Descriptive analysis of complex odors: Reality, model or illusion?

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 10, Issue 4-5, 1999, Pages 325-332

  Lawless, Harry T ^a  

^a Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics   (United States)

Author keywords

Complex; Descriptive analysis; Models; Odors

Indexed keywords

CITRUS;

EID: 0001600848     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00052-4     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Amoore J.E. Specific anosmia and the concept of primary odors. Chemical Senses and Flavor. 2:1977;267-281.
2. Cain W.S. To know with the nose: keys to odor identification. Science. 203:1979;467-470.
3. Cain W.S., Drexler M. Scope and evaluation of odor counteraction and masking. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 237:1974;427-439.
4. Civille G.V., Lawless H.T. The importance of language in describing perceptions. Journal of Sensory Studies. 1:1986;203-215.
5. Dravnieks A. Odor quality: semantically generated multidimensional profiles are stable. Science. 218:1982;799-801.
6. Dravnieks, A. (1985) Atlas of odor character profiles. Philadelphia, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.
7. Engen T., Pfaffmann C. Absolute judgments of odor intensity. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 58:1959;23-26.
8. Engen, T., & Pfaffmann, C. (1960). Absolute judgements of odor quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 214-219.
9. Engen T., Ross B.M. Long term memory for odors with and without verbal descriptors. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 100:1974;221-227.
10. Ennis, D. M. (1998) Foundations of sensory science and a vision for the future. Food Technology, 52 (7), 78-84, 89.
11. Erickson R.P., Covey E. On the singularity of taste sensations: what is a primary taste. Physiology and Behavior. 25:1980;527-533.
12. Erickson R.P., Priolo C.V., Warwick Z.S., Schiffman S.S. Synthesis of tastes other than the primaries: implications for neural coding theories and the concept of suppression. Chemical Senses. 15:1990;495-504.
13. Heymann H., Noble A.C. Descriptive analysis of commercial cabernet sauvignon wines in California. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 38:1987;41-47.
14. Jellinek J.S., Koster E.P. Perceived fragrance complexity and its relation to familiarity and pleasantness. Journal of the Society of Cosmetic Chemists. 30:1979;253-262.
15. Jeltema M.A., Southwick E.W. Evaluations and application of odor profiling. Journal of Sensory Studies. 1:1986;123-136.
16. Laing, D. G. (1991). Characteristics of the human sense of smell when processing odor mixtures. In D. G. Laing, R. L. Doty, & W. Breipohl (Eds.), The human sense of smell, (pp. 241-259). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
17. Laska M., Hudson R. Ability to discriminate between related odor mixtures. Chemical Senses. 17:1992;403-415.
18. Lawless H.T. Flavor description of white wine by "expert" and non-expert wine consumers. Journal of Food Science. 49:1984;120-123.
19. Lawless, H. T. (1988). Odour description and odour classification revisited. In D. M. H. Thomson (Ed.), Food acceptability (pp. 27-40). London: Elsevier Applied Science.
20. Lawless, H. T. (1992). Unexpected congruence in odor quality and intensity ratings. (Abstract) 1992 annual meeting, Association for Chemoreception Sciences, Sarasota, FL. Chemical Senses 17, 657-658.
21. Lawless H.T., Engen T. Associations to odors: interference, mnemonics and verbal labeling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory. 3:1977;52-57.
22. Lawless H.T., Corrigan Thomas C.C., Johnston M. Variation in odor thresholds for L-carvone and cineole and correlations with suprathreshold intensity ratings. Chemical Senses. 20:1995;9-17.
23. Lawless H.T., Glatter S., Hohn C. Context dependent changes in the perception of odor quality. Chemical Senses. 16:1991;349-360.
24. Lawless, H. T., Heymann, H. (1997) Sensory evaluation of food, principles and practices. New York: Chapman and Hall.
25. Marin A.B., Acree T.E., Barnard J. Variation in odor detection thresholds determined by CHARM analysis. Chemical Senses. 13:1988;435-444.
26. McCloskey L.P., Sylvan M., Arrhenius S.P. Descriptive analysis for wine quality experts determining appellations by chardonnay wine aroma. Journal of Sensory Studies. 11:1996;49-67.
27. Moskowitz H.R., Barbe C.D. Profiling of odor components and their mixtures. Sensory Processes. 1:1977;212-226.
28. Noble A.C., Arnold R.A., Buechsenstein J., Leach E.J., Schmidt J.O., Stern P.M. Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 38 2:1987;143-146.
29. O'Mahony M., Atassi-Sheldon S., Rothman L., Murphy-Ellison T. Relative singularity/mixedness of judgement for selected taste stimuli. Physiology and Behavior. 31:1983;749-755.
30. Rochman D., Guinard J.-X., O'Mahony M. Eliminating artifacts in the study of singularity/mixedness of taste stimuli. Journal of Sensory Studies. 12:1997;181-193.
31. Rosch E., Mervis C.B. Family resemblance: studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology. 7:1975;573-605.
32. Schutz H.G. A matching-standards method for characterizing odor qualities. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 116:1964;517-526.
33. Solomon G.E.A. The psychology of novice and expert wine talk. American Journal of Psychology. 103:1990;495-517.
34. Stevens, J. C. (1971). Psychophysical problems and procedures. In W. S. Cain & L. E. Marks (Eds.), Stimulus and sensation: readings in sensory psychology, (pp. 5-18). Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Co.
35. Wedell, D. H. (1990). Methods for determining the locus of context effects in judgment. In J. P. Caverni, J. M. Fabre, & M. Gonzalez (Eds.), Cognitive biases (pp. 285-300). New York: Elsevier Science pp. 285-300.