A Slovene Translation of the System Usability Scale: The SUS-SI

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 112-117

  Blažica, Bojan ^a   Lewis, James R ^b  

^a XLAB Research   (Slovenia)

^b IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; USER INTERFACES;

IS TECHNOLOGIES; PERCEIVED USABILITY; SYSTEM USABILITY; SYSTEM USABILITY SCALE (SUS); USABILITY EVALUATION; USER RESEARCH;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 84924529109     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447318.2014.986634     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Anastasi, A. (1976). Psychological testing. New York, NY: Macmillan.
2. Bangor, A., Kortum, P. T., & Miller, J. T. (2008). An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 24, 574–594.
3. Barnette, J. J. (2000). Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 60, 361–370.
4. Borsci, S., Federici, S., & Lauriola, M. (2009). On the dimensionality of the system usability scale: A test of alternative measurement models. Cognitive Processes, 10, 193–197.
5. Brooke, J. (1996). SUS—A “quick and dirty” usability scale. In P. W. Jordan (Eds.), Usability evaluation in industry (pp. 189–194). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
6. Brooke, J. (2013). SUS: A retrospective. Journal of Usability Studies, 8(2), 29–40.
7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.
8. Davis, D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–339.
9. Erdinç, O., & Lewis, J. R. (2013). Psychometric evaluation of the T-CSUQ: The Turkish version of the Computer System Usability Questionnaire. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 319–326.
10. Finstad, K. (2006). The System Usability Scale and non-native English speakers. Journal of Usability Studies, 1, 185–188.
11. Finstad, K. (2010). The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22, 323–327.
12. Göransson, B. (2011). SUS Svensk: System Usability Scale in Swedish. Available from http://rosenfeldmedia.com/books/survey-design/blog/sus_svensk_system_usability_sc/
13. Kirakowski, J., & Murphy, R. (2009). A comparison of current approaches to usability measurement. Proceedings of the Irish Human–Computer Interaction Conference 2009 TCD, pp. 13–17.
14. Kodžoman, J. (2012). Model ocenjevanja uporabnost: Spletnih trgovin v tujem jeziku [The evaluation model for usability of Internet shops in foreign language]. (Unpublished bachelor thesis). Univerza v Ljubljani, Ljubljana, Slovenia. Retrieved from http://eprints.fri.uni-lj.si/1678/1/Kod%C5%BEoman-1.pdf
15. Kortum, P. T., & Bangor, A. (2013). Usability ratings for everyday products measured with the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 29, 67–76.
16. Landauer, T. K. (1997). Behavioral research methods in human–computer interaction. In M. Helander, K. T. Landauer, & P. Prabhu (Eds.), Handbook of human–computer interaction (2nd ed., pp. 203–227). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
17. Lewis, J. R. (1995). IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: Psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 7, 57–78.
18. Lewis, J. R., & Sauro, J. (2009). The factor structure of the system usability scale. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-centered design (pp. 94–103). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
19. Lewis, J. R., Utesch, B. S., & Maher, D. E. (2013). UMUX-LITE—When there’s no time for the SUS. In Proceedings of CHI 2013 (pp. 2099–2102). Paris, France: ACM.
20. Lindgaard, G., & Kirakowski, J. (2013). Introduction to the special issue: The tricky landscape of developing rating scales in HCI. Interacting with Computers, 25, 271–277.
21. Lohmann, K., & Schäffer, J. (2013). System Usability Scale (SUS)—An improved German translation of the questionnaire. Retrieved from http://minds.coremedia.com/2013/09/18/sus-scale-an-improved-german-translation-questionnaire/
22. Lucey, N. M. (1991). More than Meets the I: User-Satisfaction of Computer Systems. (Unpublished thesis for diploma in Applied Psychology). Cork, Ireland: University College Cork.
23. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
24. Pilotte, W. J., & Gable, R. K. (1990). The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50, 603–610.
25. Pipan, M. (2011, March 17). Uporaba technologije sledenja oči pri ocenjevanju uporabnosti e-učnega okolja [The use of eye-tracking for usability evaluation of e-learning environments] Paper presented at Konferenca o E-Izobraževanju. Retrieved from http://www.b2.eu/portals/0/E-izobrazevanje/konferenca/09-IJS-Matic-Pipan.pdf
26. Raita, E., & Oulasvirta, A. (2011). Too good to be bad: Favorable product expectations boost subjective usability ratings. Interacting with Computers, 23, 363–371.
27. Rummel, B., Ruegenhagen, E., & Reinhardt, W. (2013). System Usability Scale [German trans.]. Retrieved from http://www.sapdesignguild.org/resources/sus.asp
28. Sauro, J. (2011). A practical guide to the System Usability Scale (SUS): Background, bench-marks & best practices. Denver, CO: Measuring Usability LLC.
29. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2009). Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: Evidence for the construct of usability. In Proceedings of CHI 2009 (pp. 1609–1618). Boston, MA: ACM.
30. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2011). When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? In Proceedings of CHI 2011 (pp. 2215–2223). Vancouver, Canada: ACM.
31. Sauro, J., & Lewis, J. R. (2012). Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. Burlington, MA: Morgan-Kaufmann.
32. Schmitt, N., & Stuits, D. (1985) Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9, 367–373.
33. Schriesheim, C. A., & Hill, K. D. (1981). Controlling acquiescence response bias by item reversals: The effect on questionnaire validity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 41, 1101–1114.
34. Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74, 107–120.
35. Stojmenova, E. (2009). Ocenjevanje uporabnosti spletne aplikacije Web Communicator [Usability evaluation of web-based application Web Communicator] (Unpublished bachelor thesis). FERI. Available at http://dkum.uni-mb.si/IzpisGradiva.php?id=11082
36. Tullis, T. S., & Stetson, J. N. (2004). A comparison of questionnaires for assessing website usability. Paper presented at the Usability Professionals Association Annual Conference. Minneapolis, MN: UPA. Available from http://www.userfocus.co.uk/articles/satisfaction.html
37. van de Vijver, F. J. R., & Leung, K. (2001). Personality in cultural context: Methodological issues. Journal of Personality, 69, 1007–1031.
38. Wong, N., Rindfleisch, A., & Burroughs, J. (2003). Do reverse-worded items confound measures in cross-cultural consumer research? The case of the material values scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30, 72–91.