The nature of supreme court power

The Nature of Supreme Court Power

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 1-248

  Hall, Matthew E K ^a  

^a SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924711087     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511933943     Document Type: Book

References (288)

1. Abel, C. F., and Hans J. Hacker. 2006. “Local Compliance with Supreme Court Decisions: Making Space for Religious Expression in Public Schools.” Journal of Church and State 48 (2): 355-77.
2. Ackerman, Bruce, ed. 2002. Bush v. Gore: The Question of Legitimacy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
3. Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review 1973: 790-846.
4. Adamczyk, Amy, John Wybraniec, and Roger Finke. 2004. “Religious Regulation and the Courts: Documenting the Effects of Smith and RFRA.” The Journal of Church and State 46: 237-62.
5. Adler, Scott. 2003. “Congressional District Data File.” University of Colorado, Boulder, CO. http: //socsci. colorado. edu/~esadler/districtdatawebsite/Congre ssional-DistrictDatasetwebpage. htm.
6. American Library Association (ALA). 1970-95. The Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. Chicago: Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association.
7. Ansolabehere, Stephen, Alan Gerber, and James Snyder. 2002. “Equal Votes, Equal Money: Court-Ordered Redistricting and Public Expenditures in the American States.” American Political Science Review 96 (4): 767-77.
8. Ansolabehere, Stephen and James Snyder. 2008. The End of Inequality: One Person, One Vote, and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Norton.
9. Arkes, Hadley. 1992. First Things. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
10. Association of American Publishers, American Library Association, Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (AAP). 1981. Limiting What Students Shall Read: Books and Other Learning Materials in Our Public Schools: How they Are Selected and How They Are Removed. Washington: Association of American Publishers.
11. Ball, Howard. 2000. The Bakke Case: Race, Education, and Affirmative Action. University Press of Kansas.
12. Ban, Michael. 1973a. “The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio on Police Behavior.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, May.
13. Ban, Michael. 1973b. “Local Courts v. The Supreme Court: The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA, September.
14. Banks, Christopher P., Michael E. Cohen, and John Clifford Green, eds. 2005. The Final Arbiter: The Consequences of Bush v. Gore for Law and Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Barreto, Matt A., Gary M. Segura, and Nathan D. Woods. 2004. “The Mobilizing Effect of Majority-Minority Districts on Latino Turnout.” American Political Science Review 98 (1): 65-75.
16. Bartley N. V. 1969. The Rise of Massive Resistance: Race and Politics in the South during the 1950’s. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
17. Baum, Lawrence. 2003. “The Supreme Court in American Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 6: 161-80.
18. Bazelon, David. L. 1976. “The Realities of Gideon and Argersinger.” Georgetown Law Journal 64: 811-38.
19. Beaney, William M. and Edward N. Beiser. 1964. “Prayer and Politics: The Impact of Engel and Schempp on the Political Process.” Journal of Public Law 13: 475-503.
20. Bedau, Hugo Adam. 1998. The Death Penalty in America: Current Controversies. Oxford University Press.
21. Benesh, Sarah C. and Malia Reddick. 2002. “Overruled: An Event History Analysis of Lower Court Reaction to Supreme Court Precedent.” Journal of Politics 64 (2): 534-50.
22. Benjamin, Roger W. and Theodore B. Pedeliski. 1969. “The Minnesota Public Defender System and the Criminal Law Process: A Comparative Study of Behavior at the Judicial District Level.” Law & Society Review 4 (2): 279-320.
23. Benner, Laurance A. 1975. “Tokenism and the American Indigent: Some Perspectives on Defense Services.” American Criminal Law Review 12: 667-88.
24. Berutti, Ronald A. 1992. “The Cherokee Cases: The Fight to Save the Supreme Court and the Cherokee Indians.” American Indian Law Review 17: 291.
25. Bickel, Alexander. [1962] 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch. New Haven: Yale University Press.
26. Birkby, Robert H. 1966 “The Supreme Court and the Bible Belt: Tennessee Reaction to the ‘Schempp’ Decision.” Midwest Journal of Political Science 10 (3): 304-19.
27. Bitler, Marianne and Madeline Zavodny. 2002. “Did Abortion Legalization Reduce the Number of Unwanted Children? Evidence from Adoptions.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 34 (1): 25-33.
28. Black, Charles. 1960. The People and the Court: Judicial Review in a Democracy. New York: Macmillan.
29. Blatnik, Edward J. W. 1998. “No RFRAF Allowed: The Status of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act’s Federal Application in the Wake of City of Boerne v. Flores.” Columbia Law Review 98 (6): 1410-60.
30. Bradley, Craig. 1993. The Failure of the Criminal Procedure Revolution. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
31. Bravin, Jesse. 2005. “Voting Cases Could Shape Debate Over Alito.” The Wall Street Journal, November 21.
32. Brent, James. 1999. “An Agent and Two Principals: U. S. Court of Appeals Reponses to Employment Division, Department of Human Resources v. Smith and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.” American Politics Quarterly 27 (2): 236-66.
33. Brent, James. 2003. “A Principal-Agent Analysis of the U. S. Courts of Appeals Responses to Boerne v. Flores.” American Politics Research 31 (5): 557-70.
