Sample size in consumer test and descriptive analysis

Journal of Sensory Studies

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 129-145

  Gacula Jr , Maximo ^a   Rutenbeck, Sheri ^b  

^a Gacula Associates Consulting   (United States)

^b Rich Products Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33645088953     PISSN: 08878250     EISSN: 1745459X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-459X.2006.00055.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. GACULA, M.C., JR. 1993. Design and Analysis of Sensory Optimization. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
2. GACULA, M.C., JR. 2003. Language development in descriptive analysis and the formation of sensory science. In Viewpoints and Controversies in Sensory Science and Consumer Product Testing (Moskowitz et al.) pp. 331-336, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
3. GACULA, M.C., JR. and SINGH, J. 1984. Statistical Methods in Food and Consumer Research. Academic Press, Orlando, FL.
4. GACULA, M.C., JR. and SINGH, J. 2002. A review of strategy for the estimation of sample size in research investigation. J. Sens. Stud. 17, 283-598.
5. HOUGH, G. 2005. Commentary: Two types of sensory panels or are there more? J. Sens. Stud. 20, 550-552.
6. HOUGH, G., WAKELING, I., MUCCI, A., CHAMBERS, E., IV, MENDEZGALLARDO, I. and RANGEL, ALVES L. 2006. Number of consumers necessary for sensory acceptability tests. Food Qual. Prefer, (in press).
7. LAWLESS, H.T. and HEYMANN, H.H. 1998. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Chapman & Hall, New York NY.
8. MEILGAARD, M., CIVILLE, G.V, and CARR, B.T. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
9. MOSKOWITZ, H.R., MUNOZ, A.M. and GACULA JR., M.C. 2003. Viewpoints and Controversies in Food Science and Consumer Product Testing. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA.
10. MOSKOWITZ, H.R. 1997. Base size in product testing: A psychophysical viewpoint and analysis. Food Qual. Prefer. 8, 247-255.
11. PASS. 1996. PASS 6.0 User's Guide: Power Analysis and Sample Size for Windows. NCSS, Kaysville, UT.
12. SAS INSTITUTE, INC. 1999. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 8. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.
13. SCRIVEN, F. 2005. Two types of sensory panels or are there more? J. Sens. Stud. 20, 526-538.
14. STONE, H. and SIDEL, J. 1993. Sensory Evaluation Practices. Academic Press, New York, NY.