Computer-supported feedback message tailoring: Theory-informed adaptation of clinical audit and feedback for learning and behavior change

Implementation Science

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Landis Lewis, Zach ^a   Brehaut, Jamie C ^b,c   Hochheiser, Harry ^a,d   Douglas, Gerald P ^a   Jacobson, Rebecca S ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL AUDIT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; TEACHING; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER-ASSISTED INSTRUCTION; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; MEDICAL AUDIT; PHYSICIANS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT;

EID: 84924094539     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17485908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0203-z     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Brehaut JC, Eva KW. Building theories of knowledge translation interventions: use the entire menu of constructs. Implementation Sci. 2012; 7:114.
2. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (Online). 2012; 6:CD000259.
3. Ivers NM, Sales A, Colquhoun H, Michie S, Foy R, Francis JJ, et al. No more 'business as usual' with audit and feedback interventions: towards an agenda for a reinvigorated intervention. Implementation Sci. 2014; 9:14.
4. Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust. 2004; 180(6 Suppl):S57-60.
5. Fretheim A, Oxman AD, Flottorp S. Improving prescribing of antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering drugs: a method for identifying and addressing barriers to change. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004; 4:23.
6. Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, Davis D. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
7. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ: Br Med J. 2001; 323(7313):625-628.
8. Ilgen D, Davis C. Bearing bad news: reactions to negative performance feedback. Appl Psychol. 2000; 49(3):550-65.
9. Kluger AN, Van Dijk D. Feedback, the various tasks of the doctor, and the feedforward alternative. Med Educ. 2010; 44(12):1166-74.
10. Biomedical Informatics. Computer applications in health care and biomedicine, 3rd ed. New York: Springer; 2006.
11. Garg AX, Adhikari NKJ, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, et al. Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc. 2005; 293(10):1223-38.
12. Crowley RS, Medvedeva O. An intelligent tutoring system for visual classification problem solving. Artif Intell Med. 2006; 36:85-117.
13. Peleg M. Computer-interpretable clinical guidelines: a methodological review. J Biomed Inform. 2013; 46(4):744-63.
14. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. Defining what works in tailoring: a meta-analysis of computer-tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med. 2010; 51(3-4):214-21.
15. Portnoy DB, Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Johnson BT, Carey MP. Computer-delivered interventions for health promotion and behavioral risk reduction: a meta-analysis of 75 randomized controlled trials 1988-2007. Prev Med. 2008; 47:3-16.
16. Lustria MLA, Noar SM, Cortese J, Van Stee SK, Glueckauf RL, Lee J. A meta-analysis of web-delivered tailored health behavior change interventions. J Health Commun. 2013; 18(9):1039-69.
17. Park EJ, McDaniel A, Jung MS. Computerized tailoring of health information. Comput Inf Nursing: CIN. 2009; 27:34-43.
18. Kreuter MW, Skinner CS. Tailoring: what's in a name?. Health Educ Res. 2000; 15:1-4.
19. Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, Shaw EJ, Cheater F, Flottorp S, et al. Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; 3(3):CD005470.
20. Heather C, Grimshaw J, Wensing M. Knowledge translation in health care: moving from evidence to practice In: Straus S, Tetroe J, Graham ID, editors. 2nd ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons: 2013.
21. Parkes J, Abercrombie S, McCarty T. Feedback sandwiches affect perceptions but not performance. Adv Health Sci Educ: Theory Pract. 2013; 18(3):397-407.
22. Landis Lewis Z, Mello-Thoms C, Gadabu OJ, Gillespie EM, Douglas GP, Crowley RS. The feasibility of automating audit and feedback for ART guideline adherence in Malawi. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011; 18(6):868-74.
23. Hysong SJ. Meta-analysis: audit and feedback features impact effectiveness on care quality. Med Care. 2009; 47(3):356-63.
24. Anseel F, Beatty AS, Shen W, Lievens F, Sackett PR. How are we doing after 30 years? A meta-analytic review of the antecedents and outcomes of feedback-seeking behavior. J Manag. 2015; 41(1):318-48.
25. Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C, Anandan C, Cresswell K, Bokun T, et al. The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS Med. 2011; 8:e1000387.
26. Wright A, Henkin S, Feblowitz J, McCoy AB, Bates DW, Sittig DF. Early results of the meaningful use program for electronic health records. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368(8):779-80.
27. Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A. What is eHealth 3: a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res. 2005; 7:e1.
28. Weiner MG, Embi PJ. Toward reuse of clinical data for research and quality improvement: the end of the beginning?. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151(5):359-60.
29. Powell A, Davies H, Thomson R. Using routine comparative data to assess the quality of health care: understanding and avoiding common pitfalls. Qual Safety Health Care. 2003; 12(2):122-8.
30. Hersh WR, Weiner MG, Embi PJ, Logan JR, Payne PRO, Bernstam EV, et al. Caveats for the use of operational electronic health record data in comparative effectiveness research. Med Care. 2013; 51(8 Suppl 3):S30-37.
31. Hripcsak G, Albers DJ. Next-generation phenotyping of electronic health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013; 20(1):117-21.
