Interpretation of Quantitative Structure - Property and - Activity Relationships

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 679-685

  Katritzky, Alan R ^a   Petrukhin, Ruslan ^a   Tatham, Douglas ^a   Basak, Subhash ^b   Benfenati, Emilio ^c   Karelson, Mati ^d   Maran, Uko ^d  

^a University of Florida ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA DULUTH   (United States)

^c MARIO NEGRI INSTITUTE FOR PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TARTU   (Estonia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; SOLUBILITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TASTE;

CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL; CHROMATOGRAPHY, GAS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SOLUBILITY; TASTE;

GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MATRIX ALGEBRA; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SOLUBILITY; SOLVENTS; TOXICITY;

QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-PROPERTY RELATIONSHIPS (QSPR);

DATA REDUCTION;

EID: 0035324937     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci000134w     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Katritzky, A. R.; Maran, U.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Structurally Diverse Quantitative Structure - Property Relationship Correlations of Technologically Relevant Physical Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1-18.
2. (a) Basak, S. C.; Magnuson, V. R.; Niemi, G. J.; Regal, R. R. Topological Indexes - Their Nature, Mutual Relatedness, and Applications. Math Model. 1987, 8, 300-305.
3. (b) Basak S. C.; Niemi G. J.; Regal, R. R.; Veith, G. D. Determining Structural Similarity of Chemicals Using Graph-Theoretic Indexes. Discrete Appl. Math. 1988, 19 (1-3) 17-44.
4. (a) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D.; Host, G. E.; Niemi, G. J.; Bradbury, S. P. A Comparative Study of Molecular Similarity, Statistical, and Neural Methods for Predicting Toxic Modes of Action. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17, 1056-1064.
5. (b) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D. Molecular Similarity and Estimation of Molecular-Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 366-372.
6. (c) Basak, S. C.; Niemi, G. J.; Veith, G. D. Predicting Properties of Molecules Using Graph Invariants. J. Math. Chem. 1991, 7, 243-272.
7. (d) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D. Use of Topological Space and Property Space in Selecting Structural Analogs. Math. Modell. Sci. Comput., in press.
8. (e) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D. Development and Application of Molecular Similarity Methods Using Nonempirical Parameters. Math. Modell. Sci. Comput., in press.
9. (f) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D. Quantitative Comparison of Five Molecular Structure Spaces in Selecting Analogs of Chemicals. Math. Modell. Sci. Comput., in press.
10. (g) Xue, L.; Bajorath, J. Molecular Descriptors for Effective Classification of Biologically Active Compounds Based on Principal Component Analysis Identified by a Genetic Algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Sci. 2000, 40, 801-809.
11. (h) Basak, S. C.; Grunwald, G. D. Tolerance Space and Molecular Similarity. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1995, 3, 265-277.
12. Basak, S. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D. Characterization of the Molecular Similarity of Chemicals Using Topological Invariants. In Advances in Molecular Similarity; JAI Press: Greenwich, CT, 1996; Vol. 2, pp 171-185.
13. Balasubramanian, K.; Basak, S. C. Characterization of Isospectral Graphs Using Graph Invariants and Derived Orthogonal Parameters. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 367-373.
14. Auer, C. M.; Nabholz, J. V.; Baetcke, K. P. Mode of Action and the Assessment of Chemical Hazards in the Presence of Limited Data: Use of Structure - Activity Relationships (SAR) Under TSCA, Section 5. Environ. Health Perspect. 1990, 87, 183-197.
15. (a) Jurs, P. C.; Bakken, G. A.; McClelland, H. E. Computational Methods for the Analysis of Chemical Sensor Array Data from Volatile Analytes. Chem. Rev. 2000, 100, 2649-2678.
16. (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Petrukhin, R.; Karelson, M.; Prakash, I.; Desai, N. Sweetness Correlations Using CODESSA. Part I. Manuscript in preparation.
17. Katritzky, A. R.; Tamm, T.; Wang, Y.; Karelson, M. A Unified Treatment of Solvent Properties. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 692-698.
