Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationship modelling: apparent volume of distribution. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2004;56:339-50.
42. Clark DE. Rapid calculation of polar molecular surface area and its application to the prediction of transport phenomena 1 prediction of intestinal absorption. J Pharm Sci. 1999;88:807-14.
43. Ghafourian T, Freitas AA, Newby D. The impact of training set data distributions for modelling of passive intestinal absorption. Int J Pharm. 2012;436:711-20.
44. Gasteiger J, Marsili M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity - a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron. 1980;36:3219.
45. del Amo EM, Ghemtio L, Xhaard H, Yliperttula M, Urtti A, Kidron H. Applying linear and non-linear methods for parallel prediction of volume of distribution and fraction of unbound drug. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e74758.
46. Paixão P, Aniceto N, Gouveia LF, Morais JA. Prediction of drug distribution in rat and humans using an artificial neural networks ensemble and a PBPK model. Pharm Res. 2014;31:3313-22.
47. Berellini G, Springer C, Waters NJ, Lombardo F. In silico prediction of volume of distribution in human using linear and nonlinear models on a 669 compound data set. J Med Chem. 2009;52:4488-95.
48. Zheng N, Zhang X, Rosania GR. Effect of Phospholipidosis on the Cellular Pharmacokinetics of Chloroquine. J Pharmacol Exp Therapeut. 2011;336:661-71.
49. Min KA, Zhang X, Yu JY, Rosania GR. Computational approaches to analyse and predict small molecule transport and distribution at cellular and subcellular levels. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 2014;35:15-32.
50. Gong Y, Zhao Z, McConn DJ, Beaudet B, Tallman M, Speake JD, et al. Lysosomes contribute to anomalous pharmacokinetic behavior of melanocortin-4 receptor agonists. Pharm Res. 2007;24:1138-44.
51. Yudate HT, Kai T, Aoki M, Minowa Y, Yamada T, Kimura T, et al. Identification of a novel set of biomarkers for evaluating phospholipidosis-inducing potential of compounds using rat liver microarray data measured 24-h after single dose administration. Toxicology. 2012;295:1-7.
52. Obach RS, Baxter JG, Liston TE, Silber BM, Jones BC, MacIntyre F, et al. The prediction of human pharmacokinetic parameters from preclinical and in vitro metabolism data. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1997;283:46-58.