메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-290

Legislative deferrals: Statutory ambiguity, judicial power, and American democracy

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 84922951173     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511509872     Document Type: Book
Times cited : (142)

References (169)
  • 3
    • 84895594062 scopus 로고
    • Commodity form and legal form: An essay on the ‘relative autonomy’ of the law
    • Balbus, Isaac. 1977. “Commodity Form and Legal Form: An Essay on the ‘Relative Autonomy’ of the Law.” Law and Society Review11:571–88.
    • (1977) Law and Society Review , vol.11 , pp. 571-588
    • Balbus, I.1
  • 4
    • 0038975969 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Counter-conversationalism and the sense of difficulty
    • Bennett, Robert W. 2001. “Counter-Conversationalism and the Sense of Difficulty.” Northwestern University Law Review95:845–906.
    • (2001) Northwestern University Law Review , vol.95 , pp. 845-906
    • Bennett, R.W.1
  • 8
    • 0038874371 scopus 로고
    • New York: Oxford University Press
    • Bobbitt, Philip. 1982. Constitutional Fate. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • (1982) Constitutional Fate
    • Bobbitt, P.1
  • 10
    • 0013304033 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • 5th ed. New York: Longman
    • Carter, Lief H. 1998. Reason in Law, 5th ed. New York: Longman.
    • (1998) Reason in Law
    • Carter, L.H.1
  • 11
    • 84883931458 scopus 로고
    • Drafting wagner’s act: Leon keyserling and the precommittee drafts of the labor disputes act and the national labor relations act
    • Casebeer, Kenneth. 1989. “Drafting Wagner’s Act: Leon Keyserling and the Precommittee Drafts of the Labor Disputes Act and the National Labor Relations Act.” Industrial Relations Law Journal11:73–131.
    • (1989) Industrial Relations Law Journal , vol.11 , pp. 73-131
    • Casebeer, K.1
  • 12
    • 84922953813 scopus 로고
    • The supreme court and national policy making
    • Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy Making.” American Political Science Review70:550–63.
    • (1976) American Political Science Review , vol.70 , pp. 550-563
    • Casper, J.D.1
  • 14
    • 84922897044 scopus 로고
    • The federal courts and organized labor. i
    • Christ, Jay Finley. 1930. “The Federal Courts and Organized Labor. I.” Journal of Business3:205–49.
    • (1930) Journal of Business , vol.3 , pp. 205-249
    • Christ, J.F.1
  • 15
    • 84922932663 scopus 로고
    • The federal courts and organized labor. Iii. since the clayton act
    • 103–29, 283–300, 380–99
    • Christ, Jay Finley. 1932. “The Federal Courts and Organized Labor. III. Since the Clayton Act.” Journal of Business5: 47–75, 103–29, 283–300, 380–99.
    • (1932) Journal of Business , vol.5 , pp. 47-75
    • Christ, J.F.1
  • 16
    • 84922845132 scopus 로고
    • The federal courts and organized labor. Iii. since the clayton act, continued
    • Christ, Jay Finley. 1933. “The Federal Courts and Organized Labor. III. Since the Clayton Act, continued.” Journal of Business6:157–261.
    • (1933) Journal of Business , vol.6 , pp. 157-261
    • Christ, J.F.1
  • 18
    • 84922932662 scopus 로고
    • Why organized labor is fighting ‘yellow dog’ contracts
    • Cochrane, Cornelius. 1927. “Why Organized Labor is Fighting ‘Yellow Dog’ Contracts.” American Labor Legislation Review15:227–32.
    • (1927) American Labor Legislation Review , vol.15 , pp. 227-232
    • Cochrane, C.1
  • 19
    • 0003323192 scopus 로고
    • The supreme court, 1982 term–foreword: Nomos and narrative
    • Cover, Robert. 1983. “The Supreme Court, 1982 Term–Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.” Harvard Law Review97:4–68.
    • (1983) Harvard Law Review , vol.97 , pp. 4-68
    • Cover, R.1
  • 21
    • 84933492083 scopus 로고
    • Doctrinal synergies and liberal dilemmas: The case of the yellow-dog contract
    • Cushman, Barry. 1992. “Doctrinal Synergies and Liberal Dilemmas: The Case of the Yellow-Dog Contract.” Supreme Court Review7:235–93.
