Effects of feedforward video self-modelling on reading fluency and comprehension

Behaviour Change

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 46-58

  Robson, Cathy ^a,b   Blampied, Neville ^a,b   Walker, Lawrence ^a,b  

^a Ministry of Education   (New Zealand)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CANTERBURY   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Comprehension; Feedforward; Fluency; Ipads; Primary school; Reading; Video self modelling

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPREHENSION; EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MICROCOMPUTER; MODEL; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIMARY SCHOOL; READING; READING FLUENCY; SCHOOL CHILD; SCREENING; SELF MODELLING; TEACHER; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 84924613503     PISSN: 08134839     EISSN: 20497768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/bec.2014.29     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Allington, R.L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556-561.
3. Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191.
4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5. Bilias-Lolis, E., Chafouleas, S.M., Kehle, T.J., & Bray, M.A. (2012). Exploring the utility of selfmodeling in decreasing disruptive behavior in students with intellectual disability. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 82-92.
6. Blampied, N.M. (2007, August). Single-case research: Adaptations for the analysis of group data. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis International Conference, Sydney, Australia.
7. Blampied, N.M. (2014). Using modified Brinley plots to analyse behavior change in individuals within groups. (Under review).
8. Buggey, T. (2007). A picture is worth.: Video self-modeling applications at school and home. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 151-158.
9. Buggey, T., & Ogle, L. (2012). Video self-modeling. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 52-70.
10. Burns, M.K. (2007). Reading at the instructional level with children identified as learning disabled: Potential implications for response-to-intervention. School Psychology Quarterly, 22, 297-313.
11. Collier-Meek, M.A., Fallon, L.M., Johnson, A.H., Sanetti, L.M.H., & Delcampo, M.A. (2012). Constructing self-modeling videos: Procedures and technology. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 3-14.
12. Cooper, J.O., Heron, T.E.,&Heward, W.L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
13. Daly, E.J., & Kupzyk, S. (2013). Teaching reading. In G.J. Madden & W.V. Dube (Eds.), APA handbook of behavior analysis: Vol. 2. Translating principles into practice (pp. 405-443).Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
14. Deeney, T.A. (2010). One-minute fluency measures: Mixed messages in assessment and instruction. The Reading Teacher, 63, 440-450.
15. Dowrick, P.W. (1999). A review of self modeling and related interventions. Applied and Preventive Psychology, 8, 23-39.
16. Dowrick, P.W. (2012). Self-modeling: Expanding the theories of learning. Psychology in the Schools, 49, 30-41.
17. Dowrick, P.W., & Raeburn, J.M. (1977). Video editing and medication to produce a therapeutic self-model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 1156-1158.
18. Dowrick, P.W.,&Raeburn, J.M. (1995). Self-modeling: Rapid skill training for children with physical disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 7, 25-37.
19. Dowrick, P.W., Kim-Rupnow, W.S.,&Power, T.J. (2006).Video feedforward for reading. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 194-207.
20. Edl, H. (2007). Examining the impact of video self-modelling on the reading fluency of upper elementary andmiddle school students with significant reading disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, IN.
21. Hattie, J., & Yates, G.C. (2014). Visible learning and the science of how we learn. New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Hempenstall, K. (2009). Research-driven reading assessment: Drilling to the core. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 14, 17-52.
23. Henk, W.A., & Melnick, S.A. (1995). The reader self-perception scale (RSPS): A new tool for measuring how children feel about themselves as readers. The Reading Teacher, 48, 470-470.
24. Hersen, M., Barlow, D.H.,&Kazdin, A.E. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York, NY: PergamonPress.
25. Hitchcock, C.H., Prater, M.A., & Dowrick, P.W. (2004). Reading comprehension and fluency: examining the effects of tutoring and video self-modeling on first-grade students with reading difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 89-103.
26. Hudson, R.F., Lane, H.B.,&Pullen, P.C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how? The Reading Teacher, 58, 702-714.
27. Jacobson, N.S., & Truax, P. (1991). Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 59, 12-19.
28. Johnson, K.R., & Layng, T.V. (1996). On terms and procedures: Fluency. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 281-288.
29. Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.
30. Logan, G.D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 123-146.
31. Mastropieri, M.A., Leinart, A., & Scruggs, T.E. (1999). Strategies to increase reading fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34, 278-283.
32. National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Bethesda, MD: Author.
33. New Zealand Department of Education Reading Advisory Service. (1984). Informal Prose Inventory. Wellington, NZ: Author.
34. Neale, M.D. (1999). Neale analysis of reading ability: Manual (3rd ed.). Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.
35. Parker, D.H., Scannell, G., & Science Research Associates. (1973). SRA Reading Laboratory: 1a. Chicago, IL: Science Research Associates.
36. Schunk, D.H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19, 159-172.
37. Skinner, C.H., & Shapiro, E.S. (1989). A comparison of taped-words and drill interventions on reading fluency in adolescents with behavior disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 12, 123-33.
38. Smith, A., & Randell, B., (2002). PM benchmark kit: An assessment resource for emergent-12 years R.A. Southbank [Vic.]: Thomson Nelson.
39. Vygotsky, L.S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Welsch, R.G. (2006). Increase oral reading fluency. Intervention in School and Clinic, 41, 180-183.
41. Zutell, J.,&Rasinski, T.V. (1991). Training teachers to attend to their students' oral reading fluency. Theory into Practice, 30, 211-217.