34. Brosi, Kathleen B. 1979. A Cross-City Comparison of Felony Case Processing. Washington: Institute for Law and Social Research.
35. Bruni, Frank. 2000. “Bush Remains Upbeat as the Tension Mounts.” The New York Times, November 8.
36. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2006. “Capital Punishment, 2006-Statistical Tables.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics. http: //www. ojp. usdoj. gov/bjs/glance/exe. htm.
37. Burress, Lee. 1989. Battle of the Books: Literary Censorship in the Public Schools, 1950-1985. Metuchen, NJ: Scarecrow Press.
38. Caldeira, Gregory A. and James L. Gibson. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 635-664.
39. Caldeira, Gregory A. and Christopher J. W. Zorn. 1998. “Of Time and Consensual Norms in the Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (3): 874-902.
40. Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharyn O’Halloran. 1996. “Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?” American Political Science Review 90 (4): 794-812.
41. Canon, Bradley C. 1974. “Is the Exclusionary Rule in Failing Health? Some New Data and a Plea against a Precipitous Conclusion.” Kentucky Law Journal 62: 703-7.
42. Canon, Bradley C. 1977. “Testing the Effectiveness of Civil Liberties Policies at the State and Federal Levels: The Case of the Exclusionary Rule.” American Politics Quarterly 5 (1): 57-82.
43. Canon, Bradley C. and Charles A. Johnson. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
44. Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review 70 (1): 50-63.
45. Cassell, Paul G. 1996a. “Miranda’s Social Costs: An Empirical Reassessment.” Northwestern University Law Review 90 (2): 387.
46. Cassell, Paul G. 1996b. “All Benefits, No Costs: The Grand Illusion of Miranda’s Defenders.” Northwestern University Law Review 90 (3): 1084-124.
47. Cassell, Paul G. 1997. “Miranda’s ‘Negligible’ Effect on Law Enforcement: Some Skeptical Observations.” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 20 (2): 327-46.
48. Cassell, Paul G. and Richard Fowles. 1998a. “Handcuffing the Cops? A Thirty-Year Perspective on Miranda’s Harmful Effects on Law Enforcement.” Stanford Law Review 50: 1055-2245.
49. Cassell, Paul G. and Richard Fowles. 1998b. “Falling Clearance Rates After Miranda: Coincidence or Consequence?” Stanford Law Review 50: 1181-92.
50. Centers for Disease Control. 1969-2003. “Abortion Surveillance Report.” Washington: National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health.
51. Clayton, Cornell W. and J. Mitchell Pickerill. 2006. “The Politics of Criminal Justice: How the New Right Regime Shaped the Rehnquist Court’s Criminal Justice Jurisprudence.” Georgetown Law Journal 94 (June): 1385-425.
52. Clegg, Roger. 2005. “Time Has Not Favored Racial Preferences.” Chronicle of Higher Education 51 (19): B10. January 14.
53. Comptroller General of the United States. 1979. “Impact of the Exclusionary Rule on Federal Criminal Prosecutions.” Washington: General Accounting Office, Rep. No. CDG-79-45.
54. Congressional Record. 1956. 84th Cong., Vol. 102.
55. Cox, Gary W. and Jonathon N. Katz. 1999. “The Reapportionment Revolution and Bias in U. S. Congressional Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (3): 812-41.
56. Cox, Gary W. and Jonathon N. Katz. 2002. Elbridge Gerry’s Salamander: The Electoral Consequences of the Reapportionment Revolution. New York: Cambridge University Press.
57. Cushman, Barry. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court. New York: Oxford University Press.
58. Dahl, Robert. 1957. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6: 279.
59. Davies, Thomas Y. 1982. “Affirmed: A Study of Criminal Appeals and Decision-Making Norms in a California Court of Appeal.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 7 (3): 543-648.
60. Davies, Thomas Y. 1983. “A Hard Look at What We Know (And Still Need to Learn) about the ‘Costs’ of the Exclusionary Rule: The NIJ Study and Other Studies of ‘Lost’ Arrests.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 8 (3): 611-90.
61. Davis, James A., Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 2007. General Social Surveys, 1972-2006. Chicago, IL: National Opinion Research Center. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut /Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research /Berkeley, CA: Computer-assisted Survey Methods Program (http: //sda. berkeley. edu), University of California.
62. DeFrances, Carol J. 2001. “State-Funded Indigent Defense Services, 1999.” Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ 188464.
63. DeVoe, Jill F., Katharin Peter, Phillip Kaufman, Amanda Miller, Thomas D. Snyder, and Katrina Baum. 2004. “Indicators of School Crime and Safety.” Washington: National Center for Education Statistics, NCES 2005-002; Bureau of Justice Statistics, NCJ 205290.
64. Dierenfield, R. B. 1962. Religion in American Public Schools. Washington: Public Affairs Press.
65. DiNardo, John. 2007. “Interesting Questions in Freakonomics.” Journal of Economic Literature XLV: 973-1000.
66. Dionne, E. J., Jr., and William Kristol. 2001. Bush v. Gore: The Court Cases and the Commentary. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.
