Legislative voting and accountability

Legislative Voting and Accountability

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 1-204

  Carey, John M ^a  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84924159848     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511810077     Document Type: Book

References (208)

1. Adserá Alicia, Carles Boix, and Mark Payne. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 445–90.
2. Alcántara, Manuel. 1994–2000. Proyecto Elites Latinoamericanos (PELA). Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoamérica (Universidad de Salamanca).
3. Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. Aleman, Eduardo, and George Tsebelis. 2005. “Presidential Conditional Agenda Setting in Latin America.” World Politics 57(3): 396–420.
5. Altman, David. 2005. “De un sistema paralelo a un compensatorio (proporcional personalizado).” Santiago, Chile: Instituto de Ciencia Politica, Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile.
6. American Political Science Association. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. New York: Rinehart.
7. Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 406–33.
8. Ames, Barry. 2002. “Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, 185–221. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. AmorimNeto, Octavio. 2002. “Presidential Cabinets, ElectoralCycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, 48–78. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. AmorimNeto, Octavio. 2006. Presidencialismo e governabilidade nas Americas. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fundacion Getulio Vargas.
11. Amorim Neto, Octavio, Gary W. Cox, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2003. “Agenda Power in Brazil’s Camara dos Deputados, 1989–98.” World Politics 55(4): 550–78.
12. Asamblea Nacional de Panamá. 2005. http://www.asamblea.gob.pa/.
13. Associación de Derechos Civiles. 2004. “Ley de Reforma Laboral: Falencias de su votación.” Buenos Aires, Argentina.
14. Austen-Smith, David. 1994. “Strategic Transmission of Costly Information.” Econometrica 62: 955–64.
15. Bagehot, Walter. 1867. The English Constitution. Reprint, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1963.
16. Baldez, Lisa A., and John M. Carey. 1999. “Presidential Agenda Control and Spending Policy: Lessons from General Pinochet’s Constitution.” American Journal of Political Science 43(1): 29–55.
17. Barczak, Monica. 2001. “Representation by Consultation? The Rise of Direct Democracy in Latin America.” Latin American Politics and Society 43(3): 37–60.
18. Bianco, William T., David B. Spence, and John D. Wilkerson. 1996. “The Electoral Connection in the Early Congress: The Case of the Compensation Act of 1816.” American Journal of Political Science 40(1): 145–71.
19. Bowler, Shaun, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz. 1999. “Party Cohesion, Party Discipline, and Parliaments.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz, 3–22. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
20. Brady, David W., Joseph Cooper, and Patricia A. Hurley. 1977. “The Electoral Basis of Party Voting: Patterns and Trends in the U.S. House of Representatives.” In The Impact of the Electoral Process, ed. Louis Misel and Joseph Cooper, 133–65. Beverly Hills: Sage.
21. Brambor, Thomas, William R. Clark, and Matthew Golder. 2006. “Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analysis.” Political Analysis 14: 63–82.
22. Brennan, Geoffrey, and Philip Pettit. 1990. “Unveiling the Vote.” British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 311–33.
23. Burke, Edmund. 1774. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Henry G. Bohn.
24. Burns, John F., and Nat Ives. 2005. “Shiites Win Most Votes in Iraq, Election Results Show.” New York Times, February 13, International sec., 1–22.
25. Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Calvo, Ernesto. 2007. “The Responsive Legislature: Public Opinion and Discipline in a Highly Disciplined Legislature.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 263–80.
27. Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David W. Brady, and John F. Cogan. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.” American Political Science Review 96(1): 127–40.
28. Carey, John M. 2002. “Parties and Coalitions in Chile in the 1990s.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, 222–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Carey, John M. 2003. “Discipline, Accountability, and Legislative Voting in Latin America.” Comparative Politics 35(2): 191–211.
30. Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.
31. Carey, John M., and Gina Yanitell Reinhardt. 2004. “State-Level Institutional Effects on Legislative Coalition Unity in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(1): 23–47.
32. Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–39.
33. Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1998. “Calling Out the Tanks, or Filling Out the Forms?” In Executive Decree Authority, ed. John M. Carey and Matthew Soberg Shugart, 1–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Carroll, Royce, Gary W. Cox, and Monica Pachon. 2006. “How Political Parties Create Democracy, Chapter 2.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 31(2): 153–74.
35. Centro de Estudios Públicos. 2007. Estudio nacional de opinion pública. Santiago, Chile: Centro de Estudios Públicos.
36. Cevasco Piedra, José. 2000. El Congreso del Perú: Un modelo de modernización. Lima: Ediciones del Congreso del Perú.
37. Cheibub, Jose Antonio, and Adam Przeworski. 1999. “Democracy, Elections, and Accountability for Economic Outcomes.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes, 222–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Cheibub, José Antonio, Adam Przeworski, and Sebastian M. Saiegh. 2004. “Government Coalitions and Legislative Effectiveness under Presidentialism and Parliamentarism.” British Journal of Political Science 34: 565–87.
39. Chhibber, Pradeep, and Ken Kollman. 1998. “Party Aggregation and the Number of Parties in India and the United States.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 329–42.
40. Clarín. 2004a. “La justicia resolvera si debe quedar registrado como vota cada diputado porteno.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 17. www.clarin.com.
41. Clarín. 2004b. “Otra forma de votar las leyes.” Buenos Aires, Argentina. February 18. www.clarin.com.
42. Cleary, Matthew R., and Susan C. Stokes. 2006. Democracy and the Culture of Skepticism: Political Trust in Argentina and Mexico. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
43. Colomer, Josep M. 2001. Political Institutions: Democracy and Social Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
44. De Condorcet, Marquis. 1785. Essay on the Application of Analysis to the Probability of Majority Decisions (Essai sur l’application de l’analyse a` la probabilté des decisions rendues a la pluralité des voix). Paris: De l’Imprimerie royale.
45. Congreso del Perú. 1998. Diario de los debates. Primera Legislatura Ordinaria de 1998, 11a Sesió n, 24 de setiembre.
46. Coppedge, Michael J. 1994. Strong Parties and Lame Ducks: Presidentialism, Partyarchy, and Factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
47. Coppedge, Michael J. 1998. “The Dynamic Diversity of Latin American Party Systems.” Party Politics 4(4): 547–68.
48. Corrado, Anthony. 2002. “A History of Federal Campaign Finance Law.” In The New Campaign Finance Sourcebook, ed. Anthony Corrado, Thomas Mann, Daniel Ortiz, and Trevor Potter. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution. http://www.brook.edu/dybdocroot/gs/cf/sourcebk01/HistoryChap.pdf.
49. Cox, Gary W. 1987. The Efficient Secret. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
50. Cox, Gary W. 1990. “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral Systems.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4): 903–35.
51. Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
52. Cox, Gary W. 2006a. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures.” In Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Barry Weingast and Donald Wittman, 141–61. New York: Oxford University Press.
53. Cox, Gary W. 2006b. “Evaluating Electoral Systems.” Revista de Ciencia Politica 26(1): 212–15.
54. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
55. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Cox, Gary W., Mikitaka Masuyama, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2000. “Agenda Power in the Japanese House of Representatives.” Japanese Journal of Political Science 1(1): 1–12.
57. Cox, Gary W., and Keith T. Poole. 2004. “On Measuring Partisanship in Roll-Call Voting: The US House of Representatives, 1877–1999.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 477–89.
58. Cox, Gary W., and Matthew S. Shugart. 1995. “In the Absence of Vote Pooling: Nomination and Vote Allocation Errors in Colombia.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 441–60.
59. Cox, Gary W., and Michael F. Thies. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontransferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 267–91.
60. Crisp, Brian F., and Rachel E. Ingall. 2002. “Institutional Engineering and the Nature of Representation: Mapping the Effects of Electoral Reform in Colombia.” American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 733–48.
61. Crisp, Brian, and Juan Carlos Rey. 2001. “The Causes of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 173–93. New York: Oxford University Press.