32. Ivers NM, Tu K, Young J, Francis JJ, Barnsley J, Shah BR, et al. Feedback GAP: pragmatic, cluster-randomized trial of goal setting and action plans to increase the effectiveness of audit and feedback interventions in primary care. Implementation Sci: IS. 2013; 8:142.
33. Chalouhi GE, Salomon LJ, Fontanges M, Althuser M, Haddad G, Scemama O, et al. Formative assessment based on an audit and feedback improves nuchal translucency ultrasound image quality. J Ultrasound Med: Official J Am Institute Ultrasound Med. 2013; 32(9):1601-5.
34. Simunovic M, Coates A, Smith A, Thabane L, Goldsmith CH, Levine MN. Uptake of an innovation in surgery: observations from the cluster-randomized quality initiative in rectal cancer trial. Can J Surg J Can de chirurgie. 2013; 56(6):415-421.
35. Geller BM, Ichikawa L, Miglioretti DL, Eastman D. Web-based mammography audit feedback. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 198(6):W562-7.
36. Oxman AD, Fretheim A, Flottorp S. The OFF theory of research utilization. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(2):113-116.
37. Eccles M, Grimshaw J, Walker A, Johnston M, Pitts N. Changing the behavior of healthcare professionals: the use of theory in promoting the uptake of research findings. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005; 58(2):107-12.
38. Grol RPTM, Bosch MC, Hulscher MEJL, Eccles MP, Wensing M. Planning and studying improvement in patient care: the use of theoretical perspectives. Milbank Q. 2007; 85:93-138.
39. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Safety Health Care. 2005; 14:26-33.
40. Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implementation Sci. 2012; 7:37.
41. Colquhoun HL, Brehaut JC, Sales A, Ivers N, Grimshaw J, Michie S, et al. A systematic review of the use of theory in randomized controlled trials of audit and feedback. Implementation Sci. 2013; 8:66.
42. Michie S, Stralen MMv, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implementation Sci. 2011; 6:42.
43. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2):191-215.
44. Vicente KJ. Cognitive work analysis: toward safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.
45. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J Appl Psychol. 1979; 64(4):349-71.
46. Eva KW, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K, et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ. 2012; 17:15-26.
47. WHO. WHO Global Strategy for Containment of Antimicrobial Resistance. Tech. rep. World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland; 2001. http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/drugresist/WHO_CDS_CSR_DRS_2001_2_EN/en/ .
48. Silver WS, Mitchell TR, Gist ME. Responses to successful and unsuccessful performance: the moderating effect of self-efficacy on the relationship between performance and attributions. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1995; 62(3):286-99.
49. Bandura A. Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educ Psychologist. 1993; 28(2):117-48.
50. Bandura A, Jourden FJ. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991; 60(6):941-51.
51. Kiefe CI, Allison JJ, Williams O, Person SD, Weaver MT, Weissman NW. Improving quality improvement using achievable benchmarks for physician feedback: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2001; 285(22):2871-9.
52. Gerber JS, Prasad PA, Fiks AG, Localio AR, Grundmeier RW, Bell LM, et al. Effect of an outpatient antimicrobial stewardship intervention on broad-spectrum antibiotic prescribing by primary care pediatricians: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2013; 309(22):2345-52.
53. Colquhoun H, Leeman J, Michie S, Lokker C, Bragge P, Hempel S, et al. Towards a common terminology: a simplified framework of interventions to promote and integrate evidence into health practices, systems, and policies. Implementation Sci. 2014; 9:51.
54. Waltz TJ, Powell BJ, Chinman MJ, Smith JL, Matthieu MM, Proctor EK, et al. Expert recommendations for implementing change (ERIC): protocol for a mixed methods study. Implementation Sci. 2014; 9:39.
55. Steinbrook R. For sale: physicians' prescribing data. N Engl J Med. 2006; 354(26):2745-7.
56. Fugh-Berman A, Ahari S. Following the script: how drug reps make friends and influence doctors. PLoS Med. 2007; 4(4):e150.
57. Narayanan S, Manchanda P, Chintagunta PK. The informative versus persuasive role of marketing communication in new product categories: an application to the prescription antihistamines market. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 472881. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2003.
58. Scheuer O, Loll F, Pinkwart N, McLaren BM. Computer-supported argumentation: a review of the state of the art. Int J Computer-Supported Collaborative Learn. 2010; 5:43-102.
59. Walker E, Ogan A, Aleven V, Jones C. Two approaches for providing adaptive support for discussion in an ill-defined domain. Intelligent Tutoring Systems for Ill-Defined Domains: Assessment and Feedback in Ill-Defined Domains; 2008, p. 1.
60. Diamant EI, Lim BY, Echenique A, Leshed G, Fussell SR. Supporting intercultural collaboration with dynamic feedback systems: preliminary evidence from a creative design task. In: CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI '09. New York, NY, USA: ACM: 2009. p. 3997-4002.
61. Leshed G, Perez D, Hancock JT, Cosley D, Birnholtz J, Lee S, et al. Visualizing real-time language-based feedback on teamwork behavior in computer-mediated groups. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems CHI '09. New York, NY, USA: ACM: 2009. p. 537-546.
62. Gutierrez F, Atkinson J. Adaptive feedback selection for intelligent tutoring systems. Expert Syst Appl. 2011; 38(5):6146-52.
63. Ogan A, Walker E, Aleven V, Jones C. Using a peer moderator to support collaborative cultural discussion. In: CATS 2008: Workshop on culturally-aware tutoring systems: 2008. p. 71.
64. Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, Hardeman W, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013; 46:81-95.