67. Dolbeare, Kenneth M. and Phillip E. Hammond. 1971. The School Prayer Decisions: From Court Policy to Local Practice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
68. Donohue, John J., III. 1998. “Did Miranda Diminish Police Effectiveness?” Stanford Law Review 50: 1147-80.
69. Donohue, John J., III, and Steven D. Levitt. 2001. “The Impact of Legalized Abortion on Crime.” Quarterly Journal of Economics CXVI (2): 379-420.
70. Donohue, John J., III, and Steven D. Levitt. 2008. “Measurement Error, Legalized Abortion, and the Decline in Crime: A Response to Foote and Goetz.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 425-40.
71. Douglas, William O. 1956. We, the Judges: Studies in American and Indian Constitutional Law from Marshal to Mukherjea. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
72. Drecksel, Paul Calvin. 1991. “The Crisis in Indigent Defense Systems.” Arkansas Law Review 44: 363-408.
73. Dreyfuss, Joel and Charles Lawrence. 1979. The Bakke Case: Politics of Inequality. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
74. Dudley, Louise M. 1995. “Board Changes Funding Guidelines: Student Religious Publications Now Eligible.” UVaToday, August 25.
75. Dworkin, Ronald, ed. 2002. A Badly Flawed Election: Debating Bush v. Gore, the Supreme Court, and American Democracy. New York: New Press.
76. Edwards, George C., III. 1980. Presidential Influence in Congress. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
77. Edwards, George C., III. 1985. “Measuring Presidential Success in Congress: Alternative Approaches.” Journal of Politics 47: 667-85.
78. Employment Standards Administration. 1983-90. “Minimum Wage and Maximum Hours Standards under the Fair Labor Standards Act.” Washington: U. S. Department of Labor.
79. Enemark, Christine E. 1997. “Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. Pena: Forcing the Federal Communications Commission into a New Constitutional Regime.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 30 (2): 215-66.
80. Engel, Stephen. 2009. “A Mere Party Machine”? Judicial Authority, Party Development, and the Changing Politics of Attacking the Courts. Dissertation, Yale University.
81. Epstein, Lee and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Congressional Quarterly Press.
82. Epstein, Lee and Joseph F. Kobylka. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.
83. Epstein, Lee, and Thomas G. Walker. 1995. Constitutional Law for a Changing America: Institutional Powers and Constraints. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
84. Eskridge, William N. 1991a. “Reneging on History? Playing the Court/Congress/President Civil Rights Game.” California Law Review 79 (3): 613-84.
85. Eskridge, William N. 1991b. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Interpretation Decisions.” Yale Journal 101 (2): 331-455.
86. Feeley, Malcom M. 1973. “Power, Impact, and the Supreme Court.” In The Impact of Supreme Court Decisions, ed. Theodore L. Becker and Malcolm M. Feeley. 2d ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
87. Feeney, Floyd, Forrest Dill, and Adriane Weir. 1983. “Arrests Without Conviction: How Often They Occur and Why.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
88. Ferejohn, John. 2002. “Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law.” Law and Contemporary Problems 65 (3): 41-68.
89. Fisher, Louis. 1993. “The Legislative Veto: Invalidated, It Survives.” Law and Contemporary Problems 56 (4): 273-92.
90. Fisher, Louis. 2005. “Legislative Vetoes After Chadha.” Washington: Congressional Research Service, RS22132.
91. Fletcher, Matthew L. M. 2007. “Bringing Balance to Indian Gaming.” Harvard Journal on Legislation 44: 39.
92. Fletcher, William A. 1982. “The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy.” Yale Law Journal 91 (4): 635-97.
93. Foote, Christopher L. and Christopher F. Goetz. 2008. “The Impact of Abortion on Crime: Comment.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 407-23.
94. Forst, Brian, Judith Lucianovic, and Sarah J. Cox. 1977. “What Happens After Arrest? A Court Perspective of Police Operations in the District of Columbia.” PROMIS Research Project Publication. Washington: Institute for Law and Social Research.
95. Forst, Brian, Judith Lucianovic, and Sarah J. Cox. 1982. “Arrest Convictability as a Measure of Police Performance.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
96. Frankfurter, Felix. 1954. Some Observations on Supreme Court Litigation and Legal Education (The Ernst Freund Lecture). University of Chicago Press.
97. Franklin, Charles H. and Liane C. Kosaki. 1989. “Republican Schoolmaster: the U. S. Supreme Court, Public Opinion, and Abortion.” American Political Science Review 83 (3): 751-71.
98. Frymer, Paul. 2003. “Acting When Elected Officials Won’t: Federal Courts and Civil Rights Enforcement in U. S. Labor Unions.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 483-99.
99. Funston, Richard. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.” American Political Science Review 69 (3): 795-811.
100. Gay, Claudine. 2001. “The Effect of Minority Districts and Minority Representation on Political Participation in California.” San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
101. General Accounting Office. 1987. “Compensatory Education: Chapter 1 Services Provided to Private Sectarian School Students.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-87-128BR.
102. General Accounting Office. 1989. “Compensatory Education: Aguilar v. Felton Decision’s Continuing Impact on Chapter 1 Program.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-89-131BR.