62. Culver, William W., and Alfonso Ferrufino. 2000. “Diputados uninominales: La participacion politica en Bolivia.” Contribuciones 1: 1–28.
63. Dallas Morning News. 2003a.“Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Legislature Needs to Get Online with Records.” Dallas Morning News Online, April 1. http://www.dallasnews.com/.
64. Dallas Morning News. 2003b.“Editorial: Let the Sun Shine – Excuses for Not Recording Votes Are Flimsy.” Dallas Morning News Online, March 31. http://www.dallasnews.com/.
65. Dawisha, Adeed, and Larry Diamond. 2006. “Iraq’s Year of Voting Dangerously.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 89–103.
66. Desposato, Scott. 2004a. “Going Negative in Comparative Perspective: The Impact of Electoral Rules on Campaign Strategy.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, August 30–September 3.
67. Desposato, Scott. 2004b. “The Impact of Federalism on National Party Cohesion in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(2): 259–85.
68. Desposato, Scott. 2005. “Correcting for Small-Group Cohesion in Roll Call Cohesion Scores.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 731–44.
69. Desposato, Scott. 2006a. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party-Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1): 62–80.
70. Desposato, Scott. 2006b. “Brazilian Political Reform: What Needs Fixing and How to Fix It.” Paper presented at the Center for Brazilian Studies, Oxford University, June 5.
71. Diermeier, Daniel, and Timothy J. Feddersen. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–22.
72. Diez Canseco, Javier. 2001. “Impondra el Congreso mano blanda y lucro cesante?” La Republica, May 6, p. 24.
73. Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
74. El Tiempo. 2002. “Alvaro Uribe Velez radico proyecto de referendo en su primer acto de gobierno.” August 7. http://www.eltiempo.com/.
75. Erickson, Robert S. 1971. “The Electoral Impact of Congressional Roll Call Voting.” American Political Science Review 65: 1018–32.
76. Farrell, David M., and Ian McAllister. 2004. “Voter Satisfaction and Electoral Systems: Does Preferential Voting in Candidate-Centered Systems Make a Difference?” Paper presented at the University of California, Irvine. Posted in eScholarship Repository: http://repositories.cdlib.org/csd/04-04.
77. Fearon, James D. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes, 55–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
78. Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
79. Ferejohn, John. 1999. “Accountability and Authority: Toward a Theory of Political Accountability.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes, 131–53. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
80. Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2): 151–70.
81. Fleischer, David. 2004. “The Politics of the Lula PT-led Coalition.” Paper prepared for the conference of the Latin American Studies Association, Las Vegas, NV, November 4–6.
82. Frye, Timothy. 1997. “A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies.” Comparative Political Studies 30(5): 523–52.
83. Gallagher, Michael. 1991. “Proportionality, Disproportionality and Electoral Systems.” Electoral Studies 10: 33–51.
84. Garman, Christopher, Stephan Haggard, and Eliza Willis. 2001. “Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases.” World Politics 53(2): 205–36.
85. Gerring, John, and Strom C. Thacker. 2008. A Centripetal Theory of Democratic Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Gerring, John, Strom C. Thacker, and C. Moreno. 2005. “Centripetal Democratic Governance: A Theory and Global Inquiry.” American Political Science Review 99(4): 567–81.
87. Golden, Miriam A., and Eric C.C. Chang. 2001. “Competitive Corruption: Factional Conflict and Political Malfeasance in Postwar Italian Christian Democracy.” World Politics 53(4): 588–622. http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/world_politics/v053/53.4golden.pdf.
88. Gonzalez Bertomeu, Juan F. 2004. Cada voto con su nombre: Votaciones nominales en el Poder Legislativo. Buenos Aires: Asociación por los Derechos Civiles.
89. Gunson, Phil. 2006. “Chavez’s Venezuela.” Current History 105(688): 58–63.
90. Hallerberg, Mark, and Patrik Mairer. 2004. “Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 571–87.
91. Haspel, Moshe, Thomas Remington, and Steven S. Smith. 1998. “Electoral Institutions and Party Cohesion in the Russian Duma.” Journal of Politics 60(2): 417–39.
