The Supreme Court in American Politics

Annual Review of Political Science

Volumn 6, Issue , 2003, Pages 161-180

  Baum, Lawrence ^a  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Implementation; Judicial policy making; Judicial review; Policy impact; Strategic behavior

Indexed keywords

EID: 0242641381     PISSN: 10942939     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085526     Document Type: Review

References (103)

1. Alden v. Maine. 1999. 527 U.S. 706
2. Bartley NV. 1969. The Rise of Massive Resistance: Race and Politics in the South during the 1950's. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State Univ. Press
3. Baum L. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
4. Baum L. 2001. The Supreme Court. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 7th ed.
5. Brehm J, Gates S. 1997. Working, Shirking, and Sabotage; Bureaucratic Response to a Democratic Public. Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press
6. Brown v. Board of Education. 1954. 347 U.S. 483
7. Bryden DP. 1992. Is the Rehnquist Court conservative? Public Interest Fall:73-88
8. Bush v. Gore. 2000. 531 U.S. 98
9. Bussiere E. 1997. (Dis)Entitling the Poor: The Warren Court, Welfare Rights, and the American Political Tradition. University Park: Penn. State Press
10. Cameron CM, Segal JA, Songer D. 2000. Strategic auditing in a political hierarchy: an informational model of the Supreme Court's certiorari decisions. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:101-16
11. Canon BC. 1974. Organizational contumacy in the transmission of judicial policies: the Mapp, Escobedo, Miranda, and Gault cases. Villanava Law Rev. 20:50-79
12. Canon BC. 1982. A framework for the analysis of judicial activism. In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, ed. SC Halpern, CM Lamb, pp. 385-419. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
13. Canon BC, Johnson CA. 1999. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press. 2nd ed.
14. Canon BC, Ulmer SS. 1976. The Supreme Court and critical elections: a dissent. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 70:1215-18
15. Casper JD. 1976. The Supreme Court and national policy making. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 70:50-63
16. Cassell PG, Fowles R. 1998. Handcuffing the cops? A thirty-year perspective on Miranda's harmful effects on law enforcement. Stanford Law Rev. 50:1055-145
17. Cavanagh R, Sarat A. 1980. Thinking about courts: toward and beyond a jurisprudence of judicial competence. Law Soc. Rev. 14:371-420
18. Commager HS. 1943. Judicial review and democracy. Virginia Q. Rev. 19:417-28
19. Crozier M. 1964. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
20. Cushman B. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court: the Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
21. Dahl R. 1957. Decision-making in a democracy: the Supreme Court as a national policy-maker. J. Public Law 6:279-95
22. Dickerson v. United States. 2000. 530 U.S. 428
23. Epp CR. 1998. The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
24. Epstein L, Knight J. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press
25. Epstein L, Knight J. 2000. Toward a strategic revolution in judicial politics: a look back, a look ahead. Polit. Res. Q. 53:625-61
26. Epstein L, Knight J, Martin AD. 2001. The Supreme Court as a strategic national policy-maker. Emory Law J. 50:583-610
27. Eskridge WN. 1991. Reneging on history? Playing the Court/Congress/President civil rights game. Calif. Law Rev. 79:613-84
28. Fiss O. 1991. A life lived twice. Yale Law J. 100:1117-29
29. Funston R. 1975. The Supreme Court and critical elections. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 69:795-811
30. Galanter M. 1974. Why the "haves" come out ahead: speculations on the limits of legal change. Law Soc. Rev. 9:95-160
31. Galloway RW. 1991. Justice for All? The Rich and Poor in Supreme Court History 1790-1990. Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. Press
32. Gates JB. 1992. The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment: A Macro- and Microlevel Perspective. Boulder, CO: Westview
33. Gibson JL, Caldeira GA, Spence LK. 2002. The Supreme Court and the U.S. presidential election of 2000: wounds, self-inflicted or otherwise? Work. Pap., Russell Sage Found.