    • (1992) Supreme Court Review , vol.7 , pp. 235-293
    • Cushman, B.1
  • 22
    • 0004112235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New York: Oxford University Press
    • Cushman, Barry. 1998. Rethinking the New Deal Court: The Structure of a Constitutional Revolution. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • (1998) Rethinking the New Deal Court
    • Cushman, B.1
  • 23
    • 0000770507 scopus 로고
    • Decision making in a democracy: The supreme court as a national policy-maker
    • Dahl, Robert A. 1956. “Decision Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law6:279–95.
    • (1956) Journal of Public Law , vol.6 , pp. 279-295
    • Dahl, R.A.1
  • 24
    • 84856815863 scopus 로고
    • New Haven: Yale University Press
    • Dahl, Robert A. 1961. Who Governs. New Haven: Yale University Press.
    • (1961) Who Governs
    • Dahl, R.A.1
  • 28
    • 0012809517 scopus 로고
    • New deal sensitivity to labor interests
    • Milton Derber and Edwin Young, eds., Madison: University of Wisconsin Press
    • Edelman, Murray. 1957 “New Deal Sensitivity to Labor Interests.” In Milton Derber and Edwin Young, eds., Labor and the New Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 159–91.
    • (1957) Labor and the New Deal , pp. 159-191
    • Edelman, M.1
  • 32
    • 0004279652 scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    • Ely, John Hart. 1980. Democracy and Distrust. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • (1980) Democracy and Distrust
    • Ely, J.H.1
  • 34
    • 0040901276 scopus 로고
    • The yellow-dog contract and liberal reform, 1917–1932
    • Ernst, Daniel. 1989a. “The Yellow-Dog Contract and Liberal Reform, 1917–1932.” Labor History30:251–74.
    • (1989) Labor History , vol.30 , pp. 251-274
    • Ernst, D.1
  • 35
    • 84902998188 scopus 로고
    • The labor exemption: 1908–1914
    • Ernst, Daniel. 1989b. “The Labor Exemption: 1908–1914.” Iowa Law Review74:1151–73.
    • (1989) Iowa , vol.74 , pp. 1151-1173
    • Ernst, D.1
  • 36
    • 0003860077 scopus 로고
    • Urbana: University of Illinois Press
    • Ernst, Daniel. 1995. Lawyers Against Labor. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
    • (1995) Lawyers against Labor
    • Ernst, D.1
  • 37
    • 84934453716 scopus 로고
    • Overriding supreme court statutory decisions
    • Eskridge, William N., Jr. 1991. “Overriding Supreme Court Statutory Decisions.” Yale Law Review101:331–455.
    • (1991) Yale Law Review , vol.101 , pp. 331-455
    • Eskridge, W.N.1
  • 41
    • 0039691494 scopus 로고
    • Statutory interpretation and legislative supremacy
    • Farber, Daniel A. 1989. “Statutory Interpretation and Legislative Supremacy.” Georgetown Law Journal78:281–318.
    • (1989) Georgetown , vol.78 , pp. 281-318
    • Farber, D.A.1
  • 42
    • 44849121825 scopus 로고
    • Revisionism in labor law
    • Finkin, Matthew W. 1984. “Revisionism in Labor Law.” Maryland Law Review 43:23–92.
    • (1984) Maryland , vol.43 , pp. 23-92
    • Finkin, M.W.1
  • 48
    • 0039691495 scopus 로고
    • Legislative intent and public choice
    • Frickey, Philip P. and Daniel A. Farber. 1988: “Legislative Intent and Public Choice.” Virginia Law Review74:423–69.
    • (1988) Virginia Law Review , vol.74 , pp. 423-469
    • Frickey, P.P.1    Farber, D.A.2
  • 49
    • 34648845444 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The history of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part four: Law’s politics
    • Friedman, Barry. 2000. “The History Of The Countermajoritarian Difficulty, Part Four: Law’s Politics.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review148:971–1064.
    • (2000) University , vol.148 , pp. 971-1064
    • Friedman, B.1
  • 52
    • 0002007299 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The court as an idea, not a building (Or a game): Interpretive institutionalism and the analysis of supreme court decision-making
    • Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • Gillman, Howard. 1999. “The Court as an Idea, Not a Building (or a Game): Interpretive Institutionalism and the Analysis of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds., Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 65–87.
    • (1999) Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches , pp. 65-87
    • Gillman, H.1
  • 53
    • 23044527235 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What’s law got to do with it? Judicial behavioralists test the ‘legal model’ of judicial decision making
    • Review of Harold J. Spaeth and Jeffrey A. Segal, Cambridge University Press, 1999, Law and Social Inquiry
    • Gillman, Howard. 2001. “What’s Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behavioralists Test the ‘Legal Model’ of Judicial Decision Making,” Review of Harold J. Spaeth and Jeffrey A. Segal, Majority Rule or Minority Will: Adherence to Precedent on theU.S.Supreme Court(Cambridge University Press, 1999). Law and Social Inquiry 26:465–504.