92. Hellwig, Timothy, and David Samuels. 2007. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38: 65–90.
93. Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 688–98.
94. Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior – Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(2): 194–223.
95. Hix, Simon, Abdul Noury, and Gerard Roland. 2006. “Dimensions of Politics in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.
96. Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 90(2): 269–82.
97. Huber, John D., and G. Bingham Powell. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46: 291–326.
98. Huneeus, Carlos. “Binominalismo y calidad democratica.” La Tercera, Santiago, Chile, August 8, 2006, Opinion sec.
99. International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance. 1997. Handbook of Electoral Systems. Stockholm, Sweden: IDEA.
100. Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 1999. “Examining the Bonding Effects of Party: A Comparative Analysis of Roll-Call Voting in the US and Confederate Houses.” American Journal of Political Science 43(4): 1144–65.
101. Jenkins, Jeffrey A. 2000. “Examining the Robustness of Ideological Voting: Evidence from the Confederate House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 44(4): 811–22.
102. Jenkins, Jeffrey A., and Charles Stewart III. 2003. “Out in the Open: The Emergence of Viva Voce Voting in House Speakership Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(4): 481–508.
103. Johnson, Chris, William Maley, Alexander Thier, and Ali Wardak. 2003. Afghanistan’s Political and Constitutional Development. London: Overseas Development Institute and U.K. Department for International Development.
104. Johnson, Gregg, and Brian F. Crisp. 2003. “Mandates, Powers, and Policies.” American Journal of Political Science 47(1): 127–41.
105. Jones, Mark P., and W. Hwang. 2005. “Party Government in Presidential Democracies: Extending Cartel Theory beyond the US Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 267–82.
106. Katz, Richard S. 1994. “The 1993 Parliamentary Electoral Reform.” In Italian Politics, ed. Carol Mershon and Gianfranco Pasquino, 93–112. 9th ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
107. Kile, Orville M. 1948. The Farm Bureau through Three Decades. Baltimore: Waverly Press.
108. King, David C., and Richard J. Zeckhauser. 2003. “Congressional Vote Options.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 28(3): 387–411.
109. Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
110. Krehbiel, Keith. 2000. “Party Discipline and Measures of Partisanship.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 212–27.
111. Kulischeck, Michael, and Brian F. Crisp. 2001. “The Consequences of Electoral Reform in Venezuela.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 404–31. New York: Oxford University Press.
112. Kunicová, Jana, and Susan Rose-Ackerman. 2005. “Electoral Rules and Constitutional Structures as Constraints on Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 35(4): 573–606.
113. La Gaceta. 2001. “Congresistas que votaron y en contra de la revocatoria.” La Gaceta, 6 May, sec. 2.
114. La Raja, Raymond J. 2003. “Why Soft Money Has Strengthened Parties.” In Inside the Campaign Finance Battle: Court Testimony on the New Reforms, ed. Anthony Corrado, Thomas E. Mann, and Trevor Potter, 69–98. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
115. Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera. 1979. “Effective Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe.” Comparative Political Studies 12: 3–27.
116. Lanfranchi, Prisca, and Ruth Luthi. 1999. “Cohesion of Party Groups and Interparty Conflict in the Swiss Parliament: Roll Call Voting in the National Council.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz, 99–120. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
117. Latin America Data Base. 2001. “Nicaragua: Governing Party and Sandinistas Nominate Presidential Candidates.” NotiCen: Central American & Caribbean Political & Economic Affairs 6(3).
118. Latinobaró metro. 2003 Summary Report: Democracy and Economy. www.latinobarometro.org.
119. Laver, Michael, and Kenneth Shepsle. 1996. Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
120. Lijphart, Arend. 1994. Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of 27 Democracies, 1945–1990. New York: Oxford University Press.
121. Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
122. Linz, Juan J. 1994. “Presidentialism or Parliamentarism: Does It Make a Difference?” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy, ed. Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, 3–90. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
123. Londregan, John. 2001. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. Lowry, W. R., and C. R. Shipan. 2002. “Party Differentiation in Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(1): 33–60.