103. General Accounting Office. 1993. “Compensatory Education: Additional Funds Help More Private School Students Receive Chapter 1 Services.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/HRD-93-65.
104. General Accounting Office. 1996. “Gun Control: Implementation of the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/GGD-96-22.
105. General Accounting Office. 2000. “Options for Improving the National Instant Criminal Background Check System.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO/GGD-00-56.
106. General Accounting Office. 2001. “Status of Small Disadvantaged Business Certifications.” Washington: General Accounting Office, GAO-01-273.
107. Gillman, Howard. 1993. The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise of Lochner Era Police Powers Jurisprudence. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
108. Gillman, Howard. 2000. The Votes That Counted: How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election. University of Chicago Press.
109. Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875-1891.” American Political Science Review 96 (3): 511-24.
110. Glater, Jonathan D. 2006. “Colleges Open Minority Aid to All Comers.” The New York Times, March 14.
111. Goldman, Jerry. 2005. “The Canon of Constitutional Law Revisited.” Law and Politics Book Review 15 (8): 648-56.
112. Goldstein, Robert Justin. 1995. “Two Centuries of Flagburnings in the United States.” The Flag Bulletin 163: 65-77.
113. Graber, Mark A. 1993. “The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development 7 (Spring): 35-73.
114. Graber, Mark A. 1998. “Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court.” Political Research Quarterly 51 (1): 221-3.
115. Graber, Mark A. 1999. “The Problematic Establishment of Judicial Review.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. Howard Gillman, Cornell Clayton. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
116. Graber, Mark A. 2005. “Constructing Judicial Review.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 425-51.
117. Grigg, Delia and Jonathan N. Katz. 2005. “The Impact of Majority-Minority Districts on Congressional Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, April 7-10, 2005, Chicago, IL.
118. Grose, Christian R. 2005. “Disentangling Constituency and Legislator Effects in Legislative Representation: Black Legislators or Black Districts?” Social Science Quarterly 86 (2): 427-43.
119. Gruhl, John. 1980. “The Supreme Court’s Impact on the Law of Libel: Compliance by Lower Federal Courts.” Western Political Quarterly 33 (4): 502-19.
120. Gruhl, John and Susan Welch. 1990. “The Impact of the Bakke Decision on Black and Hispanic Enrollment in Medical and Law Schools.” Social Science Quarterly 71 (3): 458-73.
121. Hall, Matthew E. K. 2010. “Bringing Down Brown: Super Precedents, Myths of Rediscovery and the Retroactive Canonization of Brown v. Board of Education.” Journal of Law and Policy 16 (3): 655-99.
122. Hamilton, Alexander. 1961. The Federalist 78.
123. Hand, Learned. 1960. “The Spirit of Liberty,” speech at an “I Am an American Day” ceremony, Central Park, New York City, May 21, 1944. In The Spirit of Liberty, ed. Irving Dilliard. 3d ed. New York: Knopf.
124. Handberg, Roger and Harold F. Hill, Jr. 1980. “Court Curbing, Court Reversals, and Judicial Review: The Supreme Court versus Congress.” Law & Society Review 14 (2): 309-22.
125. Hansen, Susan B. 1980. “State Implementation of Supreme Court Decisions: Abortion Rates Since Roe v. Wade.” Journal of Politics 42 (2): 372-95.
126. Hill, Kevin. 1995. “Does the Creation of Black Majority Districts Aid Republicans: An Analysis of the 1992 Congressional Elections in Eight Southern States.” Journal of Politics 57 (2): 384-415.
127. Hirschl, Ran. 2004. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
128. Hoekstra, Valerie J. 2000. “The Supreme Court and Local Public Opinion.” American Political Science Review 94 (1): 89-100.
129. Hoekstra, Valerie. 2005. “Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.” Political Research Quarterly 58 (2): 317-28.
130. Hopkins, Dianne McAfee. 1995. “Challenges to Library Materials from Principals in United States Secondary Schools-A ‘Victory’ of Sorts.” School Libraries Worldwide 1 (2) 8-29.
131. Hopkins, Dianne McAfee. 1996. “The Library Bill of Rights and School Library Media Programs.” Library Trends 45 (1): 61.
132. Horowitz, Donald L. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington: The Brookings Institution.
133. Hulse, Carl. 2008. “Democrats Seek to Block Appointee to Obama’s Seat, but Authority Is in Question.” The New York Times, December 31.
134. Hulse, Carl. 2009. “Democrats Open Way to Seat Illinois Pick for Senate.” The New York Times, January 8.
135. Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association. 1970-95. Newsletter on Intellectual Freedom. Chicago: Intellectual Freedom Committee of the American Library Association.
136. Irons, Peter. 2006. A People’s History of the Supreme Court: The Men and Women Whose Cases and Decisions Have Shaped Our Constitution. Revised Edition. New York: Penguin Books.
137. Johnson, Charles A. 1979. “Lower Court Reactions to Supreme Court Decisions.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (4): 792-804.
138. Johnson, Charles A. 1987. “Law, Politics, and Judicial Decision Making: Lower Federal Court Uses of Supreme Court Decisions.” Law & Society Review 21 (2): 325-40.