18. Karelson, M.; Lobanov, V. S.; Katritzky, A. R. Quantum-Chemical Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR Studies. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 1027-1043.
19. Karelson, M. Molecular Descriptors in QSAR/QSPR; John Wiley & Sons: New York, 2000.
20. (a) Basak, S. C. Use of Molecular Complexity Indices in Predictive Pharmacology and Toxicology: A QSAR Approach. Med. Sci. Res. 1987, 15, 605-609.
21. (b) Johnson, M.; Basak, S. C.; Maggiora, G. A Characterization of Molecular Similarity Methods for a Property Prediction. Math. Comput. Modell. 1988, 11, 630-634.
22. (a) Cramer, R. D.; Patterson, D. E.; Bunce, J. D. Comparative Molecular Field Analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of Shape on Binding of Steroids to Carrier Proteins. J. Am Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 5959-5967.
23. (b) Höskuldsson, A. PLS Regression Methods. J. Chemom. 1988, 2, 211-228.
24. (a) Lucic, B.; Trinajstic, N. Multivariate Regression Versus Artificial Neural Networks in QSAR. Second Indo-US Workshop on Mathematical Chemistry. Duluth, MN, May 30-June 3, 2000.
25. 4 Using Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1994, 34, 1118-1121.
26. (a) Gini, G.; Lorenzini, M.; Benfenati, E.; Grasso, P.; Bruschi, M. Predictive Carcinogenicity: A Model for Aromatic Compounds, with Nitrogen-Containing Substituents, Based on Molecular Descriptors Using an Artificial Neural Network. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1076-1080.
27. (b) Basak, S. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D.; Optiz, D. W.; Balasubramanian, K. Use of Statistical and Neural Net Methods in Predicting Toxicity of Chemicals: A Hierarchical QSAR Approach. In Predictive Toxicology of Chemicals: Experiences and Impact of AI Tools; Gini, G. C., Katritzky, A. R., Eds.; AAAI 1999 Spring Symposium Series; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, 1999; pp 108-111.
28. Benfenati, E.; Gini, G. Computational Predictive Programs (Expert Systems) in Toxicology. Toxicology 1997, 119, 213-225.
29. Basak, S. C.; Mills, D.; Gute, B. D.; Balaban, A. T.; Basak K.; Grunwald, G. D. Use of Mathematical Structural Invariants in Analyzing Combinatorial Libraries: A Case Study with Psoralen Derivatives. In Aspects of Mathematical Chemistry; Sinha, D. K., Basak, S. C., Mohanty, R. K., Basumallick, I. N., Eds.; Visva Bharati University Press: in press.
30. Benfenati, E.; Lorenzini, P.; Grasso, P.; Gini, G. Classification Experiments for the Prediction of Pesticide Ecotoxicity. Second Indo-US Workshop on Mathematical Chemistry. Duluth, MN, May 30-June 3, 2000.
31. Katritzky, A. R.; Tamm, T.; Wang, Y.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M. QSPR Treatment of Solvent Scales. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 684-691.
32. Katritzky, A. R.; Mu, L.; Karelson, M. A QSPR Study of the Solubility of Gases and Vapors in Water. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 1162-1168.
33. Katritzky, A. R.; Tatham, D. B.; Maran, U. The Correlation of the Solubility of Gases and Vapors in Methanol and Ethanol with Their Molecular Structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. Accepted for publication.
34. (a) Michotte, Y.; Massart, D. L., Molecular Connectivity and Retention Indexes. J. Pharm. Sci. 1977, 66, 1630-1632.
35. (b) Bonchev, D.; Mekenjan, O.; Protic, G.; Trinajstic, N. Application of Topological Indices to Gas Chromatographic Data: Calculation of the Retention Indices of Isomeric Alkylbenzenes. J. Chromatogr. 1979, 176, 149-156.
36. Kier, L. B.; Hall, L. H. Molecular Connectivity Analysis of Structure Influencing Chromatographic Retention Indices. J. Pharm. Sci. 1979, 68, 120-122.
37. (d) Duvenbeck, Ch.; Zinn, P. List Operations on Chemical Graphs. 3. Development of Vertex and Edge Models for Fitting Retention Index Data. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 211-219.
38. (e) Duvenbeck, Ch.; Zinn, P. List Operations on Chemical Graphs. 4. Using Edge Models for Prediction of Retention Index Data. J. Chem. inf. Comput. Sci. 1993, 33, 220-230.
39. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Development and Use of Charged Partial Surface Area Structural Descriptors in Computer-Assisted Quantitative Structure - Property Relationship Studies. Anal. Chem. 1990, 62, 2323-2329.
40. Stanton, D. T.; Jurs, P. C. Computer-Assisted Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Pyrazines. Anal. Chem. 1989, 61, 1328-1332.
41. Whalen-Pedersen, E. K.; Jurs, P. C. Calculation of Linear Temperature Programmed Capillary Gas Chromatographic Retention Indices of Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds. Anal. Chem. 1981, 53, 2184-2187.