    • (2001) Majority Rule Or Minority , vol.26 , pp. 465-504
    • Gillman, H.1
  • 54
    • 0036735373 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How political parties can use the courts to advance their agendas: Federal courts in the united states, 1875–1891
    • Gillman, Howard. 2002. “How Political Parties Can Use the Courts to Advance Their Agendas: Federal Courts in the United States, 1875–1891.” AmericanPolitical Science Review96:511–24.
    • (2002) American , vol.96 , pp. 511-524
    • Gillman, H.1
  • 58
    • 84973991297 scopus 로고
    • Worker insurgency, radical organization, and new deal labor legislation
    • Goldfield, Michael. 1989. “Worker Insurgency, Radical Organization, and New Deal Labor Legislation.” American Political Science Review83:1257–82.
    • (1989) American Political Science Review , vol.83 , pp. 1257-1282
    • Goldfield, M.1
  • 59
    • 84971697781 scopus 로고
    • Explaining new deal labor policy
    • response to Skocpol and Finegold
    • Goldfield, Michael. 1990. “Explaining New Deal Labor Policy” (response to Skocpol and Finegold). American Political Science Review84:1304–15.
    • (1990) American Political Science Review , vol.84 , pp. 1304-1315
    • Goldfield, M.1
  • 61
    • 70049116060 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Financial details are revealed in affirmative action settlement
    • December 5
    • Goodnough, Abby. 1997. “Financial Details are Revealed in Affirmative Action Settlement.” New York TimesDecember 5, B5.
    • (1997) New York Times , pp. B5
    • Goodnough, A.1
  • 64
    • 84927454086 scopus 로고
    • Critical legal histories
    • Gordon, Robert W. 1984. “Critical Legal Histories.” Stanford Law Review36: 57–125.
    • (1984) Stanford Law Review , vol.36 , pp. 57-125
    • Gordon, R.W.1
  • 66
    • 84972487467 scopus 로고
    • The non-majoritarian difficulty: Legislative deference to the judiciary
    • Graber, Mark A. 1993. “The Non-Majoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary.” Studies in American Political Development7:35–72.
    • (1993) Studies in American Political Development , vol.7 , pp. 35-72
    • Graber, M.A.1
  • 67
    • 0039504127 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Establishing judicial review? Schooner peggy and the early marshall court
    • Graber, Mark A. 1998. “Establishing Judicial Review? Schooner Peggy and the Early Marshall Court.” Political Research Quarterly51:7–25.
    • (1998) Political Research Quarterly , vol.51 , pp. 7-25
    • Graber, M.A.1
  • 68
    • 0007129997 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The problematic establishment of judicial review
    • Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, eds., Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
    • Graber, Mark A. 1999. “The Problematic Establishment of Judicial Review.” In Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, eds. The Supreme Court in AmericanPolitics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 28–42.
    • (1999) The Supreme Court in American , pp. 28-42
    • Graber, M.A.1
  • 73
    • 84974449901 scopus 로고
    • Reply to lovell: Politics of commitment or calculation?
    • Hattam, Victoria. 1994. “Reply to Lovell: Politics of Commitment or Calculation?” Studies in American Political Development8:103–10.
    • (1994) Studies in American Political Development , vol.8 , pp. 103-110
    • Hattam, V.1
  • 74
    • 84976040975 scopus 로고
    • The semi-sovereign interest groups
    • Hayes, Michael. 1978. “The Semi-Sovereign Interest Groups.” Journal of Politics40:134–61.
    • (1978) Journal of Politics , vol.40 , pp. 134-161
    • Hayes, M.1
  • 75
    • 0348236414 scopus 로고
    • Privilege, malice, and intent
    • Holmes, Oliver Wendell, Jr. 1894. “Privilege, Malice, and Intent.” Harvard Law Review8:1–14.
    • (1894) Harvard Law Review , vol.8 , pp. 1-14
    • Holmes, O.W.1
  • 78
    • 84922913100 scopus 로고
    • Make the laws more explicit
    • Hunt, Henry T. 1928. “Make the Laws More Explicit.” American Labor Legislation Review16:309–11.