34. Gillman H. 2001. What's law got to do with it? Judicial behavioralists test the "legal model" of judicial decision making. Law Soc. Inq. 26:465-504
35. Goldstein RJ. 2000. Flag Burning and Free Speech: The Case of Texas v. Johnson. Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
36. Graber MA. 1999. The problematic establishment of judicial review. In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. H Gillman, C Clayton, pp. 28-42. Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
37. Hammond TH, Bonneau CW, Sheehan RS. 2001. A court of appeals in a rational-choice model of Supreme Court decision-making. Presented at Conf. Inst. Games and the U.S. Supreme Court, College Station, TX, Nov. 1-4
38. Hoekstra VJ. 2000. The Supreme Court and local public opinion. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 94:89-100
39. Horowitz DL. 1977. The Courts and Social Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings Inst.
40. In re Gault. 1967. 387 U.S. 1
41. Jackson RH. 1941. The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy. New York: Knopf
42. Johnson CA. 1987. Law, politics, and judicial decision making: lower federal court uses of Supreme Court decisions. Law Soc. Rev. 21:325-40
43. Kahn R. 1994. The Supreme Court and Constitutional Theory, 1953-1993. Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
44. Kaufman H. 1960. The Forest Ranger: A Study in Administrative Behavior. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press
45. Keynes E, Miller RK. 1989. The Court vs. Congress: Prayer, Busing, and Abortion. Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
46. Kornhauser LA. 1995. Adjudication by a resource-constrained team: hierarchy and precedent in a judicial system. South. Calif. Law Rev. 68:1605-29
47. Kritzer HM, Silbey SS, eds. 1999. Do the "haves" still come out ahead? Law Soc. Rev. 33:795-1123 (spec. issue)
48. Kunda Z. 1990. The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol. Bull. 108:480-98
49. Kuran T. 1995. Private Truths, Public Lies: The Social Consequences of Preference Falsification. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
50. Lasser W. 1985. The Supreme Court in periods of critical realignment. J. Polit. 47:1174-87
51. Lawrence SE. 1990. The Poor in Court: The Legal Services Program and Supreme Court Decision Making. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
52. Lipsky M. 1980. Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. New York: Russell Sage Found.
53. Maltzman F, Spriggs JF, Wahlbeck PJ. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
54. Mapp v. Ohio. 1961. 367 U.S. 643
55. Martin AD. 2001. Statutory battles and constitutional wars: Congress and the Supreme Court. Presented at Conf. Inst. Games and the U.S. Supreme Court, College Station, TX, Nov. 1-4
56. McCann MW. 1994. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
57. McCann MW. 1999. How the Supreme Court matters in American politics: new institutionalist perspectives. In The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations, ed. H Gillman, C Clayton, pp. 63-97. Lawrence: Univ. Press Kansas
58. McCloskey RG, Levinson S. 2000. The American Supreme Court. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press. 3rd ed.
59. McCubbins MD, Schwarte T. 1984. Congressional oversight overlooked: police patrols versus fire alarms. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38:165-79
60. Mechanic D. 1962. Sources of power of lower participants in complex organizations. Admin. Sci. Q. 7:349-64
61. Meernik J, Ignagni J. 1997. Judicial review and coordinate construction of the Constitution. Am. J. Polit Sci. 41:447-67
62. Milner N. 1971. The Court and Local Law Enforcement: The Impact of Miranda. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage
63. Miranda v. Arizona. 1966. 384 U.S. 436
64. Mondak JJ, Smithey SI. 1997. The dynamics of public support for the Supreme Court. J. Polit. 59:1114-42
65. Murphy WF. 1962. Congress and the Court. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
66. Murphy WF. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
67. Peltason JW. 1971. Fifty-Eight Lonely Men: Southern Federal Judges and School Desegregation. Urbana: Univ. III. Press. Rev. ed.
68. Posner RA. 1995. Overcoming Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