42. Georgakopoulos, C. G.; Kiburis, J. C.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Relative Retention Times of Stimulants and Narcotics. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2021-2024.
43. Georgakopoulos, C. G.; Tsika. O. G.; Kiburis, J. C.; Jurs, P. C. Prediction of Gas-Chromatographic Relative Retention Times of Anabolic Steroids. Anal. Chem. 1991, 63, 2025-2028.
44. (a) Buydens, L.; Massart, D. L.; Geerlings, P. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Indexes with Topological, Physicochemical, and Quantum Chemical Parameters. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 738-744.
45. (b) Katritzky, A. R.; Ignatchenko, E. S.; Barcock, R. A.; Lobanov, V. S.; Karelson, M. Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors Using a General Quantitative Structure - Property Relashionship Treatment. Anal. Chem. 1994, 66, 1799-1807.
46. (c) Lucic, B.; Trinajstic, N.; Sild, S.; Karelson, M.; Katritzky, A. R. A New Efficient Approach for Variable Selection Based on Multire gression: Prediction of Gas Chromatographic Retention Times and Response Factors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 610-621.
47. Donovan W. H.; Famini, G. R. Using Theoretical Descriptors in Structure Activity Relationships: Retention Indices of Sulfur Vesicans and Related Compounds. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1996, 83-89.
48. Katritzky, A. R.; Chen, K.; Maran, U.; Carlson, D. A. QSPR Correlation and Predictions of GC Retention Indexed for Methyl-Branched Hydrocarbons Produced by Insects. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 101-109.
49. Shallenberger, R. S. Taste Recognition Chemistry. Pure Appl. Chem. 1997, 69, 659-666.
50. (a) Nation, D. F.; Roozen, J. P.; De Graaf, C. Sensory Evaluation of Mixtures of Maltitol or Aspartame, Sucrose and an Orange Aroma. Chem. Senses 1998, 23, 59-66.
51. (b) Nahon, D. F.; Roozen, J. P.; De Graaf, C. Sensory Evaluation of Mixtures of Sodium Cyclamate, Sucrose and an Orange Aroma. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1998, 46, 3426-3430.
52. Rossiter, K. J. Structure - Odor Relationships. Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 3201-3240.
53. http://clogp.pomona.edu/medchem/chem/qsar-db/search.html.
54. Hermens, J. QSAR for Prediction of Fate and Effects of Chemicals in the Environment. Final Report, European Commission, Project EV5V-CT92-0211.
55. (a) Russom, C. L.; Bradbury, S. P.; Broderius, S. J.; Hammermeister, D. E.; Drummond, R. A. Predicting Models of Toxic Action from Chemical Structure: Acute Toxicity in the Fathead Minnow (Pimephales Promelas). Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1997, 16, 948-967.
56. (b) Klopman, G.; Saiakhov, R.; Rosenkranz, H. S.; Hermens, J. L. M. Multiple Computer-Automated Structure Evaluation Program Study of Aquatic Toxicity 1: Guppy. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1999, 18, 2497-2505.
57. Basak, S. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D. Assessment of the Mutagenicity of Aromatic Amines from Theoretical Structural Parameters: A Hierarchical Approach. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1999, 10, 117-129.
58. Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D.; Basak, S. C. Prediction of the Dermal Penetration of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): A Hierarchical QSAR Approach. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1999, 10, 1-15.
59. Basak, S. C.; Gute, B. D.; Grunwald, G. D. Relative Effectiveness of Topological, Geometrical, and Quantum-Chemical Parameters in Investigating Mutagenicity of Chemicals. In Quantitative Structure - Activity Relationships in Environmental Sciences, VII; Chen, F., Schuurmann, G., Eds.; SETAC Press: Pensacola, FL, 1997; pp 245-261.
60. Maran, U.; Karelson, M.; Katritzky, A. R. A Comprehensive QSAR Treatment of the Genotoxicity of Heteroaromatic and Aromatic Amines. Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1999, 18, 3-10.
61. (a) Benfenati, E.; Pelagatti, S.; Grasso, P.; Gini, G. COMET: The Approach of a Project in Evaluating Toxicity. In Predictive Toxicology of Chemicals: Experiences and Impact of AI Tools; Gini, G. C., Katritzky, A. R., Eds.; AAAI 1999 Spring Symposium Series; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, 1999; pp 40-43.
62. (b) Gini, G.; Lorenzini, M.; Vittore, A.; Benfenati, E.; Grasso, P. Some Results for the Prediction of Carcinogenicity Using Hybrid Systems. In Predictive Toxicology of Chemicals: Experiences and Impact of AI Tools; Gini, G. C., Katritzky, A. R., Eds.; AAAI 1999 Spring Symposium Series; AAAI Press: Menlo Park, CA, 1999; pp 139-143.