125. Luna, Juan P., and Elizabeth J. Zechmeister. 2005. “Political Representation in Latin America: A Study of Elite-Mass Congruence in Nine Countries.” Comparative Political Studies 38(4): 388–416.
126. Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens LearnWhat TheyNeed to Know? Cambridge: CambridgeUniversity Press.
127. Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
128. Mainwaring, Scott P., and Aníbal Pérez-Lin˜ án. 1997. “Party Discipline in the Brazilian Constitutional Congress.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(4): 453–83.
129. Mainwaring, Scott P., and Timothy R. Scully. 1995. “Party Systems in Latin America.” In Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, ed. Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully, 1–36. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
130. Manin, Bernard, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes. 1999. “Elections and Representation.” In Elections, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Bernard Manin, Adam Przeworski, and Susan C. Stokes, 29–54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Mann, Thomas E. 2003. “Linking Knowledge and Action: Political Science and Campaign Finance Reform.” Perspective on Politics 17(1): 69–83.
132. Marlowe, Ann. 2007. “Life of the Parties.” Wall Street Journal, January 29, A17.
133. Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
134. Mayorga, Rene. 2001. “Electoral Reform in Bolivia: Origins of the Mixed-Member Proportional System.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 194–208. New York: Oxford University Press.
135. McCoy, J. L. 1999. “Chavez and the End of ‘Partyarchy’ in Venezuela.” Journal of Democracy 105(3): 64–77.
136. McCubbins, Mathew D., and Frances McCall Rosenbluth. 1995. “Party Provision for Personal Politics: Dividing the Vote in Japan.” In Structure and Policy in Japan and the United States, ed. Peter F. Cowhey and Mathew D. McCubbins, 35–55. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
137. McKelvey, Richard. 1976. “Intransitivities in Multidimensional Voting Models: Some Implications for Agenda Control.” Journal of Economic Theory 12: 472–82.
138. Moe, Terry M., and Michael Caldwell. 1994. “The Institutional Foundations of Democratic Government: A Comparison of Presidential and Parliamentary Systems.” Journal of Institutional Theoretical Economics 150(1): 171–95.
139. Molinar Horcacitas, Juan, and Jeffrey Weldon. 2001. “Reforming Electoral Systems in Mexico.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew Soberg Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 209–30. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
140. Morgan, Jana, Rosario Espinal, and Mitchell A. Seligson. 2006. The Political Culture of the Dominican Republic in 2006. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.
141. Morgenstern, Scott. 2003. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in Latin America and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
142. Morone, James A. 1990. The Democratic Wish: Popular Participation and the Limits of American Government. New York: Basic Books.
143. Nicolau, Jairo Marconi. 2007. “O Sistema Eleitoral De Lista Aberta no Brasil.” In Instituic xo˜es representativas no Brasil: Balanc xo e reforma, ed. Jairo Marconi Nicolau and Timothy J. Power, 97–122. Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ.
144. Odegard, Peter H. 1928. Pressure Politics: The Story of the Anti-Saloon League. New York: Columbia University Press.
145. Pérez-Lin˜án, Aníbal. 2007. Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
146. Persson, Torsten, Gerard Roland, and Guido Tabellini. 1997. “Separation of Powers and Political Accountability.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112: 1163–1202.
147. Persson, Torsten, and Guido Tabellini. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
148. Persson, Torsten, Guido Tabellini, and F. Trebbi. 2003. “Electoral Rules and Corruption.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1: 958–89.
149. Pharr, Susan J., Robert D. Putnam, and Russell J. Dalton. 2000. “A Quarter- Century of Declining Confidence.” Journal of Democracy 11(2): 500–25.
150. Poole, Keith T. 1998. “Recovering a Basic Space from a Set of Issue Scales.” American Journal of Political Science 42(3): 954–93.
151. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357–84.
152. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
153. Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress; A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 5–30.
154. Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
155. Powell, G. Bingham, and Georg Vanberg. 2000. “Election Laws, Disproportionality and Median Correspondence: Implications for Two Visions of Democracy.” British Journal of Political Science 30(3): 383–411. http://www.journals.cup.org/bin/bladerunner?REQUNIQ=1028572637&;REQSESS=75269&117000REQEVENT=&REQINT1=1202&REQAUTH=0.
