Flash profile

Novel Techniques in Sensory Characterization and Consumer Profiling

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 175-206

  Delarue, Julien ^a  

^a AGROPARISTECH   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924164472     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1201/b16853     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Albert, A., P. Varela, A. Salvador, G. Hough, and S. Fiszman. 2011. Overcoming the issues in the sensory description of hot served food with a complex tex-ture. Application of QDA®, flash profiling and projective mapping using panels with different degrees of training. Food Quality and Preference 22(5):463-473.
2. Ballay, S., S. Warrenburg, J.-M. Sieffermann, L. Glazman, and G. Gazano. 2006. A new fragrance language: Intercultural knowledge and emotions. Paper read at 24th IFSCC Congress-Integration of Cosmetic Sciences, October 16-19, 2006, Osaka, Japan.
3. Blancher, G., S. Chollet, R. Kesteloot, D.N. Hoang, G. Cuvelier, and J.M. Sieffermann. 2007. French and Vietnamese: How do they describe tex-ture characteristics of the same food? A case study with jellies. Food Quality and Preference 18(3):560-575.
4. Cadoret, M. and F. Husson. 2013. Construction and evaluation of confidence ellipses applied at sensory data. Food Quality and Preference 28(1):106-115.
5. Coustel, J. 2005. Mise au point du contre typage d’échantillons de rhum par voie organoleptique et analyses physico-chimiques. PhD thesis, Génie Industriel Alimentaire, ENSIA, Paris, France.
6. Dairou, V. and J.-M. Sieffermann. 2002. A comparison of 14 jams character-ized by conventional profile and a quick original method, the Flash Profile. Journal of Food Science 67(2):826-834.
7. Delarue, J., F. Beurier, and J.M. Sieffermann. 2008. Mapping claims according to consumers’ sensory perception of cosmetics. Paper read at 25th IFSCC Congress, October 6-9, 2008, Barcelona, Spain.
8. Delarue, J., M. Danzart, and J.-M. Sieffermann. 2004. Flash profile gives insights into human sensory perception. Paper read at Fifth International Multisensory Research Forum, June 2-5, 2004, Sitges, Spain.
9. Delarue, J. and E. Loescher. 2004. Dynamics of food preferences: A case study with chewing gums. Food Quality and Preference 15(7-8):771-779.
10. Delarue, J. and J.-M. Sieffermann. 2004a. Sensory mapping using Flash Profile. Comparison with a conventional descriptive method for the evalua-tion of the flavour of fruit dairy products. Food Quality and Preference 15(4):383-392.
11. Delarue, J. and J.-M. Sieffermann. 2004b. Use of 2(-4-methoxyphenoxy)propa-noic acid (Na-PMP) to investigate flavour interactions in real food prod-ucts. Paper read at International Symposium on Olfaction and Taste (ISOT/JASTS), July 5-9, 2004, Kyoto, Japan.
12. Eladan, N., G. Gazano, S. Ballay, and J.-M. Sieffermann. 2005. Flash profile and fragrance research: The world of perfume in the consumer’s words. Paper read at ESOMAR Fragrance Research Conference, May 15-17, 2005, New York.
13. Escofier, B. and J. Pagès. 2008. Analyses factorielles simples et multiples, objectifs méthodes et interprétation, 4th edn. Paris, France: Dunod.
14. Faye, P., D. Bremaud, E. Teillet, P. Courcoux, A. Giboreau, and H. Nicod. 2006. An alternative to external preference mapping based on consumer perceptive mapping. Food Quality and Preference 17(7-8):604-614.
15. Gacula, M. and S. Rutenbeck. 2006. Sample size in consumer test and descriptive analysis. Journal of Sensory Studies 21(2):129-145.
16. Giboreau, A., S. Navarro, P. Faye, and J. Dumortier. 2001. Sensory evaluation of automotive fabrics: The contribution of categorization tasks and non verbal information to set-up a descriptive method of tactile properties. Food Quality and Preference 12:311-322.
17. Gower, J.C. 1975. Generalised Procrustes analysis. Psychometrika 40(1):33-51.
18. Husson, F., S. Le, and J. Pages. 2005. Confidence ellipse for the sensory profiles obtained by principal component analysis. Food Quality and Preference 16(3):245-250.
