State-level institutional effects on legislative coalition unity in Brazil

Legislative Studies Quarterly

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 23-47

  Carey, John M ^a,c   Reinhardt, Gina Yannitell ^b,d  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^c Dartmouth College   (United States)

^d WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4143121243     PISSN: 03629805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3162/036298004X201087     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil: Interests, Identities, and Institutions in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Ames, Barry. 2002. "Party Discipline in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies." In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2002. "Presidential Cabinets, Electoral Cycles, and Coalition Discipline in Brazil." In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Câmara dos Deputados do Brasil. 2003. "Regimento Interno da Câmara dos Deputados." 〈http://www.camara.gov.br/Internet/ Regimento/default.asp〉
6. Carey, John M. 2002. "Party Unity in Legislative Voting." Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago. (Washington University Department of Political Science Working Paper #376)
7. Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1995. "Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas." Electoral Studies 14:417-39.
8. Cheibub, Jose Antonio, Argelina Figueiredo, and Fernando Limongi. 2002. "Presidential Agenda Power and Decision-making in Presidential Regimes: Governors and Political Parties in the Brazilian Congress." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
9. Cox, Gary W., and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Cox, Gary W., and Michael F. Theis. 2000. "How Much Does Money Matter: Buying Votes in Japan, 1967-1990." Comparative Political Studies 33(1) February: 37-57.
11. Desposato, Scott. 2002a. "Correcting for Bias in Roll-call Cohesion Scores." University of Arizona. Working paper.
12. Desposato, Scott. 2002b. "Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party-switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies." University of Arizona. Working paper.
13. Eaton, Kent. 2001. "Decentralisation, Democratization, and Liberalisation: The History of Revenue Sharing in Argentina, 1934-1999." Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 1-28.
14. Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. "Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil." Comparative Politics 32: 151-70.
15. Garman, Christopher, Stephan Haggard, and Eliza Willis. 2001. "Fiscal Decentralization: A Political Theory with Latin American Cases." World Politics 53:205-36.
16. Hix, Simon. 2002. "Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament." American Journal of Political Science 46: 688-98.
17. Krehbiel, Keith. 1992. Information and Legislative Organization. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. LADB. 1998. "Brazil: President Fernando Henrique Cardoso Unveils Economic Plan Following Regional Elections." Notisur - Latin American Affairs 8(40): October 30.
19. LADB. 1999a. "Brazil: Economic Volatility Continues Despite Successes by President Fernando Henrique Cardoso." Notisur - Latin American Affairs 9(9): March 5.
20. LADB. 1999b. "Brazil: New Financial Crisis Hits as President Fernando Henrique Cardoso Begins Second Term." Notisur - Latin American Affairs 9(2): January 15.
21. Mainwaring, Scott P. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
22. Montero, Alfred P. 2000. "Devolving Democracy? Political Decentralization and the New Brazilian Federalism." In Democratic Brazil: Actors, Institutions, and Processes, ed. Peter R. Kingstone and Timothy J. Power. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
23. Montinola, Gabriela, Yingyi Qian, and Barry R. Weingast. 1995. "Federalism, Chinese Style: The Political Basis for Economic Success in China." World Politics 48:50-81.
24. Nicolau, Jairo Marconi. 1998. Dados Eleitorais do Brasil (1982-1996). Rio de Janeiro: IUPERJ.
25. O'Neill, Kathleen. 1998. "Explaining the Great Power Give-away: Decentralization in the Andes." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, and the Latin American Science Association.
26. Ostrom, Elinor. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. New York: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rice, Stuart A. 1925. "The Behavior of Legislative Groups." Political Science Quarterly 40: 60-72.
28. Samuels, David. 2000a. "Ambition and Competition: Explaining Legislative Turnover in Brazil." Legislative Studies Quarterly 25: 481-97.
29. Samuels, David. 2000b. "Concurrent Elections, Discordant Results: Presidentialism, Federalism, and Governance in Brazil." Comparative Politics 331: 1-20.
30. Samuels, David. 2000c. "The Gubernatorial Coattails Effect: Federalism and Congressional Elections in Brazil." Journal of Politics 62:240-53.
31. Smith, Steven S., and Thomas F. Remington. 2001. The Politics of Institutional Choice: The Formation of the Russian State Duma. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
32. Spiller, Pablo T., and Mariano Tommasi. 2000. "The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina." University of California, Berkeley. Working paper.
33. Tiebout, Charles. 1956. "A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures," Journal of Political Economy 64(5): 416-24.
34. Treisman, Daniel. 1999. "Political Decentralization and Economic Reform: A Game-Theoretic Analysis." American Journal of Political Science 43: 488-517.
35. Ugalde, Luis Carlos. 2000. The Mexican Congress: Old Player, New Power. Washington, DC: Center for Strategic and International Studies.
36. Weingast, Barry. 1995. "The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Federalism, Markets, and Economic Development." Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11: 1-31.
37. Weyland, Kurt. 1996. Democracy without Equity: Failures of Reform in Brazil. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
38. Willis, Eliza, Christopher Garman, and Stephan Haggard. 1999. "The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America." Latin American Research Review 34:7-56.
39. Wright, Gerald C., and Brian F. Schaffner. 2002. "The Influence of Party: Evidence from the State Legislatures." American Political Science Review 96(2): 367-80.