139. Johnson, Charles A., and Bradley, C. Canon 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington: CQ Press.
140. Johnson, Richard M. 1967. “Compliance and Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Wisconsin Law Review 1967: 170-85.
141. Johnston, Henry P., ed., 4 vols. 1890-93. The Correspondence and Public Papers of John Jay. Vol. 4. New York and London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.
142. Joyce, Ted. 2004. “Did Legalized Abortion Lower Crime?” Journal of Human Resources 39 (1): 1-28.
143. Katz, Ellis. 1965. “Patterns of Compliance with the Schempp Decision.” Journal of Public Law 14: 396-408.
144. Keck, Thomas M. 2007. “Party Politics or Judicial Independence? The Regime Politics Literature Hits the Law Schools.” Law & Social Inquiry 32 (3): 511-44.
145. Keck, Thomas M. 2009. “Beyond Backlash: Assessing the Impact of Judicial Decisions on LGBT Rights.” Law & Society Review 42 (1): 151-85.
146. Klarman, Michael. 1996. “Rethinking the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Revolutions.” Virginia Law Review 82 (1): 1-67.
147. Klarman, Michael. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.
148. Klien, Richard. 1986. “The Emperor Gideon Has No Clothes: The Empty Promise of the Constitutional Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 13: 625-93.
149. Korn, Jessica. 1996. The Power of Separation: American Constitutionalism and the Myth of the Legislative Veto. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
150. Kramer, Larry D. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.
151. Lambert, Ken. 2007. “High Court Rejects School Integration Plans.” The Seattle Times, 28 June.
152. Lasser, William. 1988. The Limits of Judicial Power. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
153. Laubach, John H. 1969. School Prayers: Congress, the Courts, and the Public. Washington: Public Affairs.
154. Lax, Jeffrey. 2003. “Certiorari and Compliance in the Judicial Hierarchy.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15 (1): 61-86.
155. Leiken, Lawrence S. 1970. “Police Interrogation in Colorado: The Implementation of Miranda.” Denver Law Journal 47 (1): 1-53.
156. Leo, Richard A. 1996. “The Impact of Miranda Revisited.” In The Miranda Debate, ed. Richard A. Leo and George C. Thomas, III. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
157. Leuchtenburg, William. 1995. The Supreme Court Reborn. New York: Oxford University Press.
158. Levi, Edward H. 1975. “Prepared Statement of Hon. Edward H. Levi, Attorney General of the United States.” Testimony to the Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities. November 6.
159. Levinson, L. Harold. 1987. “The Decline of the Legislative Veto: Federal/State Comparisons and Interactions.” Publius 17 (1): 115-32.
160. Light, Steven Andrew, and Kathryn R. L. Rand. 2007. Indian Gaming & Tribal Sovereignty: The Casino Compromise. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
161. Lovell, George I. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge Press.
162. Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
163. Lublin, David. 1999. “Racial Redistricting and African-American Representation: A Critic of ‘Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?’” American Political Science Review 93 (1): 183-6.
164. Lublin, David and D. Stephen Voss. 2000. “Boll-Weevil Blues: Polarized Congressional Delegations into the 21st Century.” American Review of Politics 21 (Winter): 427-50.
165. Lublin, David and D. Stephen Voss. 2003. “The Missing Middle: Why Median-Voter Theory Can’t Save Democrats from Singing the Boll-Weevil Blues.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 227-37.
166. MacKenzie, John P. 1970. “First Term of the Burger Court is Notable for What Wasn’t Done.” The Washington Post, July 7, p. A6.
167. Manson, Donald A. and Darrell K. Gilliard. 1997. “Presale Handgun Checks, 1996.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
168. Manson, Donald A. and Darrell K. Gilliard. 1998. “Presale Handgun Checks, 1997.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
169. Manson, Donald A., Darrell K. Gilliard, and Gene Lauver. 1999. “Presale Handgun Checks, the Brady Interim Period, 1994-1998.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
170. Manson, Donald A., and Gene Lauver. 1997. “Presale Firearm Checks.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
171. Manwaring, David. 1972. “The Impact of Mapp v. Ohio.” In The Supreme Court as Policy-Maker: Three Case Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions, ed. D. Everson. Carbondale: Public Affairs Research Bureau Southern Illinois University at Carbondale.
172. Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. “Policymaking and the Modern Court: When Do Supreme Court Rulings Prevail?” Western Political Quarterly 42 (4): 493-507.
173. Mayhew, David. 1974. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6: 295-317.
174. Mayhew, David. 2004. Congress: The Electoral Connection. 2nd ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
175. Mayhew, David. 2005. Divided We Govern: Party Control, Lawmaking, and Investigations, 1946-2002. 2nd Ed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
176. McCann, Michael W. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
177. McCann, Michael W. 1999. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. Howard Gillman, Cornell Clayton. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
178. McCloskey, Robert G. 1960. The American Supreme Court. University of Chicago Press.
179. McCubbins, Mathew and Thomas Schwartz. 1988. “Congress, the Courts, and Public Policy: Consequences of the One Man, One Vote Rule.” American Journal of Political Science 32 (2): 388-415.