19. Husson, F., S. Le Dien, and J. Pagès. 2001. Which value can be granted to sensory profiles given by consumers? Methodology and results. Food Quality and Preference 12:291-296.
20. Jack, F.R. and J.R. Piggott. 1992. Free choice profiling in consumer research. Food Quality and Preference 3:129-134.
21. Jocteur Monrozier, R. 2001. Le profil sensoriel de la mesure a l’analyse discrimi-nante multiple. PhD thesis, Sciences de l’Aliment, ENSIA, Paris, France.
22. King, B.M., P. Arents, and N. Moreau. 1995. Cost/efficiency evaluation of descriptive analysis panels-I. Panelsize. Food Quality and Preference 6:245-261.
23. Lassoued, N., J. Delarue, B. Launay, and C. Michon. 2008. Baked product texture: Correlations between instrumental and sensory characterization using Flash Profile. Journal of Cereal Science 48(1):133-143.
24. Lavit, C. 1988. Analyse conjointe de tableaux quantitatifs. Paris, France: Masson.
25. Lawless, H.T. 1999. Descriptive analysis of complex odors: Reality, model or illusion? Food Quality and Preference 10:325-332.
26. Loescher, E. 2003. Evaluations instrumentale et sensorielles de la texture de produits alimentaires de type semi-liquide. Applications au cas de fromages blancs et compotes. PhD thesis, Science de l’Aliment, ENSIA, Paris, France.
27. Mammasse, N. and P. Schlich. 2010. Number of assessors in descriptive sensory panels: A database approach. Paper read at 11e Congrès Agrostat, February 23-28, 2010, Benevento, Italy.
28. Monrozier, R. and M. Danzart. 2001. A quality measurement for sensory profile analysis: The contribution of extended cross-validation and resampling tech-niques. Food Quality and Preference 12:393-406.
29. Moskowitz, H.R. 2003. The intertwining of psychophysics and sensory analysis: Historical perspectives and future opportunities-A personal view. Food Quality and Preference 14(2):87-98.
30. Moussaoui, K.A. and P. Varela. 2010. Exploring consumer product profiling tech-niques and their linkage to a quantitative descriptive analysis. Food Quality and Preference 21(8):1088-1099.
31. Schlich, P. 1996. Defining and validating assessor compromises about product distances and attribute correlations. In Multivariate Analysis of Data in Sensory Science, T. Noes and E. Risvik, eds. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
32. Sieffermann, J.-M. 2000. Le profil flash-Un outil rapide et innovant d’évaluation sensorielle descriptive. Paper read at AGORAL 2000-XIIèmes rencontres “L’innovation: de l’idée au succès”, Montpellier, France.
33. Stampanoni, C.R. 1993. The “quantitative flavor profiling” technique. Perfumer and Flavorist 18:19-24.
34. Taréa, S. 2005. Etude de la texture de suspensions de particules molles con-centrées. Relations entre la structure, la rhéologie et la perception sen-sorielle: Application aux purées de pommes et poires et mise au point de milieux modèles. Doctorat Sciences alimentaires, Laboratoire de Perception Sensorielle et Sensométrie, ENSIA, Paris, France.
35. Tarea, S., G. Cuvelier, and J.M. Sieffermann. 2007. Sensory evaluation of the texture of 49 commercial apple and pear purees. Journal of Food Quality 30(6):1121-1131.
36. Thamke, I., K. Dürrschmid, and H. Rohm. 2009. Sensory description of dark choc-olates by consumers. LWT-Food Science and Technology 42(2):534-539.
37. van Kleef, E., H.C.M. van Trijp, and P. Luning. 2005. Consumer research in the early stages of new product development: A critical review of methods and techniques. Food Quality and Preference 16(3):181-201.
38. Veinand, B., C. Godefroy, C. Adam, and J. Delarue. 2011. Highlight of impor-tant product characteristics for consumers. Comparison of three sensory descriptive methods performed by consumers. Food Quality and Preference 22(5):474-485.
39. Williams, A.A. and S.P. Langron. 1984. The use of free-choice profiling for the evaluation of commercial ports. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 35:558-568.
40. Worch, T., S. Lê, and P. Punter. 2010. How reliable are the consumers? Comparison of sensory profiles from consumers and experts. Food Quality and Preference 21:309-318.