Constructing judicial review

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 8, Issue , 2005, Pages 425-451

  Graber, Mark A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF LAW   (United States)

Author keywords

Constitution; Courts; Democracy; Law

Indexed keywords

EID: 22144460543     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104905     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Balkin JM, Levinson S. 2001. Understanding the Constitutional Revolution. Va. Law Rev. 87:1045-109
2. Bickel AM. 1962. The Least Dangerous Branch: The Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill
3. Buchanan J. 1897(1857). Third Annual Message. In A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, Vol. 5, ed. JD Richardson. Washington, DC: GPO
4. Colker R, Brudney JJ. 2001. Dissing Congress. Mich. Law Rev. 100:80-144
5. Dahl RA. 2001. Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policymaker. Emory Law J. 50:563-82
6. Devins NE. 1996. Shaping Constitutional Values: Elected Government, the Supreme Court, and the Abortion Debate. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press. 193 pp.
7. Dudziak ML. 2000. Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 342 pp.
8. Ferguson T. 1989. Industrial conflict and the coming of the New Deal: The triumph of multinational liberalism in America. In The Rise and Fall of the New Deal Order, 1930-1980, ed. S Fraser, G Gestle, pp. 3-31. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
9. Fisher L. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press. 320 pp.
10. Fiss OM. 1989. The law regained. Cornell Law Rev. 74:245-55
11. Forbath W. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press
12. Friedman B. 1993. Dialogue and judicial review. Mich. Law Rev. 91:577-682
13. Gillman H. 2002. How political parties can use the Courts to advance their agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875-1891. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:511-24
14. Graber MA. 1993. The non-majoritarian difficulty: Legislative deference to the judiciary. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 7:35-73
15. Graber MA. 1996. Rethinking Abortion: Equal Choice, the Constitution and Reproductive Politics. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
16. Graber MA. 1997. The Clintonification of American Law: Abortion, welfare, and liberal constitutional theory. Ohio State Law J. 58:731-818
17. Graber MA. 1998. Federalist or Friends of Adams: The Marshall Court and Party Politics. Stud. Am. Polit. Dev. 12:229-66
18. Graber MA. 2003. Establishing Judicial Review: Marbury versus The Judiciary Act of 1789. 38 Tulsa Law Rev. 38:609-50
19. Hattam V. 1993. Labor Visions and State Power. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
20. Hirschl R. 2004. Toward Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press
21. Keck TM. 2004. The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
22. Kirkpatrick DD. 2004. Conservative Groups Differ on Bush Words on Marriage. The New York Times, Jan. 22:A24
23. Klinkner PA, Smith RM. 1999. The Unsteady March: The Rise and Decline of Racial Equality in America. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 424 pp.
24. Kramer LD. 2004a. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford
25. Kramer LD. 2004b. "Popular Constitutionalism, circa 2004. Calif. Law Rev. 92:959-1011
26. Levinson SV. 2003. Redefining the Center: Liberal Decisions from a Conservative Court. The Village Voice, July 2-8, p. 38
27. Lijphart A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale Univ. Press
28. Lincoln A. 1953a [1861]. First Inaugural Address. In The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, ed. RP Basler, 4:262-71. New Brunswick: Rutgers
29. Lincoln A. 1953b[1858]. Mr. Lincoln's Reply, Fifth Debate with Stephen A. Douglas, at Galesburg, Illinois. In The Collected Works of Abraham Lincoln, ed. RP Basler, 3:219-37. New Brunswick: Rutgers
30. Lovell GI. 2003. Legislative Deferrals: Statutory Ambiguity, Judicial Power, and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge
31. Madison J, Hamilton A, Jay J. 1987 [1787-88]. The Federalist Papers, ed. I Kramnick. New York: Penguin
32. McMahon KJ. 2004. Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency Paved the Road to Brown. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
33. Murphy WF. 1961. In His Own Image: Mr. Chief Justice Taft and Supreme Court Appointments. In 1961: The Supreme Court Review, ed. PB Kurland, pp. 159-93. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
34. Page BI. 1990. The rejection of Bork preserved the Court's limited popular constituencies. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 84:1024-30
35. Peretti TJ. 1999. In Defense of a Political Court. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
36. Pertschuk M, Schaetzel W. 1989. The People Rising: The Campaign Against the Bork Nomination. New York: Thunder's Mouth Press
37. Pickerill JM, Clayton CW. 2004. The Rehnquist Court and the Political Dynamics of Federalism. Perspect. Polit. 2:233-48
38. Powe LA Jr. 2000. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press
39. Schattschneider EE. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden
40. Schnapper E. 1985. Affirmative action and the legislative history of the Fourteenth Amendment. Va. Law Rev. 71:753-98
41. Schwartz B. 1993. A History of the Supreme Court. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
42. Sherman EA. 2004. Justice's Anti-Social Stand Dubious. The Boston Herald, Oct. 3:26
43. Tushnet M. 1999. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
44. Waldron J. 1999. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford Univ. Press. 332 pp.
45. Whittington KE. 2001a. The Political Foundations of Judicial Supremacy. In Constitutional Politics: Essays on Constitution Making, Maintenance, and Change, ed. SA Barber, RP George, pp. 261-97. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press
46. Whittington KE. 2001b. Taking what they give us: Explaining the Court's Federalism Offensive. Duke Law J. 51:477-521
47. Wood GI. 1991. The Radicalism of the American Revolution. New York: Knopf