180. McMahon, Keven J. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
181. McManus, Doyle and Alan C. Miller. 2000. “Lawyers Push for Final Appeal, but Gore Passes.” The Los Angeles Times, December 14.
182. Medalie, Richard J., Leonard Zeitz, and Paul Alexander. 1968. “Custodial Police Interrogation in our Nation’s Capital: The Attempt to Implement Miranda.” Michigan Law Review 66: 1347-422.
183. Miller, Arthur Selwyn. 1968. The Supreme Court and American Capitalism. New York: The Free Press.
184. Miller, Arthur Selwyn and Alan W. Scheflin. 1967. “The Power of the Supreme Court in the Age of the Positive State: A Preliminary Excursus. Part Two: On the Need for Adaptation to Changing Reality.” Duke Law Journal 1967 (3): 522-51.
185. Milner, Neal A. 1970. “Comparative Analysis of Patterns of Compliance.” Law & Society Review 5 (1): 119-34.
186. Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1990. “Perceived Legitimacy of Supreme Court Decisions: Three Functions of Source Credibility.” Political Behavior 12 (4): 363-84.
187. Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1991. “Substantive and Procedural Aspects of Supreme Court Decisions as Determinants of Approval.” American Politics Quarterly 19 (2): 174-88.
188. Mondak, Jeffrey J. 1992. “Institutional Legitimacy, Policy Legitimacy, and the Supreme Court.” American Politics Quarterly 20 (2): 457-77.
189. Monti, Daniel J. 1980. “Administrative Forces in Educational Chicken Coops.” Law and Policy Quarterly 2: 233.
190. Moran, John Thomas, ed. 1982. “Gideon Undone: The Crisis in Indigent Defense Funding.” American Bar Association in cooperation with the National Legal Aid and Defender Association.
191. Mounts, Suzanne E. 1982. “Public Defender Programs, Professional Responsibility, and Competent Representation.” Wisconsin Law Review 473-533.
192. Mounts, Suzanne E., and Richard J. Wilson. 1986. “Systems for Providing Indigent Defense: An Introduction.” New York University Review of Law and Social Change 14: 193-201.
193. Murphy, Michael. 1966. “The Problem of Compliance by Police Departments.” Texas Law Review 44: 939-46.
194. Murphy, Walter. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. University of Chicago Press.
195. Nagel, Jack. 1975. The Descriptive Analysis of Power. New Haven: Yale University Press.
196. Nagel, Robert F. 2001. “Judicial Power and the Restoration of Federalism.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 574: 57.
197. Nagel, Stuart S. 1965. “Law and Society: Testing the Effects of Excluding Illegally Seized Evidence.” Wisconsin Law Review 1965: 283-310.
198. Nardulli, Peter F. 1983. “The Societal Costs of the Exclusionary Rule: An Empirical Assessment.” American Bar Foundation Research Journal 8 (3): 585-609.
199. Nardulli, Peter F. 1987. “The Societal Costs of the Exclusionary Rule Revisited.” University of Illinois Law Review 1987: 223-39.
200. National Association for College Admission Counseling (NACAC). 2003. “Diversity and College Admission in 2003: A Survey Report.” Alexandria, VA: National Association for College Admission Counseling.
201. National Institute of Justice, United States Department of Justice. 1982. “Criminal Justice Research Report-The Effects of the Exclusionary Rule: A Study in California.” Washington: National Institute of Justice.
202. Neier, Aryeh. 1982. Only Judgment: The Limits of Litigation in Social Change. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.
203. Note. 1968. “Effect of Mapp v. Ohio on Police Search-and-Seizure Practices in Narcotics Cases.” Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems 4: 87-104.
204. Note. 2000. “Gideon’s Promise Unfulfilled: The Need for Litigated Reform of Indigent Defense.” Harvard Law Review 113: 2062-79.
205. Oaks, Dallin H. 1970. “Studying the Exclusionary Rule in Search and Seizure.” University of Chicago Law Review 37: 665-757.
206. Orfield, Myron W., Jr. 1987. “The Exclusionary Rule and Deterrence: An Empirical Study of Chicago Narcotics Officers.” University of Chicago Law Review 54 (3): 1016-69.
207. Peltason J. W. 1971. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, Revised Edition.
208. People for the American Way (PAW). 1982-93. Attacks on the Freedom to Learn. Washington: People for the American Way.
209. Peretti, Terri J. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
210. Perrin, L. Timothy, H. Mitchell Caldwell, Carol A. Chase, and Ronald W. Fagan. 1997. “If It’s Broken, Fix It: Moving Beyond the Exclusionary Rule.” Iowa Law Review 38: 669.
211. Perry, Barbara A. 2007. The Michigan Affirmative Action Cases. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
212. Petrocik, John R. and Scott E. Desposato. 1998. “The Partisan Consequences of Majority-Minority Redistricting in the South, 1992 and 1994.” Journal of Politics 60 (3): 613-33.
213. Pickerill, J. Mitchell and Cornell W. Clayton. 2004. “The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism.” Perspectives on Politics 2 (2): 233-48.
214. Plaus, Stephen A. 1991. “Judicial Versus Legislative Charting of National Economic Policy: Plotting a Democratic Course for Minority Entrepreneurs.” Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 24: 655-89.