156. Powell, G. Bingham, and Guy D. Whitten. 1993. “A Cross-National Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2): 391–414.
157. Proyecto Élites Parlamentarias Latinoamericanas. 2006. Boletín n6: Disciplina de voto y lealtad partidista. Salamanca, Spain: Instituto Interuniversitario de Iberoame ´rica (Universidad de Salamanca).
158. Przeworski, Adam. 2007. “Is the Science of Comparative Politics Possible?” In Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Carles Boix and Susan C. Stokes, 117–39. New York: Oxford University Press.
159. Quinn, Kevin M., Burt L. Monroe, Michael Colaresi, Michael H. Crespin, and Dragomir R. Radev. 2006. “An Automated Method of Topic-Coding Legislative Speech over Time with Application to the 105th–108th U.S. Senate.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, September 2.
160. Rachadell, Manuel. 1991. “El sistema electoral y la reforma de los partidos.” In Venezuela, democracia y futuro: Los partidos politicos en la decada de los 90. Reflexiones para un cambio neceario, ed. Carlos Blanco and Edgar Paredes Pisani, 203–10. Caracas: Comision Presidencial para la Reforma del Estado.
161. Rasch, Bjorn E. 2000. “Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(1): 3–23.
162. Reynolds, Andrew. 2006. “The Curious Case of Afghanistan.” Journal of Democracy 17(2): 104–17.
163. Rice, Stuart A. 1925. “The Behavior of Legislative Groups.” Political Science Quarterly 40: 60–72.
164. Riker, William H. 1982. Liberalism against Populism. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
165. Roberts, Kenneth, and Erik Wibbels. 1999. “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–90.
166. Rosas, Guillermo. 2005. “The Ideological Organization of Latin American Legislative Parties: An Empirical Analysis of Elite Policy Preferences.” Comparative Political Studies 7(824): 849.
167. Rose-Ackerman, Susan. 1999. Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
168. Rosenthal, Howard, and Erik Voeten. 2004. “Analyzing Roll Calls with Perfect Spatial Voting: France 1946–1958.” American Journal of Political Science 48(3): 620–32.
169. Rousseau, Jean Jacques. 1763. “Voting.” In On the Social Contract, book IV, ch. XX. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1978.
170. Rubin, Barnett R. “The Wrong Voting System.” International Herald Tribune, March 16, International section.
171. Samuels, David. 2000. “Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(3): 481–97.
172. Samuels, David. 2004. “Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 98(3): 425–36.
173. Samuels, David, and Matthew S. Shugart. 2003. “Presidentialism, Elections, and Representation.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 33–60.
174. Sartori, Giovanni. 1976. Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
175. Scarrow, Susan E. 2001a. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Change: A Comparative Investigation.” Comparative Political Studies 34(688): 651–65.
176. Scarrow, Susan E. 2001b. “Germany: The Mixed-Member System as a Political Compromise.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 55–69. New York: Oxford University Press.
177. Seligson, Mitchell A., Abby B. Cordova, Juan Carlos Donoso, Daniel Moreno Morales, Diana Orces, and Vivian Schwarz Blum. 2007. Democracy Audit: Bolivia 2006 Report. Nashville, TN: Latin American Public Opinion Project.
178. Shepsle, Kenneth. 1991. Models of Multiparty Electoral Competition. New York: Harwood Academic.
179. Shugart, Matthew S. 1998. “The Inverse Relationship between Party Strength and Executive Strength: A Theory of Politicians’ Constitutional Choices.” British Journal of Political Science 28(1): 1–29.
180. Shugart, Matthew S., and John M. Carey. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
181. Shugart, Matthew S., Erika Moreno, and Luis E. Fajardo. 2006. “Deepening Democracy by Renovating Political Practices: The Struggle for Electoral Reform in Colombia.” In Peace, Democracy, and Human Rights in Colombia, ed. Christopher Welna and Gustavo Gallon, 202–66. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
182. Shugart, Matthew S., Melody E. Valdini, and K. Suominen. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–49.
183. Shugart, Matthew S., and Martin P. Wattenberg, eds. 2001. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? New York: Oxford University Press.