69. Powe LA. 2000. The Warren Court and American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
70. Pressman JL, Wildavsky A. 1973. Implementation. Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
71. Pritchett CH. 1961. Congress Versus the Supreme Court, 1957-1960. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
72. Reich D. 1968. The impact of judicial decision-making: the school prayer cases. In The Supreme Court as Policy-Maker: Three Studies on the Impact of Judicial Decisions, ed. D Everson, pp. 44-81. Carbondale: Public Aff. Res. Bur., South. 111. Univ.
73. Richards MJ, Kritzer HM. 2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court decision making. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 96:305-20
74. Roe v. Wade. 1973. 410 U.S. 113
75. Rohde DW. 1972. Policy goals, strategic choice and majority opinion assignments in the U.S. Supreme Court. Midwest J. Polit. Sci. 15:652-82
76. Rohde DW, Spaeth HJ. 1976. Supreme Court Decision Making. San Francisco: WH Freeman
77. Rosenberg GN. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
78. Scheingold SA. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
79. Schubert G. 1970. The Constitutional Polity. Boston: Boston Univ. Press
80. Schultz DA, ed. 1998. Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change. New York: Peter Lang
81. Segal JA. 1997. Separation-of-powers games in the positive theory of Congress and courts. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 91:28-44
82. Segal JA, Cover A. 1989. Ideological values and the votes of Supreme Court justices. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 83:557-65
83. Segal JA, Spaeth HJ. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
84. Shapiro M. 1978. The Supreme Court: from Warren to Burger. In The New American Political System, ed. A King, pp. 179-211. Washington, DC: Am. Enterprise Inst.
85. Sheehan RS, Mishler W, Songer DR. 1992. Ideology, status, and the differential success of direct parties before the Supreme Court. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 86:464-71
86. Songer DR. 1987. The impact of the Supreme Court on trends in economic policy making in the United States Courts of Appeals. J. Polit. 49:830-41
87. Songer DR, Cameron CM, Segal JA. 1995. An empirical test of the rational-actor theory of litigation. J. Polit. 57:1119-29
88. Songer DR, Segal JA, Cameron CM. 1994. The hierarchy of justice: testing a principal-agent model of Supreme Court-circuit court inter-actions. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 38:673-96
89. Songer DR, Sheehan RS. 1990. Supreme Court impact on compliance and outcomes: Miranda and New York Times in the United States Courts of Appeals. West. Polit. Q. 43:297-316
90. Sowell T. 1994. Blackmun plays to the crowd. St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Mar. 4, p. 7B
91. Spaeth HJ. 1964. The judicial restraint of Mr. Justice Frankfurter: myth or reality? Midwest J. Polit. Sci. 8:22-38
92. Spaeth HJ, Altfeld MF. 1986. Felix Frankfurter, judicial activism, and voting conflict on the Warren Court. In Judicial Conflict and Consensus, ed. S Goldman, CM Lamb, pp. 87-114. Lexington: Univ. Kentucky Press
93. Spaeth HJ, Teger SH. 1982. Activism and restraint: a cloak for the justices' policy preferences. In Supreme Court Activism and Restraint, ed. SC Halpern, CM Lamb, pp. 277-301. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books
94. Spiller PT, Gely R. 1992. Congressional control or judicial independence: the determinants of U.S. Supreme Court labor-relations decisions, 1949-1988. RAND J. Econ. 23:469-92
95. Spriggs JF. 1997. Explaining federal bureaucratic compliance with Supreme Court opinions. Polit. Res. Q. 50:567-93
96. Stidham R, Carp RA. 1982. Trial courts' responses to Supreme Court policy changes: three case studies. Law Policy Q. 4:215-34
97. Texas v. Johnson. 1989. 491 U.S. 397
98. United States v. Eichman. 1990. 496 U.S. 310
99. .United States v. Morrison. 2000. 529 U.S. 598
100. Wasby SL. 1970. The Impact of the United States Supreme Court: Some Perspectives. Homewood, IL: Dorsey
101. Way HF. 1968. Survey research on judicial decisions: the prayer and Bible reading cases. West. Polit. Q. 21:189-205
102. Willing R. 1997. "Activist" label actively applied. USA Today, Mar. 10, p. 3A
103. Wilson JQ. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books