215. Prucha, Francis Paul. 1984. The Great Father: The United States Government and the American Indians, volume I. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
216. Radelet, Michael L. n. d. “Thirty Years After Gregg.” Manuscript prepared for Amnesty International. http: //www. amnestyusa. org/abolish/greggvgeorgia/study _guide. pdf.
217. Reed, Douglas S. 2001. On Equal Terms: The Constitutional Politics of Educational Opportunity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
218. Reich, D. 1968. “The Impact of Judicial Decision Making: The School Prayer Cases.” In The Supreme Court as Policy-Maker: Three Case Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions, ed. D. Everson. Carbondale: Public Affairs Research Bureau Southern Illinois University.
219. Reichman, Henry. 1993. Censorship and Selection: Issues and Answers for Schools. Chicago: American Library Association.
220. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. 1979. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, June/July, p. 18.
221. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. 1980. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, October/November, p. 34.
222. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press. 1981. “Court Watch Summary.” The News Media and the Law, June/July, p. 18.
223. Rice, Mitchell F. 1999. “Federal Set-Aside Policy and Minority Business Contracting: Understanding the Adarand Decision.” International Journal of Public Administration 22 (7): 1001-16.
224. Richardson, James T. 1995. “Legal Status of Minority Religions in the United States.” Social Compass 42: 249.
225. Robinson, Cyril D. 1968. “Police and Prosecutor Practices and Attitudes Relating to Interrogation as Revealed by Pre-and Post-Miranda Questionnaires: A Construct of Police Capacity to Comply.” Duke Law Journal 1968 (3): 425-524.
226. Rosen, Jeffrey. 2006. The Most Democratic Branch: How the Courts Serve America. New York: Oxford University Press.
227. Rosen, Jeffrey. 2007 “Can a Law Change a Society?” The Nation, 1 July.
228. Rosenberg, Gerald. 2008. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? 2d ed. University of Chicago Press.
229. Rostow, Eugene V. 1952. “The Democratic Character of Judicial Review.” Harvard Law Review 66: 193.
230. Rudenstine, David. 1996. The Day the Presses Stopped: A History of the Pentagon Papers Case. Berkeley: University of California Press.
231. Sack, Kevin and Frank Bruni. 2000. “How Gore Stopped Short On His Way to Concede.” The New York Times, November 9.
232. Safra, Seth J. 2000. “The Amended Gun-Free School Zones Act: Doubt as to its Constitutionality Remains.” Duke Law Journal 50: 637-62.
233. Saikowski, Charlotte. 1987. “The Power of Judicial Review.” Christian Science Monitor, February 11.
234. Scalia, John. 2000. “Federal Firearm Offenders, 1992-98.” Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
235. Scheingold, Stuart A. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
236. Schmidt, Peter. 2004. “Since Court Ruled, Fewer Black Students Have Applied to Michigan and Ohio State.” Chronicle of Higher Education 50 (26): A22. March 5.
237. Schmidt, Peter and Jeffrey R. Young. 2003. “MIT and Princeton Open 2 Summer Programs to Students of All Races.” Chronicle of Higher Education 49 (24): A31. February 21.
238. Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1987. “Reconsidering Miranda.” University of Chicago Law Review 54 (2): 435-61.
239. Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1996a. “Miranda’s Practical Effect: Substantial Benefits and Vanishingly Small Social Costs.” Northwestern University Law Review 90 (2): 500-63.
240. Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1996b. “Miranda and Clearance Rates.” Northwestern University Law Review 91 (1): 278.
241. Schulhofer, Stephen J. 1997. “Reconsidering Miranda.” University of Chicago Law Review 54 (2): 435-61.
242. Schultz, D. A., ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang.
243. Seeburger, Richard H. and R. Stanton Wettick, Jr. 1967. “Miranda in Pittsburgh-A Statistical Study.” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 29: 1-16.
244. Segal, Jeffery A. and Harold J. Spaeth. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge University Press.
245. Segal, Jeffrey A., Harold J. Spaeth, and Lee Epstein. 2001. “The Norm of Consensus on the U. S. Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 362-77.
246. Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations. 1976. “Warrantless F. B. I. Electronic Surveillance.” Supplementary Detailed Staff Reports on Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans.
247. Selingo, Jeffrey. 2005. “Michigan: Who Really Won?” Chronicle of Higher Education 51 (19): A21. January 14.
248. Senate Committee on the Judiciary. 2005. Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. To Be Chief Justice of the United States: Hearing Before the S. Comm. on the Judiciary. 109th Cong. 144-5.
249. “Senate lets Reapportionment Ruling Stand.” 1966. CQ Press Electronic Library, CQ Almanac Online Edition, cqal66-1301890. Originally published in CQ Almanac 1966 (Washington: Congressional Quarterly). http: //library. cqpress. com/cqalmanac/cqal66-1301890 (28 January 2009).
250. Sharpe, Christine Leveaux and James C. Garand. 2001. “Race, Roll Calls, and Redistricting: The Impact of Race-Based Redistricting on Congressional Roll-Call.” Political Research Quarterly 54 (1): 31-51.