184. Siavelis, Peter. 2000. The President and Congress in Postauthoritarian Chile: Institutional Constraints to Democratic Consolidation. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
185. Sieberer, Ulrich. 2006. “Party Unity in Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Analysis.” Journal of Legislative Studies 12(2): 150–78.
186. Singer, Judith D. 1998. “Using SAS PROC MIXED to Fit Multilevel Models, Hierarchical Models, and Individual Growth Models.” Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24(4): 323–55.
187. Skeen, C. Edward. 1986. “Vox Populi, Vox Dei: The Compensation Act of 1816 and the Rise of Popular Politics.” Journal of the Early Republic 6(253): 274.
188. Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
189. Snyder, James M., and Tim Groseclose. 2000. “Estimating Party Influence in Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 193–211.
190. Snyder, James M., and Michael M. Ting. 2005. “Why Roll Calls? A Model of Position Taking in Legislative Voting and Elections.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 21(1): 153–78.
191. Steenbergen, Marco R., and Bradford S. Jones. 2002. “Modeling Multilevel Data Structures.” American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218–237.
192. Stokes, Susan C. 2001. Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
193. Sundquist, James L. 1981. The Decline and Resurgence of Congress. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
194. Taagepera, Rein, and Matthew Sobert Shugart. 1989. Seats and Votes: The Effects and Determinants of Electoral Systems. New Haven: Yale University Press.
195. Tapia G., Sady. 2004. “Legisladores ‘huyen’ del voto electrónico.” La Prensa, March 25. La Prensa Web, http://www.prensa.com/.Texas State Legislature.
196. Tapia G., Sady. 2005. “Texas Legislature Online.” http://www.capitol.state.tx.us/tlo/legislation/voteinfo.htm.
197. Thames, Francis C. 2007. “Searching for the Electoral Connection: Parliamentary Party Switching in the Ukrainian Rada, 1998–2002.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(2): 223–56.
198. Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 591–608.
199. Ungar Bleier, Elisabeth. 2002. “Consideraciones sobre la reforma politica.” Testimony before the Comisión Primera Constitucional del Senado de la República.
200. Bogotá. United States Supreme Court. 1958. Majority Decision in NAACP v. Alabama Ex Rel. Patterson, Attorney General. No. 91 Supreme Court of the United States 357 U.S. 449; 78 S. Ct. 1163.
201. Valenzuela, Arturo. 1994. “Party Politics and the Crisis of Presidentialism in Chile: A Proposal for a Parliamentary Form of Government.” In The Failure of Presidential Democracy: The Case of Latin America, vol. 2, ed. Juan J. Linz and Arturo Valenzuela, 91–150. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
202. VoteWorld. 2008. VoteWorld: The International Legislative Roll-Call Voting Website. http://ucdata.berkeley.edu:7101/new_web/VoteWorld/voteworld/.
203. Wallack, Jessica S., A. Gaviria, Ugo Panizza, and Eduardo Stein. 2003. “Particularism around the World.” World Bank Economic Review 17(1): 133–43.
204. Weldon, Jeffrey. 1997. “Political Sources of Presidencialismo in Mexico.” In Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Scott P. Mainwaring, 225–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
205. Weldon, Jeffrey. 2001. “The Consequences of Mexico’s Mixed-Member Electoral System, 1988–1997.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Matthew S. Shugart and Martin P. Wattenberg, 447–74. New York: Oxford University Press.
206. Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
207. White, Leonard D. 1951. The Jeffersonians: A Study in Administrative History, 1801–1829. New York: Macmillan.
208. Whiteley, Paul F., and Patrick Seyd. 1999. “Discipline in the British Conservative Party: The Attitudes of Party Activists toward the Role of Their Members of Parliament.” In Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government, ed. Shaun Bowler, David M. Farrell, and Richard S. Katz, 53–71. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.