    • (1928) American , vol.16 , pp. 309-311
    • Hunt, H.T.1
  • 79
    • 84922932660 scopus 로고
    • Princeton: Princeton University Press
    • Irons, Peter H. 1982. The New Deal Lawyers. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • (1982) The
    • Irons, P.H.1
  • 82
    • 84974041281 scopus 로고
    • Joseph g. Cannon and howard w. smith: An essay on the limits of leadership in the house of representatives
    • Jones, Charles O. 1968. “Joseph G. Cannon and Howard W. Smith: An Essay on the Limits of Leadership in the House of Representatives.” Journal of Politics 30:617–44.
    • (1968) Journal of Politics , vol.30 , pp. 617-644
    • Jones, C.O.1
  • 84
    • 84922929357 scopus 로고
    • The sherman act–a menace to freedom
    • Joseph, Charles M. 1928. “The Sherman Act–A Menace to Freedom.” American Labor Legislation Review18:297–301.
    • (1928) American Labor Legislation Review , vol.18 , pp. 297-301
    • Joseph, C.M.1
  • 85
    • 84922932659 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press
    • Katzmann, Robert A. 1997. Courts and Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
    • (1997) Courts and Congress
    • Katzmann, R.A.1
  • 88
    • 0011648131 scopus 로고
    • Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    • Keller, Morton. 1990. Regulating a New Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    • (1990) Regulating a New Economy
    • Keller, M.1
  • 89
    • 0011609834 scopus 로고
    • Judicial deradicalization of the wagner act and the origins of modern legal consciousness, 1937–1941
    • Klare, Karl. 1978. “Judicial Deradicalization of the Wagner Act and the Origins of Modern Legal Consciousness, 1937–1941.” Minnesota Law Review62:265–339.
    • (1978) Minnesota , vol.62 , pp. 265-339
    • Klare, K.1
  • 90
    • 0008810922 scopus 로고
    • Law making as praxis
    • Klare, Karl. 1979. “Law Making as Praxis.” Telos123–35.
    • (1979) Telos , pp. 123-135
    • Klare, K.1
  • 91
    • 0040592661 scopus 로고
    • Labor law as ideology: Towards a new historiography of collective bargaining law
    • Klare, Karl. 1981. “Labor Law as Ideology: Towards a New Historiography of Collective Bargaining Law.” Industrial Relations Law Journal4:450–506.
    • (1981) Industrial Relations Law Journal , vol.4 , pp. 450-506
    • Klare, K.1
  • 92
    • 12444331675 scopus 로고
    • Traditional labor law scholarship and the crisis of collective bargaining law: A reply to professor finkin
    • Klare, Karl. 1985. “Traditional Labor Law Scholarship and the Crisis of Collective Bargaining Law: A Reply to Professor Finkin.” Maryland Law Review44:731–837.
    • (1985) Maryland , vol.44 , pp. 731-837
    • Klare, K.1
  • 93
    • 0011666373 scopus 로고
    • Critical theory and labor relations law
    • David Kairys, ed., New York: Pantheon Books
    • Klare, Karl. 1990. “Critical Theory and Labor Relations Law.” In David Kairys, ed., The Politics of Law. New York: Pantheon Books.
    • (1990) The Politics of Law
    • Klare, K.1
  • 95
    • 0346036571 scopus 로고
    • Labor, the clayton act, and the supreme courts
    • Kutler, Stanley. 1962. “Labor, the Clayton Act, and the Supreme Courts.” Labor History3:19–38.
    • (1962) Labor History , vol.3 , pp. 19-38
    • Kutler, S.1
  • 98
    • 84971139376 scopus 로고
    • Can government regulate safety? The coal mine example
    • Lewis-Beck, Michael and John R. Alford. 1980: “Can Government Regulate Safety? The Coal Mine Example.” American Political Science Review74:745–56.
    • (1980) American Political Science Review , vol.74 , pp. 745-756
    • Lewis-Beck, M.1    Alford, J.R.2
  • 100
    • 0011539611 scopus 로고
    • The ambiguities of labor’s legislative reforms in new york state in the late nineteenth century
    • Lovell, George. 1994. “The Ambiguities of Labor’s Legislative Reforms in New York State in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Studies in American Political Development 8:81–102.
    • (1994) Studies in American Political Development , vol.8 , pp. 81-102
    • Lovell, G.1
  • 104
    • 0002016388 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Strategy and judicial choice: New institutionalist approaches to supreme court decision-making
    • Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds, Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1999. “Strategy and Judicial Choice: New Institutionalist Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-Making.” In Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds. SupremeCourt Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 43–63.