251. Shotts, Kenneth W. 2001. “The Effect of Majority-Minority Mandates on Partisan Gerrymandering.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 120-35.
252. Shotts, Kenneth W. 2002. “Gerrymandering, Legislative Composition, and National Policy Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (2): 398-414.
253. Shotts, Kenneth W. 2003a. “Does Racial Redistricting Cause Conservative Policy Outcomes? Policy Preferences of Southern Representatives in the 1980s and 1990s.” Journal of Politics 65 (1): 216-26.
254. Shotts, Kenneth W. 2003b. “Racial Redistricting’s Alleged Perverse Effects: Theory, Data and ‘Reality’.” The Journal of Politics 65 (1): 238-43.
255. Simms, M. C. 1990. “Rebuilding Set-Aside Programs.” Black Enterprise 21 (2).
256. Skolnick, Jerome H. 1966. Justice Without Trial: Law Enforcement in Democratic Society. New York: Wiley.
257. Skowronek, Stephen. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of Nat ional Administrative Capacities 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
258. Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics President Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
259. Smith, Steven K. and Carol J. DeFrances. 1996. “Indigent Defense.” Bureau of Justice Statistics. NCJ-158909.
260. Songer, Donald R. 1987. “The Impact of the Supreme Court on Trends in Economic Policy Making in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Journal of Politics 49 (3): 830-41.
261. Songer, Donald R. 1988. “Alternative Approaches to the Study of Judicial Impact: Miranda in Five State Courts.” American Politics Research 16: 245-444.
262. Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. “The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 673-96.
263. Songer, Donald R. and Reginald S. Sheehan. 1990. “Supreme Court Impact on Compliance and Outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals.” Western Political Quarterly 43 (2): 297-316.
264. Spangenberg, Robert L. and Marea L. Beeman. 1995. “Indigent Defense Systems in the United States.” Law and Contemporary Problems 58 (1): 31-49.
265. Specter, Arlen. 1962. “Mapp v. Ohio: Pandora’s Problems for the Prosecutor.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 111: 4.
266. Spiotto, James E. 1973. “Search and Seizure: An Empirical Study of the Exclusionary Rule and Its Alternatives.” Journal of Legal Studies 2 (1): 243-78.
267. Spriggs, James F. 1997. “Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions.” Political Research Quarterly 50 (3): 567-93.
268. Stephens, Otis H. Jr. 1965. “Police Interrogation and the Supreme Court: An Inquiry into the Limits of Judicial Policy-Making.” Journal of Public Law 17: 241-57.
269. Strazzella, James A. 1977. “Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: New Uses, New Problems.” Arizona Law Review 19: 443-84.
270. Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1945. Democracy in America, Volume I. New York: Random House, Inc.
271. Tushnet, Mark. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
272. Twetten, Daniel. 2000. “Public Law 280 and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act: Could Two Wrongs Ever Be Made into a Right?” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 90 (4): 1317-52.
273. Uchida, Craig D. and Timothy S. Bynum. 1991. “Search Warrants, Motions to Suppress and ‘Lost Cases’: The Effects of the Exclusionary Rule in Seven Jurisdictions.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 81 (4): 1034-66.
274. U. S. Congress. House. 1995. Proposed Legislation: “The Gun-Free School Zones Amendments Act of 1995.” 104th Cong., 1st sess. H. Doc. 104-72.
275. United States Commission on Civil Rights. 2005. “Federal Procurement after Adarand.” Washington: U. S. Commission on Civil Rights.
276. Van Zwaluwenburg, Pamela Joy. 2004. Wide Awake or Sound Asleep? Universities and the Implementation of Rosenberger v. University of Virginia. Dissertation, Miami University, 2004.
277. Wald, Michael S., Richard Ayres, David W. Hess, Michael Schantz, and Charles H. Whitebread II. 1967. “Interrogations in New Haven: The Impact of Miranda.” Yale Law Journal 76: 1519-648.
278. Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.
279. Ward, James D. 1994. “Response to Croson.” Public Administration Review 54 (5): 483-5.
280. Wasby, Stephen L. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
281. Wasby, Stephen L. 1976. Small Town Police and the Supreme Court. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
282. Way, H. Frank. 1968. “Survey Research on Judicial Decisions: The Prayer and Bible Reading Cases.” Western Political Quarterly 21 (2): 189-205.
283. Wayne, Stephen J. 1978. The Legislative Presidency. New York: Harper and Row.
284. Wechsler, Herbert. 1959. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73: 1.
285. Wetstein, Matthew E. 1995. “The Abortion Rate Paradox: The Impact of National Policy Change on Abortion Rates.” Social Science Quarterly 76 (3): 607-18.
286. Whittington, Keith E. 2001. “Once More Unto the Breach: Post-Behavioralist Approachesto Judicial Politics.” Law & Social Inquiry 25: 601.
287. Whittington, Keith E. 2005. “‘Interpose Your Friendly Hand’: Political Supports for the Exercise of Judicial Review by the United States Supreme Court.” American Political Science Review 99 (4): 583-96.
288. Whittington, Keith E. 2007. Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy: The Presidency, the Supreme Court, and Constitutional Leadership in U. S. History. Princeton University Press.