UMUX-LITE - When there's no time for the SUS

Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 2099-2102

  Lewis, James R ^a   Utesch, Brian S ^a   Maher, Deborah E ^a  

^a IBM   (United States)

Author keywords

Psychometric evaluation; Satisfaction measures; Standardized questionnaires; SUS; System Usability Scale; UMUX; UMUX LITE; Usability evaluation; Usability Metric for User Experience

Indexed keywords

PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; SATISFACTION MEASURES; STANDARDIZED QUESTIONNAIRES; SUS; SYSTEM USABILITY; UMUX; UMUX-LITE; USABILITY EVALUATION; USER EXPERIENCE;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; USABILITY ENGINEERING;

SURVEYS;

EID: 84877970092     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2470654.2481287     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., and Miller, J.T. An empirical evaluation of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24 (2008), 574-594.
2. Borsci, S., Federici, S., and Lauriola, M. On the dimensionality of the system usability scale: A test of alternative measurement models. Cognitive Processes, 10 (2009), 193-197.
3. Brooke, J. SUS: A "quick and dirty" usability scale. In: Jordan, P., Thomas, B., Weerdmeester, B. (Eds.), Usability Evaluation in Industry. Taylor & Francis, London, UK, (1996) 189-194.
4. Coovert, M.D., and McNelis, K. Determining the number of common factors in factor analysis: A review and program. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48 (1988), 687-693.
5. Davis, D. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13 (1989), 319-339.
6. Finstad, K. The usability metric for user experience. Interacting with Computers, 22 (2010), 323-327.
7. ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs). Part 11: Guidance on Usability, 1998.
8. Lewis, J. R. Critical review of "The Usability Metric for User Experience". Interacting with Computers (In press).
9. Lewis, J.R., and Sauro, J. The factor structure of the System Usability Scale. In: Kurosu, M. (Ed.), Human Centered Design, HCII 2009. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, (2009) 94-103.
10. Pilotte, W.J., and Gable, R.K. The impact of positive and negative item stems on the validity of a computer anxiety scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 50 (1990), 603-610.
11. Sauro, J., and Dumas, J.S. Comparison of three onequestion, post-task usability questionnaires. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1599-1608.
12. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J.R. Correlations among prototypical usability metrics: Evidence for the construct of usability. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM Press (2009), 1609-1618.
13. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J.R. When designing usability questionnaires, does it hurt to be positive? In Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2215-2223.
14. Sauro, J., and Lewis, J. R. Quantifying the User Experience: Practical Statistics for User Research. Morgan-Kaufmann, Waltham, MA, USA, 2012.
15. Schmitt N., and Stuits, D. Factors defined by negatively keyed items: The result of careless respondents? Applied Psychological Measurement, 9 (1985), 367-373.
16. Stewart, T.J., and Frye, A.W. Investigating the use of negatively-phrased survey items in medical education settings: Common wisdom or common mistake? Academic Medicine, 79 (2004), S1-S3.