    • (1999) Supreme , pp. 43-63
    • Maltzman, F.1    Spriggs, J.F.2    Wahlbeck, P.J.3
  • 105
    • 0035533822 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Congressional decision making and the separation of powers
    • Martin, Andrew D. 2001. “Congressional Decision Making and the Separation of Powers.” American Political Science Review95:361–78.
    • (2001) American Political Science Review , vol.95 , pp. 361-378
    • Martin, A.D.1
  • 108
    • 0005357003 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How the supreme court matters in american politics: New institutionalist perspectives
    • Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, eds, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas
    • McCann, Michael W. 1999. “How the Supreme Court Matters in American Politics: New Institutionalist Perspectives.” In Howard Gillman and Cornell Clayton, eds. The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 63–97.
    • (1999) The Supreme Court in American Politics: New Institutionalist Interpretations , pp. 63-97
    • McCann, M.W.1
  • 110
    • 21844505520 scopus 로고
    • Politics and the courts:Apositive theory of judicial doctrine and the rule of law
    • McNollgast. 1995. “Politics and the Courts: A Positive Theory of Judicial Doctrine and the Rule of Law.” Southern California Law Review68:1631–81.
    • (1995) Southern California , vol.68 , pp. 1631-1681
    • McNollgast, M.1
  • 115
    • 84922932657 scopus 로고
    • Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • Murphy, Walter F. 1962. Congress and the Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    • (1962) Congress and the Court
    • Murphy, W.F.1
  • 116
    • 84922904442 scopus 로고
    • 2nd ed. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press
    • Murphy, Walter F., James E. Fleming, and Sotirios A. Barber. 1995. AmericanConstitutional Interpretation, 2nd ed. Westbury, NY: Foundation Press.
    • (1995) American
    • Murphy, W.F.1    Fleming, J.E.2    Barber, S.A.3
  • 120
    • 0040307146 scopus 로고
    • Discrimination against union labor–legal?
    • Olney, Richard. 1908. “Discrimination Against Union Labor–Legal?” American Law Review42:161–7.
    • (1908) American Law Review , vol.42 , pp. 161-167
    • Olney, R.1
  • 122
    • 84974450443 scopus 로고
    • The primacy of labor in american constitutional development
    • Orren, Karen. 1995. “The Primacy of Labor in American Constitutional Development.” American Political Science Review89:377–88.
    • (1995) American Political Science Review , vol.89 , pp. 377-388
    • Orren, K.1
  • 128
    • 0002276054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Labor’s constitution of freedom
    • Pope, James Gray. 1997. “Labor’s Constitution of Freedom.” Yale Law Journal106:941–1031.
    • (1997) Yale Law Journal , vol.106 , pp. 941-1031
    • Pope, J.G.1
  • 130
    • 0007277458 scopus 로고
    • Legal formalism, legal realism, and the interpretation of statues and the constitution
    • Posner, Richard A. 1986. “Legal Formalism, Legal Realism, and the Interpretation of Statues and the Constitution.” Case Western Reserve Law Review37:179–200.
    • (1986) Case Western Reserve Law , vol.37 , pp. 179-200
    • Posner, R.A.1
  • 132
    • 0010394575 scopus 로고
    • Liberty of contract
    • Pound, Roscoe. 1909. “Liberty of Contract.” Yale Law Journal19:454–87.
    • (1909) Yale Law Journal , vol.19 , pp. 454-487
    • Pound, R.1
  • 133
    • 21844506188 scopus 로고
    • The iww free speech fights and popular conceptions of free expression before world war i
    • Rabban, David M. 1994. “The IWW Free Speech Fights and Popular Conceptions of Free Expression before World War I.” Virginia Law Review80:1055–158.
    • (1994) Virginia Law Review , vol.80 , pp. 1055-1158
    • Rabban, D.M.1
  • 135
    • 0035529090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Information and judicial review: A signaling game of legislative-judicial interaction
    • Rogers, James R. 2001. “Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction.” American Journal of Political Science45: 84–99.
    • (2001) American Journal of Political Science , vol.45 , pp. 84-99
    • Rogers, J.R.1
  • 136
    • 85050787135 scopus 로고
    • Voluntarism: The political functions of an antipoliticaldoctrine
    • Rogin, Michael. 1962. “Voluntarism: The Political Functions of an Antipolitical Doctrine.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review15:521–35.
    • (1962) Industrial and Labor Relations Review , vol.15 , pp. 521-535
    • Rogin, M.1
  • 138
    • 0039123092 scopus 로고
    • Princeton: Princeton University Press
    • Ross, W. G. 1994. A Muted Fury. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
    • (1994) A Muted Fury
    • Ross, W.G.1
  • 142
    • 0031286123 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Separation of powers games in the positive theory of law and courts
    • Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. “Separation of Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Law and Courts.” American Political Science Review91:28–44.
    • (1997) American Political Science Review , vol.91 , pp. 28-44
    • Segal, J.A.1
  • 143
    • 84875771921 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Supreme court deference to congress: An examination of the marksist model
    • CornellW. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds., Chicago: University of Chicago Press
    • Segal, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Marksist Model.” In Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman, eds. SupremeCourt Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 237–53.
    • (1999) Supreme , pp. 237-253
    • Segal, J.A.1
  • 146
    • 84922850469 scopus 로고
    • Legal, legislative, and managerial responses to the organization of supervising employees in the 1940s
    • Seitz, Virginia A. 1984. “Legal, Legislative, and Managerial Responses to the Organization of Supervising Employees in the 1940s.” American Journal of LegalHistory28:193.
    • (1984) American Journal of Legal , vol.28 , pp. 193
    • Seitz, V.1
  • 147
    • 3142766442 scopus 로고
    • Fathers and sons: The courts, the commentators, and the search for values
    • Vincent Blasi, ed., New Haven: Yale University Press
    • Shapiro, Martin M. 1983. “Fathers and Sons: The Courts, the Commentators, and the Search for Values.” In Vincent Blasi, ed. The Burger Court: The Counter Revolution that Wasn’t. New Haven: Yale University Press, 218–33.
    • (1983) The Burger Court: The Counter Revolution that Wasn’t , pp. 218-233
    • Shapiro, M.M.1
  • 149
    • 84977196224 scopus 로고
    • Political response to capitalist crisis: Neo-marxist theories of the state and the case of the new deal
    • Skocpol, Theda. 1980. “Political Response to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal.” Politics and Society10:155–201.
    • (1980) Politics and Society , vol.10 , pp. 155-201
    • Skocpol, T.1
  • 150
    • 84971697781 scopus 로고
    • Explaining new deal labor policy
    • with response by Michael Goldfield
    • Skocpol, Theda and Kenneth Finegold. 1990. “Explaining New Deal Labor Policy” (with response by Michael Goldfield). American Political Science Review84:1297–1304.
    • (1990) American Political Science Review , vol.84 , pp. 1297-1304
    • Skocpol, T.1    Finegold, K.2
  • 152
    • 84971736964 scopus 로고
    • Political jurisprudence, the ‘new institutionalism,’ and the future of public law
    • Smith, Rogers M. 1988. “Political Jurisprudence, the ‘New Institutionalism,’ and the Future of Public Law.” American Political Science Review80:89–108.
    • (1988) American Political Science Review , vol.80 , pp. 89-108
    • Smith, R.M.1
  • 154
    • 33846360893 scopus 로고
    • The post-war paradigm in american labor law
    • Stone, Katherine van Wezel. 1981. “The Post-War Paradigm in American Labor Law.” Yale Law Journal90:1509–80.
    • (1981) Yale Law Journal , vol.90 , pp. 1509-1580
    • Stone, K.V.1
  • 158
    • 84935082584 scopus 로고
    • Where the action is: Critical legal studies and empiricism
    • Trubeck, David M. 1984. “Where the Action Is: Critical Legal Studies and Empiricism.” Stanford Law Review36:575–623.
    • (1984) Stanford Law Review , vol.36 , pp. 575-623
    • Trubeck, D.M.1
  • 160
  • 162
    • 0004015503 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • New York: Oxford University Press
    • Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press.
    • (1999) Law and Disagreement
    • Waldron, J.1
  • 164
    • 84922918512 scopus 로고
    • New developments in labor injunctions
    • Witte, Edwin. 1929. “New Developments in Labor Injunctions.” American Labor Legislation Review19:308–16.
    • (1929) American Labor Legislation Review , vol.19 , pp. 308-316
    • Witte, E.1
  • 168
    • 84922843688 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA
    • Whittington, Keith A. 2001. “The Strategic Environment of Judicial Review.” Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA.
    • (2001) The Strategic Environment of Judicial Review
    • Whittington, K.A.1
  • 169
    • 84922932655 scopus 로고
    • Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
    • Zinn, Howard. 1959. LaGuardia in Congress. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
    • (1959) Laguardia in Congress
    • Zinn, H.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.